Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181187Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Gray, Chris H. | - |
| dc.date | 2021-12-10 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:34:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:34:27Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/78292 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/tekn.78292 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181187 | - |
| dc.description | Knowledge is a form of power, but power for those who deploy it, not create it. New technoscientific programs, such as nanotechnology, are crucial realms for democratizing society since they aren’t ‘locked-in’ through technological momentum and because they are sites of cultural and technological production, which is another important form of power. Science and technology in the early 21st Century are mainly shaped by market (profit) and military priorities. Sometimes within these new areas, resistance to these pressures produces new ways of understanding how science and technology can contribute to a just and sustainable future. In nanotechnology research this tension can be seen in the various codes promulgated for its regulation. It is also clear in such theories and practices as cyborg citizenship, hybrid imagination, scientists’ social responsibility and activism, prefigurative practices such as art and Do-It-Yourself (DIY) and Do-It-Together (DIT) organizing and the democracy and technology movement. They reveal how the development of nanotechnologies and the nanosciences can lead not just to new inventions and medical treatments, but to stronger democracy as well. | en-US |
| dc.description | El conocimiento es una forma de poder, pero para quienes lo ejercen, no para quienes lo crean. Los nuevos programas tecnocientíficos, como la nanotecnología, son ámbitos cruciales para la democratización social, pues no están ‘bloqueados’ por el impulso tecnológico y porque son lugares de producción tecnológica y cultural, lo cual sería otra importante forma de poder. La ciencia y la tecnología en los inicios del siglo XII se encuentran determinados por las necesidades mercantiles (beneficios) y militares. En ocasiones, las resistencias ante este tipo de presiones permiten entender las posibles formas en que la ciencia y la tecnología pueden servir para alcanzar un futuro justo y sostenible. En el ámbito de la investigación nanotecnológica estas tensiones están inscritas en los códigos que se han formulado para la regulación de sus mismas prácticas de investigación. Resulta evidente cómo las teorías y prácticas relativas a la ciudadanía cyborg, la imaginación híbrida, así como en las ciencias sociales responsables y comprometidas con el activismo y las disciplinas prefigurativas como el arte, el ‘hazlo tú mismo’ (Do-It-Yourself o DIY), el ‘hacerlo juntos’ (Do-It-Together o DIT), al igual que el movimiento relativo a la tecnología democrática, revelan que el desarrollo de la nanotecnología y la nanociencia pueden propiciar nuevos hallazgos y tratamientos médicos y democracias más democráticas o fuertes. | es-ES |
| dc.description | O conhecimento é uma forma de poder, mas poder para quem o exercita, não para quem o cria. Novos programas tecnocêntricos, como a nanotecnologia, são áreas cruciais para a democratização da sociedade, uma vez que não estejam " fechados " pelo momentum tecnológico e porque são locais de produção cultural e tecnológica, que é outra forma importante de poder. A ciência e a tecnologia no início do século XXI são modeladas principalmente pelas prioridades do mercado (lucro) e militares. Às vezes, dentro dessas novas áreas, a resistência a essas pressões produz novas maneiras de entender como a ciência e a tecnologia podem contribuir para um futuro justo e sustentável. Na pesquisa em nanotecnologia, esta tensão pode ser vista nos diversos códigos promulgados para sua regulamentação. Também está claro em teorias e práticas como cidadania ciborgue, imaginação híbrida, responsabilidade social e ativismo dos cientistas, práticas prefigurativas como arte e bricolage (Do-It-Yourself) e Do-It-Together (DIT) organizando e a democracia e o movimento tecnológico. Eles revelam como o desenvolvimento das nanotecnologias e das nanociências pode levar não apenas a novas invenções e tratamentos médicos, mas também a uma democracia mais forte. | pt-BR |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Grupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguas | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/78292/4564456559534 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Allhoff, F., Lin, P., and Moore, D. (2010). What is nanotechnology and why does it matter? From science to ethics. Wiley-Blackwell. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Barakat, N. and Jiao, H. (2010). Proposed strategies for teaching ethics of nanotechnology. Nanoethics, 4(3). 221-228. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11569-010-0100-0.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/BASF (2009). Code of Nanotechnology. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Biroudian, S., M. Abbasi and M Kiani (2019). Theoretical and practical principles on nanoethics: A narrative review article. Iranian Journal of Public Health. 48(10), 1760-1767. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908913/ | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bobe, J. (19th January 2011). DIY Biology and the creation of community norms, at the UCSC Science & Justice Working Group Meeting. University of California at Santa Cruz. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Boler, M. and Davis, E. (2021). Affective politics of digital media: Propaganda by other means. Routledge. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cameron, N. M. de S. (2005). The NELSI imperative: Nano ethical and legal and social issues, and federal policy development. Nanotechnology Law & Business. 3(3), 159-166. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nantechlb3&div=25&g_sent=1&casa_token=&collection=journals | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Commision of the Europea Communities (CEC) (7th February 2008). On a code of conduct for responsible nanosciences and nanotechnologies research. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/fp7/89918/nanocode-recommendation_en.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (1999). One planet, one net: Principles for the Internet era. http://www.dotcomeon.com/onenet.html | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Del Monte, L. A. (25th May 2017). The second technological singularity: Self-replicating nanobots. HuffPost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-second-technological-singularity-self-replicating_b_59273e43e4b0d2a92f2f423f | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Drexler, E. (1986). Engines of creation: The coming era of nanotechnogy. Anchor Books. http://e-drexler.com/p/06/00/EOC_Cover.html | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Farrelly, C. (2007). Deliberative democracy and nanotechnology. In F. Allhoff, P. Lin, J. H. Moor, J. Weckert (Eds.) Nanoethics: The ethical and social implications of nanotechnology (pp. 215-224). John Wiley & Sons. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Feynaman, R. (1959). There’s plenty of room at the bottom. http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/feynman.html | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Friedrichs, S. (7th August 2007). Deciphering nanotechnology codes on the nanotechnolgy now site. http://www.nanotech-now.com/columns/?article=093 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gray, C. H. (2014). Big data, actionable information, scientific knowledge and the goal of control. Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales, 11(3). 529-554. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/48168 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gray, C. H. (2005). Peace, war, and computers. Routledge. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gray, C. H. (2002). In defense of prefigurative art: The aesthetics and ethics of Orlan and Stelarc. In Joanna Zylinska (Ed.), The cyborg experiments: extensions of the body in the media age (181-192). Althone/Continuum. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gray, C. H. (2001). Cyborg citizen: Politics in the posthuman age. Routledge. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gray, C. H. (1999). Ethics for computer professionals: Responsibility, service, and citizenship. Academic Exchange Quarterly. Winter, 86-90. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gray, C. H. (1997). The ethics and politics of cyborg embodiment: Citizenship as a hypervalue. Cultural Values, 1(2), 252-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797589709367148 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gray, C. H. and Gordo, Á. (2021). El cambiante gobierno digital: la virtualidad interactiva y remaking de la realidad en clave QAnon. In J. Candón-Mena and D. Moreno Sánchez (Eds.) Del ciberactivismo a la tecnopolítica. Movimientos sociales en la era del escepticismo tecnológico (95-114). Comunicación Social. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gray, C. H. and Gordo, Á. (2014). Social media in conflict: Comparing military and social movement technocultures. Cultural Politics. 1(3), 251-261. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hard, M. and Jamison, A. (2005). Hubris and hybrids—a cultural history of technology and science. Routledge. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Holz, R. L. (6th October 2010). Scientists create synthetic organism. The Wall Street Journal. May 21. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703559004575256470152341984.html | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Interessengemeinschaft Detailhandel Schweiz. (2007). Code of conduct: Nanotechnologies. http://www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=5375.php | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Isin, E. (1997). Who is the new citizen? Citizenship Studies, 1, 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621029708420650 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Jamison, A. and Mejlgaard, N. (2010). Contextualizing nanotechnology education: fostering a hybrid imagination in Aalborg, Denmark. Science as Culture, 19(3). 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430903512911 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Keane, J. (2009). The life and death of democracy. Norton. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kevles, D. J. (1992). Out of eugenics: The historical politics of the human genome. In D.J. Kevles and L. Hood (Eds.) The code of codes: scientific and social issues in the Human Genome Project (3-36). Harvard University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lessig, L. (1999). Code and other laws of cyberspace. Basic Books. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/McGinn, R. (2010a). What’s different, ethically about nanotechhology? Foundational questions and answers. Nanoethics. 4(2), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-010-0089-4 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/McGinn, R. (2010b). Ethical responsibilities of nanotechnology researchers: A short guide. Nanoethics, 4(1). 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-010-0082-y | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/McGinn, R. (2008). Ethics and nanotechnology: Views of nanotechnology researchers. Nanoethics, 2(2). 101-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-008-0040-0 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ratto, M. and Boler, M. (2014). DIY citizenship: Critical making and social media. MIT Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sclove, R. (1995). Democracy and technology. Guilford. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Norio T. (1974). On the basic concept of “nano-technology”. Proceedings of the International Conference on Precision Engineering, Part II. Tokyo: Japan Society of Precision Engineering. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Weiner, C. (2001). Drawing the line in genetic engineering: Self-regulation and public participation. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 44(3). 208-220. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Working Group of the Responsible Nano Code (2008). Seven principles of the code for responsible nanotechnology. https://www.nanowerk.com/news/newsid=5890.php | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Zuboff, S. (2019). Surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs. | - |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2021 Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022): Miscellany; 25-31 | en-US |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2022): Miscelánea; 25-31 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 19 n. 1 (2022): Miscelánea; 25-31 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 1549-2230 | - |
| dc.subject | cyborg citizenship | en-US |
| dc.subject | democratic science | en-US |
| dc.subject | hybrid imagination | en-US |
| dc.subject | nanotechnology codes | en-US |
| dc.subject | ciudadanía ciborg | es-ES |
| dc.subject | ciencia democrática | es-ES |
| dc.subject | imaginación híbrida | es-ES |
| dc.subject | códigos nanotecnológicos | es-ES |
| dc.subject | ciência democrática | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | cidadania ciborgue | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | códigos nanotecnológicos | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | imaginação híbrida | pt-BR |
| dc.title | Governing nanotechnology: Codes, citizenship and strong democracy | en-US |
| dc.title | Governing nanotechnology: Codes, citizenship and strong democracy | es-ES |
| dc.title | Governando a nanotecnologia: Códigos, cidadania e democracia forte | pt-BR |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| dc.type | Karpeta | es-ES |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.