Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/180761Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Piqueiras Conlledo, Paloma | - |
| dc.date | 2020-06-25 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:32:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:32:10Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CGAP/article/view/64948 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/cgap.64948 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/180761 | - |
| dc.description | The 2008 economic crisis triggered a period of austerity, risks and socio-economic challenges. In the case of the Public Administration, this could meant, at least, three defiance: a) maintaining the same level of excellence with fewer resources (Luoma-aho, 2007); b) undertake the problems to satisfy the demands of the population (Thomas, 2013) and; c) face the loss of trust that citizens have in the Public Administration (Eurofound, 2013). In short, the financial situation forced the public sector to rethink its way of relating to citizens. This research, based on the theory of intangible assets (Canel and Luoma-aho, 2017), studies the differences between citizen engagement and co-production actions and provides suggestions for the development of cooperation between public institutions and citizens. | en-US |
| dc.description | La crisis económica del 2008 desencadenó un periodo de austeridad y desafíos socioeconómicos. Para la Administración Pública esto supuso, al menos, tres retos: a) mantener el mismo nivel de excelencia contando con menos recursos (Luoma-aho, 2007); b) sortear los problemas para satisfacer las demandas de la población (Thomas, 2013) y; c) afrontar la pérdida de confianza de los ciudadanos (Eurofound, 2013). La situación financiera obligó al sector público a repensar su forma de relacionarse con los ciudadanos. Esta investigación, basándose en la teoría de los bienes intangibles (Canel y Luoma-aho, 2017), estudia las diferencias entre el Compromiso Ciudadano y las fórmulas de coproducción y aporta sugerencias para el desarrollo de la cooperación entre instituciones públicas y ciudadanos. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | spa | - |
| dc.publisher | Ediciones Complutense | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CGAP/article/view/64948/4564456553798 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Adler, R. P., y Goggin, J. (2005). “What do we mean by “civic engagement”?”, en Journal of Transformative Education, vol. 3, nº 3, pp. 236-253. DOI: 10.1177/154134460527679 Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Banco de conocimiento del Insituto Nacional de la Administración Pública (INAP). Consultado en septiembre de 2016 en https://bci.inap.es/ Berger, B. (2009). “Political Theory, Political Science, and the End of Civic Engagement”, en Perspectives on Politics, vol. 7, nº 2, pp. 335-350. Bossi, A., Fuertes, Y., Serrano, C. (2014). “Reflexiones en torno a la aplicación del capital intelectual en el sector público”, en Spanish Journal of Finances and Accounting/ Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, vol. 34, nº 124, pp. 211-245. Bovaird, T. (2007). “Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services”, en Public Administration Review, vol. 67, nº 5, pp. 846–860. Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2016). “User and community co-production of public services: what does the evidence tell us?” en International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 39, nº 13, pp. 1006-1019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1250559 Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2012b). From engagement to co-production: How users and communities contribute to public services. New Public governance, the third sector and co-production. London: Routledge, pp. 35-60. Bovaird, T., Van Ryzin, G. G., Loeffler, E., & Parrado, S. (2015). “Activating citizens to participate in collective co-production of public service2, en Journal of Social Policy, vol. 44, nº 1, pp. 1–23. Bovaird, T., y Loeffler, E. (2012a). “From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value”, en Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, vol. 23, nº 4, pp. 1119–1138. DOI 10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6. Brady, H. (1999). “Political participation”, en Robinson, J. P.; Shaver, P.R.; Wrightsman, L. S. (eds.). Measures of political attitudes. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 737-801. Brandsen, T., & Honingh, M. (2016). “Distinguishing Different Types of Coproduction: A Conceptual Analysis Based on the Classical Definitions”, en Public Administration Review, vol. 76, nº 3, pp. 427-435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12465 Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public value governance: Moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Administration Review, 74(4), 445-456. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12238 Canel, M.J. (2017). “La investigación sobre los bienes intangibles en la Administración Pública”, en Canel, Piqueiras Conlledo, P y Ortega (Eds.), La comunicación de la Administración Pública: conceptos y casos prácticos de bienes intangibles. Madrid: Colecciones INNAP Investiga. Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública (INAP), pp. 11-28. Canel, M.J. & Luoma-Aho, V. (2017). Public sector communication. Closing gaps between citizens and public organizations. Boston: Wiley Blackwell. Canel, M.J., Piqueiras Conlledo, P., y Ortega, G. (2017). La comunicación de la Administración Pública: conceptos y casos prácticos de bienes intangibles. Madrid: Colecciones INNAP Investiga. Instituto Nacional de Administración Pública (INAP). Carmeli, A., & Tishler, A. (2005). “Perceived organizational reputation and organizational performance: An empirical investigation of industrial enterprises”, Corporate Reputation Review, vol. 8, nº1, pp.13-30. Carpini, M. X. D., Cook, F. L., & Jacobs, L. R. (2004). “Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: A review of the empirical literature”, en Annual Review of Political Science, nº 7, pp. 315-344. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 Claes, E., & Hooghe, M. (2008). Citizenship education and political interest: Political interest as an intermediary variable in explaining the effects of citizenship education. Paper presented at the Conference on Civic Education and Political Participation. American Political Science Association, 104 edn. Boston, 28–31 agosto. Cooper, T. L. (2005). “Civic Engagement in the Twenty‐First Century: Toward a scholarly and practical agenda”, Public Administration Review, vol. 65, nº 5, pp. 534–535. Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement. Cambridge University Press Cambridge. Dalton, R. J. (2008). “Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation”, Political Studies, vol. 56, nº 1, pp. 76–98. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). “Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology”, Human affairs, vol. 22, nº 3, pp. 283-300. DOI: 10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1 Eurofound (2013). Political trust and civic engagement during the crisis. Luxemburgo: Publications Office of the European Union. Eurofound (2018a). “Cohesión social y bienestar en Europa”, en Fundación Europea para la Mejora de las Condiciones de Vida y de Trabajo, diciembre. En: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef18035es_1.pdf (Consultado, 20 de junio de 2019) Eurofound (2018b). “Cambio social y confianza en las instituciones”, en Fundación Europea para la Mejora de las Condiciones de Vida y de Trabajo, diciembre. En: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/ef_publication/field_ef_document/ef18036es1.pdf (Consultado, 20 de junio de 2019) Fung, A. (2007), ‘Mini-publics: Deliberative designs and their consequences’, in Rosenberg, S. (Ed.), Deliberation, participation, and democracy: Can the people govern? New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 159-183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230591080_8 Gaventa, J. (2002). “Exploring citizenship, participation and accountability”, en IDS Bulletin, vol. 33, nº 2, pp. 1-14. Goetz, A. M., & Jenkins, R. (2001). “Hybrid forms of accountability: Citizen Engagement in institutions of public-sector oversight in India”, en Public Management Review, vol. 3, nº 3, pp. 363-383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616670110051957 Governance International. (2016). Case Studies. En http://www.govint.org/good-practice/case-studies/ (Consultado, 16 de septiembre de 2016). Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Holmes, B. (2011). Citizens' engagement in policymaking and the design of public services. Canberra: Parliamentary Library. James, O. (2009). “Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services”, en Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 19, nº 1, pp. 107-123. James, O. (2010). “Performance measures and democracy: Information effects on citizens in field and laboratory experiments”, en Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol. 21, nº 3, pp. 399-418. James, O. (2011). “Managing citizens' expectations of public service performance: evidence from observation and experimentation in local government”, en Public Administration, vol. 89, nº 4, pp.1419-1435. James, O., & Moseley, A. (2014). “Does performance information about public services affect citizens' perceptions, satisfaction, and voice behaviour? Field experiments with absolute and relative performance information”, en Public Administration, vol. 92, nº 2, pp. 493-511. Keeter, S., Zukin, C., Andolina, M., & Jenkins, K. (2002). The civic and political health of the nation: A generational portrait. Washington: Center for information and research on civic learning and engagement (CIRCLE). Luoma-aho, V. (2007). “Neutral reputation and public sector organizations”, en Corporate Reputation Review, vol. 10, nº 2, pp. 124-143. Luoma-aho, V. (2008). “Sector reputation and public organizations”, en International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 21, nº 5, pp. 446–467. Marlowe Jr, H. A., & Arrington-Marlowe, L. L. C. (2005). Public engagement: Theory and practice, Working Paper. Nabatchi, T., & Leighninger, M. (2015). Public participation for 21st century democracy. Hoboken, Nueva Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). “Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction”, en Public Administration Review, vol. 77, nº 5, pp. 766-776. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765 Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Norris, P. (2003 November 27-28). Young people & political activism: From the politics of loyalties to the politics of choice? Report for the Council of Europe Symposium: “Young people and democratic institutions: From disillusionment to participation”, Strasbourg, France. Disponible en http://www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/Acrobat/COE%20Young%20People%20and%20Political%20Activism.pdf (Consultado, 10 de abril de 2016). Ostrom, Elinor. (1972). “Metropolitan Reform: Propositions derived from two traditions”, en Social Science Quarterly, vol. 53, nº 3, pp. 474-493. Parks, R. B., Baker, P. C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S., Vandivort, M., Whitaker, G., & Wilson, R. (1981). “Consumers as coproducers of public services: Some economic and institutional considerations”, en Policy Studies Journal, vol. 9, nº 7, pp. 1001-1011. Piqueiras Conlledo, P. (2019). El bien intangible Compromiso Ciudadano (Citizen Engagement) y su relación con el crecimiento económico de las naciones. Análisis de 27 países de la unión europea. Tesis Doctoral, Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Putnam, R. (1995). “Bowling alone: America´s declining social capital”, en Journal of Democracy, vol. 6, nº 1, pp. 65-78. Putnam, R. D. (1993). “The prosperous community”, en The American prospect, vol. 4, nº 13, pp. 35-42. Putnam, R. D. (2000). “Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital”, en Culture and politics. New Yok: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 223-234. Reddel, T., & Woolcock, G. (2004). “From consultation to participatory governance? A critical review of citizen engagement strategies in Queensland”, en Australian Journal of Public Administration, vol. 63, nº 3, pp. 75-87 Roberts, N. (2004). “Public deliberation in an age of direct citizen participation”, en The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 34, nº 4, pp. 315-353. DOI: 10.1177/0275074004269288 Sanders, K., & Canel, M. J. (2015). “Mind the gap: Local government communication strategies and Spanish citizens’ perceptions of their cities”, en Public Relations Review, vol. 45, nº 5, pp. 777-784. Stolle, D., Hooghe, M. (2005). “Inaccurate, Exceptional, One-Sided or Irrelevant? The debate about the alleged decline of social capital and civic engagement in western societies”, en British Journal of Political Science, n1 35, pp.149-167. Surva, Laidi, Piret Tõnurist, and Veiko Lember. (2016). “Co-Production in a Network Setting: Providing an Alternative to the National Probation Service”, en International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 39, nº 13, pp. 1031-1043. Teorell, J., Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2007). “Political participation: Mapping the terrain”, en Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative perspective, nº 17, pp. 334-357. Thomas, J. C. (2013). “Citizen, customer, partner: Rethinking the place of the public in public management”, Public Administration Review, vol. 73, nº 6, pp. 786-796. Tuurnas, S. (2015). “Learning to co-produce? The perspective of public service professionals”, en International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 28, nº 7, pp. 583–598. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-04-2015-0073 Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). “Public service performance and trust in government: the problem of causality”, en International Journal of Public Administration, vol. 26, nº 8–9, pp. 891–913. Van de Walle, S., Van Roosbroek, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2008). “Trust in the public sector: is there any evidence for a long-term decline?” en International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 74, nº 1, pp. 47-64. Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Social equality and political democracy. New York: Harper& Row. World Bank (2014). Strategic framework for mainstreaming citizen engagement in World Bank Group operations. Documento disponible en http://documentos.bancomundial.org/curated/es/266371468124780089/pdf/929570WP0Box380ategicFrameworkforCE.pdf (Consultado, 10 de mayo de 2017). Yang, K., y Callahan, K. (2007). “Citizen involvement efforts and bureaucratic responsiveness: Participatory values, stakeholder pressures, and administrative practicality”, en Public Administration Review, vol. 67, nº 2, pp. 249-264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00711.x | - |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2020 Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública | es-ES |
| dc.source | Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública; Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020); 1-14 | en-US |
| dc.source | Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública; Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2020); 1-14 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 2341-4839 | - |
| dc.source | 2341-3808 | - |
| dc.subject | coproduction | en-US |
| dc.subject | citizen engagement | en-US |
| dc.subject | public administration | en-US |
| dc.subject | governance | en-US |
| dc.subject | coproducción | es-ES |
| dc.subject | compromiso ciudadano | es-ES |
| dc.subject | administración pública | es-ES |
| dc.subject | gobernanza | es-ES |
| dc.title | From citizen engagement to coproduction. Analysis of the concept and cases of the public administration | en-US |
| dc.title | Del compromiso ciudadano a la coproducción. Análisis del concepto y casos de la administración pública | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.