Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

  1. Repositorio institucional de CLACSO
  2. Colección de los Centros Asociados
  3. España
  4. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181120
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorTrevisan Pigatto, Jaqueline-
dc.date2020-09-09-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:34:21Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:34:21Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/68807-
dc.identifier10.5209/tekn.68807-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181120-
dc.descriptionThis article presents the evolution of the themes data protection and net neutrality from the meetings of the Internet Governance Forum (IGF), both in the understanding of concepts and in the practices exercised, highlighting the importance of multistakeholder discussions. To this end, the topics that were selected are two of the main issues discussed during the decade of 2010 and which significantly involve the dynamics between government and private sectors. We highlight the technology giants Google and Facebook, for their central roles in collecting and processing personal data on a global level, as well as their influences on the net neutrality theme, that is, that the content transmitted to the user is the same for everyone who access their services without any discrimination. Discourse analysis begins in 2013 when the Snowden case occurred, and the topic of privacy becomes a priority in discussions related to the Internet, when the net neutrality in 2015 and 2016 was a central issue, but with a return to protection of personal data in 2018, the year in which the case of the Cambridge Analytica consultancy is revealed, also bringing a resumption of the state's role in cyberspace. It is concluded that although the Internet Governance Forum does not make decisions with some enforcement power over platforms, it generates discussions and evolution of concepts that shape regulatory actions, mostly prioritizing flexibility thanks to the participation of several sectors in the discussion, which means, the multistakeholder model proves to be efficient, even though there is sometimes a private preponderance (2013), sometimes a governmental one (2018).en-US
dc.descriptionEste artículo muestra la evolución de los temas de protección de datos y neutralidad de la red a partir de las reuniones del Foro de Gobernanza de Internet (IGF), tanto en la comprensión de los conceptos como en las prácticas ejercidas, destacando la importancia de las discusiones multistakeholder. Con este fin, se seleccionaron temas de los principales temas discutidos durante la década de 2010 y que involucran significativamente la dinámica entre el gobierno y los sectores privados. Destacamos a los gigantes de la tecnología Google y Facebook, por sus roles centrales en la recopilación y procesamient de datos personales a nivel global, así como sus influencias en el tema de neutralidad de la red, es decir, que el contenido transmitido al usuario es el mismo para todos los que acceden a sus servicios sin discriminación alguna. Análisis de los discursos comienza en 2013 cuando tuvo lugar el caso Snowden, y el tema de la privacidad se convierte en una prioridad en las discusiones relacionadas con Internet, pasando por un momento de protagonismo de neutralidad de la red en 2015 y 2016, pero con un retorno a protección de datos personales en 2018, el año en que se revela el caso de la consultoría Cambridge Analytica, lo que también conlleva la reanudación del papel del estado en el ciberespacio. Se concluye que aunque el Foro de Gobernanza de Internet no toma decisiones con ningún poder de aplicación sobre las plataformas, genera discusiones y evolución de conceptos que dan forma a las acciones reguladoras, priorizando principalmente la flexibilidad gracias a la participación de varios sectores en la discusión, es decir, el carácter multistakeholder demuestra ser eficiente, a pesar de que a veces existe una preponderancia privada (2013), a veces gubernamental (2018).es-ES
dc.descriptionEste artigo mostra a evolução dos temas de proteção de dados e neutralidade da rede a partir das reuniões do Fórum de Governança da Internet (IGF), tanto no entendimento de conceitos quanto nas práticas exercidas, evidenciando a importância das discussões multistakeholder. Para tanto, foram selecionados temas das principais problemáticas discutidas durante a década de 2010 e que envolvem de modo significativo a dinâmica entre setores governamental e privado. Destacamos as gigantes de tecnologia Google e Facebook, por seus papéis centrais em coleta e processamento de dados pessoais em nível global, assim como suas influências no tema da neutralidade da rede, isto é, que o conteúdo transmitido ao usuário seja o mesmo para todos que acessam seus serviços, sem qualquer tipo de discriminação. As análises de discurso começam pelo ano de 2013 quando se deu o caso Snowden, e o tema da privacidade se torna então prioritário nas discussões relativas à Internet, passando por um momento de protagonismo da neutralidade da rede em 2015 e 2016, mas com retorno à proteção de dados pessoais em 2018, ano em que é revelado o caso da consultoria Cambridge Analytica, trazendo também uma retomada do papel estatal no ciberespaço. Conclui-se que embora o Fórum de Governança da Internet não tome decisões com algum poder de enforcement sobre as plataformas, ele gera discussões e evoluções de conceitos que moldam ações regulatórias, em sua maioria priorizando flexibilidade graças à participação de diversos setores na discussão, ou seja, o caráter multistakeholder se revela eficiente, ainda que ora exista uma preponderância privada (2013), ora governamental (2018).pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languagepor-
dc.publisherGrupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguases-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/68807/4564456554260-
dc.relation/*ref*/Belli, L. (2016). Net Neutrality reloaded: Zero Rating, specialised service, ad blocking and traffic management. Annual report of the UN IGF Dynamic Coalition on Net Neutrality. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Direito Rio. Recuperado de https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/17532. Belli, L. & Zingales, N. (2017). Platform regulations: how platforms are regulated and how they regulate us. Rio de Janeiro: Escola de Direito do Rio de Janeiro da Fundação Getulio Vargas. Recuperado de https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/19402. Bénétreau, A. (2014). French Digital Council publishes report on platform neutrality. EDRI. Recuperado de https://edri.org/french-digital- council-publishes-report-platform-neutrality/. Comitê Gestor da Internet no Brasil (2017). Fórum de Governança da Internet: relatórios dos dez primeiros anos do IGF. São Paulo. Recuperado de https://www.cgi.br/media/docs/publicacoes/1/CadernoCGIbr_Forum_de_Governanca_da_Internet.pdf. DCPR (2020). Dynamic Coalition on Platform Responsibility. Int. Gov. Forum. Recuperado de https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/dynamic-coalition-on- platform-responsibility-dcpr. Fox, C. (2019, 21 January). Google hit with £44m GDPR fine over ads. BBC. Recuperado de https://bbc.in/2K3bU9Z. Google (2020a). Artificial Intelligence at Google: Our Principles. AI, Google. Recuperado de https://ai.google/principles/. Google (2020b). Transparency Report. Recuperado de https://transparencyreport.google.com/?hl=pt_BR. Internet Governance Forum (2015a). Dynamic Coalition on Net Neutrality. Recuperado de http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/187-igf- 2015/transcripts- igf-2015/2825-2015-11-10-%0Adynamic-coalition-on- net-neutrality- workshop-room-9. Internet Governance Forum (2015b). Workshop 126 – Can Internet rights and Access goals be Reconciled? Recuperado de http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/187-igf-2015/transcripts-igf-2015/2858- 2015-11-10-ws-%0A126-can-internet-rights-and-access-goals-be- reconciled-workshop-room-1. Internet Governance Forum (2015c). Workshop 65 - The Benefits and Challenges of the “Free Flow” of Data. Recuperado de http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/187-igf-2015/transcripts-igf-2015/2926- 2015-11-12-ws-65-%0Athe-benefits-and-challenges-of-the-free-flow-of- data-workshop-room-5-finished. Internet Governance Forum (2016). Workshop 187 - Smart Cities and Big Data: Boundless Opportunities? Recuperado de https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2016-day-3-room- 10-ws187-smart-cities-and-big-data-boundless-opportunities. Internet Governance Forum (2017a). Dynamic Coalition on Net Neutrality. Recuperado de https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/ content/igf-2017-day-2-room-xxiv-dc-on-net-neutrality. Internet Governance Forum (2017b). Plenary - Local Interventions, Global Impacts: How Can International Multistakeholder Cooperation Address Internet Disruptions, Encryption and Data Flows. Recuperado de https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf- 2017-day-1-room-xvii- plenary-local-interventions-global-impacts-how- can-international. Internet Governance Forum (2018). BPF Cybersecurity. Recuperado de https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/igf-2018-day-3-salle- xii-bpf-cybersecurity. Internet Governance Forum (2013a). Dynamic Coalition on Network Neutrality. Recuperado de https://www.intgovforum.org/cms/categoryblog/121- preparatory- process- 42721/1475-dynamic-coalition-on- network-neutrality. Internet Governance Forum (2013b). Workshop 309 e 345 - Norms and Values in Digital Media: shaping global framework. Recuperado de http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/categoryblog/121-preparatory-process- 42721/1496-ws-345-%0Aand-workshop-309-norms-and-values-in-digital- media-shaping-global-framework. Internet Governance Forum (2013c). Workshop 90 - No Cyber Security Without Government Imposed Regulation. Recuperado de https://www.intgovforum.org/cms/categoryblog/121-preparatory-process- 42721/1413-ws-90-%0Ano-cyber-security-without-government-imposed- regulation-. Internet Governance Forum (2014a). Dynamic Coalition on Network Neutrality. Recuperado de http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/174-igf- 2014/transcripts/1923-2014-09-02-dynamic-%0Acoalition-on-network- neutrality-room7. Internet Governance Forum (2014b). Dynamic Coalition on Platform Responsibility. Recuperado de http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/174-igf- 2014/%0Atranscripts/2098-2014-09-04-dynamic-coalition-on-platform- responsibility-room-10. Internet Governance Forum (2014c). Workshop 188 – Transparency Reporting as a Tool for Internet Governance. Recuperado de http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/174-igf-2014/transcripts/1945-2014-09-03-ws188-%0Atransparency-reporting-as-a-tool-for-internet-governance room-4. Internet Governance Forum (2014d). Workshop 2 - Mobile, Trust and Privacy. Recuperado de http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/174-igf- 2014/transcripts/1976-2014-09-04-ws2-mobile-%0Atrust-and-privacy- room-5. IRPC (2020). Dynamic Coalition on Internet Rights and Principles. Internet Governance Forum. Recuperado de https://www.intgovforum.org/multilingual/content/dynamic-coalition-on- internet-rights-and-principles-irpc. Kleinwächter, W. (13 junio, 2019).The UN Panel on Digital Cooperation: An Agenda for the 2020s. [Mensaje en un blog]. Recuperado de http://www.circleid.com/posts/20190613_the_un_panel_on_digital_cooperation/. Lemos, R., Mateus, P.A., Sunfeld, P. (14 mayo, 2018). Proteção de dados na Administração Pública. [Mensaje en un blog]. Recuperado de https://www.jota.info/paywall? redirect_to=//www.jota.info/opiniao-e-analise/artigos/dados-administracao- publica-14052018. Merkel, A. (2019). Youtube: Discurso na Cerimônia de Abertura do IGF: Berlim. Recuperado de https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INJNg9oTEB8. O'brien, C. & Carswell, S. (2019, abril 1). Senior politicians to meet Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg. Irish Times. Recuperado de https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/senior-politicians-to- meet-facebook-founder-mark-zuckerberg-1.3845628. Tech Accord (2018). Cybersecurity Tech Accord. Recuperado de https://cybertechaccord.org/accord/. United Nations (2014). IGF 2013: ‘Building Bridges–Enhancing Multistakeholder Cooperation for Growth and Sustainable Development’. United Nations publication. Recuperado de https://www.intgovforum.org/cms/documents/publications/208-igf-2013- building-bridgesenhancing-multistakeholder-cooperation-for-growth-and- sustainable-development. Zuckerberg, M. (2014). Facebook: As the world becomes more complex and governments everywhere struggle, trust in the internet is more important today than ever. Recuperado de https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10101301165605491?stream_ref=1. Zuckerberg, M. (2019). Facebook: I’ve spent most of the past two years focusing on issues like harmful content, elections integrity and privacy. Recuperado de https://www.facebook.com/zuck/posts/10107013839885441.-
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2020 Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Socialeses-ES
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2020): Digital capitalism; 149-158en-US
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2020): Capitalismo digital; 149-158es-ES
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 17 n. 2 (2020): Capitalismo digital; 149-158pt-BR
dc.source1549-2230-
dc.subjectspeechesen-US
dc.subjectfacebooken-US
dc.subjectmultistakeholderen-US
dc.subjectregulationen-US
dc.subjectGoogleen-US
dc.subjectdiscursoses-ES
dc.subjectFacebookes-ES
dc.subjectGooglees-ES
dc.subjectmultistakeholderes-ES
dc.subjectregulaciónes-ES
dc.subjectdiscursospt-BR
dc.subjectfacebookpt-BR
dc.subjectmultistakeholderpt-BR
dc.subjectregulaçãopt-BR
dc.subjectGooglept-BR
dc.titleAnalyses of the evolution of the themes 'net neutrality’ and 'data protection' at the Internet Governance Forum: from 2013 until 2018en-US
dc.titleAnálises de evolução dos temas 'neutralidade da rede' e 'proteção de dados' no Fórum de Governança da Internet: de 2013 a 2018es-ES
dc.titleAnálises de evolução dos temas 'neutralidade da rede' e 'proteção de dados' no Fórum de Governança da Internet: de 2013 a 2018pt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeKarpetaes-ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.