Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/72648
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorDYCK, Corey W.-
dc.date2017-01-25-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T17:55:38Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T17:55:38Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/ek/article/view/6659-
dc.identifier10.36311/2318-0501.2016.v4n2.07.p99-
dc.identifier.urihttp://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/72648-
dc.descriptionOne would be forgiven for suspecting that Kant did not think much of Christian Wolff’s contributions to logic. Wolff’s works on logic are, of course, implicated in Kant’s far-ranging verdict that the discipline has not taken a single step forward since Aristotle’s time, and Wolff in particular frequently comes up for criticism in Kant’s own lectures on the topic. In the Wiener Logik, for example, Kant is reported as referring to Wolff’s claim that the content of a concept can be completely analysed as “too dictatorial” and that as a result Wolff’s attempts to ground his philosophy on the precise definitions of concepts is “entirely false” (V-Lo/Wiener, AA 24: 917). Given this, it is to say the least surprising that (from the late 1770’s onwards1) Kant should regularly single out Wolff’s general logic in those lectures as “the best one has” (V-Lo/ Pölitz, AA 24: 509), “the best that one encounters” (V-Lo/Wiener, AA 24:796), or even simply “the best” (V-Lo/Busolt, AA 24: 613; cf. also Log 9: 20).2 Nor would this seem to be a sort of backhanded compliment, praising Wolff’s as only the best of a bad lot of modern general logics, since this high estimation is echoed by some of Kant’s closest disciples: so, we find unadulterated praise in L. H. Jakob’s preface to his Grundriß der allgemeinen Logik, where it is claimed “Wolff grasped the idea of a general logic exceedingly well,”3 a passage that is also approvingly quoted in Jäsche’s introduction to his edition of Kant’s Logik.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagepor-
dc.publisherFaculdade de Filosofia e Ciênciaspt-BR
dc.relationhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/ek/article/view/6659/4369-
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2017 Estudos Kantianos [EK]pt-BR
dc.sourceKantian Studies (EK); Vol. 4 No. 02 (2016); 99-118en-US
dc.sourceEstudos Kantianos [EK]; v. 4 n. 02 (2016); 99-118pt-BR
dc.source2318-0501-
dc.titleTHE PRIORITY OF JUDGING: KANT ON WOLFF’S GENERAL LOGICpt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - FFC/UNESP - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.