Legal Rhetoric and Criminal Law

Encalada González, Dennis Valeria

DSpace Principal
→
Colección de los Centros Asociados
→
Ecuador
→
Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - FCH-PUCE - Cosecha
→
Ver ítem

dc.creator	Encalada González, Dennis Valeria
dc.date	2018-06-30
dc.date.accessioned	2022-03-29T18:53:27Z
dc.date.available	2022-03-29T18:53:27Z
dc.identifier	http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/45
dc.identifier	10.26807/rfj.v0i3.45
dc.identifier.uri	http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/155291
dc.description	The following investigation aims to analyze the origin of the relationship between rhetoric and Criminal Law; in fact, the rhetoric or also called “the art of persuasion” where writing is not necessary, was introduced by Socrates, an important Greek philosopher and teacher who lived in Athens in the 300 BC. It is intrinsic to Criminal Law since its normative material is not perfectly codified; in fact, rhetoric constitutes a sort of instrument by which a citizen can support his own opinion both in the political and judicial sphere before, in this case, a criminal trial presenting findings of the fact and an excellent narration in order to obtain the jury’s consent. It is also of great interest to mention the importance of identifying the differences and equations between rhetoric and legal considerations; identify the main reasons why the Criminal Law requires rhetoric and then compare it with the Ecuadorian Criminal Law; examine the strategies used by “the art of persuasion” to prove the benefits and disadvantages it brings in Criminal Law; finally, to present some observations to reduce this problem finding a balance in the practice of rhetoric. KEYWORDS: rhetoric, logic, right, criminal process, rationality. JEL CODE: K14, L10	en-US
dc.description	RESUMEN La siguiente investigación tiene como objetivo analizar el origen de la relación entre retórica y Derecho Penal; de hecho, la retórica o también llamada “el arte de la persuasión” donde la escritura no es necesaria, fue introducida por Sócrates, un importante filósofo y maestro griego que vivió en Atenas en el 300 a. C. Es intrínseco al Derecho Penal ya que su material normativo no está perfectamente codificado; De hecho, la retórica constituye una especie de instrumento mediante el cual un ciudadano puede sustentar su propia opinión tanto en el ámbito político como judicial antes, en este caso, de un juicio penal que presenta conclusiones del hecho y una excelente narración para obtener el consentimiento del jurado. . También es de gran interés mencionar la importancia de identificar las diferencias y ecuaciones entre la retórica y las consideraciones legales; identificar las principales razones por las que el Derecho Penal requiere retórica y luego compararlo con el Derecho Penal ecuatoriano; examinar las estrategias empleadas por “el arte de la persuasión” para demostrar los beneficios y desventajas que aporta al Derecho Penal; finalmente, presentar algunas observaciones para reducir este problema encontrando un equilibrio en la práctica de la retórica. ABSTRACT The following investigation aims to analyze the origin of the relationship between rhetoric and Criminal Law; in fact, the rhetoric or also called “the art of persuasion” where writing is not necessary, was introduced by Socrates, an important Greek philosopher and teacher who lived in Athens in the 300 BC. It is intrinsic to Criminal Law since its normative material is not perfectly codified; in fact, rhetoric constitutes a sort of instrument by which a citizen can support his own opinion both in the political and judicial sphere before, in this case, a criminal trial presenting findings of the fact and an excellent narration in order to obtain the jury’s consent. It is also of great interest to mention the importance of identifying the differences and equations between rhetoric and legal considerations; identify the main reasons why the Criminal Law requires rhetoric and then compare it with the Ecuadorian Criminal Law; examine the strategies used by “the art of persuasion” to prove the benefits and disadvantages it brings in Criminal Law; finally, to present some observations to reduce this problem finding a balance in the practice of rhetoric. KEYWORDS: rhetoric, logic, right, criminal process, rationality. JEL CODE / CLASIFICACIÓN JEL: K14, L10	es-ES
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.language	spa
dc.publisher	Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - PUCE: Centro de Publicaciones y Dirección de Investigación	es-ES
dc.relation	http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/45/34
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ´(Journal Faculty of Jurisprudence); No. 3: Journal Faculty of Jurisprudence; 239-260	en-US
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; Núm. 3: Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; 239-260	es-ES
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; No. 3: Revue Faculté de jurisprudence; 239-260	fr-FR
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; No. 3: Rivista Facoltà di Giurisprudenza; 239-260	it-IT
dc.source	Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; No. 3: Revista da Faculdade de Jurisprudência; 239-260	pt-BR
dc.source	2588-0837
dc.source	10.26807/rfj.v0i3
dc.subject	rhetoric	en-US
dc.subject	logic	en-US
dc.subject	right	en-US
dc.subject	criminal process	en-US
dc.subject	rationality	en-US
dc.subject	retórica	es-ES
dc.subject	lógica	es-ES
dc.subject	Derecho	es-ES
dc.subject	proceso penal	es-ES
dc.subject	auxesis	es-ES
dc.subject	extra causam	es-ES
dc.subject	sistema procesal	es-ES
dc.subject	dialéctica	es-ES
dc.subject	racionalidad	es-ES
dc.title	Legal Rhetoric and Criminal Law	en-US
dc.title	La retórica jurídica y el derecho penal	es-ES
dc.title	Rhétorique juridique et droit pénal	fr-FR
dc.title	Retorica giuridica e diritto penale	it-IT
dc.title	Retórica Legal e Direito Penal	pt-BR
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion