Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

  1. Repositorio institucional de CLACSO
  2. Colección de los Centros Asociados
  3. España
  4. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181060
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorMaseda García, Rebeca-
dc.creatorGómez Nicolau, Emma-
dc.date2018-08-28-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:34:12Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:34:12Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/59362-
dc.identifier10.5209/TEKN.59362-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181060-
dc.descriptionIn this paper we assess to what extent Oprah Winfrey’s speech during the Golden Globes 2018, situated in the new context of the #MeToo movement and the Time’s Up initiative, destabilizes the modes of recognition of gender violence, offering an example of the operationalization of the concept of ‘ethical witnessing’ in communication media brought about by celebrities. In order to do so we consider the connections she establishes between the fight for rights and other fights for recognition, redistribution and participation; the degree of transgression of the reified models of identification of the subjectvictim and the focus on the capacity of agency; and the type of relationship that develops between the subject who gives testimony and the witness. The paper concludes that Oprah’s intersectional approach to gender violence, her focus on agency and resistance (verging on heroism), her role as both witness of her own victimization and facilitator of others’ testimonies, and her activism and inspiration for others to engage socially and politically, comes close to transgressing the boundaries of the current mode of recognition and representation of gender violence. Nevertheless, the widely accepted image of Oprah as an authority assumes a hierarchical relation that contravenes an ethical dimension of witnessing. In addition, in line with a liberal position, Oprah reimagines the ‘good victim’ as an empowered individual who overcomes vulnerability, and she envisions the eradication of gender inequality as something that comes from the top down.en-US
dc.descriptionEn este trabajo evaluamos hasta qué punto el discurso de Oprah Winfrey durante los Golden Globes 2018, ubicado en el nuevo contexto del movimiento #MeToo y la iniciativa Time’s Up, desestabiliza los modos de reconocimiento de la violencia de género, ofreciendo un ejemplo de operacionalización del concepto de ‘testimonio ético’ aplicado a la acción de celebridades en los medios de comunicación. Para hacerlo, consideramos las conexiones que se establecen entre la lucha por los derechos de las mujeres y otras luchas por el reconocimiento, la redistribución y la participación; el grado de transgresión de los modelos reificados de identificación del sujeto-víctima y el enfoque en la capacidad de agencia; y el tipo de relación que se desarrolla entre el sujeto que da el testimonio y el testigo. El documento concluye que el enfoque interseccional de Oprah respecto a la violencia de género, su enfoque en agencia y resistencia (rayando en heroísmo), su papel como testigo de su propia victimización y facilitador de los testimonios de los demás, y su activismo e inspiración para que otros participen social y políticamente, están cerca de transgredir los límites del modo actual de reconocimiento y representación de la violencia de género. Sin embargo, la imagen ampliamente aceptada de Oprah como autoridad toma una relación jerárquica que contraviene una dimensión ética del testimonio. Además, Oprah vuelve a imaginar a la “buena víctima” como una persona empoderada que supera la vulnerabilidad, al mismo tiempo que concibe la erradicación de la desigualdad de género como algo que se genera de arriba hacia abajo.es-ES
dc.descriptionNeste trabalho avaliamos até que ponto o discurso de Oprah Winfrey durante o Globo de Outro de 2018, situado no novo contexto do movimento #MeToo e a iniciativa do Time’s up, desestabiliza os modos de reconhecimento da violência de gênero, oferecendo um exemplo da operacionalização do conceito de ‘testemunho ético’ (‘ethical witnessing’) trazido por celebridades nos meios de comunicação. Para isso nós consideramos as conexões que ela estabelece entre a luta pelos direitos das mulheres e outras lutas por reconhecimento, redistribuição e participação, o nível da transgressão dos modelos reificados de identificação do sujeito-vítima e o foco na capacidade de agência, e o tipo de relação que se desenvolve entre o sujeito que dá o testemunho e a testemunha. Este trabalho conclui que a perspectiva interseccional para violência de gênero de Oprah, seu foco na agência e resistência (beirando o heroísmo), seu papel como ambas as testemunha da sua própria vitimização e facilitadora dos testemunhos dos outros, e seu ativismo e inspiração para outros se engajarem socialmente e politicamente, chega perto à transgressão das fronteiras do corrente modo de reconhecimento e representação de violência de gênero. No entanto, a amplamente aceita imagem da Oprah como uma autoridade assume uma relação hierárquica que contravém uma dimensão ética do testemunho. Ainda, alinhada com uma posição liberal, Oprah reimagina a “boa vítima” como um indivíduo empoderado que supera vulnerabilidade, e imagina a erradicação da desigualdade de gênero como algo que vem de cima para baixo.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherGrupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguases-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/59362/4564456548848-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bracke, S. (2016). Bouncing Back. Vulnerability and Resistance in Times of Resilience. In J.Butler, Z. Gambetti & L. Sabsay (eds.), Vulnerability in Resistance (pp. 52-75). Durham & London: Duke University Press [eBook].-
dc.relation/*ref*/Brown, B. (2012). Listening to shame. TEDtalk2012. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/brene_brown_listening_to_shame#t-1132803 (Accessed 13-01-2018).-
dc.relation/*ref*/Butler, J. (2006). Precarious Life: the Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Butler, J. (2011). Bodies in Alliance and the Politics of the Street. Keynote delivered in Venice (Italy) in The State of Things, organized by the Norwegian Office for Contemporary Art. Retrieved from http://eipcp.net/transversal/1011/butler/en-
dc.relation/*ref*/Butler, J. & Athanasiou, A. (2013). Dispossession: the Performative in the Political. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Chan, S. (2017). Recy Taylor, Who Fought for Justice After a 1944 Rape, Dies at 97. The New York Times (Obituaries). Dec 29, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes. com/2017/12/29/obituaries/recy-taylor-alabama-rape-victim-dead.html-
dc.relation/*ref*/Coates, L. & Ridley, P. (2009). Representing Victims of Sexualized Assault. In Faulkner, E. & MacDonald, G. (eds.), Victim No More: Women’s Resistance to Law, Culture, and Power (pp. 109-124). Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Cohn, J. (2018). #Womenagainstfeminism. Towards a Phenomenology of Incoherence. In Keller, J. & Ryan, M. E. (eds.), Emergent Feminisms. Complicating a Postfeminist Media Culture (pp. 176-192). New York & London: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash. The Undeclared War Against American Women. New York: Crown.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Foucault, M. (1978). The Will of Knowledge. The History of Sexuality, vol. 1. (Trans.) Robert Hurley. London: Penguin Books.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural Violence, Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), 291-305.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gámez Fuentes, M. J. & Maseda, R. (eds.) (2018). Gender and Violence in Spanish Culture: From Vulnerability to Accountability. New York: Peter Lang.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gámez Fuentes, M. J.; Gómez Nicolau, E. (2017). El ‘testimonio ético’ como modelo analítico en la comunicación para el cambio social. Investigação Qualitativa em Ciências Sociais, 3, 170-179.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gámez Fuentes, M. J.; Gómez Nicolau, E. & Maseda, R. (2016). Celebrities, violencia de género y derechos de las mujeres: ¿Hacia una transformación del marco de reconocimiento? Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 71, 833-852. DOI: 10.4185/RLCS-2016-1123.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Guerra, C. (2017). Where did ‘MeToo’ come from? Activist Tarana Burke, long before hashtags. Boston Globe. Oct 17, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.bostonglobe.com/ lifestyle/2017/10/17/alyssa-milano-credits-activist-tarana-burke-with-founding-metoo- movement-years-ago/o2Jv29v6ljObkKPTPB9KGP/story.html-
dc.relation/*ref*/hooks, b. (1984). From margin to center. Boston: South End.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jiwani, Y. (2006). Discourses of Denial: Mediations of Race, Gender, and Violence. Vancouver: UBC Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kaplan, A. (2005). Trauma Culture. The Politics of Terror and Loss in Media and Literature. New Brunswick, New Jersey & London: Rutgers University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kaplan, A. & Wang, B. (eds.) (2004). Trauma and Cinema. Cross-Cultural Explorations. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kimmel, M. (2013). Angry White Men: American Masculinity and the End of an Era. New York: Nation Books.-
dc.relation/*ref*/King, B. (2008). Stardom, celebrity and the para-confession. Social Semiotics, 18(2), 115- 132. DOI: 10.1080/10350330802002135-
dc.relation/*ref*/Messuti, A. (2015). La dimensión jurídica internacional del feminicidio. In G. Atencio (ed.), Feminicidio. El asesinato de mujeres por ser mujeres (pp. 37-61). Madrid: Fibgar & Catarata.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Miller, A. (2004). Sexuality, Violence Against Women, and Human Rights: Women Make Demands and Ladies Get Protection. Sexuality, Human Rights and Health, 7(2), 16-47. DOI: 10.2307/4065347-
dc.relation/*ref*/Oliver, K. (2001). Witnessing: Beyond Recognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. DOI: 10.1080/1353464032000171118-
dc.relation/*ref*/Oliver, K. (2004). Witnessing and Testimony. Parallax, 10(1), 79-88.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Plummer, K. (1995). Telling Sexual Stories. Power, Change and Social Worlds. London and New York: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Plummer, K. (2003). Intimate Citizenship. Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Seattle and London: University of Washington Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Radford, J. (2006). ¿De aquí por dónde seguimos. In J. Radford & D. Rusell (eds.), Feminicidio. La política del asesinato de las mujeres (pp. 665-678). México: UNAM. Sontag, S. (2003). Regarding the Pain of Others. New York: Farrar, Strauss and-
dc.relation/*ref*/Giroux. Sokoloff, N. & Dupont, I. (2005). Domestic Violence at the Intersections of Race, Class, and Gender. Challenges and Contributions to Understanding Violence Against Marginalized Women in Diverse Communities. Violence Against Women, 11, 38 64.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Shugerman, E. (2017). MeToo: Why are women sharing stories of sexual assault and how did it start? Independent. Oct 17, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/me-too-facebook-hashtag-why-when-meaning-sexual-harassment-rape-stories-explained-a8005936.html-
dc.relation/*ref*/Time staff (2017). 700,000 Female Farmworkers Say They Stand With Hollywood Actors Against Sexual Assault. Times. Nov 10, 2017. Retrieved from http://time.com/5018813/ farmworkers-solidarity-hollywood-sexual-assault/-
dc.relation/*ref*/Time’s Up (2018). Dear Sisters. Jan 1, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.timesupnow.com. Wessels, E. (2010). The Politics of Ethical Witnessing: The Participatory Networks of 9/11 Media Culture. Thesis submitted to the University of Minnesota.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wilson, S. (2003). Oprah, Celebrity and Formations of the Self. New York and Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wifrey, O. (2018). Oprah Winfrey Receives the Cecil B. deMille Award. Golden Globes 2018.Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=3&v=LyBims8OkSY-
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018): Communication, gender violence and resistance practices: new narratives for social change; 193-205en-US
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2018): Comunicación, violencia de género y prácticas de resistencia: narrativas innovadoras para un cambio social; 193-205es-ES
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 15 n. 2 (2018): Comunicação, violência de gênero e práticas de resistência: narrativas inovadores para uma mudança social; 193-205pt-BR
dc.source1549-2230-
dc.subjectactivismen-US
dc.subjectconfessionen-US
dc.subjectethical witnessingen-US
dc.subjectintersectionalityen-US
dc.subjectvictim.en-US
dc.subjectFeminismoen-US
dc.subjectComunicación socialen-US
dc.subjectactivismoes-ES
dc.subjectconfesiónes-ES
dc.subjectinterseccionalidades-ES
dc.subjecttestimonio éticoes-ES
dc.subjectvíctimaes-ES
dc.subjectativismopt-BR
dc.subjecttestemunho éticopt-BR
dc.subjectinterseccionalidadept-BR
dc.subjectconfissãopt-BR
dc.subjectvítimapt-BR
dc.titleTime’s Up, celebrities and the transformation of gender violence paradigms: The case of Oprah Winfrey’s Speech at the Golden Globes (2018)en-US
dc.titleTime’s Up, celebrities and the transformation of gender violence paradigms: The case of Oprah Winfrey’s Speech at the Golden Globes (2018)es-ES
dc.titleTime’s up, celebridades e a transformação do paradigma da violência de gênero: o do discurso de Oprah Winfrey no Globo de Ouro (2018)pt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeKarpetaes-ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.