Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/183566Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Pfeiffer, Sabine | - |
| dc.creator | Lee, Horan | - |
| dc.creator | Held, Maximilian | - |
| dc.date | 2019-10-15 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:43:07Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:43:07Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CRLA/article/view/66039 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/crla.66039 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/183566 | - |
| dc.description | Industry 4.0 features a cluster of diverse technologies. Implementing these in the enterprise will require a considerable amount of participation. Current forms of participatory design (Agile methods, design thinking, open innovation) more closely involve customers, but not generally the company’s own production workers. We investigate if and how the production engineers who will implement Industry 4.0 want to involve their colleagues on the shop floor. We present results of qualitative interviews, a quantitative survey and Q-sorts conducted with around 230 engineering employees of an automotive plant. Participating engineers were invited to express their viewpoints, experiences and visions on how production workers could be involved in the implementation of Industry 4.0. On the one hand, the data suggest positive attitudes towards, and experiences of participation. On the other hand, participation is demanding: respondents report a lack of time and opportunities. It may require more imagination and initiative to break through existing formal processes often restricted to “catch-up” improvements. | en-US |
| dc.description | La Industria 4.0 incorpora un grupo de tecnologías diversas. Implantarlas en las empresas requerirá una amplia participación. Las actuales formas de diseño participativo (métodos ‘Agile’, Design Thinking, innovación abierta…) suelen implicar más a los clientes pero no a los trabajadores de producción de las compañías. Los autores han investigado si la ingeniería de producción que implanta la Industria 4.0 quiere involucrar a sus colegas del taller y, en su caso, cómo lo harán. Se presentan resultados de entrevistas cualitativas, de una encuesta cuantitativa y de ordenamientos a partir del método Q de encuestas, realizados a alrededor de 230 empleados de ingeniería de una planta de automoción. Se invitó a los ingenieros que han participado a que expresaran sus puntos de vista, sus experiencias y visiones sobre cómo los trabajadores de producción podrían ser involucrados en la implantación de la Industria 4.0. Por un lado, los datos sugieren una actitud positiva hacia las experiencias de participación. Por otro lado, la participación es muy exigente: los entrevistados señalan una falta de tiempo y de oportunidades para desarrollarla. Requerirá más imaginación e iniciativa para romper con los procesos formales, a menudo limitados a ir alcanzado simples mejoras productivas. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Ediciones Complutense | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CRLA/article/view/66039/4564456552274 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Asdonk, J., Bredeweg, U. and Kowol, U. (1993). Innovation, Organisation und Facharbeit: Rahmenbedingungen und Perspektiven betrieblicher Technikentwicklung. Bielefeld: USP. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bieber, D. (Ed.). (1997). Technikentwicklung und Industriearbeit: Industrielle Produktionstechnik zwischen Eigendynamik und Nutzerinteressen. Frankfurt/M.: Campus. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Böhle, F. (1994). “Relevance of experience-based work in modern processes”. AI & Society. 8 (3): 207–215. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Böhle, F. and Huchler, N. (2017). “Cyber-Physical Systems and Human Action. A redefinition of distributed agency between humans and technology, using the example of explicit and implicit knowledge”. In S. Houbing, D. B. Rawat, S. Jeschke and C. Brecher (Eds.), Cyber-Physical Systems: Foundations, Principles, and Applications (pp. 115–127). Amsterdam: Elsevier, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803801-7.00008-0 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Böhle, F. and Milkau, B. (1988). “Computerised Manufacturing and Empirical Knowledge”. AI & Society, 2 (3): 235–243. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Boulos-Rødje, N., Ellingsen, G., Bratteteig, T., Aanestad, M. and Bjørn, P. (Eds.). (2015). ECSW 2015: Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 19–23 September 2015, Oslo Norway. Heidelberg: Springer. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Brown, S. R. (1980). Political Subjectivity – Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Funken, C. (1994). “Das Bild des Entwicklers vom Benutzer: eine Problemskizze”. In E. Fricke (Ed.), Zur Zukunftsorientierung von Ingenieuren und Naturwissenschaftlern (pp. 75–92). Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Georg, A., Katenkamp, O., Guhlemann, K. and Dechmann, U. (2017). “Digitalisierungsprozesse und das Handeln von Betriebsräten“. Arbeit - Zeitschrift für Arbeitsforschung, 26 (2): 1–24. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Glorfeld, L. W. (1995). “An Improvement on Horn’s Parallel Analysis Methodology for Selecting the Correct Number of Factors to Retain”. Educational Psychological Measurement, 55 (3): 377–393, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055003002 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hayward, P. and Candy, S. (2017). “The Polak Game, or: Where Do You Stand?” Journal of Futures Studies, 22 (2): 5–14, DOI: https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.2017.22(2).A5 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Heinz, J. and Jochum, G. (2014). “The emergence and development of the German dual vocational system: Between crises and praises”. Ammatillista Opettajankoulutusta (Vocational Teacher Education), 16 (4): 9–27. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Held, M. (2017). “Pensieve: An R Package for the Scientific Study of Human Subjectivity”. Retrieved from https://github.com/maxheld83/pensieve | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Horn, J. L. (1965). “A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis”. Psychometrica, 30 (2): 179–185. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/IG Metall. (2013). Arbeit: sicher und fair! Die Befragung. Frankfurt/M.: IG Metall. Retrieved from http://www.igmetall.de/internet/docs_13_6_18_Ergebnis_Befragung_final_51c49e134f92b4922b442d7ee4a00465d8c15626.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kagermann, H., Wahlster, W. and Helbig, J. (2013). Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0. Final report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group. Frankfurt/M.: Acatech. Retrieved from http://www.acatech.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Baumstruktur_nach_Website/Acatech/root/de/Material_fuer_Sonderseiten/Industrie_4.0/Final_report__Industrie_4.0_accessible.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lingitz, L. and Hold, P. (2015). “Integration von Lösungskompetenz operativer Mitarbeiter des Shop-Floors in die Produktionsplanung und -steuerung”. In W. Kersten, H. Koller and H. Lödding (Eds.), Industrie 4.0: wie intelligente Vernetzung und kognitive Systeme unsere Arbeit verändern. Berlin: Gito. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Manske, F. (1995). Kooperation von Ingenieuren und Facharbeitern: das Beispiel BPK. In E. Fricke (Ed.), Betrieblicher Wandel und Autonomie von Ingenieuren (pp. 51–63). Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mayring, P. (2007). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Müller, F. H. and Kals, E. (2004). “Die Q-Methode. Ein innovatives Verfahren zur Erhebung subjektiver Einstellungen und Meinungen”. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 5 (2): Art. 34. Retrieved from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/600/1301 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. and Mulgan, G. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation. London: Nestager. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Nicklich, M. and Fortwengel, J. (2017). Explaining the puzzling stagnation of apprenticeships in Germany’s security services: A case of insufficient institutional work? Journal of Professions and Organization, 4 (3): 302–323, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jox008 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Patton, J. (2015). User Story Mapping: Die Technik für besseres Nutzerverständnis in der agilen Produktentwicklung. Heidelberg: O’Reilly. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pfeiffer, S. (2014). “Digital Labour and the Use-value of Human Work. On the Importance of Labouring Capacity for understanding Digital Capitalism”. TripleC. Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12 (2): 599–619. Retrieved from http://www.triple-c.at/index.php/tripleC/article/view/545/610 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pfeiffer, S. (2016). “Robots, Industry 4.0 and Humans, or Why Assembly Work Is More than Routine Work”. Societies, 6 (2), 1–26, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc6020016 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pfeiffer, S. (2017). “The Vision of ‘Industrie 4.0’ in the Making—a Case of Future Told, Tamed, and Traded”. Nanoethics, 11 (1): 107–121, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0280-3 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pfeiffer, S. and Suphan, A. (2015). The Labouring Capacity Index: Living Labouring Capacity and Experience as Resources on the Road to Industry 4.0. Stuttgart: University of Hohenheim. Retrieved from http://www.sabine-pfeiffer.de/files/downloads/2015-Pfeiffer-Suphan-EN.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pfeiffer, S., Schütt, P. and Wühr, D. (2010). „Standardization of Production and Development Processes – Blessing or Curse?” in: Grubbström, R.W. and Hinterhuber, H. (Eds.), Sixteenth International Working Seminar on Production Economics (pp. 411–422), Innsbruck. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Polak, F. L. (1973). The Image of the Future. Amsterdam: Elsevier. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/R Core Team. (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/ | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rasmus, D. W. (2011). Management by Design: Applying Design Principles to the Work Experience. Hobokenko: Wiley. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (Eds.) (2010). Handbook of Action Research: Concise Paperback Edition. Thousands Oaks: Sage. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Schmiedgen, J. (2011). Innovating User Value. The Interrelations of Business Model Innovation, Design (Thinking) and the Production of Meaning – A Status-quo of the Current State of Research. Friedrichshafen: Zeppelin University. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Steedman, H. (2014). Overview of Apprenticeship Systems and Issues. ILO contribution to the G20 Task Force on Employment. Geneva/CH: International Labour Organization. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis – Understanding Concepts and Applications. Washington D.C.: American Sociological Association. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Will-Zocholl, M. (2017). “New Topologies of Work: Informatisation, Virtualisation and Globalisation in Automotive Engineering”. In Flecker, J. (Ed.) Space, Place and Global Digital Work (pp.31–51) London: Palgrave Macmillan. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wittke, V. and Hanekop, H. (Eds.) (2011). New Forms of Collaborative Innovation and Production on the Internet. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wolf, H. (2012). “Akademiker und Nicht-Akademiker im Wissenskapitalismus: betriebliche Kooperations- und Interessenkonstellationen”. In E. Kuda (Ed.), Akademisierung der Arbeitswelt? Zur Zukunft der beruflichen Bildung (pp. 52–67). Hamburg: VSA. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wühr, D., Pfeiffer, S., and Schütt, P. (2015). Participatory research on innovation – Methodological approaches to challenges in the field and practical experiences. IJAR International Journal of Action Research 11 (1–2): 95–118, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1688/IJAR-2015-01-Wuehr | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Zysman, J. and Kenney, M. (2017). The Next Phase in the Digital Revolution: Platforms, Automation, Growth, and Employment. Berkeley, CA: University of California. Retrieved from http://www.brie.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/CACM-Final-Submission-4-Distribution-1-1.pdf | - |
| dc.source | Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales; Vol. 37 No. 2 (2019): Monographic: Digitalization, robotization, work and life; 293-311 | en-US |
| dc.source | Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales; Vol. 37 Núm. 2 (2019): Monográfico: Digitalización, robotización, trabajo y vida; 293-311 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 1988-2572 | - |
| dc.source | 1131-8635 | - |
| dc.subject | Participation | en-US |
| dc.subject | engineering | en-US |
| dc.subject | innovation | en-US |
| dc.subject | Industry 4.0. | en-US |
| dc.subject | participación | es-ES |
| dc.subject | ingeniería | es-ES |
| dc.subject | innovación | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Industria 4.0 | es-ES |
| dc.title | Doing Industry 4.0 – participatory design on the shop floor in the view of engineering employees | en-US |
| dc.title | Doing Industry 4.0 – participatory design on the shop floor in the view of engineering employees | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| dc.type | Artículo revisado por pares | es-ES |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.