Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181459
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorOkoth Opondo, Sam-
dc.creatorShapiro, Michael J.-
dc.date2020-05-11-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:35:48Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:35:48Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/69347-
dc.identifier10.5209/geop.69347-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181459-
dc.descriptionThe consensual and dissensual modes of separation above alert us to how the COVID-19 pandemic has turned the present into a time of intense separation, one of which is between those bodies marked as essential versus non-essential, those that have ‘pre-existing conditions’ and those without, and those located in precarious zones of abandonment, congestion, and containment, and those that, owing to prevailing economic distancing and apartness, can practice a life of social distancing. Not only does this highlight how some lives and livelihoods are deemed essential yet disposable, we also come to see which forms of loss or even death are considered grievable and which ones are subjected to the sacrificial calculus and discourses of necessity. Noting the dynamics associated with that emerging division, while at the same time reviewing a series of texts featuring aesthetic separations, our essay proceeds through a series of ‘ante-metabolic spins’ that invite ‘us’ to think critically about the political implications of aesthetic separations and separation aesthetics.en-US
dc.descriptionLos modos de separación consensuales y disensuales anteriores nos alertan sobre cómo la pandemia de COVID-19 ha convertido el presente en un momento de separación intensa, uno de los cuales es entre aquellos cuerpos marcados como esenciales frente a los no esenciales, entre aquellos que tienen “pre-condiciones existentes” y aquellos que no existen, y entre aquellos ubicados en zonas precarias de abandono, congestión y contención, y aquellos que, debido al distanciamiento económico y la separación existentes, pueden practicar una vida de distanciamiento social. Esto no solo resalta cómo algunas vidas y medios de subsistencia se consideran esenciales pero desechables, sino que también vemos qué formas de pérdida o incluso muerte se consideran lamentables y cuáles están sujetas al cálculo de sacrificio y los discursos de necesidad. Al observar la dinámica asociada con esa división emergente, al mismo tiempo que revisamos una serie de textos con separaciones estéticas, buscamos avanzar a través de una serie de “giros ante-metabólicos” que “nos” invitan a pensar críticamente sobre las implicaciones políticas de las separaciones estéticas y la estética de separación.es-ES
dc.descriptionOs modos de separação consensual e dissentual anteriores nos alertam sobre como a pandemia da COVID-19 transformou o presente em um momento de intensa separação, um dos quais é entre os corpos marcados como essenciais versus os não essenciais, entre aqueles que eles têm “condições pré-existentes” e aqueles que não existem, e entre aqueles localizados em zonas precárias de abandono, congestionamento e contenção, e aqueles que, devido ao distanciamento econômico e à separação existentes, podem praticar uma vida de distanciamento social. Isso não apenas destaca como algumas vidas e meios de subsistência são considerados essenciais, mas descartáveis, mas também vemos quais formas de perda ou mesmo morte são lamentáveis ​​e quais estão sujeitas ao cálculo do sacrifício e discursos de necessidade. Ao observar a dinâmica associada a essa divisão emergente, ao mesmo tempo em que revisamos uma série de textos com separações estéticas, buscamos avançar através de uma série de “voltas pré-metabólicas” que “nos convidam” a pensar criticamente sobre as implicações políticas das separações estéticas e a estética da separação.pt-PT
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEdiciones Complutensees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/69347/4564456553395-
dc.relation/*ref*/Barthes, R. (1977). Roland Barthes by Roland Barthes (trans. Richard Howard). New York: Hill and Wang. Bazin, A. (1971). An Aesthetic of Reality: Cinematic Realism and the Italian School of liberation. In What is Cinema (trans. Hugh Gray) (pp.3-19). Berkeley: University of Cal-ifornia Press. Benton, A. (2020). Border Promiscuity, Illicit Intimacies, and Origin Stories: Or what Con-tagion’s Bookends Tell us About New Infectious Diseases and a Racialized Geography of Blame. Somatosphere, 6 March. DeMicco, F. J. (2017) Medical Tourism and Wellness: Hospitality Bridging Healthcare (h2h). Burlington, ON: Oakville Apple Academic Press. Derrida, J., & Dufourmantelle, A. (2000). Of Hospitality. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Fregonese, S., & Ramadan, A. (2015). Hotel Geopolitics: A Research Agenda. Geopolitics, 20(4), 793-813. Kracauer, S. (1995). The Mass Ornament: Weimar Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Uni-versity Press. Lee, F. (2004). If Disney Ran Your Hospital: 9 1/2 Things You Would Do Differently. Bo-zeman: Second River Healthcare Press. Luke, T. W. (2003). ‘Codes, Collectivities, and Commodities: Rethinking Global Cities as Megalogistical Spaces.’ In L. Krause and P. Petro (Eds.), Global Cities: Cinema, Archi-tecture, and Urbanism in a Digital Age (pp.157- 174). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. McDowell, L., Batnitzky, A., & Dyer, S. (2007). Division, Segmentation, and Interpellation: The Embodied Labors of Migrant Workers in a Greater London Hotel. Economic Geog-raphy, 83(1), 1-25. Mbembe, A. (2019). Necropolitics. North Carolina: Duke University Press. Mowitt, J. (2000). Trauma Envy. Cultural Critique, (46), 272-297. Nancy, J.-L., & Hanson, S. (2002). L’Intrus. CR: The New Centennial Review, 2(3), 1-14. O’Brien, E. (2015). The Little Red Chairs. New York: Little Brown. Persad, G., & Emanuel, E. J. (2020). The Ethics of COVID-19 Immunity-Based Licenses (“Immunity Passports”). JAMA, May 06. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.8102 Pravinchandra, S. (2013). Hospitality for Sale, or Dirty Pretty Things. Cultural Critique, (85), 38-60. Rancière, J. (2004). The Sublime from Lyotard to Schiller: Two Readings of Kant and their Political Significance. Radical Philosophy, (126), 8-15). Rancière, J. (2008). Aesthetic Separation, Aesthetic Community: Scenes from the Aesthetic Regime of Art. Art & Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods, 2(1). Re-trieved from http://www.artandresearch.org.uk/v2n1/pdfs/ranciere.pdf Rancière, J., & Corcoran, S. (2014). Hatred of Democracy. London: Verso. Rancière, J., & Elliott, G. (2011). The Emancipated Spectator. London: Verso. Ranciere, J., & Panagia, D. (2000). Dissenting Words: a Conversation with Jacques Ranci-ere. Diacritics, 30(2), 113-126. Rinelli, L., & Opondo, S. O. (2013). Affective Economies: Eastleigh’s Metalogistics, Urban Anxieties and the Mapping of Diasporic City Life. African and Black Diaspora, 6(2), 236-250. Roback, J. D., & Guarner, J. (2020). Convalescent Plasma to Treat Covid-19: Possibilities and Challenges. JAMA, 323(16), 1561-1562. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.4940 Shapiro, M. J. (2006). The Sublime Today: Re-Partitioning the Global Sensible. Millenni-um, 34(3), 657-681. Stein, R. (2010). Disposable Bodies: Biocolonialism in The Constant Gardener and Dirty pretty Things. In P. Willoquet-Maricondi (Ed.), Framing the world : Explorations in Ecocriticism and Film (pp.101-115). Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press. United States Army Corps. (2020). Alternative Care Sites. Retrieved from https://www.usace.army.mil/coronavirus/alternate-care-sites/ Vergès, F. (2019). Capitalocene, Waste, Race, and Gender. e-flux Journal #100 – May 2019. Retrieved from https://www.e-flux.com/journal/100/269165/capitalocene-waste-race-and-gender/ Zizek, S. (1993). Enjoy Your Nation as Yourself. In S. Zizek, Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.-
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2020 Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poderes-ES
dc.sourceGeopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 11 No. Especial (2020): Geopolitics of the COVID-19 pandemic; 223-238en-US
dc.sourceGeopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 11 Núm. Especial (2020): Geopolítica de la pandemia de COVID-19; 223-238es-ES
dc.sourceGeopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 11 N.º Especial (2020): Geopolítica da pandemia da COVID-19; 223-238pt-PT
dc.source2172-7155-
dc.source2172-3958-
dc.subjectCOVID-19 pandemicen-US
dc.subjectessential livesen-US
dc.subjectsocial distancingen-US
dc.subjectgriefen-US
dc.subjectseparation aestheticsen-US
dc.subjectpandemia de COVID-19es-ES
dc.subjectvidas esencialeses-ES
dc.subjectdistanciamiento sociales-ES
dc.subjectdueloes-ES
dc.subjectestética de separaciónes-ES
dc.subjectpandemia da COVID-19pt-PT
dc.subjectvidas essenciaispt-PT
dc.subjectdistanciamento socialpt-PT
dc.subjectlutopt-PT
dc.subjectestética de separaçãopt-PT
dc.titleAesthetic Separation / Separation Aesthetics: The Pandemic and the Event Spaces of Precarityen-US
dc.titleAesthetic Separation / Separation Aesthetics: The Pandemic and the Event Spaces of Precarityes-ES
dc.titleSeparação estética / Separação estética: a pandemia e as atividades dos espaços de precariedadept-PT
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeArtículo revisado por pareses-ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.