Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

  1. Repositorio institucional de CLACSO
  2. Colección de los Centros Asociados
  3. Brasil
  4. Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - FFC/UNESP - Cosecha
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/73341
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorSánchez, Manuel-
dc.date2013-07-26-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T18:05:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T18:05:58Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3098-
dc.identifier10.1590/S0101-31732013000200004-
dc.identifier.urihttp://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/73341-
dc.descriptionIn this paper, it is argued that only in the section on dialectic in the Critique of Judgment does Kant reach a definitive and conclusive version of deduction, after discovering the concept of the supersensible. In the section on the deduction of pure aesthetic judgments, Kant does not satisfactorily explain the critical distinction between the sensible nature of humanity and the supersensible nature of human reason presupposed in the concept of universal communicability. While the concept of the supersensible illustrates this distinction, it is only through this concept that Kant that can justify the specific possibility of claiming subjective validity in taste. The priority of the solution found in the dialectic is illustrated not only by a comparative analysis of the two sections, but also by a historical reconstruction of the process of the formation of the work, which shows that the first formulation of the concept of validity coincides with the use of the concept of the supersensible.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagepor-
dc.publisherFaculdade de Filosofia e Ciênciaspt-BR
dc.relationhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/transformacao/article/view/3098/2359-
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2021 TRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofiapt-BR
dc.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0pt-BR
dc.sourceTRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; Vol. 36 No. 2 (2013); 45-62en-US
dc.sourceTRANS/FORM/AÇÃO: Revista de Filosofia; v. 36 n. 2 (2013); 45-62pt-BR
dc.source1980-539X-
dc.source0101-3173-
dc.subjectKantpt-BR
dc.subjectJudgmentpt-BR
dc.subjectCritique of Judgmentpt-BR
dc.subjectDeductionpt-BR
dc.subjectJudgment of Tastept-BR
dc.subjectDialecticpt-BR
dc.subjectSupersensiblept-BR
dc.titleThe conclusion of the deduction of taste in the dialectic of the power of judgment aesthetic in Kantpt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - FFC/UNESP - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.