Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

  1. Repositorio institucional de CLACSO
  2. Colección de los Centros Asociados
  3. España
  4. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181500
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorZiebell de Oliveira, Guilherme-
dc.creatorFerabolli, Silvia Regina-
dc.creatorPereira dos Santos Júnior, Luis Haroldo-
dc.date2022-12-16-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:35:51Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:35:51Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/78370-
dc.identifier10.5209/geop.78370-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181500-
dc.descriptionThis article proposes a comparative analysis of how the borders of Latin America, the Arab World and Africa were – and still are – built, legitimized and contested. Based on a constructivist perspective, which understands that not only state sovereignty, but also state borders, are socially constructed, the text seeks to demonstrate that even if the countries located in the three regions are recognized as sovereign entities in the current international system, the processes that led to the definition and establishment of their borders responded to different logics and had differentiated dynamics. In methodological terms, the comparative method supported by the hermeneutic approach was adopted. The study concludes that Latin American borders were built at a historical moment when the system was more permissive for territorial acquisition through war. The African continent, on the other hand, had its colonial borders maintained by the new independent nations, as these were fundamental to both avoid conflicts and to guarantee its international recognition. Finally, in the Arab world, contesting borders meant erasing the artificial borders that divided the imagined Arab nationen-US
dc.descriptionEste artículo propone un análisis comparativo de cómo se construyeron, legitimaron y disputaron las fronteras de América Latina, el Mundo Árabe y África. Con base en una perspectiva constructivista, que entiende que no solo la soberanía, sino también las fronteras estatales, se construyen socialmente, el texto busca demostrar que si bien los países ubicados en las tres regiones son reconocidos como entidades soberanas en el actual sistema internacional, los procesos que llevaron a la definición y establecimiento de sus fronteras respondieron a lógicas diferentes y tuvieron dinámicas diferenciadas. En términos metodológicos, se adoptó el método comparativo apoyado por el enfoque hermenéutico. El estudio concluye que las fronteras latinoamericanas se construyeron en un momento histórico en el que el sistema era más permisivo para la adquisición territorial a través de la guerra. El continente africano, en cambio, tuvo sus fronteras coloniales mantenidas por las nuevas naciones independientes, ya que estas eran fundamentales tanto para evitar conflictos como para garantizar su reconocimiento internacional. Finalmente, en el mundo árabe, disputar fronteras significaba borrar las fronteras artificiales que dividían a la nación árabe imaginada.es-ES
dc.descriptionO presente artigo propõe uma análise comparada de como as fronteiras da América Latina, do Mundo Árabe e da África foram – e ainda continuam sendo – construídas, legitimadas e contestadas. Apoiando-se em uma perspectiva construtivista, que entende que não apenas a soberania dos Estados, mas também suas fronteiras são socialmente construídas, o que se busca demonstrar é que, ainda que os países localizados nas três regiões sejam reconhecidos como Estados soberanos no atual sistema internacional, os processos que levaram à definição e estabelecimento de suas fronteiras responderam a lógicas diferentes e tiveram dinâmicas distintas entre si. Em termos metodológicos, adotou-se o método comparativo, apoiado em uma abordagem hermenêutica. O estudo conclui que as fronteiras latino-americanas foram construídas em um momento histórico em que o sistema era mais permissivo para aquisição territorial através da guerra. Já o continente africano teve suas fronteiras coloniais mantidas pelas novas nações independentes porquanto essas eram fundamentais tanto para evitar conflitos, quanto para garantir o seu reconhecimento internacional. Finalmente, no Mundo Árabe, contestar fronteiras significava apagar as fronteiras artificiais que dividiam a imaginada nação árabe.pt-PT
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagepor-
dc.publisherEdiciones Complutensees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/78370/4564456562187-
dc.relation/*ref*/Adebajo, A. (2013). The curse of Berlin: Africa after the Cold War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.-
dc.relation/*ref*/African Union (AU) (2000). Constitutive Act of the African Union (CAAU). Lomé: African Union.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ajala, A. (1983). The Nature of African Boundaries. Africa Spectrum, 18(2), 177-189-
dc.relation/*ref*/Althusser, L. (2001). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays. New York: Monthly Review Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bandeira, L.A.M. (1998). Expansionismo Brasileiro e a Formação dos Estados na Bacia da Prata. Brasília: UNB.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Barnett, M. (1998). Dialogues in Arab Politics: Negotiations in Regional Order. New York: Columbia University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Benedetti, A. (2017) La construcción conceptual en los procesos de delimitación y de fronterización: la región platina de Sudamérica (siglos XIX y XX). Geopolítica(s) Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder. 8(1), 91-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/GEOP.54146-
dc.relation/*ref*/Benedetti, A. (2018). Algunas marcas de la nación y el nacionalismo en los estudios latinoamericanos sobre fronteras. Estudios Fronterizos, 19, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.21670/ref.1818018-
dc.relation/*ref*/Berger, P. & Luckmann, T. (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bethell, L. (Ed) (1991). Historia de América Latina: América Latina Independiente (1820-1870). Barcelona: Editorial Crítica.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Beyhaut, G. & Beyhaut, H. (1985). América Latina III: De la independencia a la segunda guerra mundial. Ciudad de México: Siglo Veintiuno.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Biersteker, T. & Weber, C. (1996) State Sovereignty as social construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Brand, L.A. (2014). Official Stories: Politics and National Narratives in Egypt and Algeria. Califórnia: Stanford University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bridge, F. R. & Bullen, R. (2005). The great powers and the European states system (1814-1914). London: Pearson Longman.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bunton, M. & Cleveland, W.L. (2016). A History of the Modern Middle East. London: Routledge, 2016.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Cervo, A. & Bueno, C. (2002). História da política exterior do Brasil. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Champion, D. (2005). The Paradoxical Kingdom: Saudi Arabia and the Momentum of Reform. New York: Columbia University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Church, R. J. H (1956). African Boundaries. In: East, W.G.& Moodie, A.E.(Eds.) The Changing World: Studies in Political Geography. London: George G. Harrap.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Clapham, C. (1996). Africa and the international system: the politics of state survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Collier, D. (1993) The Comparative Method. In: Finifter, A. (Ed.) Political Science: the state of discipline II. Washington: American Political Science Association.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Crawford, J. (1979). The Creation of States in International Law. Oxford: Claredon Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Doratioto, F. (2014). O Brasil no Rio da Prata (1822-1994). Brasília: FUNAG.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ferabolli, S. (2016). Uma nova visão para a regionalização do mercado de trabalho árabe. Conjuntura Austral: journal of the Global South, 7(36), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.65599-
dc.relation/*ref*/Filho, S.S.G. (2015). Navegantes, Bandeirantes, Diplomatas: um ensaio sobre a formação das fronteiras do Brasil. Brasília: FUNAG.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Foltz, W. (1973) Political Boundaries and Political Competition in Tropical Africa. In: Eisenstadt, S.N. & Rokkan, S. (Eds.) Building States and Nations: Analyses by Region. Beverly Hills: Sage.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gause III, F. G. (1994) Oil Monarchies: domestic and security challenges in the Arab Gulf States. New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gerges, F. (2014). ISIS and the third wave of Jihadism. New York: Current History.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Herbst, J. (2015) States and Power in Africa: Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control Comparative Lessons in Authority and Control. Princeton: Princeton University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Herbst, J. (1989) The Creation and Maintenance of National Boundaries in Africa. International Organization, 43(4), 673-692.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hinnebusch, R.A. (1990) Authoritarian Power and State Formation in Ba’athist Syria: Army, Party, and Peasant. Boulder: Westview Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Iliffe, J. (1995) Africans: The History of a Continent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jackson, R. (1990). Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University.-
dc.relation/*ref*/James, A. (1986). Sovereign Statehood: The Basis of International Society. London: Allen & Unwin.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jarvis, J. (2021) Decolonizing Memory: Algeria and the Politics of Testimony. North Carolina: Duke University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. (2021). رؤية المملكة العربية السعودية 2030. Vision 2030; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. https://www.vision2030.gov.sa-
dc.relation/*ref*/Krasner, S.D. (1995). Westphalia. In Lyons, G.M. & Mastanduno, M. (Eds.), Beyond Westphalia? State Sovereignty and International Intervention. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lois, C. (2019). De las fronteras coloniales del imperio hispánico en América a los límites internacionales entre Estados latinoamericanos independientes: génesis de la imposibilidad de un mapa político de Sudamérica consensuado. Revista de historiografia, 30, 207-222. https://doi.org/10.20318/revhisto.2019.4749-
dc.relation/*ref*/Magnoli, D. (1997). O corpo da pátria: imaginação geográfica e política externa no Brasil (1808-1912). São Paulo: Moderna.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mazrui, A (1984). Africa Entrapped: Between the Protestant Ethic and the Legacy of Westphalia. In: Bull, H. & Watson, A. (Eds.). The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Meillassoux, C. (1977) Mulheres, celeiros & capitais. Porto: Afrontamento.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Morsy, H. (2017). Arab Oil Exporters: Coping with a New Global Oil Order. Policy Conference. European Bank.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Oliveira, G.Z., Barbosa, L.C. & Cardoso, N.C. Da Não Interferência da Organização da Unidade Africana à Não Indiferença da União Africana: Percepções Africanas sobre a Segurança do Continente. Século XXI. 5(1), 93-111.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Organization of African Unity (OAU) (1963). OAU Charter. Addis Ababa: Organization of African Unity.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Organization of African Unity (OAU) (1967) OAU Resolution on Situation in Nigeria. Addis Ababa: Organization of African Unity.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Organization of African Unity (OAU) (1964). Resolutions Adopted by the First Ordinary Session of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government Held in Cairo UAR. Addis Ababa: Organization of African Unity.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Osterhammel, J. (1997) Colonialism: A Theoretical Overview. Princeton: Markus Wiener.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Owen, R. & Zahlan, R.S (1998) The Making of the Modern Gulf States: Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Oman. London: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Owen, R. (1992). State, Power and Politics in the Making of the Modern Middle East. London: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pérez, J. G. (2005). Conflictos territoriales y luchas fronterizas en América Latina durante los siglos XIX y XX. Norba. Revista de História, 18, 215-241.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Perus, M.C. (2005) Fronteras y representaciones fronterizas: aproximaciones comparativas entre Estados Unidos y América Latina. Estudios Fronterizos, 6(11), 9-38.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ravenhill, J. (1988) Redrawing the Map of Africa. In: Rothchild, D & Chazan, N. (Eds.). The Precarious Balance: state and society in Africa. Boulder: Westview Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Saraiva, J.F.S.(Org.). (2007). História das relações internacionais contemporâneas: da sociedade internacional do século XIX à era da globalização. São Paulo: Saraiva.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Spruyt, H. (1994). Institutional Selection in International Relations: State Anarchy as Order. International Organization, 48(4), 527-557.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Thompson, M. (2019). Being Young, Male and Saudi: Identity and Politics in a Globalized Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tilly, C. (1975) Reflections on the History of European State-Making. In: Tilly, C.(Org.). The Formation of national States in Western Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tiusaba Gomez, B.H, Barreto Gonzalez, R. & Ceron Rincon, L.A. (2019). Hermenéutica, realidad y método en la disciplina de las Relaciones Internacionales. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias políticas y sociales, 64(236), 217-237. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.2448492xe.2019.236.63223-
dc.relation/*ref*/Touval, S. (1966). Treaties, Borders and the Partition of Africa, Journal of African History, 7(2), 279-293. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021853700006320-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tripp, C. (2003). A History of Iraq. Cambridge: Cambridge University.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tripp, C. (2003). After Saddam. Cambridge: Cambridge University.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Vargas, F.A. (2017). Formação das fronteiras latino-americanas. Brasília: FUNAG.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Yapp, M. (1987). The Making of the Modern Near East 1792-1923. London: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Yapp, M. (1995) The Near East since the First World War: A History to 1995. London: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Zartman, I.W. (1965) The Politics of Boundaries in North and West Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 3(2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X00023600-
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poderes-ES
dc.sourceGeopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2022); 311-330en-US
dc.sourceGeopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2022); 311-330es-ES
dc.sourceGeopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 13 N.º 2 (2022); 311-330pt-PT
dc.source2172-7155-
dc.source2172-3958-
dc.subjectBordersen-US
dc.subjectAfricaen-US
dc.subjectLatin Americaen-US
dc.subjectArab worlden-US
dc.subjectConstructivismen-US
dc.subjectFronterases-ES
dc.subjectÁfricaes-ES
dc.subjectAmérica Latinaes-ES
dc.subjectMundo Árabees-ES
dc.subjectConstructivismoes-ES
dc.subjectFronteiraspt-PT
dc.subjectÁfricapt-PT
dc.subjectAmérica Latinapt-PT
dc.subjectMundo Árabept-PT
dc.subjectConstrutivismopt-PT
dc.titleThe Borders Issue in the Global South: A Comparative Study between Latin America, Africa and the Arab Worlden-US
dc.titleA questão das fronteiras no Sul Global: um estudo comparado entre América Latina, África e Mundo Árabees-ES
dc.titleA questão das fronteiras no Sul Global: um estudo comparado entre América Latina, África e Mundo Árabept-PT
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeArtículo revisado por pareses-ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.