Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181025Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Kreimer, Pablo | - |
| dc.date | 2017-06-09 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:34:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:34:10Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/55727 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/TEKN.55727 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181025 | - |
| dc.description | The relation between STS and the social sciences is far from simple. While including STS in the field of social sciences is an object of dispute for certain researchers, others have tried to involve, seduce, or debate with colleagues in other subfields to establish bridges across these two disciplinary fields. The majority of social sciences researchers however know very little about current developments in STS and some question or even attack it directly. In this article I take up the debate about these relations to ask why sociology has paid scant attention to the contributions of sociology of science. For the conclusion, I advance certain hypotheses to offer clues for the interpretation of these tensions without claiming to explain them in a more definitive manner. | en-US |
| dc.description | La relación entre las ciencias sociales y los estudios sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología (CTS) dista de ser simple. Mientras que para algunos aún es un objeto de disputa la inclusión de los estudios CTS dentro de la amplia avenida de las ciencias sociales, otros han intentado interesar, seducir o discutir con los colegas de otras disciplinas del campo, para tender puentes entre ambos espacios disciplinarios. No obstante, hasta hoy la mayor parte de los académicos de las ciencias sociales conocen muy poco el desarrollo de los estudios CTS. Intento en este artículo hacer una estado de la cuestión acerca de estas relaciones, preguntándome por qué la sociología presta poca atención en sus explicaciones a los aportes de la sociología de la ciencia, la historia respecto de la historia de la ciencia, y lo mismo respecto de la antropología, las ciencias políticas o la comunicación. Hacia el final avanzo algunas hipótesis que no pretenden explicar estas tensiones en forma acabada pero que puedan ofrecer, al menos, algunas pistas para su lectura. | es-ES |
| dc.description | A relação entre as ciências sociais e os estudos sociais da ciência, tecnologia e sociedade (CTS) é longe de ser simples. Enquanto que para alguns ainda é um objeto de disputa a inclusão dos estudos CTS dentro do amplo campo das ciências sociais, outros tem tentado fazer interessar, seduzir ou discutir com colegas de outras disciplinas do campo, para estabelecer pontes entre ambos espaços disciplinares. Não obstante, até hoje a maior parte dos acadêmicos das ciências sociais conhecem muito pouco sobre o desenvolvimento dos estudos CTS. Viso neste artigo trazer a questão sobre estas relações, perguntando por que a sociologia presta pouca atenção nas suas explicações às contribuições da sociologia da ciência, a história a respeito da história da ciência, e o mesmo sobre a antropologia, as ciências políticas ou a comunicação. Ao final levanto algumas hipóteses que não pretendem explicar essas tensões de forma definitiva, mas que podem oferecer, ao menos, algumas pistas para a sua leitura. | pt-BR |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | spa | - |
| dc.publisher | Grupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguas | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/55727/51154 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ashmore, M., Mulkay, M., y Pinch, T. (1989), Health and Efficiency: A Sociology of Health Economics, Milton Keynes: Open University Press | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Augé, M (2016), La Sacrée Semaine qui changea la face du monde. Paris: Ed. Odile Jacob. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Barnes, B. (1982), T. S. Kuhn and social science. New York: Columbia University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Berthelot, J. M. (2008), L’Emprise du vrai. Connaissance scientifique et modernité. Paris: PUF. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Blanckaert, C. (2006), La discipline en perspective. Le système des sciences à l’heure du spécialisme (XIXe-XXe siècle), In Boutier, J., Passeron, J. C., Revel, J. (éd.), Qu'est-ce qu'une discipline?, Paris: Éditions de l’EHESS. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Blok, A., Jensen, T. A. (2011), Bruno Latour Hybrid Thoughts in a Hybrid World. New York: Routledge. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bloor, D. (1973), Wittgenstein and Mannheim on the sociology of mathematics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 4 (2), 173-191. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Boudon, R., y Clavelin, M. (éd.) (1994), Le relativisme est-il résistible? Regards sur la sociologie des sciences. Paris: PUF. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bourdieu, P. (2001), Science de la science et réflexivité. Paris: Raisons d’agir. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bowker, G., Latour, B. (1987), A Booming Discipline Short of Discipline: (Social) Studies of Science in France. Social Studies of Science, 17 (4), 715-748. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Camic, C., Gross, N., y Lamont M. (eds.) (2011), Social Knowledge in th Making. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Chabaud-Rychter, D., Descoutures, V., Devreux, A. M., y Varikas E. (dir.) (2010), Sous les sciences sociales, le genre. Relectures critiques de Max Weber à Bruno Latour. Paris: La Découverte. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Collins, H. M., y Yearley S. (1992), Epistemological Chicken. In: Pickering, A. (ed.), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Collins, H. M. (1992) [1985], Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Prac-tice. London, Beverly Hills: Sage Publications | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cozzens, S. (2001), Making Disciplines Disappear in STS. In: Cutcliffe S., y Mitcham C. (eds.), Visions of STS. Counterpoints in Science, Technology, and Society Studies. New York: SUNY Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Crawford, E. T. (1971), The Sociology of the Social Sciences: a trend report and bibliog-raphy. Current Sociology, XIX (2). | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Czarniawska, B. (2014), Bruno Latour: An Accidental Organization Theorist. In: Adler P., du Gay P., Morgan G., Reed M. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social The-ory, and Organization Studies: Contemporary Currents. Oxford: Oxford University Press | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dutch, S. (2002), ‘The Anti-Science Movement of the 1970's’ http://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/PSEUDOSC/AntiSci70.HTM (consultado por última vez el 9 de marzo de 2017) | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Elam, M. (1999), Living Dangerously with Bruno Latour in a Hybrid World. Theory, Cul-ture and Society, 16 (4), 1-24. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Favre, P. (2008), Ce que les science studies font à la science politique. Réponse à Bruno Latour, Revue Française de Science Politique. 58 (5), 817-829. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Fuller, S. (1993), Philosophy, rhetoric, and the end of knowledge a new beginning for science and technology studies. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ianni, O. (1971), A Sociologia da Sociologia Latino-americana. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Civilização Brasileira. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Isambert, F. A. (1985), Un ‘programme fort’ en sociologie de la science?, Revue française de sociologie, 26 (4), 485-508. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Jurdant, B. (ed.) (2010), Impostures scientifiques. Paris: La Découverte. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Knorr-Cetina, K. (1981), Introduction: The micro-sociological challenge of macro-sociology: towards a reconstruction of social theory and methodology. In: Knorr-Cetina K., Cicourel A. (eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: toward an integration of micro- and macro-sociologies. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Knorr-Cetina, K. (1995), Laboratory Studies: The Cultural Approach to the Study of Sci-ence. In: Jasanoff S., Markle G., Petersen, J., y Pinch, T. (eds). Handbook of science and technology studies. Londres y New Delhi: Sage. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kreimer, P. (1992), Les études sociales de la S & T en France. Essai de fondation d'un champ de recherche: Le Programme 'STS/CNRS'. Paris: Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers (CNAM-STS). | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kreimer, P. (2007), Estudios sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología en América latina: ¿para qué?, ¿para quién? REDES, Revista de estudios sociales de la ciencia, 26 (13), 55-64 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kreimer, P. (2015), Public understanding of science and social studies of science: conver-gence or parallel paths?. In Schiele B., Le Marec, J., y Baranger P. (eds.) Science Com-munication Today. Nancy: PUN. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kreimer, P. (2016), Contra viento y marea en la ciencia de la modernidad periférica: nive-les de análisis, conceptos y métodos. In: Kreimer, P. (editor), Contra viento y marea. Emergencia y desarrollo de campos científicos en la periferia. Buenos Aires: Editorial de CLACSO. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kreimer, P., Levin L., y Jensen, P. (2011), Popularization by Argentine researchers: the activities and motivations of CONICET scientists. Public Understanding of Science, 20 (1), 37-47. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Latour, B. (1991), Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Paris: La Découverte. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Latour, B. (2000), When things strike back: a possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology, 51 (1), 107-123. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Latour, B. (2008), Pour un dialogue entre science politique et science studies, Revue Fran-çaise de Science Politique. 58 (4), 657-678. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Law, J. y Wen-yuan Lin (2015), Provincialising STS: postcoloniality, symmetry and meth-od. Conferencia pronunciada en 2015 Denver para la aceptación del Bernal Prize. http://www.heterogeneities.net/papers.htm (consultado el 7 de marzo de 2017) | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mannheim, K. (1958), Ideología y Utopía. Una introducción a la sociología del conoci-miento. Madrid: Aguilar. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pandore (1983), Editorial, Pandore, (22), 1-4. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Martin, B. (1993), ‘The critique of science becomes academic’. Science, technology & human values, 18(2), 247-259. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Merton, R. (1938), Science and the Social Order, Philosophy of Science Vol. 5, No. 3 (Jul., 1938). | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pestre, D. (2006), Introduction aux science studies. Paris: La Découverte. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pickering A. (ed.) (1992), Science as Practice and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Restivo, S. (2010), Bruno Latour: The Once and Future Philosopher. In: Ritzer G., Stepin-sky J., The New Blackwell Companion to Major Social Theorists, Boston: Blackwell. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Schmidgen, H. (2015), Bruno Latour in Pieces: An Intellectual Biography. New York: Fordham University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Shinn, T. y Ragouet, P. (2005), Controverses sur la science. Pour une sociologie transver-saliste de l’activité scientifique. París: Raison d’agir. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sismondo, S. (2008), Science and Technology Studies and an Engaged Program. In Hack-ett E., Amsterdamska O., Lynch M., Wajcman, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition. Cambridge: MIT Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Snow, J. P. (1959), The two cultures. Londres: Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sokal, A., y Bricmont J. (1997), Impostures intellectuelles. Paris ; Ed. Odile Jacob. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Stichweh, R. (1992), The sociology of scientific disciplines. On the genesis and stability of the disciplinary structure in modern science. Science in Context, 5 (1), 3-15. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Vinck, D. (2007), Sciences et société. Sociologie du travail scientifique. Paris, A. Colin. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Vinck, D. (2016), Les Science studies: de la marginalité thématique à la refondation de la discipline, SociologieS [Online], http://sociologies.revues.org/5248 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wagner, P., y Wittrock B. (1991), Analyzing Social Science: On the Possibility of a Sociolo-gy of the Social Sciences. In: Wagner P., Wittrock B., Whitley R. (eds), Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. | - |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017): ICTs and STS dissemination: regulation and resistance strategies of different stakeholders; 143-162 | en-US |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2017): TIC y difusión de los CTS: regulación y estrategias de resistencia de los diferentes actores; 143-162 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 14 n. 1 (2017): Difusão das TIC e STS: estratégias de regulação e resistência dos diferentes intervenientes; 143-162 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 1549-2230 | - |
| dc.subject | Social Sciences | en-US |
| dc.subject | Science and Technology Studies (STS) | en-US |
| dc.subject | Knowledge Production | en-US |
| dc.subject | Disciplines | en-US |
| dc.subject | sociology of science | en-US |
| dc.subject | STS | en-US |
| dc.subject | Ciencias Sociales | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Ciencia | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Tecnología y Sociedad (CTS) | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Producción de conocimientos | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Disciplinas | es-ES |
| dc.subject | sociología | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Estudios de la Ciencia | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Tecnología y sociedad | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Ciências Sociais | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | Ciência | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | Tecnologia e Sociedade (CTS) | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | Produção de conhecimentos | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | Disciplinas | pt-BR |
| dc.title | Social studies of science and technology: are they part of the social sciences? | en-US |
| dc.title | Los estudios sociales de la ciencia y la tecnología: ¿son parte de las ciencias sociales? | es-ES |
| dc.title | Os estudos sociais da ciência e tecnologia: são parte das ciências sociais? | pt-BR |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| dc.type | Karpeta | es-ES |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.