Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181720
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorMiller, Henry-
dc.date2021-12-14-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:37:16Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:37:16Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/79990-
dc.identifier10.18042/hp.46.06-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181720-
dc.descriptionAccounts of mass petitioning in Britain have generally focused on the deployment of petitions within progressive, reformist or liberal campaigns. Classic examples include anti-slavery, radicalism, Chartism, free trade, and women’s suffrage. Yet the new forms of mass collective petitioning that emerged in the late eighteenth century are best regarded as neutral technologies. Many of the largest petitions of the nineteenth century came from conservative, tory, loyalist, anti-reform or reactionary campaigns. The defence of the established churches consistently mobilised tens of thousands of petitions, and millions of signatures, as did opposition to granting rights to Catholics and Dissenters. To give another example, protectionist interests resisted free trade. These campaigns reveal that conservative petitioning was generally reactive, responding to proposed changes. In addition, the practice of petitioning within such movements made greater use of established bodies, such as clergy and the church, and was rather slower to develop new forms of association and adopt the new modes of mass petitioning than their opponents. For example, conservatives continued to emphasise the respectability and quality of signatures and petitioners, even after numbers had become increasingly important in the public debates over petitions on key issues. The use of petitioning was also significant in maintaining conservative identity. Overall, the engagement of conservatives shows how they adapted, if not to democracy, then to popular politics in the nineteenth century.en-US
dc.descriptionEl estudio de las peticiones colectivas en el Reino Unido se ha centrado por lo general en campañas progresistas, reformistas o liberales, y movimientos tales como el antiesclavismo, el radicalismo, el cartismo, el libre comercio o el sufragio femenino. Sin embargo, sería mejor considerar las nuevas formas de petición colectiva surgidas a finales del siglo xviii como tecnologías neutrales. Algunas de las mayores peticiones del siglo xix resultaron de campañas tory, conservadoras, lealistas o reaccionarias. La defensa de las iglesias protestantes oficiales de Inglaterra, Irlanda, Escocia y Gales movilizó millones de firmas, al igual que la oposición a que se otorgaran derechos a los disidentes católicos y protestantes. Los intereses proteccionistas, a su vez, se opusieron al libre comercio. En contraste con las reformistas, estas campañas eran, por lo general, reactivas, y respondían a propuestas de cambio de sus adversarios. Hicieron estas también un mayor uso, en su práctica peticionaria, de redes preexistentes del clero y la Iglesia, y tardaron algo más que sus adversarios en adoptar nuevas formas de asociacionismo y nuevas formas de petición colectiva. Por ejemplo, los conservadores siguieron haciendo hincapié en la respetabilidad y la calidad de los firmantes en vez de la cantidad, por más que los números tuvieran una importancia cada vez mayor en los debates públicos. El uso de las peticiones también mantuvo la identidad conservadora. En general, las peticiones de los conservadores muestran de qué manera estos, si no a la democracia, sí se adaptaron a la política popular del siglo XIX.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.formattext/html-
dc.formatapplication/xml-
dc.languagespa-
dc.publisherCentro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionaleses-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/79990/4564456559606-
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/79990/4564456559609-
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/79990/4564456559611-
dc.relation/*ref*/Agnès, B. (2013). A Chartist Singularity? Mobilizing to Promote Democratic Petitions in Britain and France, 1838-1848. Labour History Review, 78 (1), 51-66. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.3828/lhr.2013.4.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Barbary, V. (2008). Reinterpreting «Factory Politics» in Bury, Lancashire, 1868-1880. Historical Journal, 51 (1), 115-144. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X07006607.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bateman, J. (1879). The Great Landowners of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Harrison.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Blake, R. (1985). The Conservative Party from Peel to Thatcher. London: Fontana.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Blaxill, L. (2020). The War of Words: The Language of British Elections, 1880-1914. Woodbridge: Boydell; Royal Historical Society. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/-
dc.relation/*ref*/Carpenter, D. (2016). Recruitment by Petition: American Antislavery, French Protestantism, English Suppression. Perspectives on Politics, 14 (3), 700-723. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592716001134.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Carpenter, D. y Brossard, D. (2019). L’éruption patriote: The Revolt against Dalhousie and the Petitioning Explosion in Nineteenth-Century French Canada. Social Science History, 43 (3), 453-485. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2019.23.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Carpenter, D. y Moore, C. D. (2014). When Canvassers Became Activists: Antislavery Petitioning and the Mobilization of American Women. American Political Science Review, 108 (3), 479-498. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541400029X.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Carpenter, D. y Schneer, B. (2015). Party Formation through Petitions: The whigs and the Bank War of 1832-1834. Studies in American Political Development, 29 (2), 213-234. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X15000073.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Carpenter, D., Popp, Z., Resch, T., Schneer, B. y Topich, N. (2018). Suffrage Petitioning as Formative Practice: American Women Presage and Prepare for the Vote, 1840-1940. Studies in American Political Development, 32 (1), 24-48. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X18000032.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Chase, M. (2019). What Did Chartism Petition For? Mass Petitions in the British Movement for Democracy. Social Science History, 43 (3), 531-551. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2019.20.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Cragoe, M. (2008). The Great Reform Act and the Modernization of British Politics: The Impact of Conservative Associations, 1835-1841. Journal of British Studies, 47 (3), 581-603. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1086/587723.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Daunton, M. (2001). Trusting Leviathan: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1799-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Dumas, P. (2016). Proslavery Britain: Fighting for Slavery in an Era of Abolition. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137558589.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ellens, J. (1994). Religious Routes to Gladstonian Liberalism: The Church Rate Conflict in England and Wales, 1852-1868. University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271072593.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gleadle, K. (2007). Charlotte Elizabeth Tonna and the Mobilization of tory Women in Early Victorian England. Historical Journal, 50 (1), 97-117. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X06005930.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Griffin, B. (2012). Politics of Gender in Victorian Britain: Masculinity, Political Culture and the Struggle for Women’s Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139057530.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gurney, P. (2014). The Democratic Idiom: Languages of Democracy in the Chartist Movement. Journal of Modern History, 86 (3), 566-602. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1086/-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gutzke, D. (1989). Protecting the Pub: Brewers and Publicans against Temperance. Woodbridge: Boydell; Royal Historical Society.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hall, C., McClelland, K. y Rendall, J. (2000). Defining the Victorian Nation: Class, Race and Gender and the British Reform Act of 1867. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Harling, P. (1995). The Waning of «Old Corruption»: The Politics of Economical Reform in Britain, 1779-1846. Oxford: Clarendon Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Harrison, B. (1978). Separate Spheres: The Opposition to Women’s Suffrage in Britain. Londres: Croom Helm.-
dc.relation/*ref*/. Drink and the Victorians: The Temperance Question in England, 1815-1872. Keele: Keele University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Huzzey, R. (2019). A Micro History of British Antislavery Petitioning. Social Science History, 43 (3), 599-623. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2019.19.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Huzzey, R. y Miller, H. (2020). Petitions, Parliament and Political Culture: Petitioning the House of Commons, 1780-1918. Past and Present, 248, 123-164. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtz061.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Huzzey, R. y Miller, H. (2021). The Politics of Petitioning: Parliament, Government and Subscriptional Cultures in Britain, 1780-1918. History, 106 (370), 221-243. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-229X.13103.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Innes, J., Philp, M. y Saunders, R. (2013). The Rise of Democratic Discourse in the Reform Era: Britain in the 1830s and 1840s. En J. Innes y M. Philp (eds). Re-imagining Democracy in the Age of Revolutions: America, France, Britain, Ireland, 1750-1850 (pp. 114-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199669158.003.0009.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Janse, M. (2019). «What Value Should We Attach to All These Petitions?». Petition Campaigns and the Problem of Legitimacy in the Nineteenth-Century Netherlands. Social Science History, 43 (3), 509-530. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2019.18.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jenkins, T. (1994). The Liberal Ascendancy, 1830-1886. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23483-7.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jones, A. (1972). The Politics of Reform, 1884. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jones, E. (2017). Edmund Burke and the Invention of Modern Conservatism, 1830-1914: An Intellectual History. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198799429.001.0001.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lawrence, J. (1993). Class and Gender in the Making of Urban toryism, 1880-1914. English Historical Review, 108 (428), 629-652. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/CVIII.428.629.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Marsh, P. T. (1978). The Discipline of Popular Government: Lord Salisbury’s Domestic Statecraft, 1881-1902. Hassocks: Harvester Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Midgley, C. (1992). Women Against Slavery: The British Campaigns, 1780-1870. London: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Miller, H. (2012). Popular Petitioning and the Corn Laws, 1833-1846. English Historical Review, 127 (527), 882-919. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/ces073.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Miller, H. (2017). Petition! Petition!! Petition!!!: Petitioning and Political Organization in Britain, c. 1800-1850. En H. Te Velde y M. Janse (eds). Organizing Democracy: Reflections on the Rise of Political Organizations in the Nineteenth Century (pp. 43-61). Basingstoke: Palgrave. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50020-1_3.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Miller, H. (2019). Introduction: The Transformation of Petitioning in the Long Nineteenth Century (1780-1914). Social Science History, 43 (3), 409-429. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2019.24.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Miller, H. (2021). The British Women’s Suffrage Movement and the Practice of Petitioning, 1890-1914. The Historical Journal, 64 (2), 332-356. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X20000035.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Neuheiser, J. (2016). Crown, Church and Constitution: Popular Conservatism in England, 1815-1867. New York: Berghahn. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvpj7j7n.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Palacios Cerezales, D. (2019). Re-imagining Petitioning in Spain (1808-1823). Social Science History, 43 (3), 487-508. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/ssh.2019.21.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Parry, J. (1993). The Rise and Fall of Liberal Government in Victorian Britain, 1830-1886. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Paz, D. (1992). Popular Anti-Catholicism in Mid-Victorian England. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Philp, M. (1995). Vulgar Conservatism, 1792-3. English Historical Review, 110 (435), 42-69. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/ehr/CX.435.42.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pickering, P. (2001). «And Your Petitioners, &c.» Chartist Petitioning in Popular Politics, 1838-1848. English Historical Review, 116 (466), 368-388. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/enghis/116.466.368.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pinabarsi, S. (2020). Manchester Antislavery, 1792-1807. Slavery and Abolition, 41 (2), 349-376. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1080/0144039X.2019.1614324.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Prochaska, F. (2012). Eminent Victorians on American Democracy: The View from Albion. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640614.001.0001.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pugh, M. (2000). The March of the Women: A Revisionist Analysis of the Campaign for Women’s Suffrage, 1866-1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Roberts, M. (2006). «Villa toryism» and Popular Conservatism in Leeds, 1885-1902. Historical Journal, 49 (1), 217-46. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S001824 X05005108.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Salmon, P. (2002). Electoral Reform at Work: Local Politics and National Parties, 1832-1841. Woodbridge: Boydell; Royal Historical Society.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Saunders, R. (2011). Democracy and the Vote in British Politics, 1848-1867: The Making of the Second Reform Act. Farnham: Ashgate.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Saunders, R (2013). Democracy. En D. Craig y J. Thompson (eds). Languages of Politics in Nineteenth-Century Britain (pp. 142-167). Basingstoke: Palgrave. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137312891_7.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Saward, M. (2010). The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Shannon, R. T. (1992). The Age of Disraeli, 1868-1881. London: Longman.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Shannon, R. T. (1996). The Age of Salisbury, 1881-1902. London: Longman.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Stewart, R. (1978). The Foundation of the Conservative Party, 1830-1867. London: Longman.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Thackeray, D. (2013). Conservatism for the Democratic Age: Conservative Cultures and the Challenge of Mass Politics in Early Twentieth-Century England. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9780719087615. 0001.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Thelwell, A. S. (1845). Proceedings of the Anti-Maynooth Conference of 1845. London: Seeley; Burnside and Seeley.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tilly, C. (1995). Popular Contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Vallance, E. (2019). Loyalty, Memory and Public Opinion in England, 1658-1727. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526117908.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wilton, C. (2000). Popular Politics and Political Culture in Upper Canada, 1800-1850. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Windscheffel, A. (2007). Popular Conservatism in Imperial London, 1868-1906. London: British Academy.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Yonge, C. D. (1868). The Life and Administration of the Second Earl of Liverpool (3 vols.). London: Macmillan.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Zaeske, S. (2003). Signatures of Citizenship: Petitioning, Antislavery and Women’s Political Identity. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press.-
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 Historia y Políticaes-ES
dc.sourceHistoria y Política; Vol. 46 (2021): Politización y movilización social antes del sufragio universal masculino; 149-174en-US
dc.sourceHistoria y Política; Vol. 46 (2021): Politización y movilización social antes del sufragio universal masculino; 149-174es-ES
dc.source1989-063X-
dc.source1575-0361-
dc.subjectGreat Britainen-US
dc.subject19th centuryen-US
dc.subjectpetitioningen-US
dc.subjectpopular politicsen-US
dc.subjectconservative mobilisationen-US
dc.subjectGran Bretañaes-ES
dc.subjectsiglo XIXes-ES
dc.subjectpeticioneses-ES
dc.subjectpolítica populares-ES
dc.subjectmovilización conservadoraes-ES
dc.titleSignatures of conservatism: Petitioning, popular politics and campaigns against reform in Britain, 1780-1918en-US
dc.titleFirmas del conservadurismo: peticiones, política popular y campañas contra las reformas en Gran Bretaña, 1780-1918es-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.