Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

  1. Repositorio institucional de CLACSO
  2. Colección de los Centros Asociados
  3. España
  4. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181188
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorLópez Flores, Luis Moisés-
dc.date2022-05-09-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:34:27Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:34:27Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/78681-
dc.identifier10.5209/tekn.78681-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181188-
dc.descriptionIn recent years, cultural studies on algorithm-based decision-making technologies have been on the rise. New approaches in social sciences and humanities aim to analyze particular cases of algorithmic biases, but also the structural relationship between algorithmic technologies and the exercise of power. In this article, I propose the concept of algorithmic coloniality, defined as the racialized and sexualized mechanization of the modern and contemporary world through digital technologies. Algorithms are a digital renewal of the rationalization and bureaucratization of the modern/capitalist world, but with racial and gender-based overtones. The contemporary world runs the risk of building a digital colony.en-US
dc.descriptionEn los últimos años los estudios culturales sobre las tecnologías de toma de decisiones basadas en algoritmos han ido en aumento. Las nuevas aproximaciones, provenientes de las ciencias sociales y las humanidades, tienen como objetivo analizar no sólo los casos particulares de sesgos algorítmicos, sino la relación estructural entre tecnologías algorítmicas y ejercicios del poder. Así, propongo el concepto de colonialidad algorítmica que puede ser definida como la mecanización racializada y sexualizada de las tecnologías modernas y contemporáneas-digitales. Los algoritmos son la actualización digital de la racionalización y burocratización del mundo moderno/capitalista, pero con tintes raciales y de género. El mundo contemporáneo corre el riesgo de construir una colonia digital.es-ES
dc.descriptionNos últimos anos os estudos culturais sobre as tecnologias de tomada de decisão baseadas em algoritmos têm aumentado. Novas abordagens das ciências sociais e humanas visam analisar não apenas casos particulares de vieses algorítmicos, mas também a relação estrutural entre tecnologias algorítmicas e exercícios de poder. Assim, proponho o conceito de colonialidade algorítmica que pode ser definida como a mecanização racializada e sexualizada das tecnologias modernas e contemporâneas-digitais. Os algoritmos são a atualização digital da racionalização e da burocratização do mundo moderno/capitalista, mas com tons raciais e de gênero. O mundo contemporâneo corre o risco de construir uma colônia digital.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagespa-
dc.publisherGrupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguases-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/78681/4564456560594-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ampuja, M. y Koivisto J. (2014). From “post-industrial” to “network society” and beyond: The political conjunctures and current crisis of information society theory. TripleC, 12(2), 447-463.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Arendt, H. (1951). The origins of totalitarianism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bell, D. (1976). The coming of the post-industrial society. The Educational Forum, 40(4), 574-579.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bell, D. (1978). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. Basic Books.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Beller, J. (2018). The message is murder substrates of computational capital. Pluto Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Blau, P. (1956). Bureaucracy in modern society. Random House.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bridges, L. (2021). Digital failure: Unbecoming the “good” data subject through entropic, fugitive, and queer data. Big Data & Society, 1(8), 1-17. http://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720977882-
dc.relation/*ref*/Buolamwini. J. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 1-15. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a.html-
dc.relation/*ref*/Burrell, J. (2016). How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data y Society, 3(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512-
dc.relation/*ref*/Castro-Gómez, S. y Grosfoguel, R. (Eds.). (2007). El giro decolonial. Reflexiones para una diversidad epistémica más allá del capitalismo global. Biblioteca Universitaria.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Couldry, N. y Mejías U. (2019). The Costs of Connection. How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI. Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Davis, A. (1983). Women, race and class. Vintage Books.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Eubanks, V. (1972). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Habermas, J. (1981). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Suhrkamp.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hayles, K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. The University of Chicago Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hill, R. (2016). What an algorithm is. Philosophy and Technology, 29(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-014-0184-5-
dc.relation/*ref*/Khanna, P. (2017). Technocracy in America: Rise of the info-state. Parag Khanna.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Khanna, P. (2019). The future is Asian. Commerce, conflict, and culture in the 21st century. Simon y Schuster.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kitchin, R. (2014). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lee, F. y Larsen, L.B. (2019). How should we theorize algorithms? Five ideal types in analyzing algorithmic normativities. Big Data y Society, 6(2), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951719867349-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mandel, E. (1979). El capitalismo tardío. Ediciones Era.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Maschewski, F. y Nosthoff, V. (2018) Res publica ex machina: On neo-cybernetic governance and the end of politics. Let’s Get Physical. INC Reader13. https://networkcultures.org/longform/2018/10/18/res-publica-ex-machina-on-neocybernetic-governance-and-the-end-of-politics/-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mignolo, W. (2005). The idea of Latin America. Blackwell Publishing.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mignolo, W. (2000). Local histories/global designs. Coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S. y Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679-
dc.relation/*ref*/Noble, S. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. New York University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishers.-
dc.relation/*ref*/O’Reilly, T. (2013). Open data and algorithmic regulation. En B. Goldstein y L. Dyson (Eds.), Beyond Transparency: Open Data and the Future of Civic Innovation, 21, 289-300. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.674.6114&rep=rep1&type=pdf#page=300-
dc.relation/*ref*/Parisi, L. (2015). Instrumental reason, algorithmic capitalism, and the incomputable. En M. Pasquinelli (Ed.), Alleys of your mind: Augmented intelligence and its traumas (pp. 125–37). Meson Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pasquale, F. (2019). The second wave of algorithmic accountability. Law and Political Economy. https://lpeproject.org/blog/the-second-wave-of-algorithmic-accountability/-
dc.relation/*ref*/Pasquinelli, M. (2019). Three thousand years of algorithmic rituals: The emergence of AI from the computation of space. e-flux Journal, 101. https://www.e-flux.com/journal/101/273221/three-thousand-years-of-algorithmic-rituals-the-emergence-of-ai-from-the-computation-of-space/-
dc.relation/*ref*/Quijano, A. (1992). Colonialidad y Modernidad/racionalidad. Perú Indígena, 13(29), pp. 11-20. https://www.lavaca.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/quijano.pdf-
dc.relation/*ref*/Segato, R. (2013). La crítica de la colonialidad en ocho ensayos y una antropología por demanda. Prometeo.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Shannon, C. y Weaver, W. (1964). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Totaro, P. y Ninno, D. (2014). The concept of algorithm as an interpretative key of modern rationality. Theory Culture Society, 31(4), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413510051-
dc.relation/*ref*/Volti, R. (1995). Society and technological change. St. Martin's Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Weber, M. (2016). Die protestantische Ethik und der „Geist“des Kapitalismus. Springer VS.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Technology Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.-
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2022 Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Socialeses-ES
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 19 No. 2 (2022): Digital Education in the Time of COVID-19; 231-239en-US
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 19 Núm. 2 (2022): La educación digital en tiempo del COVID-19; 231-239es-ES
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 19 n. 2 (2022): La educación digital en tiempo del COVID-19; 231-239pt-BR
dc.source1549-2230-
dc.subjectalgorithmen-US
dc.subjectcolonialismen-US
dc.subjectdigital worlden-US
dc.subjectracismen-US
dc.subjectsexismen-US
dc.subjectalgoritmoes-ES
dc.subjectcolonialismoes-ES
dc.subjectmundo digitales-ES
dc.subjectracismoes-ES
dc.subjectsexismoes-ES
dc.subjectalgoritmopt-BR
dc.subjectcolonialismopt-BR
dc.subjectmundo digitalpt-BR
dc.subjectracismopt-BR
dc.subjectsexismopt-BR
dc.titleAlgorithmic coloniality: Mechanized racialization and sexualization in digital capitalismen-US
dc.titleColonialidad algorítmica: Racialización y sexualización mecanizada en el capitalismo digitales-ES
dc.titleColonialidade algorítmica: Racialização e sexualização mecanizada no capitalismo digitalpt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.