Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181213
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorJiménez González, Aitor-
dc.creatorCancela Rodríguez, Ekaitz-
dc.date2023-01-12-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:34:30Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:34:30Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/82074-
dc.identifier10.5209/tekn.82074-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181213-
dc.descriptionThis article presents the provisional findings of an ongoing research project on platform regulation in Southern Europe. Centred on debates around platform governance and platform regulation, the study had two objectives. Firstly, to contribute to the debate on Southern European platform regulation, which has generally been neglected in the literature outside the context of labour related platforms. To do so, the article analyses current online discourse in relation to the regulatory framework and the recently adopted Digital Services Act. Secondly, we set out a progressive agenda for the democratization of the digital landscape.en-US
dc.descriptionEl siguiente texto presenta los hallazgos provisionales de una investigación en curso sobre regulación de plataformas digitales en el Sur de Europa. El artículo, situado en los debates de la regulación y gobierno de las plataformas, apunta a dos objetivos. En primer lugar, contribuir a los estudios de gobierno de las plataformas en los países periféricos de la Unión Europea; un enfoque que, al margen del ámbito laboral, apenas ha sido explorado en la literatura. Para ello analiza tanto el actual modelo de regulación del discurso online como los aportes y limitaciones de la nueva ley Europea de Servicios Digitales (2022). En segundo lugar, ofrecer una agenda progresista que permita imaginar la democratización del sector tecnológico.es-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagespa-
dc.publisherGrupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguases-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/82074/4564456562883-
dc.relation/*ref*/Amnistía Internacional (2019). Surveillance giants: How the business model of Google and Facebook-Meta threatens human rights. Amnesty International. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol30/1404/2019/en/ Araújo, B. y Prior H. (2021). Framing political populism: The role of media in framing the election of Jair Bolsonaro. Journalism Practice, 2(15), 226-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2019.1709881 Barrera, R y Bustamante, J. (2018). The rotten apple: Tax avoidance in Ireland. The International Trade Journal, 32(1), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2017.1356250 Birch, K. y Bronson, K. (2022). Big Tech. Science as Culture (2022), 31(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2022.2036118 Bossio, D., Flew, T., Meese, J., Leaver, T. y Barnet, B. (2022). Australia's News Media Bargaining Code and the global turn towards platform regulation. Policy & Internet, 14, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.284 Calice, M., Bao, L. y Freiling, I. (2021). Polarized platforms? How partisanship shapes perceptions of “algorithmic news bias”. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211034159 Cancela, E y Jiménez, A. (2020). La economía política del capitalismo digital en España. Madrid: Instituto 25M. https://instituto25m.info/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Working-Paper-INSTITUTO-25M.pdf Cancela, E y Rivas, N. (2021, 16 de febrero). La entrega de las administraciones públicas a Microsoft: 793 millones en contratos para licencias y servicios. El Salto. https://www.elsaltodiario.com/tecnologia/administraciones-publicas-microsoft-793-millones-contratos-licencias-servicios Canning, V. y Tombs, S. (2021) From social harm to zemiology: A critical introduction. Routledge. Cini, M. y Czulno, O. (2022). Digital Single Market and the EU Competition Regime: An Explanation of Policy Change. Journal of European Integration, 44(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.2011260 Comisión Europea (2018). Joint Communication to The European Parliament, The European Council, The Council, The European Economic and Social Committee and The Committee of The Regions: Action Plan against Disinformation, 12 de diciembre, JOIN. https://op.europa.eu/es/publication-detail/-/publication/e18263d2-f962-11e8-8885-01aa75ed71a1/language-en European Parliament (2021, 8 de noviembre). Frances Haugen to MEPs: EU digital rules can be a game changer for the world. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/pressroom/20211107IPR16801/frances-haugen-to-meps-eu-digital-rules-can-be-a-game-changer-for-the-world Facebook-Meta Oversight Board (2022). Ensuring respect for free expression, through independent judgement. https://oversightboard.com/ Friedman, M. (1970, 13 de septiembre). A Friedman doctrine‐- The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html Fuchs, C. (2018). Digital demagogue: Authoritarian capitalism in the age of Trump and Twitter. Pluto Press. Garrison S.T. (2017). Politicizing Digital Space: Theory, the Internet, and Renewing Democracy. Westminster University Press. Gobierno de la República Federal Alemana (2017). Netzwerkdurchsetzungsgesetz. Gorwa, R. (2019). What is platform governance? Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 854-871. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914 Gorwa, R. (2021). Elections, institutions, and the regulatory politics of platform governance: The case of the German NetzDG. Telecommunications Policy, 45(6), 102-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102145 Harris, B. (2020). El Consejo asesor de contenido comienza a recibir casos. Facebook-Meta Newsroom, 22 de octubre. https://about.fb.com/es/news/2020/10/el-consejo-asesor-de-contenido-comienza-a-recibir-casos Jiménez, A. (2022). Law, Code and Exploitation: How Corporations Regulate the Working Conditions of the Digital Proletariat. Critical Sociology, 48(2): 361-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/08969205211028964 Jiménez, A. y Oleson, J. C. (2022). The Crimes of Digital Capitalism. Mitchell Hamline Law Review, 48(4), 972-1018. https://open.mitchellhamline.edu/mhlr/vol48/iss4/5 Kalsnes, B. y Ihlebæk K.A. (2021). Hiding hate speech: political moderation on Facebook-Meta. Media, Culture & Society, 43(2): 326-342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720957562 Kayali, L. (2021, 27 de mayo). France 's plan to rein in Big Tech (and Ireland and Luxembourg). Político. https://www.politico.eu/article/france-ireland-luxembourg-big-tech-regulation-apple-amazon-Facebook-Meta-google-digital-services-act-digital-markets/ Klossa, G. (2019). Towards European Media Sovereignty an Industrial Media Strategy to leverage Data, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence. Report, European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/towards-european-media-sovereignty_en Koene, A., Clifton, C., Hatada, Y., Webb, H. y Richardson, R. (2019). A governance framework for algorithmic accountability and transparency. Bruselas: European Parliamentary Research Service. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/624262/EPRS_STU(2019)624262_EN.pdf Matamoros-Fernández, A. (2017). Platformed racism: the mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook-Meta and YouTube. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6): 930-946. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293130 Moore, M. (2021). Regulating Big Tech: Policy Responses to Digital Dominance. Oxford University Press. Nielsen, R. K., Schulz, A. y Fletcher, R. (2021). An ongoing infodemic: how people in eight countries access news and information about coronavirus a year into the pandemic. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Orden PCM/1030/2020, de 30 de octubre, por la que se publica el Procedimiento de actuación contra la desinformación aprobado por el Consejo de Seguridad Nacional (2020). Boletín Oficial del Estado, 292, 5 de noviembre. https://www.boe.es/buscar/act.php?id=BOE-A-2020-13663 Orden PCM/541/2022 de 10 de junio, por la que se publica el Acuerdo del Consejo de Ministros del 31 de mayo de 2022, por el que se crea el Foro contra las campañas de desinformación en el ámbito de la Seguridad Nacional y se regula su composición y funcionamiento (2022). Boletín Oficial del Estado, 142, 15 de junio. https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2022/06/15/pdfs/BOE-A-2022-9965.pdf Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector (Digital Markets Act) (2020), 15 de diciembre, COM/2020/842 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2020%3A842%3AFIN Sadowski, J. (2020). Too smart: How digital capitalism is extracting data, controlling our lives, and taking over the world. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/12240.001.0001 Schwarz, O. (2019). Facebook rules: structures of governance in digital capitalism and the control of generalized social capital. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(4), 117-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419826 Statista. (2022). Leading countries based the share of internet users who use WhatsApp monthly as of 4th quarter 2020. Disponible en: https://www.statista.com/statistics/291540/mobile-internet-user-whatsapp/ Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, and Data Security Hearing. (2021). Protecting Kids Online: Testimony from a Facebook-Meta Whistleblower, 5 de octubre. https://www.commerce.senate.gov/2021/10/protecting%20kids%20online:%20testimony%20from%20a%20Facebook-Meta%20whistleblower Tombs, S. y Whyte D. (2015). The corporate criminal: Why corporations must be abolished. Routledge. Van Dijck, J. (2020). Governing digital societies: Private platforms, public values. Computer Law & Security Review, 36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105377 Von der Leyen, U. (2019). Speech by President-elect von der Leyen in the European Parliament Plenary on the occasion of the presentation of her College of Commissioners and their programme. 27 de noviembre. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_19_6408 Wells, G., Horwitz, J. y Seetharaman, D. (2021, 14 de septiembre). Facebook Knows Instagram Is Toxic for Many Teen Girls, Company Documents Show, Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/Facebook-Meta-knows-instagram-is-toxic-for-teen-girls-company-documents-show-11631620739?mod=article_inline-
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Socialeses-ES
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 20 No. 1 (2023): Democratic deliberation on the Net: From digital dialogue to digital noise; 91-99en-US
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 20 Núm. 1 (2023): Deliberación democrática en la Red: Del diálogo al ruido digital; 91-99es-ES
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 20 n. 1 (2023): Miscelánea; 91-99pt-BR
dc.source1549-2230-
dc.subjectDigital Services Acten-US
dc.subjectdisinformationen-US
dc.subjectfake newsen-US
dc.subjectplatform regulationen-US
dc.subjectGobierno de las plataformases-ES
dc.subjectLey de Servicios Digitaleses-ES
dc.subjectdesinformaciónes-ES
dc.subjectnoticias falsases-ES
dc.titleIs it possible to govern Big Tech? A critical analysis of the EU Digital Services Acten-US
dc.title¿Es posible gobernar a las plataformas digitales? Análisis crítico de la Ley Europea de Servicios Digitaleses-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.