Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181522Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Megoran, Nick | - |
| dc.date | 2022-12-16 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:35:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:35:54Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/85077 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/geop.85077 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181522 | - |
| dc.description | The war in Ukraine poses an exceptionally dangerous risk of major escalation by design, accident or miscalculation. However, the causes and drivers of the war are far from exceptional, being struggles over how to imagine, name, organize, and control space at local, regional (subnational), national and international scales. Advocating a geography that is “for peace,” this article uses a transscalar conception of how conflict and peace are interrelated within states and internationally. Analyzing a number of key Russian government speeches and legal texts, it identifies major political geographical elements of the conflict and, drawing on comparative examples, proposes creative ways in which they might be addressed as part of negotiations. | en-US |
| dc.description | La guerra de Ucrania plantea un riesgo excepcionalmente alto de que se produzca una escalada importante debido a designios, accidentes o errores de cálculo. No obstante, las causas y estímulos de la guerra no son nada excepcionales, porque se trata de disputas en torno a la forma de imaginar, llamar, organizar y controlar el espacio en las escalas locales, regionales (subnacionales), nacionales e internacionales. Este artículo, defendiendo una geografía que es “para la paz”, utiliza una concepción transescalar de cómo se interrelacionan el conflicto y la paz en el seno de los Estados e internacionalmente. Analizando diversos discursos gubernamentales y textos legales rusos, señala elementos principales de la geografía política del conflicto y, recurriendo a ejemplos comparativos, propone formas creativas en que se podrían tratar como parte de las negociaciones. | es-ES |
| dc.description | A guerra na Ucrânia representa um risco excepcionalmente alto de uma grande escalada devido a projeto, acidente ou erro de cálculo. No entanto, as causas e estímulos da guerra não são excepcionais, pois são disputas em torno da forma de imaginar, nomear, organizar e controlar o espaço no âmbito local, regional (subnacional), nacional e internacional. Este artigo, defendendo uma geografia "pela paz", utiliza uma concepção transescalar de como o conflito e a paz se inter-relacionam dentro dos Estados e internacionalmente. Ao analisar vários discursos do governo russo e textos legais, aponta os principais elementos da geografia política do conflito e, com base em exemplos comparativos, propõe maneiras criativas de abordá-los como parte das negociações. | pt-PT |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | spa | - |
| dc.publisher | Ediciones Complutense | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/85077/4564456562186 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Akbarzadeh, S. (1996). Nation-building in Uzbekistan. Central Asian Survey, 15(1), 23-32. Aksenov, P. (2013). Stanislav Petrov: The man who may have saved the world. BBC News, 23 de septiembre. Recuperado de https://bbc.co.uk/news/ Allworth, E. (1990). The Modern Uzbeks. Stanford, CA: Hoover. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Londres: Verso. Atland, K. (2020). Destined for deadlock? Russia, Ukraine, and the unfulfilled Minsk agreements.Post-Soviet Affairs, 36(2), 122-139. Atwood, W. (1935). The increasing significance of geographic conditions in the growth of nation-states. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 25(1), 1-16. Atzili, B. (2007). When good fences make bad neighbours: fixed borders, state weakness,and international conflict. International Security, 31(3), 139-173. Barrett, A. (2016). False alarms, true dangers? Current and future risks of inadvertent U.S.-Russian nuclear war. Rand Corporation (Perspective series, no. PE-191-TSF). https://doi.org/10.7249/PE191 Bjorkdahl, A. S. K. (2021). Spaces of peace. En O. P. Richmond y G. Visoka (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Peacebuilding, Statebuilding, and Peace Formation (pp. 139-151).Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bohr, A. (1998). The Central Asian states as nationalising regimes. En G. Smith, V. Law, A.Wilson, A. Bohr y E. Allworth (Eds.), Nation-Building in the Post-Soviet Borderlands: The Politics of National Identities (pp. 139-164). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Clem, R., & Craumer, P. (2008). Orange, Blue and White, and Blonde: The Electoral Geography of Ukraine's 2006 and 2007 Rada Elections. Eurasian Geography and Economics, 49(2), 127-151. Crawford, J. (2006). The Creation of States in International Law. (2a ed). Oxford: The Clarendon Press. Dalby, S. (1993). Post-Cold War security in the new Europe. En J. O’Loughlin y H. van der Wusten (Eds.), The New Political Geography of Eastern Europe (pp. 71-85). Londres: Bellhaven. David, M., & Duke, D. (1995). Ukraine, Russia, and the question of Crimea. Nationalities Papers, 23(2), 261-289. DeCamp, D. (2022). Jake Sullivan says US Wants ‘Independent’ Ukraine and a ‘Weakened’Russia. Defend Democracy Press, 11 de abril. https://www.defenddemocracy.press/jakesullivan-says-us-wants-independent-ukraine-and-a-weakened-russia/ Dickinson, P. (2021). Putin's new Ukraine essay reveals imperial ambitions. Atlantic Council: Ukraine Alert, 15 de julio. Recuperado de https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/putins-new-ukraine-essay-reflects-imperial-ambitions/ Diener, A. (2004). Homeland Conceptions and Ethnic Integration Among Kazakhstan's Germans and Koreans. Lampeter: Edwin Mellen Press. Diener, A. (2009). One Homeland or Two? The Nationalization and Transnationalization of Mongolia’s Kazakhs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Dogan, H. (2022). Power, culture, and elite interactions: A neoclassical realist analysis of US grand strategy and foreign policy towards Russia, 1993-2001. Exeter. Fumagalli, M., & Rymarenko, M. (2022). Krym. Rossiya…Navsegda? Critical junctures, critical antecedents, and the paths not taken in the making of Crimea’s annexation. Nationaliities Papers (en linea). https://doi.org/10.1017/nps.2021.75 Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell. George, J. (2009). Expecting ethnic conflict: The Soviet legacy and ethnic politics in the Caucasus and Central Asia. En A. Wooden y C. Stefes (Eds.), The Politics of Transition in Central Asia and the Caucasus (pp. 75-102.). Londres: Routledge. Henrikson, A. (2022). The trauma of territorial break-up: The Russia-Ukraine conflict and its international management – geopolitical strategy and diplomatic therapy. Geopolítica(s), 13(1), 11-36. Hirsch, F. (2005). Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. Londres: Cornell University Press. Hobsbawm, E. (1990). Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. (2ª ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hunter, R. (2022). The Ukraine crisis: why and what now? Survival, 64(1), 7-28. Inwood, J., & Tyner, J. (2011). Geography’s pro-peace agenda: an unfinished project. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 10(3), 442-457. Ishchenko, V. (2011). Fighting Fences vs Fighting Monuments: Politics of Memory and Protest Mobilization in Ukraine,. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern 19(1-2), 369-395. Kassymbekova, B. (2011). Humans as territory: forced resettlement and the making of Soviet Tajikistan, 1920-38. Central Asian Survey, 30(3-4), 349-370. Kedourie, E. (1971 [1960]). Nationalism. (3a ed). Londres: Hutchinson University Library. Kennan, G. (1997). A fateful error. New York Times, 5 de febrero, p.23. Recuperado de https://www.nytimes.com/1997/02/05/opinion/a-fateful-error.html Klatt, M. (2022). Schleswig and Non-Territorial Autonomy – The Territorial Trap? Nationalities Papers, 50(5), 906-922. Koopman, S. (2017). Geographies of Peace. Oxford Bibliographies. Recuperado de www.oxfordbibliographies.com. Lavrov, S. (2015). Russia’s Priorities in Europe and the World. Horizons, Winter 2015(2),12-21. Lerner, H. (2011). Making Constitutions in Deeply Divided Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Liphshiz, C. (2020). Israel and Poland slam glorification of Nazi collaborators in Ukraine. Jewish Telegraphic Agency, 2 de enero. Recuperado de https://www.jta.org/quickreads/israel-and-poland-slam-glorification-of-nazi-collaborators-in-ukraine Lynn, N. J., & Fryer, P. (1998). National-territorial change in the republics of the Russian north. Political Geography, 17(5), 567-588. Mackinder, H. (1890). The physical basis of political geography. The Scottish Geographical Magazine, 6(2), 78-84. Mackinder, H. (1917). Some geographical aspects of international reconstruction. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 33(1), 1-11. Malloy, T. (2017). Functional non-territorial autonomy in Denmark and Germany. En T. Malloy, A. Osipov y V. Balazs (Eds.), Managing Diversity Through Non-Territorial Autonomy(pp. 183-204). Oxford: Oxford University Press. March, A. (2003). From Leninism to Karimovism: hegemony, ideology, and authoritarian legitimation. Post-Soviet Affairs, 19(4), 307-336. Marshall, T. (2015). Prisoners of Geograpy: Ten Maps That Tell You Everything You Need to Know About Global Politics. Londres: Elliott and Thompson. Marston, G. (1994). The stability of land and sea delimitations in international law. En G.Blake (Ed.), World Boundaries Volume 5: Maritime Boundaries (pp. 144-167). Londres: Routledge. Martinez, S. (2022). The European Political Community: a successful test? Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Recuperado de https://www.csis.org/analysis/europeanpolitical-community-successful-test McConnell, F., Megoran, N., & Williams, P. (Eds). (2014). Geographies of Peace. Londres: I.B. Tauris. Mearsheimer, J. (2014). Why the Ukraine crisis Is the West's fault: The liberal delusions that provoked Putin. Foreign Affairs, 93(5), 77-84. Megoran, N. (2010). Towards a geography of peace: pacific geopolitics and evangelical Christian Crusade apologies. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 35(3),382-398. Megoran, N. (2011). War and peace? An agenda for peace research and practice in geography. Political Geography, 30(4), 178-189. Megoran, N. (2017). Nationalism in Central Asia: A Biography of the Uzbekistan-Kyrgyzstan Boundary. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press. Megoran, N. (2022). “Russian Troops Out! No to NATO expansion!” A pacific geopolitics for a new Europe. Political Geography, 98, 102699. Megoran, N., & Dalby, S. (2018). Geopolitics and peace: A century of change in the discipline of geography. Geopolitics, 23(2), 251-276. Megoran, N., & Sharapova, S. (Eds). (2013). Central Asia in International Relations: The Legacies of Halford Mackinder. Londres: Hurst and Co. Millar, G. (2020). Toward a trans-scalar peace system: challenging complex global conflicto systems. Peacebuilding, 8(3), 261-278. Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de la Federacion Rusa. (2022a). Agreement on measures to ensure the security of The Russian Federation and member States of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (draft text). Recuperado de https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/nato/1790818/?lang=en Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores de la Federacion Rusa. (2022b). Treaty between The United States of America and the Russian Federation on security guarantees (draft text). Recuperado de https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/nato/1790818/?lang=en Murphy, A. B. (2022). The modernist territorial order and the Ukraine crisis. Political Geography,97(102667). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102667 Nairn, T. (2003). The Break-Up of Britain. (2a ed). Edinburgo: Big Thinking. NATO (The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation). (2008). Bucharest Summit Statement. Issued by the Heads of State and Government participating in the meeting of the North Atlantic Council in Bucharest on 3 April 2008. Recuperado de https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/official_texts_8443.htm O Tuathail, G. (1992). Putting Mackinder in his place: material transformations and myth.Political Geography, 11(1), 100-118. Okunev, I. (2019). Political Geography. Oxford: Peter Lang. Park, W. (1986). Defending the West: A History of NATO. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books. Putin, V. (2021). On the historical unity of Russians and Ukrainians. President of Russia, 12 de julio. Recuperado de http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/66181 Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty. (2021). Zelenskiy trolls Putin after Russian President publishes article on Ukraine. RFERL, 13 de julio. Recuperado de https://www.rferl.org/a/zelenskiy-trolls-putin-ukraine/31356912.html Rozenas, A., & Vlasenko, A. (2022). The Real Consequences of Symbolic Politics: Breaking the Soviet Past in Ukraine. The Journal of Politics, 84(3), 1263-1277. Ryabchuk, A. (2014). Right Revolution? Hopes and Perils of the Euromaidan Protests in Ukraine. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern, 22(1), 127-134 https://doi.org/10.1080/0965156X.2013.877268 Simonsen, S. G. (2000). “You take your oath only once:” Crimea, the black sea fleet, and national identity among Russian officers. Nationalities Papers, 28(2), 289-316. Smith, A. (1991). National Identity. Londres: Penguin. Smith, G. (1996). The Soviet state and nationalities policy. En G..Smith (Ed.), The Nationalities Question in the Post-Soviet States (pp. 2-22). Londres: Longman. Smoleński, J., & Dutkiewicz, J. (2022). The American pundits who can’t resist “Westsplaining”Ukraine. The New Republic, 4 de marzo. Recuperado de https://newrepublic.com/article/165603/carlson-russia-ukraine-imperialism-nato Solonenko, I. (2017). Policy and Legislative Challenges to Non-Discrimination, Minority Protection and Diversity Issues in Ukraine. ECMI Studies. Flensburg: European Centre for Minority Issues. Thompson, E. P., & Smith, D. (Eds). (1980). Protest and Survive. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Williams, P., & McConnell, F. (2011). Critical geographies of peace. Antipode, 43(4), 927-931. Williams, P., Megoran, N., & McConnell, F. (2014). Geographical approaches to peace. En F. McConnell, N. Megoran y P. Williams (Eds.), Geographies of Peace (pp. 1-25). Londres:I.B. Tauris. Yoder, P. (1987). Shalom: The Bible's Word for Salvation, Justice and Peace. Sevenoaks, RU: Hodder and Stoughton. Zubok, V. (2022). Can Putin Survive? The Lessons of the Soviet Collapse. Foreign Affairs, 101(4), 84-96. | - |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2022 Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder | es-ES |
| dc.source | Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022); 285-309 | en-US |
| dc.source | Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2022); 285-309 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 13 N.º 2 (2022); 285-309 | pt-PT |
| dc.source | 2172-7155 | - |
| dc.source | 2172-3958 | - |
| dc.subject | conflicto ruso-ucraniano | es-ES |
| dc.subject | guerra | es-ES |
| dc.subject | geografía para la paz | es-ES |
| dc.subject | negociaciones de paz | es-ES |
| dc.subject | análisis transescalar | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Russo-Ukraine conflict | en-US |
| dc.subject | war | en-US |
| dc.subject | geography for peace | en-US |
| dc.subject | peace negotiations | en-US |
| dc.subject | trans-scalar analysis | en-US |
| dc.subject | conflito russo-ucraniano | pt-PT |
| dc.subject | guerra | pt-PT |
| dc.subject | geografia para a paz | pt-PT |
| dc.subject | negociações de paz | pt-PT |
| dc.subject | análise transescalar | pt-PT |
| dc.title | Geographical Contributions to Understanding and Resolving the Russo- Ukraine Conflict | en-US |
| dc.title | Contribuciones geográficas para comprender y resolver el conflicto ruso-ucraniano | es-ES |
| dc.title | Contribuições geográficas para a compreensão e resolução do conflito russo-ucraniano | pt-PT |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.