Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181139Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Jiménez González, Aitor | - |
| dc.creator | Rendueles Menéndez de Llano, César | - |
| dc.date | 2020-09-09 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:34:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:34:23Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/70378 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/tekn.70378 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181139 | - |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | spa | - |
| dc.publisher | Grupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguas | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/70378/4564456554254 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Barbrook, R., & Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian ideology. Science as Culture, 6(1), 44-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439609526455 Bimber, B. (2014). Digital media in the Obama campaigns of 2008 and 2012: Adaptation to the personalized political communication environment. Journal of information technology & politics, 11(2), 130-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.895691 Birch, K. (2020). Technoscience rent: Toward a theory of rentiership for technoscientific capitalism. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(1), 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919829567 Blankenship, L. (1986). The hacker manifesto. The Conscience of a Hacker”), Phrack Magazine, Volume One, (7). Castells, M. (2000). Toward a sociology of the network society. Contemporary sociology, 29(5), 693-699. Crémer, J., de Montjoye, Y. A., & Schweitzer, H. (2019). Competition policy for the digital era. Report for the European Commission. Culpepper, P. D., & Thelen, K. (2020). Are we all amazon primed? Consumers and the politics of platform power. Comparative Political Studies, 53(2), 288-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019852687 Dean, J. (2009). Democracy and other neoliberal fantasies: Communicative capitalism and left politics. Durham: Duke University Press. Delfanti, A. (2019). Machinic dispossession and augmented despotism: Digital work in an Amazon warehouse. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819891613 Dubal, V. B. (2017). The Drive to Precarity: A Political History of Work, Regulation, & Labor Advocacy in San Francisco's Taxi & Uber Economics. Berkeley J. Emp. & Lab. L., 38(1), 73-136. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.15779/Z38KW57H5S Dyer-Witheford, N. (1999). Cyber-Marx: Cycles and circuits of struggle in high-technology capitalism. Chicago: University of Illinois Press. Dyer-Witheford, N. (2020). Left Populism and Platform Capitalism. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 18(1), 116-131. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1130 Ferguson, A. G. (2019). The rise of big data policing: Surveillance, race, and the future of law enforcement. New York: NYU Press. Frischmann, B. (2000). Privatization and commercialization of the internet infrastructure: rethinking market intervention into government and government intervention into the market. Colum. Sci. & Tech. L. Rev., 2, 1-70. https://doi.org/10.7916/stlr.v2i0.3537 Fuchs, C. (2018). Digital demagogue: Authoritarian capitalism in the age of Trump and Twitter. Pluto Press. Fuchs, C. (2019). Rereading Marx in the age of digital capitalism. London: Pluto Press. Fuchs, C. (2020). Communication and Capitalism. London: Westminster Press Harfoush, R. (2009). Yes We Did! An inside look at how social media built the Obama brand. San Francisco: New Riders. Himanen, P. (2001). The hacker ethic and the spirit of the information age. New York: Penguin Janeway, W. H. (2018). Doing capitalism in the innovation economy: Reconfiguring the three-player game between markets, speculators and the state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Jiménez, A. (2020). The Silicon Doctrine. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 18(1), 322-336. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v18i1.1147 Jones, C. (2020). Introduction: The Return of Economic Planning. Katz, J., Barris, M., & Jain, A. (2013). The social media president: Barack Obama and the politics of digital engagement. New York: Springer. Khan, L. M. (2016). Amazon's antitrust paradox. Yale lJ, 126(2), 710-805. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5785&context=ylj Klein, N. (2020). Screen New Deal: Under cover of mass death, Andrew Cuomo calls in the billionaires to build a high-tech dystopia. The Intercept, May 8. Lazzarato, M. (1997). Lavoro immateriale: Forme di vita e produzione di soggettività. Roma: Ombre corte. Levine, Y. (2018). Surveillance valley: The secret military history of the Internet. New York: Public Affairs. Lynskey, O. (2015). The foundations of EU data protection law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lynskey, O. (2019). Grappling with “data power”: normative nudges from data protection and privacy. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 20(1), 189-220. http://doi.org/10.1515/til-2019-0007 Lyon, D. (2015). Surveillance after snowden. Hoboken: Wiley & Sons. Mazzucato, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial state. Soundings, 49(49), 131-142. Moore, M., & Tambini, D. (Eds.). (2018). Digital dominance: the power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Morozov, E. (2012). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs. Morozov, E. (2019). Digital socialism? The calculation debate in the age of big data. New Left Review, (116), 33-67. https://newleftreview.es/issues/116/articles/digital-socialism.pdf Morrison, Sara. (2020, February 21). Google’s education tech has a privacy problem. Vox. Obtenido en: https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/2/21/21146998/google-new-mexico-children-privacy-school-chromebook-lawsuit Moulier-Boutang, Y. (2001). Richesse, propriété, liberté et revenu dans le «capitalisme cognitif». Multitudes, (2), 17-36. Noveck, B. S. (2009). Wiki government: How technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Washington: Brookings Institution Press. Noveck, B. S. (2017). Five hacks for digital democracy. Nature, 544(7650), 287-289. O'Reilly, T. (2011). Government as a Platform. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 6(1), 13-40. Rahman, K. S. (2018). Regulating informational infrastructure: Internet platforms as the new public utilities. Georgetown Law and Technology Review, 2, 234-251. Rahman, K. S., & Thelen, K. (2019). The rise of the platform business model and the transformation of twenty-first-century capitalism. Politics & Society, 47(2), 177-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329219838932 Rendueles, C. (2013). Sociofobia: el cambio político en la era de la utopía digital. Madrid: Capitán Swing. Richardson, R., Schultz, J. M., & Crawford, K. (2019). Dirty data, bad predictions: How civil rights violations impact police data, predictive policing systems, and justice. NYUL Rev. Online, 94, 15. Sadowski, J. (2020a). The internet of landlords: Digital platforms and new mechanisms of rentier capitalism. Antipode, 52(2), 562-580. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595 Sadowski, J. (2020b). Too smart: How digital capitalism is extracting data, controlling our lives, and taking over the world. Massachusetts: MIT Press. Scholz, T. (2016). Platform cooperativism. Challenging the corporate sharing economy. New York: Rosa Luxemburg Foundation. Schwaller, C. (2019). Crisis, austerity and the normalisation of precarity in Spain–in academia and beyond. Social Anthropology, 27, 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12691 Schwartz, R. (2020). Patel v. Facebook, Inc.: Biometric Data Collection Changes the Interpretation of Concrete Injury for Intangible Harms. Tul. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop., 22, 263-275. https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol50/iss1/9 Smyrnaios, N. (2018). Internet oligopoly: The corporate takeover of our digital world. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing. Smythe, D. W. (1981). Dependency road: Communications, capitalism, consciousness, and Canada. Wesport: Praeger Pub Text. Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Srnicek, N. (2017). The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture, 23(4), 254-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12023 Taplin, J. (2017). Move fast and break things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon have cornered culture and what it means for all of us. London: Pan Macmillan. Terranova, T. (2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social text, 18(2), 33-58. http://web.mit.edu/schock/www/docs/18.2terranova.pdf Turse, N. (2012). The changing face of empire: Special ops, drones, spies, proxy fighters, secret bases, and cyberwarfare. Chicago: Haymarket Books. Van Dijk, J. A. (1999). The one-dimensional network society of Manuel Castells. New media & society, 1(1), 127-138. Vargas, J. A. (2008). Obama raised half a billion online. The Washington Post, 20, 44. http://voices.washingtonpost.com/44/2008/11/obama-raised-half-a-billion-on.html Wang, J. (2018). Carceral capitalism (Vol. 21). Massachusetts: MIT Press. Yoffie, D. B., & Cusumano, M. A. (1999). Building a company on Internet time: Lessons from Netscape. California Management Review, 41(3), 8-28. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165995 | - |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2020 Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020): Digital capitalism; 95-101 | en-US |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2020): Capitalismo digital; 95-101 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 17 n. 2 (2020): Capitalismo digital; 95-101 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 1549-2230 | - |
| dc.title | Digital capitalism: social fragility, exploitation and technological solutionism | en-US |
| dc.title | Capitalismo digital: fragilidad social, explotación y solucionismo tecnológico | es-ES |
| dc.title | Capitalismo digital: fragilidade social, explotação e ‘solucionismo’ tecnológico | pt-BR |
| dc.title | Capitalismo digital: fragilidade social, explotação e ‘solucionismo’ tecnológico | pt-PT |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| dc.type | Editorial | en-US |
| dc.type | Editorial | es-ES |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.