Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181699Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Stanciu, Cezar | - |
| dc.date | 2021-06-15 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:37:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:37:14Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/76594 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.18042/hp.45.08 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181699 | - |
| dc.description | The CSCE process was regarded by the Soviet Union as an opportunity to settle unresolved issues of the Second World War such as the recognition of its Western borders as victorious power. Romania too saw the conference as an opportunity but in another sense: to put an end to a world of victors and losers replacing it with the equality of all states. Moscow’s status as victor was the source of its hegemony in Eastern Europe, as the regime in Bucharest understood it, which is why challenging the relations and bipolarity originating from the war was Romania’s primary aim. As the regime in Bucharest claimed to pursue an independent course towards Communism and refused subordination to Moscow, Romania had reasons to presume that its security was threatened by the Soviet Union. This article explores Romania’s approach to the CSCE, the ideas it advanced and the rhetoric it used trying to undermine the bipolarity and hegemony which placed the country in the Soviet sphere of influence and explained the Brezhnev doctrine. Undermining the principles which offered Moscow such power and also promoting instruments (both legal and institutional) to limit superpower domination, Romania hoped to secure its independence and gain protection against the Soviets. | en-US |
| dc.description | La Unión Soviética consideró el proceso de la CSCE una oportunidad para resolver problemas que pendientes tras la Segunda Guerra Mundial; por ejemplo, el reconocimiento de sus fronteras occidentales como potencia victoriosa. Rumania también vio la conferencia como una oportunidad, pero en otro sentido: el de poner fin a un mundo de vencedores y perdedores, reemplazándolo por la igualdad de todos los Estados. El régimen de Bucarest entendía que el estatus de Moscú como vencedor era la fuente de su hegemonía en Europa del Este y por eso su objetivo principal fue desafiar las relaciones y la bipolaridad originadas en la guerra. Debido a su intento de seguir su propia vía hacia el comunismo y no subordinarse a Moscú, Rumania tenía razones para creer que su seguridad estaba amenazada por la Unión Soviética. Este artículo explora el enfoque rumano de la CSCE: las ideas que propuso y la retórica que utilizó para tratar de socavar la bipolaridad y la hegemonía que colocó al país en la esfera de influencia soviética y explicó la doctrina Brezhnev. Rumanía esperaba asegurar su independencia y obtener protección frente a los soviéticos minando los principios de los que procedía el poder de Moscú y promoviendo instrumentos (tanto legales como institucionales) para limitar el dominio de las superpotencias. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format | text/html | - |
| dc.format | application/xml | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/76594/4564456557516 | - |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/76594/4564456557517 | - |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/HPOL/article/view/76594/4564456557518 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Békés, C. (2008). The Warsaw Pact, the German Question and the Birth of the CSCE Process, 1961-1970. In O. Bange and G. Niedhart (eds.). Helsinki 1975 and the Trans¬formation of Europe (pp. 113-128). New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bloed, A. (ed.) (1993). The Conference on Security and Co-Operation in Europe: Analysis and Basic Documents, 1972-1993. London: Kluwer. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cary, N. (2000). Reassessing Germany’s Ostpolitik. Part 2: From Refreeze to Reunification. Central European History, 33, 369-390. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/156916100746374. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Davy, R. (2009). Helsinki myths: setting the record straight on the Final Act of the CSCE, 1975. Cold War History, 9, 1-22. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14682740802490380. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Deletant, D. (2008). Romania’s return to Europe. Between politics and culture. In R. Detrez and B. Segaert (eds.). Europe and the historical legacies in the Balkans (pp. 83-98). Brus¬sels: Peter Lang. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dimitrakopoulos, D. (2010). Introduction. Social-democracy, European integration and preference formation. En D. Dimitrakopoulos (ed.). Social Democracy and European Integration: The politics of preference formation. Abingdon: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203845349. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dragomir, E. (2012). The perceived threat of hegemonism in Romania during the second détente. Cold War History, 12, 111-134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2010.510837. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dragomir, E. (2014). Cold War Perceptions. Romania’s policy change towards the Soviet Union, 1960-1964. Helsinki: Helsinki University Printing House. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Fry, J. (1993). The Helsinki Process: Negotiating Security and Cooperation in Europe. Washin¬gton DC: National Defense University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA276654. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/González Aldea, P. (2008). Helsinki 1975. Începutul sfârșitului. București: Curtea Veche. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ham, P. van (1995). The EC, Eastern Europe and European Unity: Discord, Collaboration and Integration Since 1947. London: Pinter. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hanhimäki, J. (2003). “They can write it in Swahili”: Kissinger, the Soviets, and the Helsinki accords, 1973-75. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 1, 37-58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14794010308656791. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hanhimäki, J. (2010). Détente in Europe, 1962-1975. En M. Leffler and O. A. Westad (eds.). Cambridge History of the Cold War, vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521837200.011. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Heraclides, A. (2014). Security and Co-operation in Europe: The Human Dimension 1972-1992. Abingdon: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315035840. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Jarzabek, W. (2008). Hope and Reality: Poland and the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe, 1964-1989. Working Paper, 65. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Inter¬national Center for Scholars. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ludlow, P. (2010). European integration and the Cold War. In M. Leffler and O. A. Westad (eds.). Cambridge History of the Cold War, vol. II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521837200.010. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Miklóssy, K. (2011). Khrushchevism after Khrushchev: the rise of national interest in the Soviet bloc. In J. Smith and M. Ilic (eds.). Khrushchev in the Kremlin: Policy and Gover¬nment in the Soviet Union, 1953-64 (pp. 150-170). Abingdon: Routledge. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Morgan, M. C. (2020). The Final Act: The Helsinki Accords and the Transformation of the Cold War. Princeton: Princeton University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pechlivanis, P. (2017). Between Détente and Differentiation: Nixon’s visit to Bucharest in August 1969. Cold War History, 17, 241-258. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2016.1267144. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Petrescu, D. (2009). Building the nation, instrumentalizing nationalism: revisiting Roma¬nian National Communism, 1956-1989. Nationalities Papers, 37, 523-544. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00905990902985728. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Radchenko, S. (2009). Two Suns in the Heavens: The Sino-Soviet Struggle for Supremacy, 1962-1967. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4000/chinaperspectives.4954. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rey, M. P. (2008). The USSR and the Helsinki process, 1969-1975: optimism, doubt or defiance? In A. Wenger, V. Mastny and C. Nuenlist (eds.). Origins of the European Security System: The Helsinki Process Revisited, 1965-75 (pp. 65-82). Abingdon: Rout¬ledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895306.ch4. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Romano, A. (2009). From Détente in Europe to European Détente: How the West Shaped the Helsinki CSCE. Brussels: Peter Lang. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sarotte, M. E. (2008). The Frailties of Grand Strategies: A Comparison of Détente and Ostpolitik. In F. Logevall and A. Preston (eds.). Nixon in the World. American Foreign Relations, 1969-1977 (pp. 146-163). Oxford: Oxford University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Soutou, G. H. (2007). The linkage between European integration and detente. The contras¬ting approaches of de Gaulle and Pompidou, 1965-1974. In P. Ludlow (ed.). European Integration and the Cold War: Ostpolitik-Westpolitik, 1965-1973 (pp. 11-35). Abingdon: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088975.ch1. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Stanciu, C. (2013). Crisis management in the Communist bloc: Romania’s policy towards the USSR in the aftermath of the Prague Spring. Cold War History, 13, 353-372. Avai¬lable at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14682745.2012.746955. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Stanciu, C. (2015). Nicolae Ceauşescu and the origins of Eurocommunism. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 48, 83-95. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcom¬stud.2015.01.006. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Tismăneanu, V. (1991). Reinventing Politics. Eastern Europe from Stalin to Havel. New York NY: Free Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Tismăneanu, V.(2003). Stalinism for All Seasons: A Political History of Romanian Communism. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Watts, L. (2012). A Romanian INTERKIT? Soviet Active Measures and the Warsaw Pact “Maverick” 1965-1989. Working Paper, 65. Washington DC: Woodrow Wilson Inter¬national Center for Scholars. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wenger, A. (2004). Crisis and Opportunity: NATO’s Transformation and the Multilatera¬lization of Détente, 1966–1968. Journal of Cold War Studies, 6, 22-74. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/152039704772741588. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wenger, A. and Mastny, V. (2008). New perspectives on the origins of the CSCE process. In A. Wenger, V. Mastny and C. Nuenlist. Origins of the European Security System: The Helsinki Process Revisited, 1965-75 (pp. 3-20). Abingdon: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203895306.ch1. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Zagorski, A. (2018). The Human Dimension of the CSCE, 1975-1990. In N. Badalassi and S. Snyder (eds.). The CSCE and the End of the Cold War: Diplomacy, Societies and Human Rights, 1972-1990 (p. 17). New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw049dp.7. | - |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2021 Historia y Política | es-ES |
| dc.source | Historia y Política; Vol. 45 (2021): El trienio liberal español, modelo transnacional de pedagogía política; 205-234 | en-US |
| dc.source | Historia y Política; Vol. 45 (2021): El trienio liberal español, modelo transnacional de pedagogía política; 205-234 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 1989-063X | - |
| dc.source | 1575-0361 | - |
| dc.subject | CSCE | en-US |
| dc.subject | Romania | en-US |
| dc.subject | Soviet Union | en-US |
| dc.subject | bipolarity | en-US |
| dc.subject | hegemony | en-US |
| dc.subject | Western Europe | en-US |
| dc.subject | Cold War | en-US |
| dc.subject | CSCE | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Rumania | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Unión Soviética | es-ES |
| dc.subject | bipolaridad | es-ES |
| dc.subject | hegemonía | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Europa Occidental | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Guerra Fría | es-ES |
| dc.title | Romania, the CSCE and the legacy of World War II | en-US |
| dc.title | Rumanía, el CSCE y el legado de la Segunda Guerra Mundial | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.