Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe

logo CLACSO

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/180777
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.creatorMannoni, Elisabetta-
dc.date2021-05-26-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-15T20:32:11Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-15T20:32:11Z-
dc.identifierhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CGAP/article/view/76194-
dc.identifier10.5209/cgap.76194-
dc.identifier.urihttps://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/180777-
dc.descriptionThis paper tackles whether it is possible to identify cognitive biases that foster environmental concern among public opinion. In particular, the study focuses on the mere exposure effect. Regression analysis was conducted on data concerning Spain and Italy to test the hypotheses that (1) exposing individuals to proenvironmental stimuli in the form of physical natural environments or recycling policies and (2) belonging to younger generations today is associated with a greater extent of environmental concern. The results confirmed both the hypotheses, suggesting environmental policies that affect individuals in their everyday lives, besides being beneficial for the environment, make the public opinion more conscious about the issueen-US
dc.descriptionEl presente estudio busca investigar si los sesgos cognitivos – en particular, el de la mera exposición – puedan promover preocupación ambiental entre la opinión pública. Se llevó a cabo un análisis de regresión a partir de datos concernientes España e Italia para averiguar si (1) la exposición de individuos a estímulos proambientales en forma de ambientes físicos naturales o políticas públicas de reciclaje y (2) el pertenecer a las nuevas generaciones hodiernas estuvieran asociados a una mayor preocupación ambiental. Los resultados confirman ambas hipótesis y sugieren que las políticas ambientales que implican cambios en la vida diaria de los individuos, más allá de ser benéficas para el ambiente, concientizan a la opinión pública sobre el tema ambientales-ES
dc.formatapplication/pdf-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherEdiciones Complutensees-ES
dc.relationhttps://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CGAP/article/view/76194/4564456557458-
dc.relation/*ref*/Allen, R. S., Castano, E., & Allen, P. D. (2007). “Conservatism and concern for the environment”, Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 30: 1–25.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Babad, E., & Katz, Y. (1991). “Wishful thinking—against all odds”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(23): 1921-1938.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Baldassarri, D. (2005). La semplice arte di votare. Le scorciatoie cognitive degli elettori italiani. Il Mulino.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Brechin, S. R., & Kempton, W. (1994). “Global environmentalism: a challenge to the postmaterialism thesis?”, Social science quarterly, 75(2): 245-269.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Brough, A. R., Wilkie, J. E., Ma, J., Isaac, M. S., & Gal, D. (2016). “Is eco-friendly unmanly? The green-feminine stereotype and its effect on sustainable consumption”, Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4): 567-582.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Delli Carpini, M., & Keeter, S. (1991). “Stability and change in the U.S. public’s knowledge of politics”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 55: 583-612.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Deryugina, T. (2013). “How do people update? The effects of local weather fluctuations on beliefs about global warming”, Climatic change, 118(2): 397-416.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Dimock, M. (2019). “Defining generations: Where Millennials end and Generation Z begins. Pew Research Center, 17: 1-7.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Dunlap, R. E., & Heffernan, R. B. (1975). “Outdoor recreation and environmental concern: An empirical examination”, Rural Sociology, 40(1): 18.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Dunlap, R. E., & York, R. (2012). “The globalization of environmental concern”, Comparative Environmental Politics: Theory, Practice, and Prospects, 89-112.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Egan, P. J., & Mullin, M. (2012). “Turning personal experience into political attitudes: The effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming”, The Journal of Politics, 74(3): 796-809.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Easton, D. (1957). “An approach to the analysis of political systems”, World politics, 9(3): 383-400.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Feygina, I., Jost, J. T., & Goldsmith, R. E. (2010). “System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change”. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 36(3): 326-338.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Fernandez, R., & Rodrik, D. (1991). “Resistance to reform: Status quo bias in the presence of individual-specific uncertainty”, The American economic review, 1146-1155.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Funk, C., Kennedy, B., Hefferon, M., & Strauss, M. (2018). “Majorities see government efforts to protect the environment as insufficient”, Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/science/wp-content/uploads/sites/16/2018/05/PS_2018.05.14_energyclimate_FINAL.pdf on May 23, 2020.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hartwig, M. G., & Tkach-Kawasaki, L. (2020). “Correction to: Identifying the ‘Fukushima Effect’in Germany through policy actors’ responses: evidence from the G-GEPON 2 survey”, Quality & Quantity, 1-22.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Hatfield, J., & Job, R. S. (2001). “Optimism bias about environmental degradation: The role of the range of impact of precautions”, Journal of environmental Psychology, 21(1): 17-30.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Inglehart, R. (1981). “Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity”. The American Political Science Review, 880-900.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Jost, J. T., & Andrews, R. (2011). “System justification theory”, The encyclopedia of peace psychology. London: Wiley-Blackwell.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin-
dc.relation/*ref*/Karlsson, N., Loewenstein, G., & Seppi, D. (2009). “The ostrich effect: Selective attention to information”, Journal of Risk and uncertainty, 38(2): 95-115.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Karp, L. (2005). “Global warming and hyperbolic discounting”, Journal of Public Economics, 89(2-3): 261-282.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kemmelmeier, M., Krol, G., & Kim, Y. H. (2002). “Values, economics, and proenvironmental attitudes in 22 societies”, Cross-cultural research, 36(3): 256-285.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kent, R. J., & Allen, C. T. (1994). “Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: the role of brand familiarity”, The Journal of Marketing, 58: 97-105.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kilbourne, W. E., Beckmann, S. C., & Thelen, E. (2002). “The role of the dominant social paradigm in environmental attitudes: A multinational examination”, Journal of business Research, 55(3): 193-204.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kitschelt, H. (1993). “The green phenomenon in Western party systems”. En Kamieniecki, S. (ed.). Environmental politics in the international arena: Movements, parties, organizations and policy. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kuligowski, E. D., & Gwynne, S. M. (2010). “The need for behavioral theory in evacuation modeling”, In Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics 2008. Berlin: Heidelberg, pp. 721-732-
dc.relation/*ref*/Kvaløy, B., Finseraas, H., & Listhaug, O. (2012). “The publics’ concern for global warming: A cross-national study of 47 countries”, Journal of Peace Research, 49(1): 11-22.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Marshall, G. (2015). Don't even think about it: Why our brains are wired to ignore climate change. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.-
dc.relation/*ref*/McCright, A. M. (2010). “The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public”, Population and Environment, 32(1): 66-87.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Monahan, J. L., Murphy, S. T., &, Zajonc, R. B. (2000). “Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects”, Psychological Science, 11: 462-466.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Omer, H., & Alon, N. (1994). “The continuity principle: A unified approach to disaster and trauma”, American Journal of Community Psychology, 22(2): 273-287.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Puleo, A. H. (2013). Ecofeminismo para otro mundo posible. Madrid: Ediciones Cátedra.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Quoidbach, J., Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2013). “The end of history illusion”, Science, 339(6115): 96-98.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Richardson, D., & Rootes, C. (2006). The green challenge: The development of green parties in Europe. London: Routledge.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Rodríguez, M. P., & López, Y. H. (2010). “Ecofeminismo, una propuesta para repensar el presente y construir el futuro”, CIP-Ecosocial. Boletín ECOS, 10: 1-3.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Sabbagh, C. (2005). “Environmentalism, right‐wing extremism, and social justice beliefs among East German adolescents”, International Journal of Psychology, 40(2):118-131.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Sniderman, P. M., Brody, R. A., & Tetlock, P. E. (1991). Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Son Hing, L. S., Bobocel, D. R., Zanna, M. P., & McBride, M. V. (2007). “Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making: High social dominance orientation leaders and high right-wing authoritarianism followers”, Journal of personality and social psychology, 92(1): 67.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Taylor, P., Parker, K., Morin, R., Patten, E., & Brown, A. (2014). Millennials in adulthood. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). “Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases”, Science, 185(4157): 1124-1131.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Valentine, P. V., & Smith, T. E. (2002). “Finding something to do: The disaster continuity care model”, Brief Treatment & Crisis Intervention, 2(2): 183.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Vázquez, P. Y. (2020). “Environmental concern in the global south: Tackling the post-materialist thesis and the impact of ideology”. In Latin America in Times of Global Environmental Change. London: Cham, pp. 75-91-
dc.relation/*ref*/Watts, J. (2019). “The Greta Thunberg effect: at last, MPs focus on climate change”, The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/apr/23/greta-thunberg on April 8, 2020.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Zajonc, R. B. (1968). “The attitudinal effects of mere exposure”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92: 1-27.-
dc.relation/*ref*/Zajonc, R. B. (2001). “Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10: 224-228.-
dc.rightsDerechos de autor 2021 Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Públicaes-ES
dc.sourceCuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021); 1-14en-US
dc.sourceCuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública; Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2021); 1-14es-ES
dc.source2341-4839-
dc.source2341-3808-
dc.subjectenvironmental concernen-US
dc.subjectcognitive biasesen-US
dc.subjectenvironmental policiesen-US
dc.subjectSpainen-US
dc.subjectItalyen-US
dc.subjectpreocupación ambientales-ES
dc.subjectsesgos cognitivoses-ES
dc.subjectpolíticas ambientaleses-ES
dc.subjectEspañaes-ES
dc.subjectItaliaes-ES
dc.titleDo cognitive biases condition environmental concern? The case of Italy and Spainen-US
dc.title¿Pueden los sesgos cognitivos condicionar la preocupación ambiental? El caso de Italia y Españaes-ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article-
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion-
Aparece en las colecciones: Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha

Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.