Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181399
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorWeichelt, Ryan-
dc.date2018-06-20-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:35:39Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:35:39Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/60705-
dc.identifier10.5209/GEOP.60705-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181399-
dc.descriptionEarly electoral research analyzed elections as whole areal ecological units such as individual states to examine how people voted. However, in the 1920s, political scientists began to place a strong emphasis on individual voter behavior, becoming increasingly reliant on survey data. Electoral geographers who utilized surveys were always troubled with this method due to the difficultly of connecting geographic voting patterns to individual respondents. The rise of positivism in the 1960s, inspired electoral geographers to re-center their focus on the voting behavior of large groups in the aggregate, not the individual. While qualitative methods still have an important role to play in electoral inquiry, the growth of geospatial technologies and increased interests in electoral cartography can yield important insights and should be utilized more in the study of elections. This paper will highlight a variety of spatial analysis techniques (i.e. cartographic methods, spatial statistics, and spatial autocorrelation) focusing on the recent electoral patterns of Hispanic voters in the United States. By providing a robust discussion of geospatial analysis methods, this paper can provide new avenues of discussion regarding geography’s role in the study elections.en-US
dc.descriptionLas primeras investigaciones electorales analizaban las elecciones considerando unidades de área ecológica compactas, tales como los estados, para examinar cómo se votaba. Sin embargo, en la década de 1920, la ciencia política comenzó a centrarse en el comportamiento del votante individual, volviéndose cada vez más dependiente de los datos de la encuesta. La geografía electoral que también recurría a encuestas encontraba problemática esta aproximación metodológica debido a la dificultad de conectar patrones de votación geográfica con las encuestas individuales. En la década de 1960, el surgimiento del positivismo recondujo a los geógrafos/as electorales hacia el estudio del comportamiento electoral de grupos grandes sobre datos agregados, no individuales. Si bien los métodos cualitativos aún tienen un papel importante en la investigación electoral, el crecimiento de las tecnologías geoespaciales y el aumento de los intereses en la cartografía electoral podrían proporcionar hallazgos importantes y deberían utilizarse más en el estudio de las elecciones. Este artículo señalará una variedad de técnicas de análisis espacial (es decir, métodos cartográficos, estadísticas espaciales y autocorrelación espacial) aplicadas al análisis de los patrones electorales más recientes del voto de las comunidades hispanas en Estados Unidos. Al proporcionar una discusión sólida de los métodos de análisis geoespacial, nuestro objetivo es proporcionar nuevas líneas de debate sobre el papel de la geografía en las elecciones de estudio.es-ES
dc.descriptionAs primeiras investigações eleitorais analisavam as eleições considerando unidades de área ecológica compactas, tais como os estados, para examinar como se votava. No entanto, na década de 1920, a ciência política começou a centrar no comportamento do votante individual, voltando-se a cada vez mais dependente dos dados da pesquisa de opinião. A geografia eleitoral que também recorria a pesquisas de opinião encontrava problemática esta aproximação metodológica devido à dificuldade de ligar padrões de votação geográfica com as pesquisas de opinião individuais. Na década de 1960, o surgimento do positivismo devolveu aos geógrafos/as eleitorais para o estudo do comportamento eleitoral de grupos grandes sobre dados agregados, não individuais.. Conquanto os métodos qualitativos ainda têm um papel importante na investigação eleitoral, o crescimento das tecnologias geo-espaciais e o aumento dos interesses na cartografia eleitoral poderiam proporcionar achados importantes e deveriam se utilizar mais no estudo das eleições. Este artigo assinalará uma variedade de técnicas de análise espacial (isto é, métodos cartográficos, estatísticas espaciais e autocorrelação espacial) aplicadas à análise dos padrões eleitorais mais recentes do voto das comunidades hispanas em Estados Unidos. Ao proporcionar uma discussão sólida dos métodos de análises geo-espacial, nosso objectivo é proporcionar novas linhas de debate sobre o papel da geografia nas eleições de estudo.pt-PT
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagespa-
dc.publisherEdiciones Complutensees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/GEOP/article/view/60705/4564456547555-
dc.relation/*ref*/Agnew, J. (1985) “Models of Spatial Variation in Political Expression: The Case of the Scottish of National Party”. International Political Science Review, vol. 6, núm. 2, 171-196.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Agnew, J. (1987) The United States in the World-Economy: A Regional Geography. Cam-bridge: Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Agnew, J. (1990) “From Political Methodology to Geographical Social Theory: A Critical Review of Electoral Geography, 1960-1987”, en R. J. Johnston, F. M. Shelley & P. J. Taylor (eds.) Developments in Electoral Geography. London: Routledge, 15-21.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Agnew, J. (1996) “Mapping Politics: How Context Counts in Electoral Geography”. Politi-cal Geography, vol. 15, núm. 2, 129-146.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Anselin, L. (2005) Exploring Spatial Data with GeoDa: A Workbook. Urbana-Champaign: Spatial Analysis Laboratory, Department of Geography, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Archer, J. C. & Shelley, F. M. (1986) American Electoral Mosaics. Washington, D.C.: Asso-ciation of American Geographers.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Archer, J. C. & Taylor, P. J. (1981) Section and Party: A Political Geography of American Presidential Elections from Andrew Jackson to Ronald Regan. Chichester: John Wiley.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Arreola, D. (2002) Tejano South Texas. Austin: University of Texas Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Arvizu, J. R. & Garcia, C. F. (1996) “Latino Voting Participation: Explaining and Differen-tiating Latino Voting Turnout Out”. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, vol. 18, núm. 2, 104-128.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Baybeck, B. & McClurg, S. D. (2005) “What Do They Know and How Do They Know It? An Examination of Citizen Awareness of Context”. American Politics Research, vol. 33, núm. 4, 492-520.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bean, F. D. & Tienda, M. (1987) The Hispanic Population of the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Boswell, T. D. & Jones, T. C. (1980) “A Regionalization of Mexican Americans in the Unit-ed States”. Geographical Review, vol. 70, núm. 1, 88-98.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Brunn, S. D. (1974) Geography and Politics in America. New York: Harper and Row.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Cliff, A. D. & Ord, J. K. (1969) “The problem of spatial autocorrelation”, en A. J. Scott (ed.) London Papers in Regional Science, Studies in Regional Science. London: Pion, 25-55.-
dc.relation/*ref*/CNN (2004) “America Votes 2004” [URL: <http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2004/>. Visitado el 20 de junio de 2010].-
dc.relation/*ref*/CNN (2008) “Election Center 2008” [URL: <http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/>. Visitado el 20 de junio de 2010].-
dc.relation/*ref*/Cox, K. R. (1969) “The Voting Decision in a Spatial Context”. Progress in Geography, vol. 1, 81-117.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Cox, K. R. (1973) Conflict, Power, and Politics in the City: Geographic View. New York: McGraw Hill.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Classen, R. L. (2004) “Political Opinion and Distinctiveness: The Case of Hispanic Ethnici-ty”. Political Research Quarterly, vol. 57, núm. 4, 609-620.-
dc.relation/*ref*/De la Garza, R. O.; DeSipio, L.; Chris Garcia, F.; Garcia, J. & Falcón, A. (1992) Latino Voices: Mexican, Puerto Rican, and Cuban Perspectives on American Politics. Boul-der: Westview Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/DeSipio, L. (1996) Counting on the Latino Vote. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Elazar, D. J. (1984) American Federalism: A View from the States. New York: Harper and Row.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ehsan, R. (2017) “What the Democrats Can (and must) Learn from their Unexpected De-feat”. LSE US Centre. [URL: <http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2017/01/23/what-the-democrats-can-and-must-learn-from-their-unexpected-defeat/>. Visitado el 4 de febre-ro de 2017].-
dc.relation/*ref*/Falcόn, A.; De la Garza, R. O.; Garcia F.C. & Garcia, J. A. (1991) Modes of Political Par-ticipation of Mexican-Americans, Puerto Ricans, and Cuban-Americans: Findings from the Latino National Political Survey. New York: Institute for Puerto Rican Policy.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Garcia, J. A. & C. H. Arce (1988) “Political orientations and behaviors of Chicanos: Trying tomake sense out of attitudes and participation”, en F. C. Garcia (ed.) Latinos and the Political System. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 125-151.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Getis, A. (2007) “Reflections on spatial autocorrelation”. Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 37, núm. 4, 491-496.-
dc.relation/*ref*/GMU (2010) Voter Turnout [URL: <http://www.electproject.org/>. Visitado el 23 de junio de 2010].-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hartshorne, Richard (1950) “The Functional Approach in Political Geography”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 44, núm. 2, 95-114.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Heppen, J. (2003) “Racial and Social Diversity and U.S. Presidential Election Regions”. The Professional Geographer, vol. 55, núm. 1, 191-205.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jaschik, S. (2010) “The Missing Latinos”. Inside Higher Ed [URL: <http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/05/14/latinos>. Visitado el 16 de mayo de 2010].-
dc.relation/*ref*/Johnston, R. J. (1974) “Local Effects in Voting at a Local Election”. Annals of the Associa-tion of American Geographers, vol. 64, núm. 3, 418-429.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Johnston, R. J. (1977) “The Geography of Federal Allocations in the United States”. Geofo-rum, vol. 8, núm. 5-6, 319-326.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Johnston, R. J. (1979) Political, Electoral, and Spatial Systems. Oxford: Clarendon Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Johnston, R.; Jones, K.; Propper, C. & Burgess, S. (2007) “Region, Local Context, and Vot-ing at the 1997 General Election in England”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 51, núm. 3, 640-654.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jones, K.; Johnston, R. J. & Pattie, C. J. (1992) “People, Places and Regions: Exploring the Use of Multi-Level Modeling in the Analysis of Electoral Data”. British Journal of Po-litical Science, vol. 22, núm. 3, 343-380.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kim, J. & Mueller, C. W. (1978) Introduction to factor analysis: what it is and how to do it. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lee, M. Y. H. (2015) “Analysis: Donald Trump’s false comments connecting Mexican immigrants and crime”. The Washington Post. [URL: <https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/07/08/donald-trumps-false-comments-connecting-mexican-immigrants-and-crime/?utm_term=.872648389ce5>. Visitado el 23 de marzo de 2017).-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lopez, M. H. (2009) “The Hispanic Vote in the 2008 Election”. Pew Hispanic Trust [URL: <http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/98.pdf>. Visitado el 12 de marzo de 2010].-
dc.relation/*ref*/McClain, P. D. & Garcia, J. A. (1993) “Expanding Disciplinary Boundaries: Black, Latino, and Racial Minority Group Politics in Political Science”, en A. W. Finifter (ed.) Political Science: The State of the Discipline, II. Washington, D.C.: American Political Science Association, 247-279.-
dc.relation/*ref*/McPhail, I. R. (1971) “The Vote for Major of Los Angeles in 1969”. Annals of the Associa-tion of American Geographers, vol. 61, núm. 4, 744-758.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mercer, J. & Agnew J. A. (1988) “Small Worlds and Local Heroes: The 1987 General Elec-tion in Scotland”. Scottish Geographical Magazine, vol. 104, núm. 3, 136-145.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Moran, P. A. P. (1950) “Notes on Continuous Stochastic Phenomena”. Biometrika, vol. 37, núm. 1-2, 17-33.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pattie, C. J. & Johnston, R. J. (1990) “Embellishment and Detail? The Changing Relation-ship between Voting, Class, Attitudes and the Core. Periphery Division of Great Britain 1979-1987”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 15, núm. 2, 205-226.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pattie, C. J. & Johnston, R. J. (2000) “People Who Talk Together Vote Together”: An Ex-ploration of Contextual Effects in Great Britain”. Annals of the Association of Ameri-can Geographers, vol. 90, núm. 1, 41-66.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pew Research Center (2016) “2106 Campaign: Strong Interest, Widespread Dissatisfac-tion”. Pew Research [URL: <http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2016/07/07-07-16-Voter-attitudes-release.pdf>. Visitado el 15 de abril de 2017).-
dc.relation/*ref*/Prescott, J. R. V. (1959) “The Function and Methods of Electoral Geography”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 49, núm. 3, 296-304.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Rodriguez, D. (2002) Latino National Political Coalitions: Struggles and Challenges. New York: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Shaw, D.; de la Garza, R. O. & Lee, J. (2000) “Examining Latino Turnout in 1996: A Three State, Validated Survey Approach”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 44, núm. 2, 338-346.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Shelley, Fred M. & Archer, J. Clark (1984) “Political Habit, Political Culture, and the Elec-toral Mosaic of a Border Region”. Geographical Perspectives, vol. 54, núm. 1, 7-20.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Shelley, Fred M. & Archer, J. Clark (1989) “Sectionalism and Presidential Politics: Voting Patterns in Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio”. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 20, núm. 2, 227-255.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Shelley, Fred M.; Archer, J. Clark; Davidson, Fiona M. & Brunn, Stanley D. (1996) Politi-cal Geography of the United States. New York: Guilford Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Shelley, Fred M.; Johnston, Ron. J. & Taylor, Peter J. (1990) “Developments in electoral geography”, en R. J. Johnston, F. M. Shelley & P. J. Taylor (eds.) Developments in Elec-toral Geography. London: Routledge, 1-11.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2007) Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston: Pearson (5ª ed).-
dc.relation/*ref*/Taylor, P. J. & Johnston, R. J. (1979) Geography of Elections. London: Croom Helm.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tobler, W. R. (1970) “A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region”. Economic Geography, vol. 46 núm. 2, 234-240.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Torres, M. de los A. (1988) “Cuban American Politics”, en C. Garcia (ed.) Latinos and the Political System. Notre Dame, Indiana: Notre Dame Press, 81-98.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Trubowitz, P. (1998) Defining the National Interest: Conflict and Change in American Foreign Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tunstall, H.; Rossiter, D. J.; Pattie, C. J.; MacAllister, I.; Johnston, R. J. & Dorling, D. F. L. (2000) “Geographical Scale, the «Feel-Good Factor» and Voting at the 1997 General Election in England and Wales”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 25, núm. 1, 51-64.-
dc.relation/*ref*/U. S. Census Bureau (2016) American Community Survey. [URL: <http://factfinder.census.gov/>. Visitado el 3 de febrero de 2017].-
dc.relation/*ref*/Uhlaner, C. J.; Cain, B.E. & Kiewiet, D. R. (1989) “Political Participation of Ethnic Minori-ties in the 1980s”. Political Behavior, vol. 11, núm. 3, 195-231.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ward, N. (2002) “Representing rurality? New labour and the electoral geography of rural Britain”. Area, vol. 34, núm. 2, 171-181.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Warf, Barney & Leib, Jonathan (eds.) (2011) Revitalizing Electoral Geography. Farnham (RU): Ashgate.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Watrel, Robert (2001) Sectionalism, Coalitions, and Local-National Politics: A Geograph-ical History of Presidential and Gubernatorial Elections in North Dakota, 1889-2000. Tesis doctoral, Department of Geography, University of Nebraska.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Weichelt, R. (2008) Scale Factors in Hispanic Voting. Tesis doctoral, Department of An-thropology and Geography, University of Nebraska.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Weichelt, R. (2010) “Does a Hispanic Region of South Texas Exist? An Electoral Analysis of U.S. Presidential Elections, 1952 to 2008 in the State of Texas”. Southwestern Geo-grapher. vol. 14, 88-121.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Weichelt, R. & Zeitler, E. (2012) “Multi-Scalar Cartographic Analysis of 2008 and 2010 Election Returns in Wisconsin, USA”. Journal of Maps, vol. 8, núm. 3, 312-319.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Welch, S. & Hibbing, J. R. (1984) “Hispanic Representation in the U.S. Congress”. Social Science Quarterly, vol. 65, núm. 2, 328-335.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wright, J.K. (1944) “Training for Research in Political Geography”. Annals of the Associa-tion of American Geographers, vol. 34, núm. 4, 190-201.-
dc.sourceGeopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 9 No. 1 (2018); 11-34en-US
dc.sourceGeopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2018); 11-34es-ES
dc.sourceGeopolítica(s). Revista de estudios sobre espacio y poder; Vol. 9 N.º 1 (2018); 11-34pt-PT
dc.source2172-7155-
dc.source2172-3958-
dc.subjectelectoral geographyen-US
dc.subjectHispanic votingen-US
dc.subjectUSAen-US
dc.subjectspatial analysisen-US
dc.subjectgeospatial technologiesen-US
dc.subjectgeografía electorales-ES
dc.subjectvoto hispanoes-ES
dc.subjectEstados Unidoses-ES
dc.subjectanálisis espaciales-ES
dc.subjecttecnologías geoespacialeses-ES
dc.subjectgeografia eleitoralpt-PT
dc.subjectvoto hispanopt-PT
dc.subjectEstados Unidospt-PT
dc.subjectanálise espacialpt-PT
dc.subjecttecnologias geo-espaciaispt-PT
dc.titleEnhancing Electoral Geography: Utilizing Geospatial Technologies to Ana-lyze Recent Hispanic Voting Patterns in the United Statesen-US
dc.titleUn impulso para la Geografía Electoral: el uso de tecnologías geoespaciales para el análisis del voto de las comunidades hispanas en Estados Unidoses-ES
dc.titleUm impulso para a Geografia Eleitoral: o uso de tecnologias geo- espaciais para a análise do voto das comunidades hispanas em Estados Unidospt-PT
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.