Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181009Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Hernández Socha, Yuirubán | - |
| dc.creator | Márquez Valderrama, Jorge | - |
| dc.date | 2017-06-16 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:34:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:34:08Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/54079 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/TEKN.54079 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/181009 | - |
| dc.description | International Bibliographic Indexes (IBIs) like Science Citation Index and Scopus have played an important role in the field of science. However, IBIs increased use has been controversial and has raised positive and negative standpoints regarding their use as objective tools to represent and track the state of science. This has led to the emergence of deep tensions between both sides, expressed in oppositions like: IBIs are/are not objective, scientific, and universal. However, it is paradoxical that both sides are presented as mutually exclusive when all their complaints consider aspects that coexist in the communication process. We present evidences of this coexistence. In our approach, research papers are conceived as a techno-scientific object in the context of actor-network theory and metaphor tracking: optical, industrial, and associative, to analyze scientific communication networks. The aim of this study is twofold: first, we propose three networks to track scientific communication: manifest, underlying, and associative, to reconsider both positive and negative allegations about IBIs. Secondly, we encourage to rethink the opposition, starting from a more relational approach rather than an essentialist one to the process of scientific communication. | en-US |
| dc.description | Los Índices Bibliográficos Internacionales (IBIs) como Science Citation Index y Scopus, han adquirido protagonismo en la ciencia. Sin embargo, su ascenso ha sido polémico y alrededor de ellos se han configurado visiones a favor y en contra de su uso como herramientas objetivas para representar y seguir el estado de la ciencia. Esto ha conducido a profundas tensiones entre ambos polos expresadas en oposiciones del tipo: “los IBIs son/no son herramientas objetivas, científicas y universales”. No obstante, es paradójico que ambos polos se presenten como excluyentes entre sí cuando en la realidad las denuncias de uno y otro dan cuenta de aspectos que coexisten en el proceso comunicativo. En este artículo analizamos esta coexistencia. El artículo resultado de investigación se concibe aquí como un objeto tecno-científico, en el contexto de la teoría del actor red y las metáforas de seguimiento: óptica, industrial y asociativa, para analizar las redes de comunicación científica. Este artículo tiene un objetivo doble: primero, proponer tres redes de seguimiento de la comunicación científica: manifiesta, subyacente y asociativa, para reconsiderar las denuncias a favor y en contra de los IBIs, y segundo, contribuir a la reflexión sobre la oposición enunciada a partir de una visión relacional, no sustancial, del proceso de la comunicación científica. | es-ES |
| dc.description | Os Índices Bibliográficos Internacionais (IBIs), como o Science Citation Index e o Scopus, ganharam notoriedade no campo da ciência. No entanto, seu protagonismo tem sido controverso e ao redor deles foram se configurando visões a favor e contra seu uso como ferramenta objetiva para representar e rastrear o estado da ciência. Isso levou a profundas tensões entre os dois polos; tensões estas expressas em oposições do tipo: “IBIs são (não são) ferramentas objetivas, científicas e universais”. Não obstante, é paradoxal que ambos os polos se apresentem como excludentes entre si, quando, na realidade, os apontamentos de um e outro explicam aspectos que coexistem no processo comunicativo. Neste artigo, analisamos essa coexistência. O artigo, resultante de pesquisa, é concebido aqui como um objeto tecnocientífico, no contexto da teoria do “Ator-Rede” e das metáforas de rastreamento: óptica, industrial e associativa, para analisar as redes de comunicação científica. Este artigo tem um duplo objetivo: primeiro, propor três redes de monitoramento da comunicação científica (manifesta, subjacente e associativa), para reconsiderar as declarações a favor e contra os IBIs; e, segundo, contribuir para a reflexão a respeito da oposição enunciada, a partir de uma visão relacional, não substancial, do processo de comunicação científica. | pt-BR |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.format | application/zip | - |
| dc.format | application/zip | - |
| dc.language | spa | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Grupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguas | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/54079/51150 | - |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/54079/4564456550497 | - |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/54079/4564456550498 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Alatas, F. (2003). Academic dependency and the global division of labour in the social sciences. Current Sociology, 51(6), 599–613. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Alperin, J. (2014). Citation databases omit local journals. Naure, 511, 155. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Aman, I. (2015). Local, Networked or External? - Inclusion of regional journals in WoS and its effect. Isi, 66, 358-369. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Arunachalam, S. (1995). Science on the periphery: can it contribute to mainstream science? Knowledge and Policy, 8(2), 68-87. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Arunachalam, S. and Manorama, K. (1988). How do journals on the periphery compare with mainstream scientific journals? Scientrometrics, 14, 83-95. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Basu, A. (2010). Does a country’s scientific ‘productivity’ depend critically on the number of country journals indexed? Scientometrics, 82, 507–516. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Beigel, F. (2013). Centros y periferias en la circulación internacional del conocimiento. Nueva Sociedad, 245, 110–123. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Beigel, F. (2014a). Introduction: current tensions and trends in the world scientific system. Current sociology, 62(5), 617-625. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Beigel, F. (2014b). Publishing from the periphery: Structural heterogeneity and segmented circuits. The evaluation of scientific publications for tenure in Argentina’s CONICET. Current Sociology, 62(5), 743– 765. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bonitz, M. (2002). Ranking Nations and Heightened Competition in Matthew Core Journals: Two Faces of the Matthew Effect for Countries, Library Trends, 50(3), 440- 460. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bordons, M. and Fernández, I. (2002). The use of impact factor should be treated carefully when applied to the analysis of peripheral countries, whose national journals are hardly covered by ISI databases. Scientometrics, 53(2), 195–206; | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bourdieu, P. (2001). Science de la science er réflexivité. Paris: Editions Raisons d´agir. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bredan, A., Benamer, H. and Bakoush, O. (2014). Why are journals from less-developed countries constrained to low impact factors? Libyan J. Med., 9, 257-274. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/CLACSO (2015). Declaración de la asamblea general de CLACSO sobre la evaluación universitaria y científica, [en línea]. Medellín. CLACSO. Disponible en: http://www.clacso.org.ar/conferencia2015/documentos/asamblea/declaraciones/2-Declaracion-de-la-Asamblea-General-de-CLACSO-sobre-la-evaluacion-universitaria-y-cientifica.pdf | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Collazo, F. (2014). Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: the effect on the impact of each country. Scientometrics, 98, 197–209. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cuartas, G. (2013). Sociología de la ciencia: una revisión de las teorías subyacentes. Revista Interamericana de Bibliotecología, 36(1), 11-24. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cuartas, G., Lucio, D. and Leydesdorff, L. (2016). Regional and Global Science: Latin American and Caribbean publications in the Scielo Citation Index and the Web of Science. Profesional de la información, 25(1), 35-46. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Daston, L. (Comp.) (2000). Biographies of scientific objects. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Daston, L. (Comp.) (2008). Things that talk. Objects lessons from art and science. New York: Zone Books. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Falagas, M. and Alexiou, V. (2008). The top-ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp., 56(4), 223–226. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gibbs, W. (1995). Lost science in the third world. Scientific american, 273(2), 76-83. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gomez, Y. (2004). The scientific production: the socio-technical construction of bibliometric measurement. Phd. Dissertation, Department of sociology, The University of York, York. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gross, P. (1927). Fundamental Science and War. Science, 66 (1722), 640-645. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Guédon, J. (2001). In oldenburg´s long shadow. Librarians, research scientists, publishers, and the control of scientific publishing. Washington: Association of research libraries. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hanafi, S. (2011). University Systems in the Arab East: Publish Globally and Perish Locally vs Publish Locally and Perish Globally. Current Sociology, 59(3), 291-309. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hemminsson, A., Mygind, T., Skjennald, A. and Edgren, J. (2002). Manipulation of Impact Factors by Editors of Scientific Journals. American Journal of Roentgenology, 178(3), 767. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hicks, D., Wouters, P, Waltman, L., Rijcke, S. and Rafols, I. (2015). The Leiden Manifiesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429-431. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Keim, W. (2008). Social sciences internationally: The problem of marginalisation and its consequences for the discipline of sociology. African Sociological Review 12(2), 22–48. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kosanović, B. and Šipka, P. (2013). Output in WoS vs. Representation in JCR of SEE Nations: Does mother Thomson cherish all her children equally? In Journal Publishing in Developing, Transition and Emerging Countries: Proceedings of the 5th Belgrade International Open Access Conference (Comp.) (125-137). Belgrade: Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kuang-hua, C. (2004). The construction of the Taiwan Humanities Citation Index. Online Information Review, 28, 410-419. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lane, J. (2010). Let’s make science metrics more scientific. Nature, 464, 488-489. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's Hope. Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Latour, B. (2010). Cogitamus:six lettres sur les humanités scientifiques. París: La Découverte. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Latour, B. (2012). Enquete sur les modes d´existence. París: La Découverte. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Latour, B. (2014). Sobre la existencia parcial de objetos existentes y no existentes. En L. Daston, Biografía de los objetos científicos (pp. 351-381). Ciudad de México: La Cifra. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Leff, D. (2005). Making an impact: The rise of the impact factor as a measure of journal quality. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105 (1), 20-30. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lemarchand, G. (2011). The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks, Iberoamerican Countries (1973–2006). Research pólice, 41(2), 291-305. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lenoir, T. (Comp.) (1998). Inscribing science. Scientific texts and the materiality of communication. California: Stanford University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Leydesdorff, L. (1987). Various methods for the mapping of science. Scientometrics, 11(5-6), 295-324. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Liu, S. (2007a). Comment on the Correspondence by Cokol et al. EMBO reports, 8, 792-793. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Liu, S. (2007b). Fixing the Peer Review System. Scientific Ethics, 2(2), 55-56. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Liu, S. (2007c). Hwang's retracted publication still contributes to Science's impact factor. Sci.Ethics, 2, 44-45. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Livingstone, D. (2003). Putting science in its place. Geographies of scientific knowledge. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Meneghini, R. and Packer, A. (2007). Is there science beyond English? Initiatives to increase the quality and visibility of non-English publications might help to break down language barriers in scientific communication. EMBO, 8(2), 112-116. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Meneghini, R., Packer, A., Nassi-Calo, L. (2008). Articles by Latin American Authors in Prestigious Journals Have Fewer Citations. PLoS ONE, 3(11), e3804; | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Merton, R. (1977a). The Sociology of Science in Europe. Chicago: Southern Illinois University Press; | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Merton, R. (1977b). The sociology of science. Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ophir, A. and Shapin, S. (1991). The Place of Knowledge: A Methodological Survey. Science in Context, 4, 3-21. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P. and Neylon, C. (2010), Altmetrics: A manifesto, [en línea]. Disponible en: http://altmetrics.org/manifesto [2010, 26 of October] | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Repiso, R. (2016). Web of Science, Scopus y la batalla por el “nuevo mundo”, [en línea]. España: Universidad de Granada. Disponible en: https://ec3metrics.com/web-of-science-scopus-la-batalla-nuevo-mundo/ [2016, 26 of May]. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rossner, M., Hill, E., and Van Epps, H. (2007). Show me the data. J. Gen. Physiol, 131, pp. 3–4; Rossner, M., Van Epps, H., and Hill, E. (2008). Irreproducible Results—a Response to Thomson Scientific. JGP, 131(2), 183-184. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Shenhav, Y. and Kamens D. (1991). The 'Costs' of Institutional Isomorphism: Science in Non-Western Countries. Social Studies of Science, 21, 527-545. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sotudeh, H. and Horri, A. (2008). Great expectations: The role of Open Access in improving countries’ recognition. Scientometrics, 76(1), 69–93. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Spinak, E. (1996). Los análisis cuantitativos de la literatura científica y su validez para juzgar la producción latinoamericana. Bol. Oficina Sanit. Panam., 120, 139–147. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Testa J. (2009). Regional content expansion in Web of Science®: opening borders to exploration, [en línea]. Disponible en: https://globalhighered.wordpress.com/2009/01/15/regional-content-expansion-in-web-of-science/ [2016, 1 of August] | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Testa J. (2011). The globalization of Web of Science: 2005-2010, [en línea]. New York: Thomson Reuters. Disponible en: http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/globalwos-essay.pdf [2016, 1 of August] | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Van Leeuwen, N., Moed, F., Tijssen, W., Visser, S. and Van Raan, J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its onsequences for interntaional comparison of national research performance. Scientometrics, 51, 335–346. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Vessuri, H. Guédon J, Cetto, A. (2014). Excellence or quality? Impact of the current competition regime on science and scientific publishing in Latin America and its implications for development. Current Sociology, 62(5), 647-665. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Xin-ning, S., Xin-ming, H. & Xin-ning, H. (2001). Developing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index. Online Information Review, 25, 365-369. | - |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 14 No. 1 (2017): ICTs and STS dissemination: regulation and resistance strategies of different stakeholders; 67-83 | en-US |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 14 Núm. 1 (2017): TIC y difusión de los CTS: regulación y estrategias de resistencia de los diferentes actores; 67-83 | es-ES |
| dc.source | Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 14 n. 1 (2017): Difusão das TIC e STS: estratégias de regulação e resistência dos diferentes intervenientes; 67-83 | pt-BR |
| dc.source | 1549-2230 | - |
| dc.subject | STS | en-US |
| dc.subject | Scientometrics | en-US |
| dc.subject | Actor Network Theory | en-US |
| dc.subject | Mediations | en-US |
| dc.subject | Journals | en-US |
| dc.subject | Teorías sociológicas | en-US |
| dc.subject | CTS | es-ES |
| dc.subject | cienciometría | es-ES |
| dc.subject | teoría del actor-red | es-ES |
| dc.subject | mediaciones | es-ES |
| dc.subject | revistas especializadas | es-ES |
| dc.subject | sociología | es-ES |
| dc.subject | Estudos de C&T | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | cienciometria | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | teoria “Ator-Rede” | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | mediações | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | revistas especializadas | pt-BR |
| dc.title | Scientific communication networks. Analysis of journals and International Bibliographic Indexes | en-US |
| dc.title | Las redes de la comunicación científica. Análisis de revistas especializadas e índices bibliográficos internacionales | es-ES |
| dc.title | As redes de comunicação científica. Análise de revistas especializadas e Índices Bibliográficos Internacionais | pt-BR |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| dc.type | Karpeta | es-ES |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.