Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
| dc.creator | Mendoza García, Lissangee Stefanía | |
| dc.creator | López Rueda, Francisco | |
| dc.creator | Méndez Reátegui, Rubén | |
| dc.date | 2017-12-06 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-29T18:53:26Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-03-29T18:53:26Z | |
| dc.identifier | http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/28 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.26807/rfj.v1i2.28 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/155280 | |
| dc.description | The methodology used by the judges in the resolution of cases constitutes a subject of relevant discussion among jurists interested in judicial matters. From this, this document collects contributions from the majority doctrine in order to differentiate the logical methods that legal agents apply in a judicial decision of a case. Based on these doctrinal approaches to judicial decisions, a question arises: Why is it considered that judges should apply the rules in a praxeolo-gical manner? Why is Economy in Law included? ¿How does the judge implement his legal reasoning in judicial decisions? Response that is complemented with the legal reasoning and the logical methodology used by legal agents, where the subjective and objective influences that affect these judicial proceedings are considered. KEYWORDS: logical methodology, judicial agents, judicial decision, reasoning, praxeology. JEL CODE / CLASIFICACIÓN JEL: O34, R10 | en-US |
| dc.description | RESUMENLa metodología empleada por los jueces en la resolución de casos constituye un tema de discusión relevante entre juristas interesados en la materia judicial. A partir de esto, este documento recopila aportes de la doctrina mayoritaria en aras de diferenciar los métodos lógicos que los agentes jurídicos aplican en una decisión judicial de un caso. En base a estos enfoques doctrinarios sobre las decisiones judiciales, nace una interrogante: ¿Por qué se considera que los jueces deben aplicar de manera praxeológico las normas?; ¿Para qué se incluye la Economía en el Derecho? Y; ¿Cómo el juez implementa su razonamiento jurídico en las resoluciones judiciales? Respuesta que se complementa con el razonamiento jurídico y la metodología lógica empleada por los agentes jurídicos, donde se considera las influencias subjetivas y objetivas que inciden en estos procedimientos judiciales. ABSTRACTThe methodology used by the judges in the resolution of cases constitutes a subject of relevant discussion among jurists interested in judicial matters. From this, this document collects contributions from the majority doctrine in order to differentiate the logical methods that legal agents apply in a judicial decision of a case. Based on these doctrinal approaches to judicial decisions, a question arises: Why is it considered that judges should apply the rules in a praxeolo-gical manner? Why is Economy in Law included? ¿How does the judge implement his legal reasoning in judicial decisions? Response that is complemented with the legal reasoning and the logical methodology used by legal agents, where the subjective and objective influences that affect these judicial proceedings are considered. KEYWORDS: logical methodology, judicial agents, judicial decision, reasoning, praxeology. JEL CODE / CLASIFICACIÓN JEL: O34, R10 | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - PUCE: Centro de Publicaciones y Dirección de Investigación | es-ES |
| dc.relation | http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/28/23 | |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2017 Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia RFJ | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ´(Journal Faculty of Jurisprudence); No. 2: Journal Faculty of Jurisprudence | en-US |
| dc.source | Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; Núm. 2: Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; No. 2: Revue Faculté de Jurisprudence | fr-FR |
| dc.source | Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; No. 2: Revista Facoltà di Giurisprudenza | it-IT |
| dc.source | Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; No. 2: Revista Faculdade de Jurisprudência | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 2588-0837 | |
| dc.source | 10.26807/rfj.v1i2 | |
| dc.subject | logical methodology | en-US |
| dc.subject | judicial agents | en-US |
| dc.subject | judicial decision | en-US |
| dc.subject | reasoning | en-US |
| dc.subject | praxeology | en-US |
| dc.subject | metodología lógica | es-ES |
| dc.subject | agentes judiciales | es-ES |
| dc.subject | decisión judicial | es-ES |
| dc.subject | razonamiento jurídico | es-ES |
| dc.title | Methodology of Aprilorism and Logical Deduction | en-US |
| dc.title | Metodología del apriorismo y la deducción lógica | es-ES |
| dc.title | Méthodologie de l'Aprilorisme et de la Déduction Logique | fr-FR |
| dc.title | Metodologia dell'apartorismo e deduzione logica | it-IT |
| dc.title | Metodologia de abrilorismo e dedução lógica | pt-BR |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
|---|---|---|---|
|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
|||