Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

  1. Repositorio institucional de CLACSO
  2. Colección de los Centros Asociados
  3. Brasil
  4. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGD/UNOESC - Cosecha
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/246494
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorAlexy, Robert-
dc.date2016-02-19-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-30T19:33:18Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-30T19:33:18Z-
dc.identifierhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/9763-
dc.identifier10.18593/ejjl.v16i3.9763-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/246494-
dc.descriptionThe relation between proportionality analysis and human dignity is one of the most contested questions in the debate about the normative structure of human dignity. Two conceptions stand in opposition: an absolute and a relative conception. According to the absolute conception, the guarantee of human dignity counts as a norm that takes precedence over all other norms in all cases. Taking precedence over all other norms in all cases implies that balancing is precluded. This, in turn, means that each and every interference with human dignity is a violation of human dignity. Thus, justified interference with human dignity becomes impossible. By contrast, proportionality analysis is intrinsically connected to the distinction between justified and unjustified interferences. A proportional interference is justified and is, therefore, constitutional. The opposite applies in the case of disproportional interference. The absolute conception is incompatible with this conceptual framework. For this reason, it is incompatible with proportionality analysis. According to the relative conception, precisely the opposite is true. The relative conception says that the question of whether human dignity is violated is a question of proportionality. With this, the relative conception is not only compatible with proportionality analysis, it presupposes it.en-US
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherUniversidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESCpt-BR
dc.relationhttps://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/9763/pdf-
dc.rightsCopyright (c) 2016 Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law [EJJL] - Qualis A2pt-BR
dc.sourceEspaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 16 (2015): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] | Edição Especial - Graves Violações DDHH; 83-96de-DE
dc.sourceEspaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 16 (2015): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] | Edição Especial - Graves Violações DDHH; 83-96en-US
dc.sourceEspaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 16 (2015): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] | Edição Especial - Graves Violações DDHH; 83-96es-ES
dc.sourceEspaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 16 (2015): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] | Edição Especial - Graves Violações DDHH; 83-96fr-CA
dc.sourceEspaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 16 (2015): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] | Edição Especial - Graves Violações DDHH; 83-96pt-BR
dc.source2179-7943-
dc.source1519-5899-
dc.titleHUMAN DIGNITY AND PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS / A DIGNIDADE HUMANA E A ANÁLISE DA PROPORCIONALIDADEen-US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGD/UNOESC - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.