Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/215483
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorOrtega Marin, Jeniffer-
dc.date2019-05-23-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T15:55:00Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-20T15:55:00Z-
dc.identifierhttps://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.12203-
dc.identifier10.33881/2027-1786.rip.12203-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/215483-
dc.descriptionFalse positives and false negatives in neuropsychological assessment can occur due to different reasons and they could have serious consequences such as the administration of an unnecessary treatment that may cause adverse effects and failure to provide timely treatment to patients. Therefore, it is important to know how confident we can be in the diagnosis. Tests scores are insufficient to this end. As a starting point, we need to establish hypotheses about the patient’s condition using the information we have collected from several sources. We also need to use information about the psychometric properties of the tests, predictive values and base rates of neurocognitive disorders and low scores. Whenever this information is lacking the interpretation of performance should be cautious. Several strategies are discussed that may contribute to improve diagnostic accuracy.en-US
dc.descriptionLos falsos positivos y los falsos negativos en la evaluación neuropsicológica pueden ocurrir debido a diferentes razones y pueden tener consecuencias graves tales como la administración de un tratamiento innecesario que puede causar efectos adversos y la incapacidad de proporcionar un tratamiento oportuno a los pacientes. Por lo tanto, es importante saber qué tanto podemos confiar en el diagnóstico. Los resultados de las pruebas son insuficientes para este fin. Como punto de partida, debemos establecer hipótesis sobre la condición del paciente utilizando la información que hemos recopilado de varias fuentes. Adicionalmente, es necesario utilizar información sobre las propiedades psicométricas de las pruebas, los valores predictivos y las tasas base de los trastornos neurocognitivos y de las puntuaciones bajas. En ausencia de esta información, la interpretación de los resultados debe ser cautelosa. En este artículo se discuten varias estrategias que pueden contribuir a mejorar la precisión diagnóstica.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagespa-
dc.publisherĬbērAMes-ES
dc.relationhttps://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.12203/1504-
dc.relation/*ref*/American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington, DC: Author.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Binder, L., Iverson, G., & Brooks, B. (2009). To err is human: “abnormal” neuropsychological scores and variability. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24, 31-46. doi:10.1093/arclin/acn001-
dc.relation/*ref*/Blakesley, R., Mazumdar, S., Dew, M., Houck, P., Tang, G., Reynolds III, C., & Butters, M. (2009). Comparisons of methods for multiple hypothesis testing in neuropsychological research (Vol. 23). Neuropsychology. doi:doi:10.1037/a0012850-
dc.relation/*ref*/Brooks, B., Sherman, E., Iverson, G., Slick, D. J., & Strauss, E. (2011). sychometric foundations for the interpretation of neuropsychological test results. In J. Glenn, & M. Schoenberg, The little black book of neuropsychology: A syndrome-based approach (pp. 893-992). New York: Springer. doi:https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/978-0-387-76978-3_16-
dc.relation/*ref*/Crawford, J. R., Garthwaite, P. H., & Gault, C. B. (2007). Estimating the percentage of the population With abnormally low scores (or abnormally large score differences) on standardized neuropsychological test batteries: A generic method with applications. Neuropsychology, 21(4), 419-430. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.21.4.419-
dc.relation/*ref*/Decker, S., Schneider, J., & Hale, J. (2012). Estimating base rates of impairment in neuropsychological test batteries: a comparison of quantitative models. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27, 69–84. doi:10.1093/arclin/acr088-
dc.relation/*ref*/Duarte, L. (2017). Lenguaje, memoria y habilidades visuoconstructivas en el envejecimiento normal: Datos normativos con la Batería Neuronorma Colombia (Tesis de maestría). Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Retrieved from http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/56804/-
dc.relation/*ref*/Duff, K. (2012). Evidence-based indicators of neuropsychological change in the individual patient: Relevant concepts and methods. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(3), 248-261. doi:10.1093/arclin/acr120-
dc.relation/*ref*/Espitia, A. (2017). Funciones ejecutivas en el envejecimiento normal: Datos normativos con la batería Neuronorma.Colombia (Tesis de maestría). Bogotá, Colombia: Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Retrieved from http://www.bdigital.unal.edu.co/56861/-
dc.relation/*ref*/Fellows, R., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2015). Between-domain cognitive dispersion and functional abilities in older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 37(10), 1013-1023. doi:10.1080/13803395.2015.1050360-
dc.relation/*ref*/Frerichs, R., & Tuokko, H. (2005). A comparison of methods for measuring cognitive change in older adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(3), 321-333. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2004.08.002-
dc.relation/*ref*/Glaros, A., & Kline, R. (1988). Understanding the accuracy of tests with cutting scores: The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value model. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(6), 1013-1023. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198811)44:6<1013::AID-JCLP2270440627>3.0.CO;2-Z-
dc.relation/*ref*/Godefroy, O., Fickl, A., Roussel, M., Auribault, C., Bugnicourt, J. M., Lamy, C., . . . Petitnicolas, G. (2011). Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination to detect poststroke cognitive impairment? A study with neuropsychological evaluation. Stroke, 42, 1712-1716. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.606277-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hebben, N., & Milberg, W. (2009). Essentials of neuropsychological assessment (Second ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved from https://www.wiley.com/en- us/Essentials+of+Neuropsychological+Assessment-p-9780471215899-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hinton-Bayre, A. (2010). Deriving reliable change statistics from test–retest normative data: Comparison of models and mathematical expressions. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(3), 244-256. doi:10.1093/arclin/acq008-
dc.relation/*ref*/Huizenga, H., Agelink van Rentergem, J., Grasman, R., Muslimovic, D., & Schmand, B. (2016). Normative comparisons for large neuropsychological test batteries: User-friendly and sensitive solutions to minimize familywise false positives. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 38(6), 611-629. doi:10.1080/13803395.2015.1132299-
dc.relation/*ref*/Iverson, G., Brooks, B., Langenecker, S., & Young, A. (2011). Identifying a cognitive impairment subgroup in adults with mood disorders. Journal of Affective Disorders, 132, 360–367. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.001-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jurado, M., & Pueyo, R. (2012). Doing and reporting a neuropsychological assessment. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 12(1), 123-141. Retrieved from https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/337/33723707009.pdf-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. London: Penguin Group. Retrieved from https://www.penguin.co.uk/books/563/56314/thinking--fast-and-slow/9780141033570.html-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kent, P., & Hancock, M. (2016). Interpretation of dichotomous outcomes: sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and pre-test and post-test probability. Journal of Physiotherapy, 62(4), 231-233. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2016.08.008-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mercier, H. (2017). Confirmation bias - Myside bias. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: Intriguing phenomena in thinking, judgment and memory (Second ed., pp. 99-114). New York: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mistridis, P., Egli, S. C., Iverson, G. L., Berres, M., Willmes, K., Welsh-Bohmer, K. A., & Monsch, A. U. (2015). Considering the base rates of low performance in cognitively healthy older adults improves the accuracy to identify neurocognitive impairment with the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s DiseaseNeuropsychological Assessment Battery. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 265, 07–417. doi:10.1007/s00406-014-0571-z-
dc.relation/*ref*/Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pardo, A., & Ferrer, R. (2013). Significación clínica: falsos positivos en la estimación del cambio individual. Anales de Psicología, 29(2), 301-310. doi:10.6018/analesps.29.2.139031-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ruff, R. M. (2003). A friendly critique of neuropsychology: facing the challenges of our future. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(8), 847-864. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2003.07.002-
dc.relation/*ref*/Russell, E. W., Russell, S. L., & Hill, B. (2005). The fundamental psychometric status of neuropsychological batteries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(6), 785-794. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.05.001-
dc.relation/*ref*/Sánchez-Benavides, G., Peña-Casanova, J., Casals-Coll, M., Gramunt, N., Manero, R. M., Puig-Pijoan, A., . . . Blesa, R. (2016). One-year reference norms of cognitive change in spanish old adults: Data from the NEURONORMA sample. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(4), 378-388. doi:10.1093/arclin/acw018-
dc.relation/*ref*/Slick, D. J. (2006). Psychometrics in neuropsychological assessment. In E. Strauss, E. M. Sherman, & O. Spreen (Eds.), A Compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary (Third ed., pp. 3-32). New York: Oxford University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Sohlberg, M. M., & Mateer, C. A. (2001). Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychologcial approach. New York: The Guilford Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Spores, J. M. (2013). Clinician’s guide to psychological assessment and testing: With forms and templates for effective practice. New York: Springer.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Stein, J., Luppa, M., Brähler, E., König, H.-H., & Riedel-Heller, S. G. (2010). The assessment of changes in cognitive functioning: Reliable change indices for neuropsychological instruments in the elderly – A systematic review. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 29(3), 275-286. doi:10.1159/000289779-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tanner-Eggen, C., Balzer, C., Perrig, W. J., & Gutbrod, K. (2015). The neuropsychological assessment of cognitive deficits considering measures of performance variability. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 30, 217–227. doi:10.1093/arclin/acv008-
dc.relation/*ref*/Teigen, K. H. (2017). Judgments by representativeness. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: Intriguing phenomena in thinking, judgment and memory (Second ed.). Oxon, United Kingdom: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Thambirajah, M. S. (2005). Chapter 8: Psychological measurements: Their uses and misuses. In Psychological Basis of Psychiatry (pp. 181-201). New York: Churchill Livingstone.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Urbina, S. (2014). Essentials of psychological testing (Second ed.). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Vakil, E. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment: Principles, rationale, and challenges. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34(2), 135-150. doi:10.1080/13803395.2011.623121-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wanlass, R. L. (2012). The neuropsychology toolkit: Guidelines, formats, and language. New York: Springer.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Watkins, M. W. (2009). Errors in diagnostic decision making and clinical judgment. In T. B. Gutkin, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of School Psychology (Fourth ed., pp. 210-229). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Woods, S. P., Ludicello, J. E., Cobb Scott, J., & Grant, I. (2009). Neuropsychological methods in mental disorders research: illustrations from methamphetamine dependence. In S. J. Wood, N. B. Allen, & C. Pantelis (Eds.), The neuropsychology of mental illness (pp. 194- 205). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wright, A. J. (2011). Conducting psychological assessment: A guide for practitioners. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.-
dc.sourceRevista Iberoamericana de Psicología; Vol. 12 Núm. 2 (2019): Neuropsicología y Neurociencia: Investigaciones en torno a las bases biológicas del comportamiento; 29-38es-ES
dc.source2500-6517-
dc.source2027-1786-
dc.subjectHypothesis-driven assessmenten-US
dc.subjectsensitivityen-US
dc.subjectspecificityen-US
dc.subjectfalse positivesen-US
dc.subjectfalse negativesen-US
dc.subjectbase ratesen-US
dc.subjectpredictive valuesen-US
dc.subjectbiasesen-US
dc.subjectheuristicsen-US
dc.subjectEvaluación basada en hipótesises-ES
dc.subjectsensibilidades-ES
dc.subjectespecificidades-ES
dc.subjectfalsos positivoses-ES
dc.subjectfalsos negativoses-ES
dc.subjecttasas basees-ES
dc.subjectvalores predictivoses-ES
dc.subjectsesgoses-ES
dc.subjectheurísticases-ES
dc.subjectAvaliação orientada por hipótesespt-BR
dc.subjectsensibilidadept-BR
dc.subjectespecificidadept-BR
dc.subjectfalso-positivopt-BR
dc.subjectfalsos negativospt-BR
dc.subjecttaxas de basept-BR
dc.subjectvalores preditivospt-BR
dc.subjectviesespt-BR
dc.subjectheurísticapt-BR
dc.titleNeuropsychological Diagnostic Accuracy: Factors That Might Lead to a Wrong Diagnosis and How to Avoid Themen-US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Educación, Ciencias Humanas y Sociales - Iberoamericana - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.