Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

  1. Repositorio institucional de CLACSO
  2. Colección de los Centros Asociados
  3. España
  4. Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/180999
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorAraujo, Erin-
dc.date2016-11-18-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:34:07Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:34:07Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/52841-
dc.identifier10.5209/rev_TEKN.2016.v13.n2.52841-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/180999-
dc.descriptionThis article examines how consensus decision-making can be used as a method in creating spaces for generative justice. Based on empirical research in a moneyless economy in San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico, the project called El Cambalache has created its own exchange value where everything in the economy shares equal value. The article is a praxiography of consensus decision-making as research method.en-US
dc.descriptionO artigo examina como a decisão consensual pode ser usada como um método para criar espaços para justiça generativa. Baseado na pesquisa empírica numa economia sem dinheiro em San Cristobal de las Casas, Chiapas, México, o projeto chamado El Cambalache tem criado seu próprio sistema de troca onde tudo na economia compartilha do mesmo valor. Este artigo é uma praxiografia de tomada de decisão consensual como método de pesquisa.pt-BR
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherGrupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguases-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/TEKN/article/view/52841/49999-
dc.relation/*ref*/Arnstein, SR. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4), 216-224.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bookchin, M. (1986). Post-Scarcity Anarchism. Montreal-Buffalo: Black Rose Books.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Bird-Rose, D., (2003). Decolonizing the Discourse of Environmental Knowledge in Settler Societies. In Hawkins & S. Muecke (Eds.) Culture and Waste: The Creation and Destruction of Value (pp. 53-72). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Butler, CTL & Rothstein, A. (2007). On conflict and consensus: a handbook on formal consensus decision-making. Alexander Technique International. Retrived from: http://www.learningmethods.com/pdf/on%20conflict%20and%20consensus.pdf-
dc.relation/*ref*/Callon, M (2007a). An essay on the growing contribution of economic markets to the proliferation of the social. Theory, Culture, Society, 24, 139-163.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Callon, M (2007b). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F. & Siu, L. (Eds), Do Economist Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. (pp. 311-57). Princeton: Princeton University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Çalişkan, K (2010). Market Threads: how cotton farmers and traders create a global commodity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Cameron, J. (2015). Enterprise innovation and economic diversity in community supported agriculture: sustaining the agricultural commons. In Roelvink, G., St. Martin, K. & Gibson-Graham, J.K. (Eds.) Making other worlds possible. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Cameron, J. & Gibson, K. (2001). Shifting Focus: Alternative pathways for communities and economies. Latrobe and Monash Universities.-
dc.relation/*ref*/DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity Continuum. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Eglash, R & Garvey, C. (2014). Basins of Attraction for generative justice. In Banerjee (Ed.), Chaos theory in politics: Understanding complex systems. Germany: Springer Science.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Freeman, J. (2014). The tyranny of structurelessness. In JoFreeman.org Retrived from http://www.jofreeman.com/joreen/tyranny.htm-
dc.relation/*ref*/Generative Justice Wiki. (2016). Retrived from: https://generativejustice.wikispaces.com-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2006). Post-capitalist politics. Minesota: University of Minnesota Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Gibson-Graham, J.K., Cameron, J. & Healy, S. (2013). Take Back the Economy. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Graeber, D. (2013). The Democracy Project: a history, a crisis, a movement. New York: Spiegel & Grau.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Graeber, D. (2016). The Utopia of Rules. New York: Melville House Publishing-
dc.relation/*ref*/Healy, S. (2015). Biofuels, ex-felons, and Empower, a worker-owned cooperative: performing enterprises differently. In Roelvink, G., St. Martin, K. & Gibson-Graham, J.K. (Eds.), Making other worlds possible. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. London: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Law, J. (2011). What’s Wrong with a One-World World. In Heterogeneities. Retrived from http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2011WhatsWrongWithAOneWorldWorld.pdf-
dc.relation/*ref*/Latour, Bruno. (1999). Pandoras Hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Mol, A. (2008). The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. New York: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Potts, K & Brown, L. (2005). Becoming and anti-oppressive researcher. In Strega, S. & Brown, L. (Eds.), Research as Resistance. Toronto, Ontario: Canadian Scholars’ Press/Women’s Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (2008). Introduction. In Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. 2Nd Edition. California: Sage Publications-
dc.relation/*ref*/Roelvink, G. (2013). Performing post-humanist economies in the Anthropocene. In Roelvink, G., St. Martin, K. & Gibson-Graham, J.K. (Eds.), Making other worlds possible. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Roelvink, G., St. Martin, K. & Gibson-Graham, J.K. (Eds.) (2013). Making other worlds possible. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Sousa Santos, B. (2014), Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. New York: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Werner, K. (2015). Performing economics of care in a New England time bank and Buddhist community. In Roelvink, G., St. Martin, K. & Gibson-Graham, J.K. (Eds.), Making other worlds possible. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/White, R.J. & Williams, C.C. (2012). The Pervasive Nature of Heterodox Economic Spaces at a Time of Neoliberal Crisis: Towards a “Postneoliberal” Anarchist Future”. Antipode, 44(5), 1625–1644-
dc.relation/*ref*/Wright, S. 2015. More-than-human, emergent belongings: A weak theory approach. Progress in Human Geography, 39(4), 391–411-
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2016): Generative justice; 439-460en-US
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2016): Generative justice; 439-460es-ES
dc.sourceTeknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital e Movimentos Sociais; v. 13 n. 2 (2016): Justiça gerativa; 439-460pt-BR
dc.source1549-2230-
dc.subjectAlternative economiesen-US
dc.subjectanarchismen-US
dc.subjectdiverse economies frameworken-US
dc.subjectfeminismen-US
dc.subjectGeographyen-US
dc.subjectAnarchismen-US
dc.subjectHeterodox Economiesen-US
dc.subjectEconomías alternativases-ES
dc.subjectanarquismoes-ES
dc.subjectdiversidad económicaes-ES
dc.subjectfeminismoes-ES
dc.subjectEconomias alternativaspt-BR
dc.subjectanarquismopt-BR
dc.subjectdiversas perspectivas econômicaspt-BR
dc.subjectfeminismopt-BR
dc.titleConsensus decision-making as a research method for generative justice: empirical practices from a money-less economy in Chiapas, Mexicoen-US
dc.titleA tomada de decisão consensual como uma método de pesquisa para justiça generativa: práticas empíricas de uma economia sem dinheiro em Chiapas, Méxicopt-BR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
dc.typeKarpetaes-ES
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.