Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181165
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorYauri-Miranda, Jaseff Raziel-
dc.date2021-12-10-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:34:25Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:34:25Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/74723-
dc.identifier10.5209/tekn.74723-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181165-
dc.descriptionThis essay provides an overview of the relationship between surveillance, individuals, and reality. To do this, I use a multilevel perspective that connects power (from agency to structure) to social systems theory. This novel approach means taking a holistic view on how individuals are managed beyond ideas of resistance and technology. At the agency level, individuals are constrained by continuous interactions through digital and behavioral exploitation. In the second meso-level, individuals attach to an informational system that renders, sorts, and distorts data fragments that resemble their ontology. Finally, at the structural level, more than being fragmented subjects, I argue that individuals and data constitute a new hermeneutic cycle in which reality itself is redefined in an autopoietic reading of things distanced from subjects and knowledge.en-US
dc.descriptionEste ensayo hace un repaso de la relación entre la vigilancia, los individuos y la realidad. Para ello utilizo una perspectiva multinivel que conecta el poder (desde la agencia hasta la estructura) con la teoría de los sistemas sociales. Este planteamiento novedoso propone una visión holística sobre cómo se gestionan los individuos más allá de las ideas de resistencia y tecnología. En el primer nivel de agencia, los individuos se ven limitados por interacciones continuas a través de la explotación digital y del comportamiento. En el segundo nivel (o mesonivel), los individuos se adhieren a un sistema de información que presenta, clasifica y distorsiona fragmentos de datos que simula su realidad. Por último, en el tercer nivel estructural, más que sujetos fragmentados, sostengo que los individuos y los datos constituyen un nuevo ciclo hermenéutico en el que la propia realidad se redefine en una lectura autopoiética de las cosas alejada de los sujetos y del conocimiento.es-ES
dc.descriptionEste ensaio faz uma visão geral da relação entre vigilância, indivíduos e realidade. Para fazer isso, lanço mão de uma perspectiva multinível que conecta poder (da agência à estrutura) à teoria de sistemas sociais. Esta nova conexão pretende apresentar uma visão holística sobre como os indivíduos são gerenciados além de idéias sobre resistência e tecnologia. No primeiro nível de agência, os indivíduos são limitados pela interação contínua por meio da exploração digital e da manipulação comportamental. No segundo meso nível, os indivíduos se fundem num sistema de informações que renderiza, classifica e distorce fragmentos de dados que emulam a ontologia deles. Por fim, no terceiro nível estrutural, mais do que sujeitos fragmentados, argumento que indivíduos e seus dados constituem um novo ciclo hermenêutico no qual a própria realidade é redefinida em uma leitura autopoiética das coisas que se afasta dos sujeitos e dos saberes.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherGrupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguases-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/74723/4564456559532-
dc.relation/*ref*/Andrejevic, M. B. (2011). Surveillance and alienation in the online economy. Surveillance and Society, 8(3), 278-287. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v8i3.4164-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ansell-Pearson, K., & Pearson, K. A. (2012). Germinal life: The difference and repetition of Deleuze. London: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ajana, B. (2005). Surveillance and biopolitics. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7, 1-15. http://www.sociology.org/content/2007/__btihaj_surveillances.pdf-
dc.relation/*ref*/Aradau, C., and Tazzioli, M. (2020). Biopolitics multiple: migration, extraction, subtraction. Millennium, 48(2), 198-220. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0305829819889139-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ball, K. (2005). Organization, surveillance and the body: towards a politics of resistance. Organization, 12(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1350508405048578-
dc.relation/*ref*/Ball, K. (2009). Exposure: exploring the subject of surveillance. Information, Communication and Society, 12(5), 639-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802270386-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bakir, V. (2015). Veillant panoptic assemblage: mutual watching and resistance to mass surveillance after Snowden. Media and Communication 3(3): 12–25. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v3i3.277-
dc.relation/*ref*/Baudrillard, J. ((1981)2019). “Simulacra and simulations”. In Crime and Media, Greer, C. (Ed.). 69-85. London: Routledge-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bevir, M. (1999). Foucault and critique: deploying agency against autonomy. Political theory, 27(1), 65-84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591799027001004-
dc.relation/*ref*/Castelluccia, C. (2020). From dataveillance to datapulation: the dark side of targeted persuasive technologies. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02904926 in 10/17/2020-
dc.relation/*ref*/Caluya, G. (2010). The post-panoptic society? Reassessing Foucault in surveillance studies. Social Identities, 16(5), 621-633. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2010.509565-
dc.relation/*ref*/Cohen, J. E. (2018). The biopolitical public domain: the legal construction of the surveillance economy. Philosophy and Technology, 31(2), 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0258-2-
dc.relation/*ref*/Colwell, C. (1996). Discipline and control: Butler and Deleuze on individuality and dividuality. Philosophy Today, 40(1), 211-216. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday199640148-
dc.relation/*ref*/Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the Societies of Control. October, 59, 3-7.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Diakopoulos, N. (2015). Accountability in algorithmic decision-making. Queue, 13(9), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2857274.2886105-
dc.relation/*ref*/Fuchs, C. (2011). Web 2.0, prosumption, and surveillance. Surveillance and Society, 8(3), 288-309. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v8i3.4165-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gandy Jr, O. H. (2012). Matrix multiplication and the digital divide. In Race after the Internet Nakamura, L. and Chow-White, P. A. (Eds.), 128-145. Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gill, R. (2019). Surveillance is a feminist issue. Handbook of Contemporary Feminism, Tasha Oren (Ed.). 148-161. Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gray, C. H. (2000). Cyborg citizen: politics in the posthuman age. London: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hall, S. (2001). Encoding/decoding. Media and cultural studies. New York: Blackwell Publishers.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Heller, K. J. (1996). Power, subjectification and resistance in Foucault. SubStance, 25(1), 78-110. https://doi.org/10.2307/3685230-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jandrić, P., Ryberg, T., Knox, J., Lacković, N., Hayes, S., Suoranta, J., and Ford, D. R. (2019). Postdigital dialogue. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 163-189. https://doi.org/10.2307/3685230-
dc.relation/*ref*/Johnson, D., and Regan, P. (2014). Transparency and surveillance as sociotechnical accountability: a house of mirrors. Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kaplan, M. (2018). Spying for the People: surveillance, democracy and the impasse of cynical reason. JOMEC Journal, 12, 166-190. http://doi.org/10.18573/jomec.165-
dc.relation/*ref*/Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. Sociocybernetic paradoxes, 6(2), 172-192.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Luhmann, N. (1995). Why systems theory. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 3(2), 3-10.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Luhmann, N. (2006). System as difference. Organization, 13(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508406059638-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lyon, D. (1994). The electronic eye: The rise of surveillance society. University of Minnesota Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance studies: An overview. Polity.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mann, S.; Nolan, J.; and Wellman, B. (2003). Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices for Data Collection in Surveillance Environments. Surveillance and Society, vol. 1 (3), 331–55. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v1i3.3344-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mann, S., Nolan, J., and Wellman, B. (2020). Wearables and Sur (over)-Veillance, Sous (under)-Veillance, Co (So)-Veillance, and MetaVeillance (Veillance of Veillance) for Health and Well-Being. Surveillance and Society 18 (2), 262-271. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v18i2.13937-
dc.relation/*ref*/Márquez, G. G. (2004/2014)). Memories of my melancholy whores. London: Penguin UK.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Martínez Cabezudo, F. (2014). Copyright y copylef. Modelos para la ecología de los saberes. Sevilla: Aconcagua Libros.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Marx, G. (2003). A tack in the shoe: neutralizing and resisting the new surveillance. Journal of social issues, 59(2), 369-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00069-
dc.relation/*ref*/Marx, G. (2004). Some concepts that may be useful in understanding the myriad forms and contexts of surveillance. Intelligence and National Security, 19(2), 226-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268452042000302976-
dc.relation/*ref*/McGrath, J. E. (2004). Loving Big Brother: performance, privacy and surveillance space. Psychology Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Peters, M. A., and Besley, T. (2019). Critical philosophy of the postdigital. Postdigital Science and Education, 1(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-018-0004-9-
dc.relation/*ref*/Striphas, T. (2015). Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1367549415577392-
dc.relation/*ref*/Smyrnaios, N. (2018). Internet oligopoly: the corporate takeover of our digital world. Emerald Group Publishing.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance and society, 12(2), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wilson, D. and Norris, C. (Eds.). (2017). Surveillance, crime and social control. Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Whitson, J. R. (2013). Gaming the quantified self. Surveillance and Society, 11(1/2), 163-176. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v11i1/2.4454-
dc.relation/*ref*/Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.-
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2021 Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Socialeses-ES
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2022): Miscellany; 5-12en-US
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2022): Miscelánea; 5-12es-ES
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 19 n. 1 (2022): Miscelánea; 5-12pt-BR
dc.source1549-2230-
dc.subjecthermeneutic differentiationen-US
dc.subjectpower relationsen-US
dc.subjectresistanceen-US
dc.subjectsystems theoryen-US
dc.subjectdiferenciación hermenéuticaes-ES
dc.subjectrelaciones de poderes-ES
dc.subjectresistenciaes-ES
dc.subjectteoría de sistemases-ES
dc.subjectdiferenciação hermenêuticapt-BR
dc.subjectrelações de poderpt-BR
dc.subjectresistênciapt-BR
dc.subjectteoria de sistemaspt-BR
dc.titleSurveillance and the redefinition of individuals and realityen-US
dc.titleSurveillance and the redefinition of individuals and realityes-ES
dc.titleA vigilância e a redefinição dos indivíduos e realidadept-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeKarpetaes-ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.