Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181055Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Küppers Johansson, Ronald | - |
| dc.date | 2018-08-26 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:34:12Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:34:12Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/58511 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/TEKN.58511 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181055 | - |
| dc.description | This article proposes a theoretic approach to the current relation between the impact of the social product of new communication technologies (new digital media) and the optimization conditions of deliberation in democracy, aiming to map the anatomy of this relation as well as its main points of conflict in respect to transparency and participation. It shows new digital media present traits both suggesting potential for positive and negative impacts, nevertheless there are certain differential factors that incline to opt for a conclusion that estimates the effect of this relation as distinctly negative. It concludes with a series of recommendations as to how to tackle the challenges derived from this analysis, pointing to the need of reconsidering certain notions of deliberation and the public sphere. | en-US |
| dc.description | Este artículo pretende un acercamiento teórico a la relación actual entre el impacto del producto social de las nuevas tecnologías de la comunicación (las nuevas redes digitales) y las condiciones de optimización de la deliberación en democracia, buscando dibujar la anatomía de esta relación, así como sus principales puntos de conflicto en lo que a transparencia y participación se refiere. Muestra que las nuevas redes digitales presentan rasgos con potencial para ejercer tanto un impacto positivo como negativo, existiendo, no obstante, ciertos factores diferenciales que hacen decantarse por concluir que el efecto de esta relación es netamente negativo. Concluye con una serie de recomendaciones acerca de cómo encarar los retos que se derivan de este análisis, apuntando a la necesidad de reconsiderar ciertas nociones acerca de la deliberación y la esfera pública. | es-ES |
| dc.description | Este artigo busca uma abordagem teórica da atual relação entre o impacto do produto social das novas tecnologias de comunicação (as novas redes digitais) e as condições de otimização de deliberação em democracia – procurando esboçar a anatomia dessa relação, bem como os principais pontos de conflito em termos de transparência e participação. Mostramos que as novas redes digitais apresentam características com potencial para exercer impactos tanto positivos quanto negativos; embora existam certos fatores diferenciais que levam a concluir que o efeito dessa relação é claramente negativo. Concluímos com uma série de recomendações sobre como enfrentar os desafios que surgem dessa análise; apontando para a necessidade de reconsiderar certas noções acerca da deliberação e da esfera pública. | pt-BR |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | spa | - |
| dc.publisher | Grupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguas | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/58511/4564456548864 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Adorno, T. y Horkheimer, M. (2007). Dialéctica de la Ilustración. (Traducción J. Chamorro). Madrid: Akal. (Original en alemán, 1944). | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Baptista Ferreira, G. (2011). Political Debate on Weblogs: A Virtual Public Sphere for Deliberation? Estudos em Comunicação, 10, 213-226. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Beas, D. (2011). La reinvención de la política, Obama, Internet y la nueva esfera pública. Barcelona: Ediciones Península. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Beltrán, E. y Vallespín, F. (Eds.) (2012). Deliberación pública y democracias contemporáneas. Madrid: Síntesis. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bennett, W. L. y Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707-731. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bennett, W. L. y Iyengar, S. (2010). The shifting foundations of political communication: responding to a defense of the media effects paradigm. Journal of Communication, 60, 35-39. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bohman, J. (1996). Public Deliberation: Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Brown, R. (1986). Social psychology: The Second Edition. Nueva York: Free Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Chomsky, N., y Herman, E. S. (2009). Los guardianes de la libertad, Propaganda, desinformación y consenso en los medios de comunicación de masas. Barcelona: Crítica. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Chun, S. A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R. y Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity, 15, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/IP-2010-0205 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy. En A. Hamlin y P. Petit (Eds.) The Good Polity (pp. 17-34). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dahlberg, L. (2001). Computer-Mediated Communication and the Public Sphere: A Critical Analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7 (1). | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and Political Engagement: Citizens, Communication, and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dahlgren, P. (2012). Mejorar la participación: La Democracia y el Cambiante Entorno de la Web. En D. Innerarity y S. Champeau, Internet y el Futuro de la Democracia (pp. 45-67). Barcelona: Paidós. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dahlgren, P. (2013). The Political Web: Media, Participation and Alternative Democracy. Basingstoke: Pelgrave Macmillan. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dahlgren, P. (2014). Participation and Alternative Democracy: Social Media and their Contingencies. En P. Serra, E. J. M. Camilo y G. Gonçalves (Eds.) (2014), Political Participation and Web 2.0 (pp. 61-86). Covilhã: Livros LabCom. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dahlgren, P. (2016). Web-based political participation: Engagement, emotion, expression, efficacy. Media & Jornalismo. Disponible en: http://fabricadesites.fcsh.unl.pt/polocicdigital/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2017/03/2015_5_web-based-political-participation.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Davis, R. (2009). Typing politics: The role of blogs in American politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Fishkin, J. S. (2000, noviembre). Virtual Democratic Possibilities: Prospects for Internet Democracy. Artículo presentado en la conferencia Internet, Democracy and Public Goods, Belo Horizonte, Brazil, 6-10 de noviembre. Disponible en: http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/papers/2000/brazil_paper.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gartner Consulting (2017, septiembre). Top Strategic Predictions for 2018 and Beyond. Stamford: Gartner. Disponible en: https://www.gartner.com/doc/3803530?srcId=1-6595640685 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gilbert, E., Bergstrom, T. y Karahalios, K. (2009). Blogs are echo chambers: Blogs are echo chambers. En Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Comp.) (pp. 1-10). Washington: IEEE Computer Society. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gruzd, A. y Roy, J. (2014). Investigating Political Polarization on Hastie, R., Schkade, D. y Sunstein, C. R. (2007, junio). Political deliberation and ideological amplification: an experimental investigation. California Law Review, 95(3), 915. https://doi.org/10.15779/Z38740Z | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Innerarity, D. (2015). La política en tiempos de indignación. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kersting, N. y Zimmermann, T. (2014). Online-comments: Deliberative or Demonstrative Political Participation on the Internet? En P. Parycek y N. Edelmann (Comp.) (2014), Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (pp. 35-47). Krems: Donau-Universität Krems. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Laclau, E. (2005). La razón populista. Buenos Aires: Fondo de Cultura Económica. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lawrence, E., Sides, J. y Farrell, H. (2010). Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics. Perspectives on Politics, 8(1), 141-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709992714 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Le Bart, C. y Lefebvre, R. (Eds.) (2005). La proximité en politique. Usages, rhétoriques, pratiques. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lipovetsky, G. (1993). Espacio privado y espacio público en la era posmoderna. Sociológica, 8(22). | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Manin, B. (1997). Los principios del gobierno representativo. Madrid: Alianza. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mansbridge, J. (2003). Rethinking representation. American Political Science Review, 97(4), 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055403000856 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Maynor, J. W. (2009). Blogging for Democracy: Deliberation, Autonomy and Reasonableness in the Blogosphere. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 12(3), 443-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13698230903127937 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L. y Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415-444. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: How Not to Liberate the World. London: Allen Lane. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: PublicAffairs. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. London: Verso. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Page, B. (1996). Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rheingold, H. (1994). Virtual Community: Finding Connection in a Computerized World.Cambridge: Secker & Warburg. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Robinson, J. P., Neustadtl, A. y Kestnbaum, M. (2002). The Online “Diversity Divide”: Public Opinion Differences among Internet Users and Nonusers. IT and Society, 1(1), 284-302. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rosanvallon, P. (2008). Counter-Democracy: Politics in an Age of Distrust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Schkade, D., Sunstein, C. R. y Hastie, R. (2006). What Happened on Deliberation Day? Oline Working Papers, 298. University of Chicago Law & Economics. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Schkade, D., Sunstein, C. R. y Kahneman, D. (2000). Deliberating about dollars: the severity shift. Columbia Law Review, 100, 1139-1175. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Schneider, S. M. (1997, junio). Expanding the Public Sphere Through Computer-Mediated Communication: Political Discussion About Abortion in a Usenet Newsgroup. Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachussets Institute of Technology, EE.UU. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Steve_Schneider2/publication/2396036_Expanding_the_Public_Sphere_through_Computer-mediated_Communication/links/00b495156605b56e1c000000.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Semaan, B., Robertson, S. P., Douglas, S. y Maruyama, M. (2014). Social Media Supporting Political Deliberation Across Multiple Public Spheres: Towards Depolarization. Social Media and Politics, CSCW 2014, 1409-1421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531605 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Shalizi, C. R. y Thomas, A. (2011). Homophily and contagion are generically confounded in observational social network studies. Sociological Methodology Research, 40(2), 211-239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0049124111404820 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Smith, M., Rainie, L., Himelboim, I. y Shneiderman, B. (2014, febrero). Mapping Twitter Topic Networks: From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters. Pew Research Center Papers. Disponible en: http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2014/02/PIP_Mapping-Twitter-networks_022014.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Strandberg, K., Himmelroos, S. y Grönlund, K. (2017). Do discussions in like-minded groups necessarily lead to more extreme opinions? Deliberative democracy and group polarization. International Political Science Review, 38(1), 1-17. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sunstein, C. R. (2002). Republic.com. Princeton: Princeton University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Neither Hayek nor Habermas. Public Choice, 134, 87-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9202-9 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sunstein, C. R., Schkade, D., Ellman, L. M. y Sawicki, A. (2006). Are judges political? An empirical investigation of the federal judiciary. Washington: Brookings. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wallace, P. (1999). The Psychology of the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Witschge, T. (2004). Online Deliberation: Possibilities of the Internet for Deliberative Democracy. En P. M. Shane (Ed.) (2004), Democracy Online: the Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (pp. 108-122). New York: Routledge. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Yardi, S. y Boyd, D. (2010). Dynamic debates: an analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 30, 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467610380011 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Zanatta, L. (2014). El populismo (2ª ed.). Madrid: Katz | - |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 15 No. 2 (2018): Communication, gender violence and resistance practices: new narratives for social change; 415-427 | en-US |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2018): Comunicación, violencia de género y prácticas de resistencia: narrativas innovadoras para un cambio social; 415-427 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 15 n. 2 (2018): Comunicação, violência de gênero e práticas de resistência: narrativas inovadores para uma mudança social; 415-427 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 1549-2230 | - |
| dc.subject | information and communication technologies | en-US |
| dc.subject | participation | en-US |
| dc.subject | solutionism | en-US |
| dc.subject | transparency public sphere. | en-US |
| dc.subject | esfera pública | es-ES |
| dc.subject | participación | es-ES |
| dc.subject | solucionismo | es-ES |
| dc.subject | tecnologías de la información y la comunicación | es-ES |
| dc.subject | transparencia. | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Teorías Políticas | es-ES |
| dc.subject | esfera pública | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | participação | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | “solucionismo” | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | tecnologias de informação e comunicação | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | transparência | pt-BR |
| dc.title | The digital agora: analysis of the relation between democratic deliberation and new digital media | en-US |
| dc.title | El ágora digital: análisis de la relación entre deliberación democrática y nuevas redes digitales | es-ES |
| dc.title | A ágora digital: análise da relação entre deliberação democrática e novas redes digitais | pt-BR |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.