Repositorio Dspace

Un análisis cuantitativo del acceso abierto en las revistas de Humanidades Digitales

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creator Martínez Cantón, Clara Isabel
dc.date 2021-06-27
dc.date.accessioned 2022-03-25T18:56:50Z
dc.date.available 2022-03-25T18:56:50Z
dc.identifier https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RGID/article/view/76948
dc.identifier 10.5209/rgid.76948
dc.identifier.uri http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/128130
dc.description El presente artículo consiste en un estudio del acceso abierto en un corpus de revistas de Humanidades Digitales seleccionado bajo unos estrictos criterios. El objetivo principal de este trabajo es proporcionar una imagen fidedigna de la publicación periódica en Humanidades Digitales, centrado sobre todo en el nivel de apertura de sus publicaciones y en su relación con otras dimensiones, como la procedencia de la revista, el tipo de editorial, lenguas de publicación, etc. y listando otras características como visibilidad de las publicaciones (DOAJ, SHERPA/RoMEO, y SCOPUS), años en activo de la publicación, cargos de publicación y periodo de embargo. El estudio llevado a cabo sobre un corpus de 38 revistas seleccionadas de la disciplina revela que las revistas de Humanidades Digitales se inclinan mayoritariamente por el acceso libre a mayor nivel. Únicamente una de ellas no permite ningún tipo de acceso abierto, mientras que 7 de ellas son híbridas (vía verde si los autores no pagan, vía dorada si pagan cargos), una es de acceso dorado y las 29 restantes son de acceso diamante. Es decir, el 76,3% de las revistas del corpus son de acceso abierto platino o diamante, sin coste para autores ni lectores, y en el que los costes de publicación se abordan con ayudas, software libre, trabajo voluntario, etc. Este estudio quiere visualizar la posición de las publicaciones del ámbito de las Humanidades Digitales en una época en que la Ciencia Abierta está revolucionando el paradigma de la comunicación científica. es-ES
dc.description This paper presents a study of open access in a corpus of Digital Humanities journals selected under strict criteria. The main objective of this work is to provide a reliable picture of Digital Humanities periodical academic publishing, with the focus on openness of its publications and its relationship with other dimensions, such as journal provenance, type of publisher, languages of publication, etc. and listing other characteristics such as publication visibility (DOAJ, SHERPA/RoMEO, and SCOPUS), years in publication, publication charges and embargo period. The study, carried out on a corpus of 38 selected journals of the discipline, reveals that Digital Humanities journals are mostly inclined to open access at its highest level. Only one of them does not allow any type of open access, while 7 of them are hybrid (green route if authors do not pay, gold route if they pay fees), one is gold open access and the remaining 29 are diamond open access. In other words, 76.3% of the journals in the corpus are platinum/diamond open access, at no cost to authors or readers. In them, publication costs are covered by grants, free software, voluntary work, etc. This study aims to visualize the position of publications in the field of Digital Humanities at a time when Open Science is revolutionizing the paradigm of scientific communication. en-US
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language spa
dc.publisher Ediciones Complutense es-ES
dc.relation https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RGID/article/view/76948/4564456558196
dc.relation /*ref*/Akhoon, I.-H. (2017). Open Access Journals In Medical Science: The Developments So Far. International Journal of Engineering Sciences & Research Technology, 6(2), 178-183. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.290139
dc.relation /*ref*/Björk, B.-C. (2017). Growth of hybrid open access, 2009–2016. PeerJ, 5, e3878. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3878
dc.relation /*ref*/Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2012). Open access versus subscription journals: A comparison of scientific impact. BMC Medicine, 10(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-10-73
dc.relation /*ref*/Borgman, C. L. (2010). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet. MIT press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Eyman, D., & Ball, C. (2015). Digital humanities scholarship and electronic publication. En J. Ridolfo & W. Hart-Davidson, Rhetoric and the Digital Humanities (pp. 65-79). University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Falk, H. (2004). Open access gains momentum. The Electronic Library, 22(6), 527-530. https://doi.org/10.1108/02640470410570848
dc.relation /*ref*/Gajović, S. (2017). Diamond Open Access in the quest for interdisciplinarity and excellence. Croatian Medical Journal, 58(4), 261-262. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2017.58.261
dc.relation /*ref*/Ghane, M. reza, & Niazmand, M. R. (2016). Current status of open access journals published in D8 countries and registered in the Directory of Open Access Journals (pre-2000 to 2014). The Electronic Library, 34(5), 740-756. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-06-2015-0107
dc.relation /*ref*/Gul, S., Wani, Z. A., & Ishrat, M. (2008). Open access journals: A global perspective. Trends in information management, 4(1), 1-19.
dc.relation /*ref*/Huggett, J. (2012). Core or Periphery? Digital Humanities from an Archaeological Perspective.
dc.relation /*ref*/Historical Social Research Vol. 37, No. 3, Volumes per year: 1 . https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.37.2012.3.86-105
dc.relation /*ref*/Jan, N., Loan, F. A., Shah, U. Y., & Kumar, A. (2018). Open access journals in the field of computer science and technology-An analytical study of the DOAJ. International Journal of Information Dissemination and Technology, 8(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-5576.2018.00016.X
dc.relation /*ref*/Kirschenbaum, M. G. (2010). What Is Digital Humanities and What’s It Doing in English Departments? ADE Bulletin, 150, 7.
dc.relation /*ref*/Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020961
dc.relation /*ref*/Loan, F. A., Un-Nisa, R., & Ali, A. (2015). A quantitative analysis of the open access business and economics journals. Brazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.5016/BRAJIS.V9I1.5217
dc.relation /*ref*/Lone, F. A. (2014). Open Access Journals in the Field of Education: An Informative Study. World Digital Libraries - An international journal, 7(2), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.3233/WDL-120122
dc.relation /*ref*/Machovec, G. (2013). An Interview with Jeffrey Beall on Open Access Publishing. The Charleston Advisor, 15(1), 50-50. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.15.1.50
dc.relation /*ref*/Manifesto for the Digital Humanities. (2011). THATCamp Paris 2010. https://tcp.hypotheses.org/411
dc.relation /*ref*/Morris, S. (2006). When is a journal not a journal? A closer look at the DOAJ. Learned Publishing, 19(1), 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315106775122565
dc.relation /*ref*/Öchsner, A. (2013). Publishing Companies, Publishing Fees, and Open Access Journals. En A. Öchsner (Ed.), Introduction to Scientific Publishing: Backgrounds, Concepts, Strategies (pp. 23-29). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38646-6_4
dc.relation /*ref*/Pareek, R., & Kumar, S. (2017). Open Access Journal in Bioinformatics: A Study. En S. Ram (Ed.), Library and Information Services for Bioinformatics Education and Research: (pp. 229-238). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1871-6
dc.relation /*ref*/Rio Riande, G. del. (2018). Humanidades digitales bajo la lupa: Investigación abierta y evaluación científica. Exlibris, 0(7), 136-149.
dc.relation /*ref*/Rufai, R., Gul, S., & Shah, T. A. (2011). Open Access Journals in Library and Information Science: The Story so Far. Trends in information management, 7(2).
dc.relation /*ref*/Schallier, W., Rio Riande, G., Hathcock, A. M., & O’Donnell, D. (2018). Where is the Open in DH? – DH 2018. DH 2018. Book of abstracts. DH-2018, Ciudad de México, México. https://dh2018.adho.org/where-is-the-open-in-dh/
dc.relation /*ref*/Sondarva, B. H. (2013). Scholarly Communication on the Web: An Investigation of Open Access Journals in Medical Science. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 3(3), 42-49.
dc.relation /*ref*/Spiro, L. (2012). “This Is Why We Fight”: Defining the Values of the Digital Humanities. En M. K. Gold, Debates in the digital humanities (pp. 16-35). University of Minnesota Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Tennant, J. P., Waldner, F., Jacques, D. C., Masuzzo, P., Collister, L. B., & Hartgerink, Chris. H. J. (2016). The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: An evidence-based review. F1000Research, 5, 632. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8460.3
dc.relation /*ref*/UCLA Mellon Seminar in Digital Humanities. (2009). The Digital Humanities Manifesto 2. 15.
dc.relation /*ref*/Van Noorden, R. (2013). Open access: The true cost of science publishing. Nature News, 495(7442), 426. https://doi.org/10.1038/495426a
dc.relation /*ref*/Voronin, Y., Myrzahmetov, A., & Bernstein, A. (2011). Access to Scientific Publications: The Scientist’s Perspective. PLoS ONE, 6(11), e27868. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027868
dc.relation /*ref*/Wakeling, S., Willett, P., Creaser, C., Fry, J., Pinfield, S., & Spezi, V. (2016). Open-Access Mega-Journals: A Bibliometric Profile. PLOS ONE, 11(11), e0165359. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165359
dc.relation /*ref*/Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM Report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. http://www.stm-assoc.org/2009_10_13_MWC_STM_Report.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Willinsky, J. (2005). Scholarly Associations and the Economic Viability of Open Access Publishing. Demonstration Journal of the Health Sciences Theme, 1(2). https://demo.publicknowledgeproject.org/ojs3/demo/index.php/healthsciences/article/view/693
dc.relation /*ref*/Wong, S. H. R. (2016). Digital Humanities: What Can Libraries Offer? Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 16(4), 669-690. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2016.0046.
dc.rights Derechos de autor 2021 Revista General de Información y Documentación es-ES
dc.source Revista General de Información y Documentación; Vol 31 No 1 (2021); 331-348 en-US
dc.source Revista General de Información y Documentación; Vol. 31 Núm. 1 (2021); 331-348 es-ES
dc.source 1988-2858
dc.source 1132-1873
dc.subject Digital Humanities; Academic Journals; Open Access; Scholarly Journals; Open Science en-US
dc.subject Humanidades Digitales; Revistas académicas; Acceso abierto; Publicaciones periódicas; Ciencia abierta es-ES
dc.title Un análisis cuantitativo del acceso abierto en las revistas de Humanidades Digitales es-ES
dc.title A Quantitative Analysis of Open Access in Digital Humanities Journals en-US
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type Artículo revisado por pares es-ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta