Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/70564
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorBernardino , Maria Cleide Rodrigues-
dc.creatorAlentejo , Eduardo da Silva-
dc.date2014-12-05-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T17:22:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T17:22:58Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/4255-
dc.identifier10.36311/1981-1640.2014.v8n1e2.14.p273-
dc.identifier.urihttp://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/70564-
dc.descriptionThis study focuses on the scientific production of postgraduate programs in Information Science from 2008 to 2012. It aims to list the scientific production recorded in the Lattes curriculum of Professors connected with the Graduate Program in Information Science accredited by the Coordination improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) with grade five. Through qualitative and quantitative research, the literature review sought to align itself with the Assessment System for Postgraduate deployed by CAPES. The methodological procedures identifies the registered Professors within these programs, collecting data in the Lattes curricula, and treating them from the bibliometric and scientometric assumptions to weave analysis and validation of results. It discusses scientific production in relation to the Information Science in the country. It analyzes that there is a difference of almost 50% between the first placed with the third and the fourth in the ranking of scientific output. The estudy argues that qualitative criteria could improve the systems of evaluation of programs that would contribute to the development of scientific production. It concludes that the different rates of production of scientific programs with the same note could be the main snag CAPES evaluation. At the same time, this study suggests, for example, postgraduate programs to adopt criterion focused on responsibility or requirement of publication policy by students of graduate programs within the programs.en-US
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFaculdade de Filosofia e Ciênciaspt-BR
dc.relationhttps://revistas.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/bjis/article/view/4255/3094-
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2014 Maria Cleide Rodrigues Bernardino , Eduardo da Silva Alentejopt-BR
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0pt-BR
dc.sourceBrazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 8 No. 1/2 (2014)en-US
dc.sourceBrazilian Journal of Information Science: Research Trends; Vol. 8 Núm. 1/2 (2014)es-ES
dc.sourceBrazilian Journal of Information Science: research trends; v. 8 n. 1/2 (2014)pt-BR
dc.source1981-1640-
dc.subjectScientific Productionen-US
dc.subjectScientometricsen-US
dc.subjectInformation Scienceen-US
dc.titleRanking da produção científica dos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação no Brasilen-US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências - FFC/UNESP - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.