The methodology used by the judges in the resolution of cases constitutes a subject of relevant discussion among jurists interested in judicial matters. From this, this document collects contributions from the majority doctrine in order to differentiate the logical methods that legal agents apply in a judicial decision of a case. Based on these doctrinal approaches to judicial decisions, a question arises: Why is it considered that judges should apply the rules in a praxeolo-gical manner? Why is Economy in Law included? ¿How does the judge implement his legal reasoning in judicial decisions? Response that is complemented with the legal reasoning and the logical methodology used by legal agents, where the subjective and objective influences that affect these judicial proceedings are considered.
KEYWORDS: logical methodology, judicial agents, judicial decision, reasoning, praxeology.
JEL CODE / CLASIFICACIÓN JEL: O34, R10
RESUMENLa metodología empleada por los jueces en la resolución de casos constituye un tema de discusión relevante entre juristas interesados en la materia judicial. A partir de esto, este documento recopila aportes de la doctrina mayoritaria en aras de diferenciar los métodos lógicos que los agentes jurídicos aplican en una decisión judicial de un caso. En base a estos enfoques doctrinarios sobre las decisiones judiciales, nace una interrogante: ¿Por qué se considera que los jueces deben aplicar de manera praxeológico las normas?; ¿Para qué se incluye la Economía en el Derecho? Y; ¿Cómo el juez implementa su razonamiento jurídico en las resoluciones judiciales? Respuesta que se complementa con el razonamiento jurídico y la metodología lógica empleada por los agentes jurídicos, donde se considera las influencias subjetivas y objetivas que inciden en estos procedimientos judiciales.
ABSTRACTThe methodology used by the judges in the resolution of cases constitutes a subject of relevant discussion among jurists interested in judicial matters. From this, this document collects contributions from the majority doctrine in order to differentiate the logical methods that legal agents apply in a judicial decision of a case. Based on these doctrinal approaches to judicial decisions, a question arises: Why is it considered that judges should apply the rules in a praxeolo-gical manner? Why is Economy in Law included? ¿How does the judge implement his legal reasoning in judicial decisions? Response that is complemented with the legal reasoning and the logical methodology used by legal agents, where the subjective and objective influences that affect these judicial proceedings are considered.
KEYWORDS: logical methodology, judicial agents, judicial decision, reasoning, praxeology.
JEL CODE / CLASIFICACIÓN JEL: O34, R10