Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/215612
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorReyes Perez, Veronica-
dc.creatorAlcazár-Olán, Raúl-
dc.creatorTorres, Christian Enrique Cruz-
dc.date2022-09-17-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T15:55:17Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-20T15:55:17Z-
dc.identifierhttps://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/2270-
dc.identifier10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15201-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/215612-
dc.descriptionThe present study validated a scale to measure the cognitive emotional regulation in a Mexican sample. The aim was to assess the validity of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), and to examine its divergent validity, based on instruments previously validated. The sample had 464 Mexican youth (332 women and 132 men); the age ranged between 18 and 33 years. Most of them (98.2%) were single. The design was instrumental, transversal, and non-experimental. Besides the CERQ, other instruments were used to measure anger (ML-STAXI), fear (IESM), depression (BDI), and anxiety (BAI). Responses were collected with the platform SurveyMonkey. As a result, the original CERQ 9-factor model showed poor fit in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFI = .853). The exploratory factor analysis yielded seven valid factors: Refocus positively on the plans (8 items, α = .86), Rumination (5 items, α = .78), Blaming on the others (4 items, α = .77), Self-blame (3 items, α = .76), Catastrophizing (4 items, α = .77), Putting in perspective (4 items, α = .70), and Refocus on the positive (3 items, α = .72). The cognitive nature of the CERQ showed divergence with emotional and behavioral variables of previous instruments. As a conclusion, the factors found with the CERQ represent valid and reliable constructs, with potential for programs that want to attend and strengthen the emotional regulation.en-US
dc.descriptionEl presente trabajo es la validación en una muestra mexicana de una escala que mide la regulación emocional cognitiva. El objetivo fue evaluar la validez del Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) y examinar su validez divergente, a partir de instrumentos previamente validados. La muestra se formó de 464 jóvenes mexicanos (332 mujeres y 132 hombres), con edad entre 18 y 33 años. El 98.2% eran solteros. El diseño fue instrumental, transversal y no experimental. Además del CERQ, se usaron instrumentos de medición del enojo (ML-STAXI), miedo (IESM), depresión (IDB) y ansiedad (IAB). Las respuestas se recabaron con la plataforma SurveyMonkey. Como resultado, el modelo original de nueve factores del CERQ mostró pobre ajuste en el análisis factorial confirmatorio (CFI = .853). Por medio de análisis factorial exploratorio, se encontraron siete factores válidos: Reenfocarse en los planes positivamente (8 reactivos, α = .86), Rumiación (5 reactivos, α = .78), Culpar a otros (4 reactivos, α = .77), Auto culpa (3 reactivos, α = .76), Catastrofizar (4 reactivos, α = .77), Poner en perspectiva (4 reactivos, α = .70) y Reenfocarse en lo positivo (3 reactivos, α = .72). El CERQ, cuya naturaleza es cognitiva, mostró divergencia con variables emocionales y conductuales de instrumentos previos. En conclusión, los factores encontrados del CERQ representan constructos válidos y confiables que tienen potencial para programas que busquen atender y fortalecer la regulación emocional.es-ES
dc.descriptionO presente estudo validou uma escala para medir a regulação emocional cognitiva em uma amostra mexicana. Oobjetivo foi avaliar a validade do Questionário de Regulação das Emoções Cognitivas (CERQ) e examinar sua validadedivergente, com base em instrumentos previamente validados. A amostra contou com 464 jovens mexicanos (332mulheres e 132 homens); a idade variou entre 18 e 33 anos. A maioria (98,2%) era solteira. O desenho foi instrumental,transversal e não experimental. Além do CERQ, outros instrumentos foram utilizados para mensurar raiva (ML-STAXI),medo (IESM), depressão (BDI) e ansiedade (BAI). As respostas foram coletadas com a plataforma SurveyMonkey.Como resultado, o modelo original de 9 fatores do CERQ mostrou um ajuste ruim na análise fatorial confirmatória (CFI= 0,853). A análise fatorial exploratória resultou em sete fatores válidos: Reorientar positivamente os planos (6 itens, α= 0,86), Ruminação (3 itens, α = 0,78), Culpar os outros (4 itens, α = 0,77), Auto – culpa (3 itens, α = 0,76), Catastrofização(4 itens, α = 0,77), Colocar em perspectiva (4 itens, α = 0,70) e Refocar no positivo (3 itens, α = 0,72) . A natureza cognitivado CERQ apresentou divergência com as variáveis emocionais e comportamentais dos instrumentos anteriores.Como conclusão, os fatores encontrados com o CERQ representam construtos válidos e confiáveis, com potencialpara programas que queiram atender e fortalecer a regulação emocionalpt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagespa-
dc.publisherĬbērAMes-ES
dc.relationhttps://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/2270/1799-
dc.relation/*ref*/Abdi, S., Taban, S., & Ghaemian, A. (2012). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: validity and reliability of persian translation of CERQ-36 item. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 2–7. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.001-
dc.relation/*ref*/Akyunus, M., Gencöz, T., & Karakose, S. (2020). The mediator role of negative cognitive emotion regulation strategies between interpersonal problems and borderline personality beliefs. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00373-0-
dc.relation/*ref*/Alcázar, R. J., Deffenbacher, J. L. & Byrne, Z. S. (2011). Assessing the factor structure of the anger expression inventory (ML-STAXI) in a Mexican sample. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 307-318. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=12&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=67065657&db=asn-
dc.relation/*ref*/Aldao, A. (2013). The future of emotion regulation research: capturing context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459518.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Aldao, A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2010). Specificity of cognitive emotion regulation strategies: A transdiagnostic examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.06.002-
dc.relation/*ref*/Aldao, A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2012). The influence of context on the implementation of adaptive emotion regulation strategies. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.04.004-
dc.relation/*ref*/Aldao, A., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J.J., (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 39, 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bonanno, G.A., Burton, C.L., (2013). Regulatory flexibility: an individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bridgett, D. J., Burt, N. M., Edwards, E. S., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2015). Intergenerational transmission of self-regulation: A multidisciplinary review and integrative conceptual framework. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 602–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038662-
dc.relation/*ref*/Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003-
dc.relation/*ref*/Çakmak, A. F., & Çevik, E. I. (2010). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: development of turkish version of 18-item short form. African Journal of Business Management, 4(10), 2097–2102 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228631257_Cognitive_emotion_regulation_questionnaire_Development__Turkish_version_of_18-item_short_form#fullTextFileContent-
dc.relation/*ref*/Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Compas, B. E., Jaser, S. S., Bettis, A. H., Watson, K. H., Gruhn, M. A., Dunbar, J. P., & Thigpen, J. C. (2017). Coping, emotion regulation, and psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 939–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000110-
dc.relation/*ref*/Dobson, D., & Dobson, K. S. (2017). Evidence-based practice of cognitive-behavioral therapy. New York: The Guilford press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Domínguez, S., & Medrano, L. (2016). Psychometric properties of the questionnaire of cognitive regulation of emotions (CERQ) in university students in Lima. Psychology, 10, 53–67. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1900-23862016000100006-
dc.relation/*ref*/Domínguez-Lara, S. (2019). Diferencias de sexo en las estrategias cognitivas de regulación emocional: un reporte exploratorio en estudiantes universitarios. Cultura, 33(1), 319-327. http://www.revistacultura.com.pe/revistas/RCU_33_diferencias-de-sexo.pdf-
dc.relation/*ref*/Fiol-Veny, A., Balle, M., De la Torre-Luque, A., & Bornas, X. (2019). Negative cognitive emotion regulation as a predictor of adolescent heart variability and entropy under social stress. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 32(6) 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2019.1641199-
dc.relation/*ref*/Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2006). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire-development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.010-
dc.relation/*ref*/Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotions regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(1). 1311-1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6-
dc.relation/*ref*/Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2002). CERQ: manual for the use of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. The Netherlands: Leiderdorp.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2. 3.271.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Fang, A., & Asnaani, A. (2012). Emotion dysregulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Depression & Anxiety, 29, 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.21888-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hu, L. & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jentsch, V. L., Merz, C. J., & Wolf, O. T. (2019). Restoring emotional stability: Cortisol effects on the neural network of cognitive emotion regulation, Behavioural Brain Research, 374(18), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.03.049-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jermann, F., Van der Linden, M., d’Acremont, M., & Zermatten, A. (2006). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ). confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric properties of the French translation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.126-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jurado, S., Villegas, M., Méndez, L., Rodríguez, F., Loperena, V. & Varela, R. (1998). La estandarización del Inventario de Depresión de Beck para los residentes de la Ciudad de México. Salud Mental, 21(3): 26-31. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=38&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=3748275&db=lth-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kraaij, V., & Garnefski, N. (2019). The behavioural Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: development psychometric properties and relationships with emotional problems and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Difference, 137(15), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.036-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kurlat, S. G. (2015). Leer la cultura popular: desplazamientos desde los márgenes. Latin American Cultural Studies Journal, 4(1), 1-26. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=6&sid=4e6808c1-31e4-4eab-9cb5-90f7b5e754bf%40sdc-v-sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=103197580&db=asn-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39(2), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.124-
dc.relation/*ref*/Li, L., Li, S., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., & Zhu X. (2019). Factor structure and measurement invariance for Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01132-
dc.relation/*ref*/Martins, D., Darcie, M., Gobbi, M. C. (2019). Día de los muertos no México: uma análise folkcomunicacional. Revista Internacional de Folkcomunicação, 38(17), 200-216. https://doi.org/10.5212/RIF.v.17.i38.0012-
dc.relation/*ref*/McKinnon, A., Kuyken, W., Hayes, R., Werner-Seidler, A., Watson, P., Dalgleish, T., & Schweizer, S. (2020). The psychometric properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in a clinical sample of adult’s whit recurrent depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 276(1), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.061-
dc.relation/*ref*/Moscoso, M. S. (2000). Estructura factorial del inventario multicultural latinoamericano de la expresión de la cólera y la hostilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 32, 321-343. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/805/80532204.pdf-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2004). Thinking makes it so: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to emotion regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory and Application (pp. 229–255). New York: Guilford Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751.x-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pedhazur, E. J., & Pedhazur, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: an integrated approach. New York: Taylor & Francis Group-
dc.relation/*ref*/Reyes, V., y Reidl, L. M. (2013). Miedo y Afrontamiento en Adolescentes Mexicanos. Psicogente, 16(30), 280-295. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=56&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=116363863&db=asn-
dc.relation/*ref*/Robles, R., Varela, R., Jurado, S. & Paez, F. (2001). Versión mexicana del inventario de ansiedad de Beck: propiedades psicométricas. Revista mexicana de psicología, 18(2), 211-218. https://psicologiaysalud.uv.mx/index.php/psicysalud/article/view/2563-
dc.relation/*ref*/Rusu, P. P., Bodenmann, G., & Kayser, K. (2019). Cognitive emotion regulation and positive dyadic outcomes in married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(1), 359-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517751664-
dc.relation/*ref*/Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/-
dc.relation/*ref*/Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2007). Métodos de investigación en psicología. México: McGrawHill-
dc.relation/*ref*/Thompson, R. A. (1991). Emotional regulation and emotional development. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 269-307. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=50&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=14792029&db=eoah-
dc.relation/*ref*/Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: a theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166137 Visted, E., Vollestad, J., Nielsen, M. B., Schanche, E. (2018). Emotion regulation in current and remitted depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psycholology. 9, 756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00756-
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 Revista Iberoamericana de Psicologíaes-ES
dc.rightshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0es-ES
dc.sourceRevista Iberoamericana de Psicología; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2022): Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología; 1-12es-ES
dc.source2500-6517-
dc.source2027-1786-
dc.subjectemotional regulation, cognition, anger, anxiety, depression, fearen-US
dc.subjectregulación emocional, cognición, enojo, ansiedad, depresión, miedoes-ES
dc.titleValidation of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in a Mexican Sampleen-US
dc.titleValidación del Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) en una muestra mexicanaes-ES
dc.titleValidação do Questionário de Regulação das Emoções Cognitivas (CERQ) em uma amostra mexicanapt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Educación, Ciencias Humanas y Sociales - Iberoamericana - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.