Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

  1. Repositorio institucional de CLACSO
  2. Colección de los Centros Asociados
  3. España
  4. Servicio Documentación Multimedia. Sección Departamental de Biblioteconomía y Documentación. Universidad Complutense de Madrid - SDM - Cosecha
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/186783
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorPlanuch Prats, Carles-
dc.creatorSalvador Vallès, Ramón-
dc.date2022-07-07-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-16T15:12:09Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-16T15:12:09Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RGID/article/view/82950-
dc.identifier10.5209/rgid.82950-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/186783-
dc.descriptionIn today's digital transformation context, organizations consider knowledge sharing and learning processes increasingly crucial to their success. In this context, information and communication technologies play an important role. In this article the capabilities of virtual communities are analysed in order to be considered a useful tool in knowledge sharing, for innovation, and for the company growth; and we give a range of such examples in the finance sector where information technologies have been used to aide these, with varying degrees of success. This has proven that virtual communities have contributed to the development of numerous products and services according to the needs of customers and to improve good practices in the organization, as well as the training of employees. Creating a favourable context for both clients and employees to participate in the communities by sharing experiences or needs is undoubtedly paramount. And from a technological point of view it seems that Web 2.0 tools are a useful tool to implement these communities in order to improve knowledge management, innovation and results in financial services. This article proposes a conceptual scheme based on the relationship of three research areas, ICT, with special emphasis on Web 2.0 tools, the creation and exchange of knowledge and virtual communities. Data are provided for the three main Spanish financial institutions, that is, Banco Santander, BBVA and CaixaBank. The results obtained show how knowledge is created and shared, based on virtual communities and later adopted in said entities; and that the process of creating and sharing knowledge positively influences entities since: it accelerates the development and implementation of new financial products and services, intensifies the entity's innovation and improves relationships with clients.en-US
dc.descriptionEn el contexto de transformación digital actual, las organizaciones consideran los procesos de intercambio de conocimiento y de aprendizaje cada vez más cruciales para su éxito. En este contexto las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación juegan un papel importante. En este artículo, se ha hallado que las comunidades virtuales constituyen una herramienta útil para compartir conocimiento, para la innovación y se analizan diversos casos en el sector financiero español, donde se han utilizado las tecnologías de la información para apoyarlas, con diversos grados de éxito. Así se ha comprobado que las comunidades virtuales han contribuido al desarrollo de numerosos productos y servicios según las necesidades de los clientes y a mejorar las buenas prácticas en la organización, así como la formación de los empleados. Crear un entorno propicio para que tanto clientes como empleados participen en las comunidades compartiendo experiencias o necesidades es sin duda primordial. Y desde el punto de vista tecnológico las herramientas Web 2.0 constituyen un instrumento primordial para implementar dichas comunidades con el fin de mejorar la gestión del conocimiento, la innovación y los resultados en los servicios financieros. En el presente articulo se propone un esquema conceptual basado en la relación de tres ámbitos de investigación, las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación, haciendo un énfasis especial sobre las herramientas Web 2.0, la creación y el intercambio de conocimiento y las comunidades virtuales. Se aportan datos de las tres principales entidades financieras españolas, es decir, Banco Santander, BBVA y CaixaBank. Los resultados obtenidos muestran cómo se crea y comparte conocimiento, a partir de las comunidades virtuales y que posteriormente se adopta en dichas entidades; y que el proceso de creación y compartición de conocimiento influye positivamente en las entidades dado que: acelera el desarrolla e implantación de nuevos productos y servicios financieros, intensifica la innovación de la entidad y mejora las relaciones con los clientes.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagespa-
dc.publisherEdiciones Complutensees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RGID/article/view/82950/4564456561002-
dc.relation/*ref*/Anand, V., Glick, W. H., & Manz, C. C. (2002). Thriving on the knowledge of the outsiders: Tapping organizational social capital. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 87–101.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Annabi, H., McGann, S. T., Pels, S., Arnold, P., & Rivinus, C. (2012). Guidelines to Align Communities of Practice with Business Objectives: An Application of Social Media. In 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3869–3878). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.297-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ardichvili, A., Page, V., & Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310463626-
dc.relation/*ref*/Armstrong, A. G., & Hagel, J. (1996). The real value of online communities. Harvard Business Review, 5(6), 21–28.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Baldwin, C., Hienerth, C., & von Hippel, E. (2006). How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study. Research Policy, 35(9), 1291–1313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.012-
dc.relation/*ref*/Barnatt, C. (1998). Virtual communities and financial services ‐ on‐line business potentials and strategic choice. The International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16(4), 161–169. article. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652329810220710-
dc.relation/*ref*/Barrett, M., Cappleman, S., Shoib, G., & Walsham, G. (2004). Learning in knowledge communities: Managing technology and context. European Management Journal, 22(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2003.11.019-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bartl, M. (2005). Virtuelle Kundenintegration in die Neuproduktentwicklung. Lehrstul Für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Insbesondere Technologie- Und Innovationamanagement, 337.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bechky, B. A. (2003). Sharing meaning across occupational communities: The transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science, 14(3), 312-330+350. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0037495910&partnerID=40&md5=8568fde5e18e4e01abddb4423c1131f9-
dc.relation/*ref*/Beckett, A. (2004). From branches to call centres: new strategic realities in retail banking. The Service Industries Journal, 24(3), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/026420604200024 7759-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bhattacherjee, A., & Sanford, C. (2006). Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 30(4), 805–825.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Boudreau, K. J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2013). Using the crowd as an innovation partner. Harvard Business Review, 91(4), 60–69.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Brazelton, J., & Gorry, G. A. (2003). Creating a knowledge-sharing community: If you build it, will they come? Communications of the ACM, 46(2), 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/606272.606290-
dc.relation/*ref*/Casolaro, L., & Gobbi, G. (2007). Information Technology and Productivity Changes in the Banking Industry. Economic Notes, 36(1), 43–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0300.2007.00178.x-
dc.relation/*ref*/Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35–41. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-3843067488&partnerID=40&md5=8f4103004112f4f7da7b2dcdbcdbbde6-
dc.relation/*ref*/Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M. K. O., & Rabjohn, N. (2008). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth: The adoption of online opinions in online customer communities. Internet Research, 18(3), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662240810883290-
dc.relation/*ref*/Choi, B., & Lee, H. (2003). An empirical investigation of KM styles and their effect on corporate performance. Information & Management, 40(5), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(02)00060-5-
dc.relation/*ref*/Clarke III, I., Flaherty, T. B., Flavian, C., & Guinaliu, M. (2005). Virtual Community. Advances in Electronic Marketing. bookitem. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-321-0.ch015-
dc.relation/*ref*/Corso, M., Giacobbe, A., & Martini, A. (2009). Designing and managing business communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910962888-
dc.relation/*ref*/Cothrel, J. P. (2000). Measuring the success of an online community. Strategy & Leadership, 28(2), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/10878570010341609-
dc.relation/*ref*/Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(3), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270510602809-
dc.relation/*ref*/Davamanirajan, P., Kauffman, R., Kriebel, C., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (2006). Systems Design, Process Performance, and Economic Outcomes in International Banking. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 65–90. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230204-
dc.relation/*ref*/Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Mass.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Dolinska, A., & d’Aquino, P. (2016). Farmers as agents in innovation systems. Empowering farmers for innovation through communities of practice. Agricultural Systems, 142, 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2015.11.009-
dc.relation/*ref*/Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gherardi, S. (2009). Knowing and learning in practicebased studies: an introduction. The Learning Organization, 16(5), 352–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470910974144-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gongla, P., & Rizzuto, C. R. (2001). Evolving communities of practice: IBM Global Services experience. IBM Systems Journal, 40(4), 842–862. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.404.0842-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo BBVA. (2008). Informe de gestión anual BBVA 2008. Bilbao. Retrieved from www.bbva.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo BBVA. (2009). Informe de gestión anual BBVA 2009. Bilbao. Retrieved from www.bbva.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo BBVA. (2010). Informe de gestión anual BBVA 2010. Bilbao. Retrieved from www.bbva.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo BBVA. (2011). Informe de gestión anual BBVA 2011. Bilbao. Retrieved from www.bbva.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo BBVA. (2012). Informe de gestión anual BBVA 2012. Bilbao. Retrieved from www.bbva.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo BBVA. (2013). Informe de gestión anual BBVA 2013. Bilbao. Retrieved from www.bbva.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo BBVA. (2014). Informe de gestión anual BBVA 2014. Bilbao. Retrieved from www.bbva.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo BBVA. (2015). Informe de gestión anual BBVA 2015. Bilbao. Retrieved from www.bbva.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo BBVA. (2016). Informe de gestión anual BBVA 2016. Bilbao. Retrieved from www.bbva.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo BBVA. (2022). Informe de gestión anual BBVA 2022. Bilbao. Retrieved from www.bbva.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo Santander. (2012). Informe de gestión anual Banco Santander 2012. Santander. Retrieved from www.santander.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo Santander. (2014). Informe de gestión anual Banco Santander 2014. Santander. Retrieved from www.santander.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo Santander. (2015). Informe de gestión anual Banco Santander 2015. Santander. Retrieved from www.santander.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Grupo Santander. (2017). Informe de gestión anual Banco Santander 2017. Santander.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hemmasi, M., & Csanda, C. M. (2009). The effectiveness of communities of practice: An empirical study. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(2), 262–279. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-77950239345&partnerID=40&md5=729ee371925410066612f84eb333a15f-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hodgkinson-Williams, C., Slay, H., & Siebörger, I. (2008). Developing communities of practice within and outside higher education institutions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(3), 433–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00841.x-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hoegl, M., & Gemuenden, H. G. (2001). Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects: A Theoretical Concept and Empirical Evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635-
dc.relation/*ref*/Informe anual CaixaBank. (2010). Memoria CaixaBank 2010. Barcelona.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Informe anual CaixaBank. (2012). Memoria CaixaBank 2012. Barcelona.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Informe anual CaixaBank. (2013). Memoria CaixaBank 2013. Barcelona.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Informe anual CaixaBank. (2014). Memoria CaixaBank 2014. Barcelona.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Informe anual CaixaBank. (2015). Memoria CaixaBank 2015. Barcelona.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jeon, S., Kim, Y., & Koh, J. (2011). An integrative model for knowledge sharing in communities‐of‐practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 251–269. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111119682-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jeppesen, L. B., & Molin, M. J. (2003). Consumers as co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(3), 363–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320310001601531-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kannan, P. K., Chang, A.-M., & Whinston, A. B. (2000). Electronic Communities in E-Business: Their Role and Issues. Information Systems Frontiers, 1(4), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010022226639-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kidwell, J. J. (2000). Applying corporate knowledge management practices in higher education. Educause Quarterly, 4(4), 28–33. article.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kim, M., Zimmermann, T., DeLine, R., & Begel, A. (2017). Data scientists in software teams: State of the art and challenges. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 44(11), 1024–1038.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kim, J., Song, J., & Jones, D. R. (2011). The cognitive selection framework for knowledge acquisition strategies in virtual communities. International Journal of Information Management, 31(2), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.05.011-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kirkman, B L, Cordery, J. L., Mathieu, J., Rosen, B., & Kukenberger, M. (2013). Global organizational communities of practice: The effects of nationality diversity, psychological safety, and media richness on community performance. Human Relations, 66(3), 333–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712464076-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kirkman, Bradley L., Mathieu, J. E., Cordery, J. L., Rosen, B., & Kukenberger, M. (2011). Managing a new collaborative entity in business organizations: Understanding organizational communities of practice effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1234–1245. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024198-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kodama, M. (2005). Knowledge creation through networked strategic communities. Case studies on new product development in Japanese companies. Long Range Planning, 38(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2004.11.011-
dc.relation/*ref*/Laine, M. O. J. (2006). Key success factors of virtual communities. Helsinki University of Technology.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lee, H., & Choi, B. (2003). Knowledge management enablers, processes, and organizational performance: An integrative view and empirical examination. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 179–228. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0042429113&partnerID=40&md5=eb4e8d574a39783e5a8e5f82356dda9d-
dc.relation/*ref*/Levy, M. (2009). WEB 2.0 implications on knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management., 13(1), 120–134. article. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910931215-
dc.relation/*ref*/Li, L. C., Grimshaw, J. M., Nielsen, C., Judd, M., Coyte, P. C., & Graham, I. D. (2009). Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 4(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-27-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lindkvist, L. (2005). Knowledge communities and knowledge collectivities: A typology of knowledge work in groups. Journal of Management Studies, 42(6), 1189–1210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00538.x-
dc.relation/*ref*/Markus, M. L., Manville, B., & Agres, C. E. (2001). What makes a virtual organization work? MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(1), 13–26. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84865063291&partnerID=40&md5=9ee867b9a7ab26452e56d3c3097e2413-
dc.relation/*ref*/Martínez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Carayannis, E. G. (2017). On the path towards open innovation: assessing the role of knowledge management capability and environmental dynamism in SMEs. Journal of Knowledge Management., 21(3), 553–570. article. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-09-2016-0403-
dc.relation/*ref*/Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M., & O’Driscoll, T. (2002). Knowledge management in pursuit of performance: Insights from Nortel Networks. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 269–289.-
dc.relation/*ref*/McDermott, R. (1999). Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management. California Management Review, 41(4), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166012-
dc.relation/*ref*/Michaelides, R., & Morton, S. C. (2008). Managing innovation through virtual global communities: Challenges and benefits. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, ICMIT (pp. 1216–1221). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2008.4654543-
dc.relation/*ref*/Nonaka, I. (1994). The dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 96–104.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. The Knowledge-Creating Company.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pisano, G. P., & Verganti, R. (2008). Which kind of collaboration is right for you? Harvard Business Review, 86(12), 78-86+133. Retrieved from https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-57549095935&partnerID=40&md5=b6be57263322112dad1dde55dd2fce62-
dc.relation/*ref*/Planuch-Prats, C., & Salvador-Vallés, R. (2018). Digitalization and knowledge management in financial services. Dyna (Spain), 93(4). https://doi.org/10.6036/8797-
dc.relation/*ref*/Preece, J. (1999). Empathic communities: Balancing emotional and factual communication. Interacting with Computers, 12(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(98)00056-3-
dc.relation/*ref*/Preece, Jenny. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: Determining and measuring success. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(5), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290110084683-
dc.relation/*ref*/Rheingold, H. (1993). The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. (Harper & N. Y. (NY) Perennial Publishers, Eds.).-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ridings, C. M., Gefen, D., & Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11(3–4), 271–295. article. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00021-5-
dc.relation/*ref*/Roberts, J. (2006). Limits to Communities of Practice. Journal of Management Studies, 43(3), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00618.x-
dc.relation/*ref*/Royo‐Vela, M., & Casamassima, P. (2011). The influence of belonging to virtual brand communities on consumers’ affective commitment, satisfaction and word‐of‐mouth advertising. Online Information Review., 35(4), 517–542. article. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521111161918-
dc.relation/*ref*/Scuotto, V. (2017). ICT Adoption for Knowledge Management: Opportunities for SMEs. ICT Adoption for Knowledge Management: Opportunities for SMEs. book.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Scuotto, Veronica, Del Giudice, M., Bresciani, S., & Meissner, D. (2017). Knowledge-driven preferences in informal inbound open innovation modes. An explorative view on small to medium enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management., 21(3), 640–655. article. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0465-
dc.relation/*ref*/Sewell, A.M., Gray, D.I., Blair, H.T., Kemp, P.D., Kenyon, P.R., Morris, S.T., Wood, B. A. (2014). Hatching new ideas about herb pastures: learning together in a community of New Zealand farmers and agricultural scientists. Agricultural Systems, 125, 63–73.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Soto-Acosta, P. (2014). The effect of information overload and disorganisation on intention to purchase online Online. Inf. Rev. book.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tanirvedi, H. (2005). Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multi-business firms. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 309–317.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. London: Atlantic Books.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Thompson, M. (2005). Structural and Epistemic Parameters in Communities of Practice. Organization Science, 16(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0120-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tietz, R., & Herstatt, C. (2007). Virtuelle Communities als ein innovatives Instrument für Unternehmen: Eine explorative Fallstudienanalyse im Hobby- und Freizeitgüterbereich. Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Vinson, C. A. (2013). Fostering’virtual communities of practice’to move cancer control research into practice. The George Washington University.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead Users: An Important Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791–805.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Santoro, G., & Papa, A. (2017). Ambidexterity, external knowledge and performance in knowledge-intensive firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(2), 374–388. article. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9502-7-
dc.relation/*ref*/Walsham, G. (2001). Knowledge Management: European Management Journal, 19(6), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(01)00085-8-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wasko, M. M., & Faraj, S. (2005). Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 29(1), 35–57.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wenger, E. (2004). Knowledge management as a doughnut: Shaping your knowledge strategy through communities of practice. Ivey Business Journal, 68(3), 1–8.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–145.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press. Boston.-
dc.relation/*ref*/West, J., & Lakhani, K. R. (2008). Getting clear about communities in open innovation. Industry and Innovation, 15(2), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710802033734-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wiertz, C., & De Ruyter, K. (2007). Beyond the call of duty: Why customers contribute to firm-hosted commercial online communities. Organization Studies, 28(3), 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076003-
dc.relation/*ref*/Yamazaki, H. (2005). Open collectivism and knowledge communities in Japan. Encyclopedia of Communities of Practice in Information and Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-556-6.ch068-
dc.relation/*ref*/Yamklin, S., & Igel, B. (2012). Communities of Practice Purposefully Designed for Improving Business Performance. Knowledge and Process Management, 19(4), 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1398-
dc.relation/*ref*/Yin, Y., Gurvich, I., McReynolds, S., Seys, D., & Van Mieghem, J. A. (2018). Learning by doing versus learning by viewing: An empirical study of data analyst productivity on a collaborative platform at ebay. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–27.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Yin, K. R. (1984). Case study research. Design and Methods, Sage Publications.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Yoo, D. K., Vonderembse, M. A., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2011). Knowledge quality: Antecedents and consequence in project teams. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(2), 329–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111119727-
dc.relation/*ref*/Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166000-
dc.relation/*ref*/Zboralski, K. (2009). Antecedents of knowledge sharing in communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(3), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270 910962897.-
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 Revista General de Información y Documentaciónes-ES
dc.sourceRevista General de Información y Documentación; Vol. 32 No. 1 (2022); 137-161en-US
dc.sourceRevista General de Información y Documentación; Vol. 32 Núm. 1 (2022); 137-161es-ES
dc.source1988-2858-
dc.source1132-1873-
dc.subjectKnowledge managementen-US
dc.subjectInformation and communication technologiesen-US
dc.subjectfinancial servicesen-US
dc.subjectvirtual communitiesen-US
dc.subjectGestión del conocimientoes-ES
dc.subjectTecnologías de la información y la comunicaciónes-ES
dc.subjectComunidades virtualeses-ES
dc.subjectServicios financieroses-ES
dc.titleContribution of virtual communities to knowledge management in the financial sectoren-US
dc.titleAportación de las comunidades virtuales a la gestión del conocimiento en el sector financieroes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeArtículo revisado por pareses-ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Servicio Documentación Multimedia. Sección Departamental de Biblioteconomía y Documentación. Universidad Complutense de Madrid - SDM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.