Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181407Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Romero Meza, Mónica Socorro | - |
| dc.date | 2019-11-25 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:35:40Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:35:40Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/61552 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/geop.61552 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181407 | - |
| dc.description | The article explores the power relations between the US immigration policy and the practices of faith-based organizations at the US-Mexico border through qualitative methods. It studies how high-level technologies implemented at the border reduce migrants to mere targets, stripping them out from their human value. It also analyzes the experiences of three faith-based organizations located at Tijuana and San Diego to understand how their humanitarian work changes the normal perception of the border as a space that only serves the purpose of the State. I argue that despite of the violence lived almost every day at the border-heightened by the implementation of military techniques- undocumented migrants can momentarily find moments of peace and justice. | en-US |
| dc.description | Este artículo explora las relaciones de poder entre la política migratoria de los Estados Unidos y las prácticas humanitarias de organizaciones religiosas en la frontera México-Estados Unidos, a través de una metodología cualitativa. En su análisis, considera cómo las tecnologías de alto nivel, implementadas en la frontera para controlar los cruces irregulares, reducen a los migrantes a meros objetos que tienen que ser manejados, despojándolos de su valor humano. Este artículo también analiza las experiencias de tres organizaciones religiosas ubicadas en Tijuana y San Diego para comprender cómo su trabajo modifica la percepción común de la frontera como un espacio que solo sirve al propósito del Estado. La autora argumenta que a pesar de la violencia que se vive casi diariamente en la frontera, intensificada por la implementación de técnicas militares, los migrantes indocumentados pueden encontrar momentos de paz y justicia. | es-ES |
| dc.description | Este artigo explora as relações de poder entre a política de imigração dos Estados Unidos e as práticas humanitárias de organizações religiosas na fronteira México-Estados Unidos, por meio de uma metodologia qualitativa. Em sua análise, ele considera como as tecnologias de alto nível, implementadas na fronteira para controlar cruzamentos irregulares, reduzem os migrantes a meros objetos que precisam ser manuseados, tirando-os de seu valor humano. Este artigo também analisa as experiências de três organizações religiosas localizadas em Tijuana e San Diego para entender como seu trabalho modifica a percepção comum da fronteira como um espaço que serve apenas ao propósito do Estado. A autora argumenta que, apesar da violência que ocorre quase diariamente na fronteira, intensificada pela implementação de técnicas militares, os migrantes sem documentos podem encontrar momentos de paz e justiça. | pt-PT |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Ediciones Complutense | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/61552/4564456552241 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ahn, I.; Chiu, A. & O’Neil, W. (2013) “And you welcomed me?: A theological response to the militarization of the US-Mexico borders and the criminalization of undocumented migrants.” Association for Religion and Intellectual Life, Vol. 63, No. 3, 303-322. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Alvesson, M. & Karreman, D. (2000) “Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis.” Human relations, Vol. 53, No. 9, 1125-1149. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Amilhat, A. & Giraut, F. (eds.) (2015) Borderities and the politics of contemporary mobile borders. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Amoore, L. (2006) “Biometric borders: Governing mobilities in the war on terror.” Political geography, Vol. 25, No. 3, 336-351. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Angelucci, M. (2012) “US Border enforcement and the net flow of Illegal migration.” Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 60, No. 2, 311-357. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Anderson, J. (2003) “The US-Mexico border: A Half-century of change.” The Social Science Journal, Vol. 40, No. 3, 535-554. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Argueta, L. (2016) Border Security: Immigration Enforcement Between Ports of Entry. Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Barry, T. (2010) Fallacies of High-Tech Fixes for Border Security. Washington, D.C.: Centre for International Policy. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bigo, D. (2007) “Mobility controls and new technologies”. In J. Lodge (ed.) Are you who you say you are? The EU and the biometrics of borders. Tilburg: Wolf Legal Publisher, 9-14. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Boggs, C. (2015) Mexico’s Southern Border Plan: More Deportations and Widespread Human Rights Violations. Washington Office on Latin America. [Online. URL: <https://www.wola.org/analysis/mexicos-southern-border-plan-more-deportations-andwidespread-human-rights-violations/>.Accessed on 4 July 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bosworth, M. (2008) “Border control and the limits of the sovereign state.” Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 17, No. 2, 199-215. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Brigden, N. K. (2018) “A visible geography of invisible journeys: Central American migration and the politics of survival.” International Journal of Migration and Border Studies, Vol.4, No. 1-2, 71-88. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Brown, W. (2017) Walled states, waning sovereignty. Massachusetts: MIT Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Carter, N.; Bryant-Lukosius, D.; DiCenso, A.; Blythe, J. & Neville, A. J. (2014) “The use of triangulation in qualitative research.” Oncology nursing forum, Vol. 41, No. 5, 545-547. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cheek, J. (2004) “At the margins? Discourse analysis and qualitative research.” Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 14, No. 8, 1140-1150. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Customs and Border Protection (2017) US Border Patrol Fiscal Year Budget Statistics (FY1990-FY2015). [Online. URL: <http://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/mediaresources/stats?title=Border+Patrol>. Accessed 16 September 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Customs and Border Protection (2018) US Border Patrol fiscal Year staffing statistics (FY1992-FY 2017). [Online. URL: <http://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/mediaresources/stats?title=Border+Patrol>. Accessed 17 September 2018]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Corporate Watch (2015) Elbit Systems. [Online. URL: <https://corporatewatch.org/company-profiles/elbit>. Accessed 12 August 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Crepeau, F., Nakache, D. & Atak, I. (2007) “International Migration: security Concerns and human rights standards.” Transcultural Psychiatry, Vol. 44, No. 3, 311-337. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Department of Homeland Security (n.d.) Technology investments between Ports of Entry. [Online. URL: <https://www.dhs.gov/taxonomy/term/3556/all/feed>. Accessed on 20 October 2019]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Doty, R. (2006) “Fronteras Compasivas and the Ethics of Unconditional Hospitality.” Journal of International Studies, Vol. 35, No. 1, 53-74. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Doty, R. (2011) “Bare life: border-crossing deaths and spaces of moral alibi.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 29, No. 4, 599-612. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ewing, W. (2010) Looking for a Quick Fix: The rise and fall of the secure border initiative`s high-tech solution to unauthorized migration. Washington, DC: IPC United States Government. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Finklea, K. & Ribando, C. (2017) US-Mexican Security Cooperation: The Mérida Intitaive and Beyond. [Online. Retrieved from Congressional Research Centre website. URL: <https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R41349.pdf>. Accessed on 15 September 2018]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Graham, M. (2013). Issue Brief: Border Security Assets. Bipartisian Policy Center [Online. URL: <http://issuu.com/bipartisanpolicycenter/docs/border_assets>. Accessed on 10 July 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hayes, A. & Mason, R. (2013) “Securing twenty-first century societies.” In S. Nikalus, R. Mason and A. Haye (eds.) Migration and Insecurity: citizenship and social inclusion in a transnational era. New York: Routledge, 3-16. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hagan, J. (2008) Migration Miracle: Faith, Hope and Meaning of Undocumented Journey. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hondagneu-Sotelo, P.; Gaudinez, G.; Lara, H. & Ortiz, B. C. (2004) “There’s a spirit that transcend the border”: Faith, ritual, and postnational protest at the US-Mexico border.” Sociological Perspectives, Vol. 47, No. 2, 133-159. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Iacson, A.; Meyer, M. & Morales G. (2014) Mexico’s other border: security, migration and the humanitarian crisis at the line with Central America. Washington Office on Latin America [Online. URL: <http://www.wola.org/files/mxgt/report/>. Accessed on 1 December 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Johnson, C.; Jones, R.; Paasi, A.; Amoore, L.; Mountz, A.; Salter, M. & Rumford, C. (2011) “Interventions on rethinking «the border» in border studies.” Political Geography, Vol. 30, No. 2, 61-69. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Jones, R. (2016) Violent borders: Refugees and the right to move. New York: Verso Books. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Klein, E. (2013) “Everything you know about immigration is wrong.” The Washington Post, August 10th 2013. [Online. URL: <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/08/10/everything-you-knowabout-immigration-is-wrong/ >. Accessed on 9 October 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Massey, D. & Sánchez, M. (2010) Brokered Boundaries: Creating Immigrant Identity in Anti-Immigrant Times. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/McCune, B. & Soden, D. (2009) “Regulating the Push and Pull of migration in the post 9/11 era on the southern border.” In M. Morgan (ed.) The Impact of 9/11 and the new legal landscape: the day that changed everything? London: Palgrave Mcmillian, 189-204 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Meissner, D. & Pierce, S. (2019). Policy Solutions to Address Crisis at Border Exist, But Require Will and Staying Power to Execute. Migration Policy Institute. [Online. URL: <https://www.migrationpolicy.org/news/policy-solutions-address-crisis-border-existrequire-will-staying-power>. Accessed on 9 May 2019]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Miller, T. (2013) “Surveillance Surge on the Border: How to Turn the US- Mexican Border into a War Zone.” Truthout, July 11th. [Online. URL: <http://www.truthout.org/news/item/17513-surveillance-surge-on-the-border-how-to-turn-the-usmexican-border-into-a-war-zone>. Accessed on 23 October 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Morrisey, K. (2018) “«Door of Hope» is closed to cross-border hugs and weddings.” Los Angeles Times, January 6th 2018. [Online. URL: <https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-sd-door-of-hope-20180106-story.html>. Accessed on 30 October 2018]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mountz, A. (2011) “Specters at the Port of Entry: Understanding State Mobilities through an Ontology of Exclusion.” Mobilities, Vol. 6, No. 3, 317-34. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Office of Inspector General (2014) US Customs and Border Protection’s Unmanned Aircraft System Program does not achieved intended results or recognize all costs of operations. [Online. URL: <https://www.oig.dhs.gov/.../OIG_15-17_Dec14.pdf>. Accessed on 13 October 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Orraca, P. (2014) “Immigrants and Cross-border workers in the US-Mexico border region.” Frontera norte, vol. 27, núm. 53, 5-34. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Passi, A. (2009) “Bounded spaces in a borderless world: border studies, power and the anatomy of territory.” Journal of Power, Vol. 2, No. 2, 213-134. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pries, L. & Pauls, R. (2013) “Introduction: New Dynamics of Migration and Belonging.” In L. Pries (ed.) Shifting boundaries of belonging and new migration dynamics in Europe and China. Hampshire, England: Springer, 1-18. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pope, J. & Garret, T. (2013) “America’s Homo Sacer: Examining US Deportation Heraings and the criminalization of illegal immigration.” Administration and Society, Vol. 45, No. 2, 167-186. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ramirez, C. (2011) “The Open wound of the US-Mexico border.” In Rights Working Group Report.Reclaiming our rights: Reflections on racial profiling in a post 9/11 America. 35-37. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sassen, S. (2014) Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Salter, M. (2013) “Introduction.” In M. Salter and C. Mutlu (eds.) Research Methods in Critical Security Studies. An Introduction. New York: Routledge, 1-15. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Silvey, R. (2005) “Borders, embodiment, and mobility: Feminist migration studies in geography.” In L. Nelson and J. Seager (eds.) A companion to feminist geography. Malden: Blackwell, 138-149. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Stuckey, H. L. (2013) “Three types of interviews: Qualitative research methods in social health.” Journal of Social Health and Diabetes, Vol. 1, No. 2, 56-59. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/US Customs and Border Protection (2004) National Border Patrol Strategy. [Online. URL: <https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=457100>. Accessed on 23 August 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/US Customs and Border Protection (2012) 2012-2016 Border Patrol Strategic Plan. [Online. Retrieved from the CBP website. URL: <http://www.cbp.gov/bordersecurity/along-us-borders/strategic-plan>. Accessed on 26 August 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/US Customs and Border Protection (2015) Vision and Strategy 2020. [Online. URL: <http://www.cbp.gov/document/publications/vision-and-strategy-2020>. Accessed on 7 August 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/US Customs and Border Protection (2018) Border Patrol History. [Online. URL: <https://www.cbp.gov/border-security/along-us-borders/history>. Accessed on 12 May 2019]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/US Customs and Border Protection (2019a) San Diego Sector California. [Online. URL: <https://www.cbp.gov/border-security/along-us-borders/border-patrol-sectors/sandiego-sector-california>. Accessed on 21 October 2019]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/US Customs and Border Protection (2019b) About CBP. [Online. URL: <https://www.cbp.gov/about>. Accessed on 21 October 2019]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/United States Environmental Protection Agency (2016) Border 2020: US-Mexico Environmental Program: State of the Border Region Indications Interim Report. [Online. URL: <https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2017-01/documents/state_of_the_border_region_2016_122216.pdf>. Accessed on 19 May 2019]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Villareal, A. (2019) US Mexico economic relations: trends, issues and implications. Congressional Research Service. RL32934. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Waller, D. (2005) US Border Enforcement from horseback to high-tech. Migration Policy Institute [Online. URL: <http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/horseback-high-techus-border-enforcement>. Accessed on 22 September 2017]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Walters, W. (2004) “Secure borders, safe heaven, domopolitics.” Citizenship Studies, Vol. 8, No. 3, 237-260. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Walters, W. (2006) “Rethinking borders beyond the state.” Comparative European Politics, Vol. 4, No. 1, 141-159. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wilson, V. (2012) “Research methods: interviews.” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, Vol. 7, No. 2, 96-98. | - |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2019 Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder | es-ES |
| dc.source | Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 10 No. 2 (2019); 185-206 | en-US |
| dc.source | Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2019); 185-206 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Geopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 10 N.º 2 (2019); 185-206 | pt-PT |
| dc.source | 2172-7155 | - |
| dc.source | 2172-3958 | - |
| dc.subject | Dehumanization | en-US |
| dc.subject | faith-based organizations | en-US |
| dc.subject | militarization | en-US |
| dc.subject | technology | en-US |
| dc.subject | US-Mexico border | en-US |
| dc.subject | deshumanización | es-ES |
| dc.subject | organizaciones religiosas | es-ES |
| dc.subject | militarización | es-ES |
| dc.subject | tecnologías | es-ES |
| dc.subject | frontera México-Estados Unidos | es-ES |
| dc.subject | desumanização | pt-PT |
| dc.subject | organizações religiosas | pt-PT |
| dc.subject | militarização | pt-PT |
| dc.subject | tecnologias | pt-PT |
| dc.subject | fronteira México- Estados Unidos | pt-PT |
| dc.title | The Power Struggle along the US-Mexico Border: A Space of Dehumanization and of Assertion of Justice | en-US |
| dc.title | The Power Struggle along the US-Mexico Border: A Space of Dehumanization and of Assertion of Justice | es-ES |
| dc.title | A luta pelo poder na fronteira México-Estados Unidos: um espaço de desumanização e de demanda por justiça | pt-PT |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| dc.type | Artículo revisado por pares | es-ES |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.