Public institutions and the paradox of liberal democracy : a step toward heterodox political science

dc.contributor.author	Idrissa, Abdourahmane
dc.date.accessioned	2021-11-11T16:58:24Z
dc.date.available	2021-11-11T16:58:24Z
dc.date.issued	2016
dc.identifier.isbn	978-987-722-178-7
dc.identifier.uri	https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/14311
dc.description.abstract	Why Niger and India? Why compare two countries that are so patently different? The empirical challenge for this study was to find cases from the South that are different in terms of continental location, yet similar in terms of political system and reform policy. The difference of continental location is a proxy for the more substantial — as far as the objectives of the study are concerned — difference of historical process and its implications for our times, which is why the South-South Research Consortium, that has funded this project, has suggested that authors should compare cases across, rather than within the three southern continents.
dc.format.extent	59 p.
dc.publisher	CLACSO
dc.publisher	CODESRIA
dc.publisher	IDEAs
dc.subject	Civil society
dc.subject	Liberal democracy
dc.subject	Neoliberalism
dc.subject	Public institutions
dc.subject	Social change
dc.subject	State
dc.title	Public institutions and the paradox of liberal democracy : a step toward heterodox political science
dc.type	Libro