Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181136Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Cancela Rodríguez, Ekaitz | - |
| dc.date | 2020-09-09 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:34:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:34:22Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/69671 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/tekn.69671 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181136 | - |
| dc.description | This work departs from a critical approach of the monopoly theory, be it neoclassical or Marxist, in order to present a reading of digitalisation focused, not on the performance of the firms, but on the structural patterns of capitalism. As in any other stage of this mode of production, the need of individual capital is to increase the long-term profitability of its business operations. In this sense, the strategy in the fight against the working class is directed to the working time extension and intensity. It is argued that while Silicon Valley firms have highly developed technologies to reproduce new Taylorist models, the structural dynamics of capitalism are the same as when Marx wrote ‘Das Kapital’. Therefore, it becomes more necessary than ever to analyze not only the strategies of workers who carry out their activity in internet companies but also to present the limits of the class struggle. The article concludes that fighting against capitalism needs to consider specific demands of digital socialism. | en-US |
| dc.description | Este trabajo parte de una aproximación crítica hacia la teoría del monopolio, sea su vertiente neoclásica o marxista, a fin de presentar una lectura de la digitalización centrada en las consideraciones estructurales del capitalismo, no en la actuación de una serie de firmas. Al igual que en cualquier otro estadio del modo de producción, la necesidad de los capitalistas es aumentar la rentabilidad a largo plazo de sus operaciones. Por tanto, la estrategia en la lucha de estos contra la clase desposeída se encuentra encaminada hacia la explotación mediante la ampliación de los tiempos y la intensidad de trabajo. A continuación, se argumenta que, si bien las firmas de Silicon Valley cuentan con tecnologías extremadamente desarrolladas para establecer nuevos modelos de taylorismo, las lógicas estructurales del capitalismo siguen siendo la misma que cuando Marx redactó El Capital. Por tanto, analizar las estrategias contra los trabajadores que desarrollan su actividad en empresas digitales y exponer los límites de una lucha centrada en el trabajo se torna necesario. Este artículo concluye con un llamamiento a la fuerzas de izquierda para que exijan una forma de socialismo digital. | es-ES |
| dc.description | Este trabalho parte de uma abordagem crítica da teoria do monopólio, seja na sua vertente neoclássica ou marxista, a fim de apresentar uma leitura da digitalização focada nas considerações estruturais do capitalismo, não no desempenho de uma série de empresas. Como em qualquer outro estágio do modo de produção, a necessidade dos capitalistas é aumentar a lucratividade a longo prazo de suas operações. Portanto, a estratégia na luta destes contra a classe despossuída é direcionada à exploração através da extensão do tempo e da intensidade do trabalho. Em seguida, argumenta-se que, embora as empresas do Vale do Silício contem com tecnologias desenvolvidas para estabelecer novos modelos de taylorismo, as lógicas estruturais do capitalismo segue sendo a mesma de quando Marx escreveu Capital. Portanto, é necessário analisar as estratégias contra os trabalhadores que exercem suas atividades em empresas digitais e expor os limites de uma luta centrada no trabalho se faz necessário. Este artigo conclui com um apelo às forças de esquerda para que exijam uma forma de socialismo digital. | pt-BR |
| dc.description | Este trabalho parte de uma abordagem crítica da teoria do monopólio, seja na sua vertente neoclássica ou marxista, a fim de apresentar uma leitura da digitalização focada nas considerações estruturais do capitalismo, não no desempenho de uma série de empresas. Como em qualquer outro estágio do modo de produção, a necessidade dos capitalistas é aumentar a lucratividade a longo prazo de suas operações. Portanto, a estratégia na luta destes contra a classe despossuída é direcionada à exploração através da extensão do tempo e da intensidade do trabalho. Em seguida, argumenta-se que, embora as empresas do Vale do Silício contem com tecnologias desenvolvidas para estabelecer novos modelos de taylorismo, as lógicas estruturais do capitalismo segue sendo a mesma de quando Marx escreveu Capital. Portanto, é necessário analisar as estratégias contra os trabalhadores que exercem suas atividades em empresas digitais e expor os limites de uma luta centrada no trabalho se faz necessário. Este artigo conclui com um apelo às forças de esquerda para que exijam uma forma de socialismo digital. | pt-PT |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | spa | - |
| dc.publisher | Grupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguas | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/69671/4564456554255 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Schaupp, S. (2020). Taylorismus oder Kybernetik? Eine kurze Ideengeschichte der algorithmischen Arbeitssteuerung. Erscheint in: WSI MITTEILUNGEN. 73, 201-208. https://doi.org/10.5771/0342-300X-2020-3-201 Schiller, D. (1999). Digital Capitalism, Networking the Global Market System. California: The MIT Press. Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform Capitalism. Londres: Polity. Spataro, J. (2020). Remote work trend report: meetings. Microsoft. Recuperado de https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/blog/2020/04/09/remote-work-trend-report-meetings/ https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X20924461 Sharma, P. (2020). Digitalisation and precarious work practices in alternative economies: Work organisation and work relations in e-cab services. Economic and Industrial Democracy. Shapiro, A. (2017). Between autonomy and control: Strategies of arbitrage in the “on-demand” economy. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817738236 Shaikh, A. (2016). Capitalism, Competition, Conflict, Crises. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. Shaikh, A. (1992). The Falling Rate of Profit as the Cause of Long Waves: Theory and Empirical Evidence. En New Findings in Long-Wave Research (A. Klienknecht, A. Mandel y I. Wallerstein, pp.174-202). New York: Palgrave. Samuels, M. (2020). Without cloud computing, businesses would now be in even deeper trouble. ZD Net. Recuperado de https://www.zdnet.com/article/without-cloud-computing-businesses-would-now-be-in-even-deeper-trouble/ Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549 Sadowski, J. (2020). The Internet of Landlords: Digital Platforms and New Mechanisms of Rentier Capitalism. Antipode. 52 (2), 562–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12595 Petit, N. (2020). Big Tech and the Digital Economy. Nueva York: Oxford University Press. Phillips, L. y Rozwroski, M. (2019). The People’s Republic of Walmart, How the World’s Biggest Corporations are Laying the Foundation for Socialism. Londres: Verso. Peterson, H. (2020). Amazon-owned Whole Foods is quietly tracking its employees with a heat map tool that ranks which stores are most at risk of unionizing. Business Insider. Recuperado de https://www.businessinsider.com/whole-foods-tracks-unionization-risk-with-heat-map-2020-1 Oravec, J. A. (2020). Digital iatrogenesis and workplace marginalization: some ethical issues involving self-tracking medical technologies. Information, Communication & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1718178 Otero, G. (2012). The neoliberal food regime in Latin America: state, agribusiness transnational corporations and biotechnology. Canadian Journal of Development Studies. 33 (3), 282-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2012.711747 https://economicsofimperialism.blogspot.com/2018/11/japans-softbank-tech-parasitism.html Mumby, D. K. (2020). Theorizing Struggle in the Social Factory. Organization Theory. 1(4) https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720919440 Norfield, T. (2018). Japan’s SoftBank: Tech Parasitism. Economics of Imperialism. Recuperado de Morris, D. (2017). Uber’s New Fare System Raises Its Cut While Angering Drivers. Fortune. Recuperado de https://fortune.com/2017/05/20/uber-new-pricing-angry-drivers/ Morozov, E. (2019b). Digital Socialism? The Calculation Debate in the Age of Big Data. New Left Review. 116. Recuperado de https://newleftreview.org/issues/II116/articles/evgeny-morozov-digital-socialism Morozov, E. (2019). Capitalism’s New Clothes. The Baffler. Recuperado de https://thebaffler.com/latest/capitalisms-new-clothes-morozov https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/19/there-is-a-leftwing-way-to-challenge-big-data-here-it-is Morozov, E. (2018). There is a leftwing way to challenge big tech for our data. Here it is. The Guardian. Recuperado de Morozov, E. (2017). Towards High-Tech Feudalism: How the Digital Economy Enslaves Us. KÅKÅ. Recuperado de https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YImyAZGNjwc Morozov, E. (2019). Opposing the Exceptionalism of the Algorithm. En The Datafied Society (M. T. Schäfer y K. van Es, pp.245-248). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Morozov, E. (2012). The Net Delusion, The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. Nueva York: PublicAffairs. Morozov, E. (2016). Tech titans are busy privatising our data. The Guardian. Recuperado de https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/apr/24/the-new-feudalism-silicon-valley-overlords-advertising-necessary-evil Mengay, A. (2020). Digitalization of work and heteronomy. Capital & Class. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816820904032 Moody, K. (2020). Capitalism Was Always Like This. Jacobin. Recuperado de https://www.jacobinmag.com/2020/06/moody-benanav-automation-capitalism-employment Manokha, I. (2019). New Means of Workplace Surveillance, Monthly Review. 70(9) Mazzucato, M. (2019). Preventing Digital Feudalism, Project Syndicate. Recuperado de https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/platform-economy-digital-feudalism-by-mariana-mazzucato-2019-10 Maltseva, K. (2020). Wearables in the workplace: The brave new world of employee engagement. Business Horizons. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.007 Isaac, M. (2019). Super Pumped: The Battle for Uber. Nueva York: W. W. Norton & Company. Heilbroner, R. (1985). The Nature and Logic of Capitalism. W. W. Norton. Harvey, G. (1990). La condición de la posmodernidad, Amorrortu Editores: Buenos Aires. Fumagalli, A. et al. (2019). Cognitive Capitalism, Welfare and Labour. The Commonfare Hypothesis. Londres: Routledge. Greene, J. (2020). Amazon fires two tech workers who criticized the company’s warehouse workplace conditions. The Washington Post. Encontrado en: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/04/13/amazon-workers-fired/ Foer, F. (2018). World Without Mind: The Existential Threat of Big Tech. Nueva York: Penguin Random House. Fleming, P., Rhoder, C. y Yu, K., (2019). On why Uber has not taken over the world. Economy and Society. 48 (4), 1-22 https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1685744 Grand View Research (2020). Artificial Intelligence Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Solution, By Technology (Deep Learning, Machine Learning), By End Use, By Region, And Segment Forecasts, 2019-2025. Grand View Research. Recuperado de https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/artificial-intelligence-ai-market?utm_source=prnewswire&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ict_5-feb-20&utm_term=artificial-intelligence-ai-market&utm_content=rd1 Dazzi, D. (2019). Gig Economy in Europe. Italian Labour e-Journal. 12(2), 67-122 https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1561-8048/9925 Galloway, S. (2018). The Four: The Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google. Nueva York: Porfolio Dantas. M. (2019) The Financial Logic of Internet Platforms: The Turnover Time of Money at the Limit of Zero. TripleC. 17(1), 132-158. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v17i1.1088 Colombini, I. (2019). Form and Essence of Precarization by Work: From Alienation to the Industrial Reserve Army at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century. Review of Radical Political Economics. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613419882124 Cancela, E. (2019). Uber, tras la pista del dinero. El Salto. Recuperado de https://www.elsaltodiario.com/uber/uber-tras-pista-dinero Cancela, E. (2019). Nick Srnicek: “Debemos regular los servicios públicos de las plataformas, y después regularlas o expropiarlas”. El Salto. Recuperado de https://www.elsaltodiario.com/economia-colaborativa/nick-srnicek-servicios-publicos-puedan-proporcionar-plataformas-digitales-expropiarlas-regularlas Boyle, A. (2018). Amazon wins a pair of patents for wireless wristbands that track warehouse workers. GeekWire. Recuperado de https://www.geekwire.com/2018/amazon-wins-patents-wireless-wristbands-track-warehouse-workers/ Bryan, R. (1985). Monopoly in Marxist method. Capital & Class. 9(2), 72-92https://doi.org/10.1177/030981688502600105 Brike, K. (2020). Welcome in the machine: Human–machine relations and knowledge capture. Capital & Class. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816819899418 Braverman, H. (1998). Labour and Monopoly Capital. The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. Nueva York: Monthly Review Press. Braton, B. H. (2016). The Stack, On Software and Sovereignty. Cambridge: The MIT Press Birch, K., Chiappet, M. y Artyushina, A. (2020) The problem of innovation in technoscientific capitalism: data rentiership and the policy implications of turning personal digital data into a private asset. Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1748264 Birch, K. (2019). Technoscience Rent: Toward a Theory of Rentiership for Technoscientific Capitalism. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 45(1) 3-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919829567 Bernhardt, L. y Dewenter, R. (2020) Collusion by code or algorithmic collusion? When pricing algorithms take over, European Competition Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2020.1733344 Andrews, L. (2019). Facebook, the Media and Democracy, Big Tech, Small State? Londres: Routledge. Ayodele, O. (2020). The new information feudalism: Africa’s relationship with the global information society. South African Journal of International Affairs, 27(1), 67-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2020.1750470 Altenried. M. (2020). The platform as factory: Crowdwork and the hidden labour behind artificial intelligence. Capital & Class. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816819899410 Adams, J., Cser. y A., Kumar, S. (2019) Cloud Security Solutions Forecast, 2018 To 2023 (Global). Forrester Analytics. Recuperado de https://www.forrester.com/report/Forrester+Analytics+Cloud+Security+Solutions+Forecast+2018+To+2023+Global/-/E-RES148715 Teixeira, A. (2019). Capitalism with a Transhuman Face. The Afterlife of Fascism and the Digital Frontier. Third Text. 33 (3), 315-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/09528822.2019.1625638 Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Londres: Bloomsbury. The Economist (2017). The world’s most valuable resource is no longer oil, but data. The Economist. Recuperado de https://www.economist.com/leaders/2017/05/06/the-worlds-most-valuable-resource-is-no-longer-oil-but-data Thompson, P. (2019). Capitalism, Technology and Work: Interrogating the Tipping Point Thesis. The Political Quarterly. 91(2), 299-309 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12787 | - |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2020 Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020): Digital capitalism; 103-112 | en-US |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2020): Capitalismo digital; 103-112 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 17 n. 2 (2020): Capitalismo digital; 103-112 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 1549-2230 | - |
| dc.subject | political economy | en-US |
| dc.subject | Silicon Valley | en-US |
| dc.subject | Taylorism | en-US |
| dc.subject | digital capitalism | en-US |
| dc.subject | automated planning | en-US |
| dc.subject | capitalismo digital | es-ES |
| dc.subject | economía política | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Silicon Valley | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Planificación algorítimica | es-ES |
| dc.subject | taylorismo | es-ES |
| dc.subject | capitalismo digital | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | economia política | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | Vale do Silício | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | planejamento algorítmico | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | Taylorismo | pt-BR |
| dc.title | There’s no alternative to socialism: class struggle and its limits under digital capitalism | en-US |
| dc.title | No hay alternativa al socialismo: los límites de la lucha de clases en el capitalismo digital | es-ES |
| dc.title | Não há alternativa ao socialismo: os limites da luta de classes no capitalismo digital | pt-BR |
| dc.title | Não há alternativa ao socialismo: os limites da luta de classes no capitalismo digital | pt-PT |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| dc.type | Karpeta | es-ES |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.