Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/8639
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorDrummond, José Augusto-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-01T23:06:19Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-01T23:06:19Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/8639-
dc.description.abstractThe text argues that there has existed and will continue to exist for much time enough geographical space and related natural resources in the Brazilian national territory to accommodate the expansion of five sets of uses and activities: (i) rural productive activities, (ii) infra-structure installations, (iii) protected areas, and (iv) indigenous homelands and (v) maroon homelands. This point has become highly relevant because recently a pro-agriculture social coalition / lobby and an associated congressional caucus have argued that the expansion of Brazilian agricultural activities has been confined by protected areas and indigenous homelands. These actors call explicitly for the unfettered expansion of agricultural activities and consider it to be strategic for the future of Brazil as a major producer of food and agricultural commodities. This coalition gives little attention to the fact that rural activities compete for territory with other activities and land uses that are common components of modern societies and economies. The present text criticizes an influential research report that defends the unlimited expansion of agricultural activities. It also pulls together data that show the contrary – agricultural areas have expanded strongly over the last decades, the same having happened with areas dedicated to environmental protection, indigenous homelands and infrastructure installations. The major inference is that although agriculture may call for freedom to expand to “new frontiers”, it can also expand by improving the productivity in currently occupied lands and by using lands officially classified as underused, unused or abandoned by farmers. Additionally, it is argued that this pro-agriculture stance should not be rejected outright, but incorporated into a wider debate about a socially legitimate distribution of different land uses in the large, tropical, humid, biologically rich territory of Brazil.-
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.format.extent36 p.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherENGOV-
dc.relationENGOV Working paper no. 13-
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess-
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported-
dc.subjectAgriculture-
dc.subjectIndigenous communities-
dc.subjectInfrastructure-
dc.subjectLand use-
dc.subjectNatural resources-
dc.subjectProtected areas-
dc.titleProtected areas versus areas occupied by productive activities and infrastructure in Brazil – is there room for everybody?-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper-
dc.typeinfo:ar-repo/semantics/documento de trabajo-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: ENGOV

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
WorkingPaperENGOV13_Drummond.pdf478,31 kBAdobe PDFVista previa
Visualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.