Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181112Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Jiménez González, Aitor | - |
| dc.date | 2020-01-29 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:34:21Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:34:21Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/66931 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/tekn.66931 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181112 | - |
| dc.description | This article explores different bodies of literature looking at the rising power of digital corporations. With this work I aim to provide a critical up-to-date approach to the topic. The first part of the paper introduces the phenomenon of digital capitalism, navigating different sociological approaches. Then, it proceeds by addressing the difficulties of naming the phenomenon and the attention that is gathering among politicians, academics and the general public. The second part of the work explores three different but complementary bodies of literature looking at tech power In the first place the paper explores critical management studies’ contributions describing the characteristics of digital corporations. Secondly, the text reflects critical legal scholars’ works analysing what has been identified as one of the essential features of digital capitalism: the infrastructural power enjoyed by corporations such as Facebook or Amazon. Finally the paper exposes two different Marxist perspectives looking at digital capitalism and its latest developments. The labour-focused Marxist contribution mainly represented by Christian Fuchs and Trebor Scholz and the postfordist approach of Maurizio Lazzarato or Matteo Pasquinelli, among others. | en-US |
| dc.description | Este artículo explora diferentes cuerpos de literatura centrados en el análisis del auge del poder de las corporaciones digitales. Con esta obra se pretende proporcionar un actualizado estado del arte sobre el poder corporativo digital, así como ofrecer un bosquejo multidisciplinario y crítico de sus complejidades. La primera parte de la obra presenta el fenómeno del capitalismo digital, navegando diferentes enfoques sociológicos. Luego procede abordando las dificultades de nombrar el evento, así como la atención que está recabando entre políticos, académicos y el público en general. La segunda parte del trabajo explora tres cuerpos de literatura analizando el capitalismo digital, diversos pero complementarios,. En primer lugar, el artículo explora diferentes aproximaciones desde los Critical Management Studies, las cuáles describen las características principales de las corporaciones digitales. En segundo lugar, el texto refleja trabajos provenientes delos Critical Legal Studies, enfoque que ha situado como una de las características esenciales del capitalismo digital el denominado como ‘Infrastructural Power’ ejercido por corporaciones como Facebook o Amazon. Finalmente, el artículo expone dos perspectivas marxistas diferentes analizando los últimos desarrollos del capitalismo digital. La contribución marxista centrada en la cuestión del trabajo representada principalmente por Christian Fuchs y Trebor Scholz y el enfoque posfordista de Maurizio Lazzarato o Matteo Pasquinelli, entre otros. | es-ES |
| dc.description | Este artigo explora diferentes corpos da literatura focados na análise da ascensão do poder das corporações digitais. Este trabalho visa fornecer um estado da arte atualizado sobre o poder corporativo digital, além de oferecer um esboço multidisciplinar e crítico de suas complexidades. Em seguida passa a abordar as dificuldades em nomear o evento, bem como a atenção que está reunindo entre políticos, acadêmicos e o público em geral. A segunda parte do artigo explora três corpos da literatura analisando o capitalismo digital, diversos porém complementares. Primeiro, o artigo explora diferentes abordagens dos Critical Management Studies, que descrevem as principais características das empresas digitais. Em segundo lugar, o texto reflete sobre trabalhos de Critical Legal Studies, uma abordagem que colocou como uma das características essenciais do capitalismo digital o chamado ‘poder infra-estrutural’ (‘Infrastructural Power’) exercido por empresas como o Facebook ou a Amazon. Finalmente, o artigo expõe duas perspectivas marxistas diferentes analisando os últimos desenvolvimentos do capitalismo digital. A contribuição marxista centrada na questão do trabalho representada principalmente por Christian Fuchs e Trebor Scholz e o enfoque pós-fordista de Maurizio Lazzarato ou Matteo Pasquinelli, entre outros. | pt-BR |
| dc.description | Este artigo explora diferentes corpos da literatura focados na análise da ascensão do poder das corporações digitais. Este trabalho visa fornecer um estado da arte atualizado sobre o poder corporativo digital, além de oferecer um esboço multidisciplinar e crítico de suas complexidades. Em seguida passa a abordar as dificuldades em nomear o evento, bem como a atenção que está reunindo entre políticos, acadêmicos e o público em geral. A segunda parte do artigo explora três corpos da literatura analisando o capitalismo digital, diversos porém complementares. Primeiro, o artigo explora diferentes abordagens dos Critical Management Studies, que descrevem as principais características das empresas digitais. Em segundo lugar, o texto reflete sobre trabalhos de Critical Legal Studies, uma abordagem que colocou como uma das características essenciais do capitalismo digital o chamado ‘poder infra-estrutural’ (‘Infrastructural Power’) exercido por empresas como o Facebook ou a Amazon. Finalmente, o artigo expõe duas perspectivas marxistas diferentes analisando os últimos desenvolvimentos do capitalismo digital. A contribuição marxista centrada na questão do trabalho representada principalmente por Christian Fuchs e Trebor Scholz e o enfoque pós-fordista de Maurizio Lazzarato ou Matteo Pasquinelli, entre outros. | pt-PT |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Grupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguas | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/66931/4564456553065 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bastani, A. (2019). Fully automated luxury communism. London: Verso. Berardi, F. B., Douglas, D., & Szwedska, T. (2017). Warming the Algorithm and Possibilities for the Future. An Interview with ‘Bifo’ Berardi. Chiasma: A Site For Thought, 4(1), 12. Braña, F. J. (2019). A fourth industrial revolution? Digital transformation, labor and work organization: a view from Spain. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 46(3), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-019-00122-0 Brossat, I. (2018). Airbnb, la ville ubérisée. Paris: la Ville brûle. Cockayne, D. G. (2016). Sharing and neoliberal discourse: The economic function of sharing in the digital on-demand economy. Geoforum, 77, 73-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.005 Carolan, M. (2019). Automated agrifood futures: robotics, labor and the distributive politics of digital agriculture. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(1) 184207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1584189 Castells, M. (2010). End of millennium: The information age: Economy, society, and culture. Hoboken: Wiley. Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Commision v. Google. (2017) Case 38606 - AT.39740 Google Search (Shopping). Corcho, R. A. (2017). La regulación de la economía colaborativa: Airbnb, BlaBlaCar, Uber y otras plataformas. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Redwood City: Stanford University Press. Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). Data colonialism: Rethinking big data’s relation to the contemporary subject. Television & New Media, 20(4), 336-349. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476418796632 Culpepper, P. D., & Thelen, K. (2019). Are We All Amazon Primed? Consumers and the Politics of Platform Power. Comparative Political Studies, 53(2), 288-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019852687 de Graaf, G. (2017). Digital economy development in Spain. Información Comercial Española, ICE: Revista de economía, (897), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.32796/ice.2017.897.1952 Doménech Pascual, G. (2015). La regulación de la economía colaborativa. El caso Uber contra el taxi. Ceflegal. Revista práctica de Derecho, 175-176, 61-104. Dyer-Witheford,N., Kjøsen A.M., & Steinhoff J.J. (2019). Inhuman power: artificial intelligence and the future of capitalism, digital barricades: Interventions in digital culture and politics. London: Pluto Press. Eubanks, V. (2012). Digital dead end: Fighting for social justice in the information age. Cambridge: MIT Press. Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. New York: St. Martin's Press. Fuchs, C. (2011). A Contribution to the Critique of the Political Economy of Google. Fast Capitalism, 8(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.32855/fcapital.201101.006 Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Labour and Karl Marx. London: Routledge Fuchs, C. (2016). Facebook. In Global media giants (B. Birkinbine, R. Gómez & J, Wasko. pp. 442-458). London: Routledge. Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction. London: Sage. Gil, J., & Sequera, J. (2018). Expansión de la ciudad turística y nuevas resistencias. El caso de Airbnb en Madrid. Empiria. Revista de metodología de ciencias sociales, 41, 15-32. https://doi.org/10.5944/empiria.41.2018.22602 Grassegger, H., & Krogerus, M. (2017, January 30). The data that turned the world upside down. Vice Magazine. Hobbs, M., Owen, S., & Gerber, L. (2017). Liquid love? Dating apps, sex, relationships and the digital transformation of intimacy. Journal of Sociology, 53(2), 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783316662718 Janeway, W. H. (2018). Doing Capitalism in the Innovation Economy: Reconfiguring the Three-Player Game between Markets, Speculators and the State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Johannessen, J. A. (2019). Automation, Capitalism and the End of the Middle Class. London: Routledge. Khan, L. (2018). Sources of Tech Platform Power. Georgetown Law Technology Review, 2(2), 325-334. Klossa, G. (2019). Towards a European Media Sovereignty an Industrial Media Strategy to leverage Data, Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence. Brussels: European Commission. Kooling, K. (2018, March 22). How Democracy Can Survive Big Data. New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/22/opinion/democracy-survive-data.html Lazzarato, M. (2014). Signs and machines: Capitalism and the production of subjectivity. Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext (e). Lazzarato, M. (1996). Immaterial labor. In Radical thought in Italy: A potential politics (P. Virno & M. Hardt, pp. 133-47). Lobel, O. (2016). The law of the platform. Minnesota Law Review, 101(1), 87-110. Lynskey, O. (2019). Grappling with “Data Power”: Normative Nudges from Data Protection and Privacy. Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 20(1), 189-220. Lynskey, O. (2018). The Power of Providence. Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Lynskey, O. (2015). The foundations of EU data protection law. Oxford University Press. Mackey, J., & Sisodia, R. (2013). Conscious Capitalism: Liberating the Heroic Spirit of Business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Marx, K. (1993). Grundrisse. London: Penguin. Moazed, A., & Johnson, N. L. (2016). Modern monopolies: what it takes to dominate the 21st century economy. New York: St. Martin's Press. Moore, M., & Tambini, D. (Eds.). (2018). Digital dominance: the power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Morozov, E. (2013). To save everything, click here: The folly of technological solutionism. New York: Public Affairs. Moulier-Boutang, Y. (2016). Du capitalisme fordiste au nouveau capitalisme: les filets du capitalisme cognitif, pour comprendre la guerre des codes. Capitalismo Cognitivo y Economía Social del Conocimiento. La lucha por el Código, 2, 15 Nickerson, D. W., & Rogers, T. (2014). Political campaigns and big data. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), 51-74. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.2.51 Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. nyu Press. Palmer, L. (2020). Dating in the Age of Tinder: Swiping for Love?. In Romantic Relationships in a Time of ‘Cold Intimacies’ (J. Cartes & L. Arocha, pp. 129-149). London Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. Pasquinelli, M. (2009). Google’s PageRank algorithm: A diagram of cognitive capitalism and the rentier of the common intellect. In Deep search: The politics of search beyond Google (K. Becker & F. Stalder, pp. 152-162). Innsbruck: Studien Verlag. Pasquinelli, M. (2015). Italian operaismo and the information machine. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(3), 49-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413514117 Rahman, K. S. (2018). Infrastructural Regulation and the New Utilities. Yale Journal on Regulation, 35(3), 911-940. Rahman, K. S., & Thelen, K. (2019). The Rise of the Platform Business Model and the Transformation of Twenty-First-Century Capitalism. Politics & Society, 47(2), 177-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329219838932 Rosenblat, A. (2018). Uberland: How Algorithms Are Rewriting the Rules of Work. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press. Rouvroy, A., & Stiegler, B. (2016). The digital regime of truth: From the algorithmic governmentality to a new rule of law. La Deleuziana: Online Journal of Philosophy, 3, 6-29. Scholz, T. (2017). Uberworked and underpaid: How workers are disrupting the digital economy. Hoboken: Wiley. Scholz, T., & Schneider, N. (Eds.). (2017). Ours to hack and to own: The rise of platform cooperativism, a new vision for the future of work and a fairer internet. New York: OR books. Schiller, D. (2000). Digital capitalism: Networking the global market system. MIT press. Slee, T. (2017). What's yours is mine: Against the Sharing Economy. New York: Or Books. Srnicek, N. (2017a). Platform capitalism. Hoboken: Wiley. Srnicek, N. (2017b).The challenges of platform capitalism: Understanding the logic of a new business model. Juncture, 23(4), 254-257. https://doi.org/10.1111/newe.12023 Srnicek, N., & Williams, A. (2015). Inventing the future: Postcapitalism and a world without work. Verso Books. Sundararajan, A. (2014). Peer-to-peer businesses and the sharing (collaborative) economy: Overview, economic effects and regulatory issues. Written testimony for the hearing titled The Power of Connection: Peer to Peer Businesses. Sundararajan, A. (2016). The sharing economy: The end of employment and the rise of crowd-based capitalism. Cambridge: Mit Press.Thatcher, J. (2017). You are where you go, the commodification of daily life through ‘location’. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(12), 2702-2717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17730580 Thelen, K. (2018). Regulating Uber: The politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on Politics, 16(4), 938-953. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592718001081 Terranova, T. (2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social text, 18(2), 33-58. Terranova, T. (2014). Red stack attack. In #Accelerate: The Acceleraonist Reader (Robin Mackay and Armen Avanessian, pp.379-399). Falmouth: Urbanomic. Thieulin, B. (2019). Towards a European digital sovereignty policy. Opinion of the Economic Social and Environmental Council presented rapporteur On behalf of the Section for European and International Affairs. Paris: Economic Social and Environmental Council Tronti, M. (2015). Teologia politica contro la dittatura del presente. Rivista di politica, 3(3), 111-115. U.K. Parliament. (2019). Disinformation and ‘fake news’ report. Sub-Committee launched on 2 April 2019 to continue work on Disinformation. U.S. House of Representatives. (2019). Hearing: Online Platforms and Market Power. Subcommittee on Antitrust, Commercial, and Administrative Law (Committee on the Judiciary) Vaidhyanathan, S. (2018). Antisocial media: How Facebook disconnects us and undermines democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. van Dijck, J., Nieborg, D., & Poell, T. (2019-8?). Reframing platform power. Internet Policy Review, 8(2). http://doi.org/10.14763/2019.2.1414 Wang, J. (2018). Carceral capitalism. Cambridge: MIT Press. Wingfield, N. (2017, March 12). Miscue Calls Attention to Amazon’s Dominance in Cloud Computing. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/12/business/amazon-web-services-outage-cloud-computing-technology.html Wittel, A. (2015). Digital Marx: Toward a political economy of distributed media. In Marx in the Age of Digital Capitalism (C. Fuchs, pp. 68-124). Leiden: Brill. Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.1057%2Fjit.2015.5 Zuboff, S. (2018). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. | - |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2020 Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 17 No. 1 (2020): Alternative models of consumption in the digital age; 77-85 | en-US |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 17 Núm. 1 (2020): Modelos alternativos de consumo en la era digital; 77-85 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 17 n. 1 (2020): Práticas alternativas de consumo na era digital; 77-85 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 1549-2230 | - |
| dc.subject | digital capitalism | en-US |
| dc.subject | digital marxism | en-US |
| dc.subject | infrastructural prower | en-US |
| dc.subject | Silicon Valley | en-US |
| dc.subject | Capitalismo digital | es-ES |
| dc.subject | marxismo digital | es-ES |
| dc.subject | poder infraestructural | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Silicon Valley | es-ES |
| dc.subject | poder infra-estrutural | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | marxismo digital | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | Capitalismo digital | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | Silicon Valley | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | poder infra-estrutural | pt-PT |
| dc.subject | marxismo digital | pt-PT |
| dc.subject | Capitalismo digital | pt-PT |
| dc.subject | Silicon Valley | pt-PT |
| dc.title | Tech power: a critical approach to digital corporations | en-US |
| dc.title | Tech power: a critical approach to digital corporations | es-ES |
| dc.title | Poder tecnológico: uma abordagem crítical às corporações digitais | pt-BR |
| dc.title | Poder tecnológico: uma abordagem crítical às corporações digitais | pt-PT |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.