Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/215422
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorGabini, Sebastián-
dc.date2017-12-15-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-20T15:54:54Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-20T15:54:54Z-
dc.identifierhttps://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.10201-
dc.identifier10.33881/2027-1786.rip.10201-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/215422-
dc.descriptionThe aim of this study was to develop and validate a scale to measure flexible work. A preliminary scale was designed based on the literature review and on interviews with the employees. First, this version of the scale was applied to a non-probabilistic sample of 87 workers from different organization, in order to analyze the operative characteristics of the scale. A second application phase was carried out in order toanalyze the psychometric properties of the instrument. This time, the non-probabilistic sample was made up by 383 workers. Factor analyses (exploratory and confirmatory) were executed over the data obtained, revealing a unidimensional structure with adequate internal consistency (α = .89), composite reliability (CR = .89), and convergent validity (AVE = .50). The instrument was finally made up by nine items and proved to be a reliable and parsimonious scale which allows to know the workers’ perceptions about the availability of flexible work in their organizations.en-US
dc.descriptionEl objetivo del presente estudio fue desarrollado y validar una escala para medir trabajo flexible. Una versión prototípica de la escala fue elaborada con base en la revisión bibliográfica y entrevistas con empleados. En primer lugar, esta versión fue aplicada a una muestra no probabilística de 87 trabajadores de diferentes organizaciones, para evaluar las características operativas de la escala. Se llevó a cabo una segunda fase de aplicación a efectos de análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del instrumento desarrollado. En esta ocasión se incluye sobre una nueva muestra no probabilística integrada por 383 trabajadores. Sobre los datos recabados se ejecutan análisis factoriales exploratorios y confirmatorios, los cuales indican una estructura unidimensional con adecuada consistencia (α = .89), confiabilidad compuesta (CR = .88), y validez convergente (AVE = .50). El instrumento quedó finalmente conformado por nueve ítems, demostrando ser una medida confiable y parsimoniosa que permite conocer la percepción de los empleados acerca de la disponibilidad de trabajo flexible al interior de sus organizaciones.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagespa-
dc.publisherĬbērAMes-ES
dc.relationhttps://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.10201/pdf_1-
dc.relation/*ref*/Aguinis, H., & Edwards, J. R. (2014). Methodological wishes for the next decade and how to make wishes come true. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 143-174.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: Deconstructing flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345-376. doi: 10.1111/peps.12012-
dc.relation/*ref*/American Psychological Association, APA (2010). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. (6a ed.). Washington: APA.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29(3), 1038-1059. doi: 10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511-
dc.relation/*ref*/Aryee, S., Chu, C. W., Kim, T. Y., & Ryu, S. (2013). Family-supportive work environment and employee work behaviors an investigation of mediating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 39(3), 792-813.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Baglin, J. (2014). Improving your exploratory factor analysis for ordinal data: A demonstration using FACTOR. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 19(5), 2-15. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=19&n=5-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bentler, P. (2006). EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bhalla, J. (2016). Impact of flexible work arrangements on productivity in indian IT sector: A study. IPE Journal of Management, 6(1), 80-104.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Crowley, J. E., & Kolenikov, S. (2014). Flexible work options and mothers' perceptions of career harm. The Sociological Quarterly, 55(1), 168-195. doi: 10.1111/tsq.12050-
dc.relation/*ref*/Demerouti, E., Derks, D., Lieke, L., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). New ways of working: Impact on working conditions, work–family balance, and well-being. In C. Korunka & P. Hoonakker (Eds.). The impact of ICT on quality of working life (pp. 123-141). Netherlands: Springer.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Dettmers, J., Kaiser, S., & Fietze, S. (2013). Theory and practice of flexible work: Organizational and individual perspectives. Introduction to the special issue. Management Revue, 24(3), 155-161. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23610676-
dc.relation/*ref*/DeVellis, R. F. (2016). Scale development: Theory and applications (4 th ed.). California: Sage Publications.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. doi: 10.2307/3150980-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gabini, S. (2016). Trabajo flexible: Conceptualización y estado del arte del constructo. Revista Investigación Administrativa, 46(118). Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=456048241005-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M. & Zumbo, D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-tipe and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3), 1-13. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v17n3.pdf-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grobler, P. A., & de Bruyn, A. J. (2012). Flexible work practices (FWP) - an effective instrument in the retention of talent: A survey of selected JSE-listed companies. South African Journal of Business Management, 42(4), 63-78. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10500/5131-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hair, J. E., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham R. L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hoffmann, A., Stover, J., De la Iglesia, G., & Fernández-Liporace, M. (2013). Correlaciones policóricas y tetracóricas en estudios factoriales exploratorios y confirmatorios. Ciencias Psicológicas, 7, 151-164. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.edu.uy/pdf/cp/v7n2/v7n2a05.pdf-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Publications.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kossek, E. E. (2016). Implementing organizational work–life interventions: toward a triple bottom line. Community, Work & Family, 19(2), 242-256. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2016.1135540-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kröll, C., & Nüesch, S. (2017). The effects of flexible work practices on employee attitudes: evidence from a large-scale panel study in Germany. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28, 1-21. doi: 10.1080/09585192.2017.1289548-
dc.relation/*ref*/Leslie, L. M., Manchester, C. F., Park, T. Y., & Mehng, S. A. (2012). Flexible work practices: A source of career premiums or penalties? Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1407-1428. doi: 10.5465/amj.2010.0651-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lloret-Segura., Ferreres, A., Hernández, A., & Tomás, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: Una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, 30(3), 1151-1169. doi: 10.6018/analesps.30.3.199361-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2: A comprehensive program for fitting Exploratory and Semiconfirmatory Factor Analysis and IRT models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497-498. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1018952-
dc.relation/*ref*/Masuda, A. D., Poelmans, S. A., Allen, T. D., Spector, P. E., Lapierre, L. M., Cooper, C. L.,...& Lu, L. (2012). Flexible work arrangements availability and their relationship with work‐to‐family conflict, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison of three country clusters. Applied Psychology, 61(1), 1-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00453.x-
dc.relation/*ref*/Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., & Hambleton, R. K. (2013). International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation. Psicothema, 25(2), 151-157. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.24-
dc.relation/*ref*/Njiru, P. M., Kiambati, K., & Kamau, A. (2015). The influence of flexible work practices on employee performance in public sector in the ministry of interior and coordination of national government, Embu County. Scholars Bulletin, 1(4), 102-106. Retrieved from http://scholarsbulletin.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/SB-14102-106.pdf-
dc.relation/*ref*/Rawashdeh, A. M., Almasarweh, M. S., & Jaber, J. (2016). Do flexible work arrangements affect job satisfaction and work-life balance in jordanian private airlines? International Journal of Information, Business and Management, 8(3), 172-184. Retrieved from http://ijibm.elitehall.com/IJIBM_Vol8No3_Aug2016.pdf#page=177-
dc.relation/*ref*/Satorra, A. (2002). Asymptotic robustness in multiple group linear-latent variable models. Econometric Theory, 18(2), 297-312. doi: 10.1017.S0266466602182041-
dc.relation/*ref*/Schooreel, T., & Verbruggen, M. (2016). Use of family-friendly work arrangements and work–family conflict: Crossover effects in dual-earner couples. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(1), 119-132. doi: 10.1037/a0039669-
dc.relation/*ref*/Shagvaliyeva, S., & Yazdanifard, R. (2014). Impact of flexible working hours on work-life balance. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 4(1), 20-23. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2014.41004-
dc.relation/*ref*/Sok, J., Blomme, R., & Tromp, D. (2014). Positive and negative spillover from work to home: The role of organizational culture and supportive arrangements. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 456-472. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.12058-
dc.relation/*ref*/Stavrou, E., & Ierodiakonou, C. (2011). Flexible work arrangements and intentions of unemployed women in Cyprus: A planned behaviour model. British Journal of Management, 22(1), 150-172. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2010.00695.x-
dc.relation/*ref*/Stecher Guzmán, A., Godoy Catalán, L., & Toro Cifuentes, J. P. (2012). Sociabilidad y calidad de vida laboral en un entorno de trabajo flexible. La experiencia de trabajadores de supermercado en Santiago de Chile. Revista de Psicología, 21(2), 133-157. Retrieved from http://www.redalyc.org/html/264/26424861006/-
dc.relation/*ref*/Sweet, S., Pitt-Catsouphes, M., Besen, E., & Golden, L. (2014). Explaining organizational variation in flexible work arrangements: Why the pattern and scale of availability matter. Community, Work & Family, 17(2), 115-141. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2014.887553-
dc.relation/*ref*/Thompson, R. J., Payne, S. C., & Taylor, A. B. (2015). Applicant attraction to flexible work arrangements: Separating the influence of flextime and flexplace. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(4), 726-749. doi: 10.1111/joop.12095-
dc.relation/*ref*/Timms, C., Brough, P., O'Driscoll, M., Kalliath, T., Siu, O. L., Sit, C., & Lo, D. (2015). Flexible work arrangements, work engagement, turnover intentions and psychological health. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 53(1), 83-103. doi: 10.1111/1744-7941.12030/full-
dc.relation/*ref*/Utami, I., & Supriyadi, D. (2013). Flexible working arrangement and stress management training in mitigating auditor’s burnout: An experimental study. Accounting and Taxation, 5(1), 97-113. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2270892-
dc.relation/*ref*/Way, S. A., Tracey, J. B., Fay, C. H., Wright, P. M., Snell, S. A., Chang, S., & Gong, Y. (2015). Validation of a multidimensional HR flexibility measure. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1098–1131. doi: 10.1177/0149206312463940-
dc.sourceRevista Iberoamericana de Psicología; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2017): Revista Iberoamericana de psicología - 2017-2; 3-11es-ES
dc.source2500-6517-
dc.source2027-1786-
dc.subjectflexible worken-US
dc.subjectscaleen-US
dc.subjectself-administereden-US
dc.subjectvalidationen-US
dc.subjecttrabajo flexiblees-ES
dc.subjectescalaes-ES
dc.subjectautoadministrable.es-ES
dc.subjectValidaciónes-ES
dc.subjecttrabalho flexívelpt-BR
dc.subjectescalapt-BR
dc.subjectauto-administradopt-BR
dc.subjectvalidaçãopt-BR
dc.titleFlexible work: instrument for your measurementen-US
dc.titleTrabajo flexible: Instrumento para su mediciónes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Educación, Ciencias Humanas y Sociales - Iberoamericana - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.