The Autonomy Challenge: Examining the Pre-emption Thesis in Judicial Reasoning and Precedent

Gómora-Juárez, Sandra

DSpace Principal
→
Colección de los Centros Asociados
→
Colombia
→
Centro de Estudios Interdisciplinarios Jurídicos y Sociales - CIES/ICESI - Cosecha
→
Ver ítem

dc.creator	Gómora-Juárez, Sandra
dc.date	2022-11-13
dc.date.accessioned	2023-03-27T17:40:38Z
dc.date.available	2023-03-27T17:40:38Z
dc.identifier	https://www.icesi.edu.co/revistas/index.php/precedente/article/view/5315
dc.identifier	10.18046/prec.v22.5315
dc.identifier.uri	https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/230377
dc.description	This article reflects on one of the challenges Gerald Postema’s account of the autonomy thesis poses to Raz’s pre-emption thesis in judicial practice and precedent. Certain flaws in the pre-emption thesis, as applied to courts, come to light upon analyzing the autonomy challenge, whereas some aspects of the former are better understood from the perspective of the latter. This work shows that, although these two theses seem to clash, the autonomy challenge leads instead to an alternative approach to the pre-emption thesis that allows exploring some disregarded relationships between judicial practical reasoning and precedent. Drawing from this Raz-Postema debate, I argue for an alternative reading of the autonomy challenge by introducing the hermeneutic strategy of courts (HeSCo) as a tool to analyze the role of officials as addressees of exclusionary legal directives and its explanatory force. The HeSCo ultimately unravels the paradox by holding the pre-emption thesis as central to the proper understanding of judicial practice and precedent.	en-US
dc.description	This article reflects on one of the challenges Gerald Postema’s account of the autonomy thesis poses to Raz’s pre-emption thesis in judicial practice and precedent. Certain flaws in the pre-emption thesis, as applied to courts, come to light upon analyzing the autonomy challenge, whereas some aspects of the former are better understood from the perspective of the latter. This work shows that, although these two theses seem to clash, the autonomy challenge leads instead to an alternative approach to the pre-emption thesis that allows exploring some disregarded relationships between judicial practical reasoning and precedent. Drawing from this Raz-Postema debate, I argue for an alternative reading of the autonomy challenge by introducing the hermeneutic strategy of courts (HeSCo) as a tool to analyze the role of officials as addressees of exclusionary legal directives and its explanatory force. The HeSCo ultimately unravels the paradox by holding the pre-emption thesis as central to the proper understanding of judicial practice and precedent.	es-ES
dc.description	Este artigo reflete sobre um dos desafios que a tese da autonomia apresenta para a tese da exclusividade no contexto da prática judicial e do precedente. Analisar-se-á o desafio da tese da autonomia para revelar alguns defeitos da tese da exclusividade no contexto judicial. O trabalho procura demonstrar que, além do aparente conflito entre ambas as teses, o desafio do teste da autonomia abre o caminho para uma perspectiva distinta e enriquecida da tese da exclusividade, segundo a qual alguns aspectos desta última podem ser mais bem compreendido desde a perspectiva da primeira. Defender-se-á, portanto, uma leitura alternativa do desafio segundo a qual a tese da exclusividade é central para a adequada compreensão da prática judicial e o precedente.	pt-BR
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	Universidad Icesi	es-ES
dc.relation	https://www.icesi.edu.co/revistas/index.php/precedente/article/view/5315/4589
dc.rights	Derechos de autor 2023 Sandra Gómora Juárez	es-ES
dc.rights	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/	es-ES
dc.source	Precedente. Revista Jurídica; Vol 22 (2023): Precedente. Revista jurídica; 11-41	en-US
dc.source	Precedente. Revista Jurídica; Vol. 22 (2023): Precedente. Revista jurídica; 11-41	es-ES
dc.source	Precedente. Revista Jurídica; v. 22 (2023): Precedente. Revista jurídica; 11-41	pt-BR
dc.source	2805-993X
dc.source	1657-6535
dc.subject	Precedent	en-US
dc.subject	Authority	en-US
dc.subject	Judicial Reasoning	en-US
dc.subject	Pre-emption Thesis	en-US
dc.subject	Autonomy Thesis	en-US
dc.subject	Practical Reasoning	en-US
dc.subject	Exclusionary Reasons	en-US
dc.subject	Precedent	es-ES
dc.subject	Authority	es-ES
dc.subject	Judicial Reasoning	es-ES
dc.subject	Pre-emption Thesis	es-ES
dc.subject	Autonomy Thesis	es-ES
dc.subject	Practical Reasoning	es-ES
dc.subject	Exclusionary Reasons	es-ES
dc.subject	precedente	pt-BR
dc.subject	autoridade	pt-BR
dc.subject	raciocínio judicial	pt-BR
dc.subject	tese da exclusividade	pt-BR
dc.subject	tese da autonomia	pt-BR
dc.subject	raciocínio prático	pt-BR
dc.subject	razões excludentes	pt-BR
dc.title	The Autonomy Challenge: Examining the Pre-emption Thesis in Judicial Reasoning and Precedent	en-US
dc.title	The Autonomy Challenge: Examining the Pre-emption Thesis in Judicial Reasoning and Precedent	es-ES
dc.title	O desafio da tese da autonomia: examinando a tese de exclusividade no raciocínio judicial e no precedente	pt-BR
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion