Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/184457
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorTorrens Arnal, Míriam-
dc.date2017-11-13-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:47:26Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:47:26Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RASO/article/view/57604-
dc.identifier10.5209/RASO.57604-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/184457-
dc.descriptionThe aim of this article is to focus on the values of justice and equity present in a customary institution of a sekler minority of Transylvania (Romania). The közbirtoksság is composed by family properties, constituting a joint property of pastures and forests. They are inalienable, indivisible and managed by a participatory and direct system. We would like to emphasize that the commons are not isolated institutions of a society, but on the contrary, they keep coherence and synergy with other local institutions and values. They conform a particular pattern of social living. Also, both State agencies and Local administration intervene at different historical conjunctures to the general pattern of evolution of the Commons.en-US
dc.descriptionEste artículo se propone reflexionar sobre los valores de justicia y equidad presentes en una institución consuetudinaria propia de la minoría székely de Transilvania, de habla húngara. El közbirtoksság (literalmente y simplificando: co-propiedad) se compone de propiedades familiares que constituyen un comunal agregado, es decir, una propiedad conjunta de pastos y bosque. Son indivisibles, inalienables y de gestión participativa directa y completa. Nos interesa subrayar que los comunales no son instituciones aisladas de una sociedad, sino que son coherentes con muchas otras instituciones locales y valores de esa misma sociedad y que conforman un modelo de convivencia particular. Veremos que entre el acuerdo y la tensión ocurren varios conflictos de intereses entre sus miembros. Junto a ellos, los intereses del Estado y de la administración local marcan la evolución del conjunto de sus regulaciones a lo largo de la historia.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagespa-
dc.publisherEdiciones Complutensees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RASO/article/view/57604/51882-
dc.relation/*ref*/Acheson, James (2000). “Clearcutting Maine: Implications for the Theory of Common Property Resources”. Human Ecology, 28 (2): 145-169.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Acheson, James (2015). “Private land and common oceans. Analysis of the development of property regimes”. Current Anthropology, 56 (1): 28-55.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Catwright, Andrew (2000a). “Against ‘Decollectivisation’: Land Reform in Romania, 1990- 1992 Perspective”. Working Paper nº4, Halle/Saale: Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Catwright, Andrew (2000b). “State law and the recognitin of property in rural Romania”. Working Paper nº10, Halle/Saale: Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Catwright, Andrew (2003). “Private Farming in Romania: What are the old people going to do with their land?” en Hann, Chris (Ed.), The Postsocialist Agrarian Question. Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology. Münster: Lit Verlag, 171-188.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Catwright, Andrew (2005). “The security of properties in Rumania”, en Hann, Chris (Ed.), Property Relations: the Halle Focus Group, 2000-2005. Halle: Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Creed, Gerald W. (1998). Domesticating Revolution. From Socialist Reform to Ambivalent Transition in a Bulgarian Village. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Devillard, Marie José (1996). “La construcción social de los usos colectivos agrarios”, en-
dc.relation/*ref*/Chamoux, Marie Noëlle y Contreras, Jesús (1996) La gestión comunal de recursos. Barcelona: Icaria.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Dorondel, Stefan (2006). “Common forest, private benefits: access to state and politics in a village in postsocialist Romania”. IASCP Europe Regional Meeting. Building the European Commons: from open fields to open source. Brescia-Italy March 23-25.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Dorondel, Stefan (2009). “‘They should be killed’ Forest restitution, ethnic groups and patronage in postsocialist Romania”, en Fay, Derick; James, Deborah (Eds.) The Rights and Wrongs of Land Restitution. New York: Routledge, 43-65.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Dragos, Paul; Dabu, Adina (2003). “Land Reform and Agricultural Reform Policies in Romania’s Transition to the Market Economy”. Eastern European Economics, 41 (5): 49-69.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Foster, George, M. (1965). “Peasant Society and the Image of Limited Good”. American Anthropologist, 67 (2): 293-315.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Garda; Birtalan; Ráduly; Tamás (2000). Tájékoztató és Gyakorlati Útmutató. Sepsiszentgyörgy: T3 Info Kiadó-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gluckman, Max (1959). “The technical vocabulary of Barotse”. American Anthropologist, 61 (5): 743-759.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hann, Chris (2005). “Main theme: Property, Neoliberalism and Rural Privatization” en Chris Hann (Ed.), Property Relations: the Halle Focus Group, 2000-2005. Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Halle/Saale.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hann, Chris (Ed.) (2003). The Postsocialist Agrarian Question. Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, Münster: Lit Verlag.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hann, Chris (2006). Not the horse we wanted! Postsocialism, neoliberalism, and Euroasia, Münster: Lit Verlag.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kaneff, Deema (2000). “Property, Work and local identity”. Working Paper nº15, Halle/ Saale: Max Planck Institute for Social Antropology.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kideckel, David A. (1993). The Solitude of Collectivism. Romanian Villagers to the Revolution and Beyond. New York: Cornell University.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kligman, Gail; Verdery, Katherine (2011). Peasants under siege. Princeton: Princeton University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lévi-Strauss, Claude (1969). Las estructuras elementales del parentesco. Barcelona: Paidós.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Maine, Henry (1965 [1861]). Ancient Law, London: Dent.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Măntescu; Vasile (2009). “Property reforms in rural Romania and community-based forest”. Romanian Sociology (Sociologie Romaneasca), 7 (2): 95-113.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Măntescu, Liviu (2009). “When Globalization meets Postsocialism. Community-based institutions of timber market in Romania”. Presentado en el seminario de la facultad de economía de la Universidad de Navarra.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mitrany, David (1930). The Land and the peasant in Rumania: the war and the agrarian reform, 1917-1921. London: Oxford University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Montagut, Xavier; Dogliotti, Fabrizio (2008). Alimentos Globalizados. Icaria: Barcelona.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Roşculet, Gheorghe (2010). “The compossessorates in Olt County”. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, 3 (52): 57-62.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Roşculet, Gheorghe (2011). “The forest code of 1910 applied to the forests belonging to the compossessorates and the rural communities”. Bulletin of the Transilvania Univerity of Braşov, 4 (53) No.2: 147-155.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Sutcliffe, Laura et al. (2013). “Pastoral commons use in Romania and the role of the Common Agricultural Policy”. International Journal of the Commons, 7 (I): 58-72.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Scott, James (1976). The Moral Economy of the Peasant. Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Torsello, Davide (2003). Trust, Property and Social Change in a Southern Slovakian Village. Münster: Lit Verlag.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Torrens, Míriam (2006). “Individuo, familia y comunidad. Un estudio de caso en Transilvania”. Perifèria, 4: 1-22.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Torrens, Míriam (2013). Pagesos del Post-socialisme. Un estudi de comunitat a Transilvània. Tesis doctoral. Departamento de Antropología Social y Cultural. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Vasile, Monica (2007). “Decentralization as an aid to enhancing corruption in Romanian forest”. Conference of American Anthropological Association in November 2007, Washington DC.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Vasile, Monica (2009). “Corruption in Romanian forestry-morality and local practice in the context of privatization”. Revista Română de Sociologie, serie nouă, anul XX, nº1-2: 105-120.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Verdery, Katherine (2001). “Inequality as temporal process. Property and time in Transylvanian’s land restitution”. Anthropological Theory, 1: 373-392.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Verdery, Katherine (2003). The Vanishing Hectare. Property and value in postsocialist transylvania. New York: Cornell University.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Vinogradoff, Paul (1913). Common sense in law. London: Williams-
dc.relation/*ref*/Von Benda-Beckmann, Franz; Von Benda-Beckmann Keebet; Melanie G. Wiber (2006). “The properties of property” en Von Benda-Beckmann Franz and Von Benda-Beckmann Keebet; Melanie G. Wiber (Eds.), Changing Properties of Property. Oxford-New York: Berghahn books: 1-39.-
dc.sourceRevista de Antropología Social; Vol. 26 Núm. 2 (2017): La Antropología y los comunes. Una aproximación crítica a las formas de apropiación; 217-234es-ES
dc.source1988-2831-
dc.source1131-558X-
dc.subjectCommonsen-US
dc.subjectSzékelyen-US
dc.subjectKözbirtoksságen-US
dc.subjectProperty relations.en-US
dc.subjectComunaleses-ES
dc.subjectSzékelyes-ES
dc.subjectKözbirtoksságes-ES
dc.subjectRelaciones de Propiedad.es-ES
dc.titleCommunal goods. Possessions and family properties with public responsibilities in Romaniaen-US
dc.titleEn torno a los bienes comunales. Posesiones y propiedades familiares con responsabilidades públicas en Rumaníaes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.