Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/72274
Título : | On guessing and reasoning: a reply to Paul Bourgine's |
Editorial : | Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências |
Descripción : | Charles Peirce ends the above tentative definition of the grounds for abduction by stating that “the effort should therefore be to make each hypothesis, which is practically no more than a question, as near an even bet as possible” (CP 1.121). The reason why I am quoting this passage of the Collected Papers is that I assume it can justify why should I (with no solid background in symbolic logic or mathematics) dare coming up with a debate on Paul Bourgine’s article “Models of abduction.” Taking the following rendition of an abductive inference as a guide: The surprising fact, C, is observed; But if A were true, C would be a matter of course, Hence, there is reason to suspect that A is true. (CP 5.189) I therefore decided to consider Paul’s article as a “surprising fact,” and to try my best in devising relevant questions about it. I believe should thank my deductive capacities for enabling me to extract hopefully clear and reliable consequences from those questions, but I will only be able to evaluate the pertinence of my efforts after a moment o f induction I expect to share with you, dear reader. |
URI : | http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/72274 |
Otros identificadores : | https://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/reic/article/view/706 10.36311/1807-8281.2000.v2n1.706 |
Aparece en las colecciones: | Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - FFC/UNESP - Cosecha |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.