Red de Bibliotecas Virtuales de Ciencias Sociales en
América Latina y el Caribe
Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/180743Registro completo de metadatos
| Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
|---|---|---|
| dc.creator | Filgueiras, Fernando | - |
| dc.date | 2018-06-11 | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-15T20:32:09Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-15T20:32:09Z | - |
| dc.identifier | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CGAP/article/view/60608 | - |
| dc.identifier | 10.5209/CGAP.60608 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/180743 | - |
| dc.description | This paper aims to analyze the institutional development process of accountability institutions in Brazil. Scholars have identified an incremental development process of horizontal accountability institutions in Brazil, stimulating an important process in democracy. Our argument is that the incremental development process of accountability institutions was not followed by systemic developments able to encompass all accountability institutions. The reason for this is that, in spite of incremental advances, there has been no development regarding the procedural ecology of accountability institutions, thus hampering coordinated and cooperative actions between institutions. We analyzed the procedural flow from the Public Sweepstakes Program of the Comptroller General in Brazil as well as the performance of the institutions of the accountability system. We also conducted interviews with the leaders of accountability institutions in order to address the issue of cooperation and strategic coordination of the system of institutions. | en-US |
| dc.description | Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar el proceso de desarrollo institucional de las instituciones de rendición de cuentas en Brasil. Los académicos han identificado un proceso de desarrollo incremental de las instituciones de rendición de cuentas horizontal en Brasil, estimulando un proceso importante en la democracia. Nuestro argumento es que el proceso de desarrollo incremental de las instituciones de rendición de cuentas no fue seguido por desarrollos sistémicos capaces de abarcar todas las instituciones de rendición de cuentas. La razón de esto es que, a pesar de los avances incrementales, no ha habido desarrollo en cuanto a la ecología procesal de las instituciones de rendición de cuentas, lo que dificulta las acciones coordinadas y cooperativas entre las instituciones. Analizamos el flujo de procedimientos del Programa de Sorteos Públicos del Controladoría General en Brasil, así como el desempeño de las instituciones del sistema de rendición de cuentas. También realizamos entrevistas con los líderes de las instituciones de rendición de cuentas para abordar el tema de la cooperación y la coordinación estratégica del sistema de instituciones. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Ediciones Complutense | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/CGAP/article/view/60608/4564456547456 | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Abranches, S. H. (1988). “Presidencialismo de coalizão: O dilema institucional brasileiro”, en Dados – Revista de Ciências Sociais, vol. 31, nº 1, pp. 5-34. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Anechiarico, F y Jacobs, J. (1996). The persuit of absolute integrity. How corruption control makes government ineffective. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Arantes, R. B. (2011a). “Polícia federal e construção institucional”, en Avritzer, L y Filgueiras, F. Corrupção e sistema político no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Civilização Brasileira. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Arantes, R. B. (2011b) “The Federal police and Ministério Público”, en Power, T y Taylor, M. (eds.). Corruption and democracy in Brazil. The struggle for accountability. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Avritzer, L. (2012). “The different designs of public participation in Brazil: Deliberation, power sharing and public ratificatio”, em Critical Policy Studies, vol. 6, nº 2, pp. 113-127, 2012. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Balbe, R. (2013). Controle interno e o foco nos resultados. São Paulo: Editora Fórum. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, vol. 13, nº 4, pp. 447-468. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Dimaggio, P y Powell, W. (1983). “The iron cage revisited: Isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, en American Sociological Review, vol. 48, nº 2, pp. 147-160. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Doig, A y Mcivor, S. (2003). “National integrity systems. Assessing corruption and reform”, en Public Administration and Development, vol. 23, nº 4, pp. 317-332. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Filgueiras, F. (2016). “Transparency and accountability: Principles and rules for the construction of publicity”, en Journal of Public Affairs, vol. 16, nº 3, pp. 192-202. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Filgueiras, F. (2013). “Corrupção e cultura política: a percepção da corrupção no Brasil”, en Telles, H y Moreno, A. Comportamento eleitoral e comunicação política na América Latina. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, pp. 221-258. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Filgueiras, F y Araújo, M. M. (2014). “A política anticorrupção e o marco legal no Brasil”, em Cunha, I. F y Serrano, E. Cobertura jornalística da corrupção. Sistemas políticos, sistemas midiáticos e enquadramentos Legais. Lisboa: Alêtheia Editores, pp. 36-71. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hall, P y Taylor, R. (1996). “Political science and three new institutionalisms”, en Political Studies, vol. 44, nº 5, pp. 936-957. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/La Porta, R., Lopes-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A y Vishny, R. (1999). “The quality of government”, en The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, vol. 15, nº 1, pp. 222-279. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Leff, N. H. (1964). “Economic development through bureaucratic corruption”, en American Behavioral Scientist, vol. 8, nº 3, pp. 8-14. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Limongi, F. (2006). “A democracia no Brasil. Presidencialismo, coalizão partidária e proceso decisório”, en Novos Estudos, nº 76, pp. 17-41. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lindblom, C. E. (1959). “The science of “muddling trough”, en Public Administration Review, vol. 19, nº 2, pp. 79-88. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Loureiro, M. R., Teixeira, M. A. C y Cacique, T. (2009). “Democratização e reforma do Estado: o desenvolvimento institucional no tribunais de contas no Brasil Recente”, em Revista de Administração Pública, vol. 43, nº 4, pp. 739-772. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mahoney, J y Thelen, K. (2010). “A theory of gradual institutional change”, en Mahoney, J y Thelen, K. (Eds.). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency and power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mainwaring, S. (2003). “Introduction: Democratic accountability in Latin America”, Mainwaring, S y Welna, C. Democratic accountability in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Nunes, E. (1997). A gramática política do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editores. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/O’Donnell, G. (1999). “Horizontal accountability in new democracies”, en Schedler, A., Diamond, L y Plattner, M. The self-restraining state. Power and accountability in new democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/O’Donnell, G. (1996). “Uma outra institucionalização: América Latina e alhures”, en Lua Nova, nº 37, pp. 5-31. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Olsen, J. P. (2017). Democratic accountability, political order, and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Philp, M. (2009). “Delimiting democratic accountability”, en Political Studies, vol. 57, nº 1, pp. 28-53. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time. History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Porto, M. (2011). “The media and political accountability”, en Power, T y Taylor, M. (eds.). Corruption and democracy in Brazil. The struggle for accountability. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Przeworski, A y Cheibub, J. A. (1999). “Democracy, elections, and accountability for economic outcomes”, en Przeworski, A., Stokes, S y Manin, B. Democracy, accountability and representation. Cambridge: University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rezende, F. C. (2009). “Analytical challenges for the neoinstitutional Theories of institutional change in comparative political science”, en Brazilian Political Science Review, vol. 3, p. 98-126. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rosanvallon, P. (2006). Le contre-democracie. Paris: Seuil. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Corruption and government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rothstein, B. (2011). The quality of government. Corruption, social trust, and inequality in international perspective. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Shleifer, A y Vishny, R. (1993). “Corruption”, en The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108, nº 3, pp. 681-712. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Speck, B. W. (2000). Inovação e rotina no Tribunal de Contas da União. O Papel da Instituição Superior de Controle Financeiro no Sistema Político-Administrativo Brasileiro. São Paulo: Fundação Konrad-Adenauer Stiftung. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Taylor, M y Praça, S. (2014). “Inching toward accountability”, en Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 56, nº 2, pp. 27-48. | - |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Taylor, M y Buranelli, V. (2007). “Ending up in Pizza. Accountability as a problem of institutional arrangement in Brazil”, en Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 49, nº 1, pp. 59-87. | - |
| dc.source | Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública; Vol. 5 No. 1 (2018); 1-26 | en-US |
| dc.source | Cuadernos de Gobierno y Administración Pública; Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2018); 1-26 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 2341-4839 | - |
| dc.source | 2341-3808 | - |
| dc.subject | Accountability institutions | en-US |
| dc.subject | control of corruption | en-US |
| dc.subject | institutional change | en-US |
| dc.subject | procedural ecology | en-US |
| dc.subject | accountability process. | en-US |
| dc.subject | instituciones de rendición de cuentas | es-ES |
| dc.subject | control de la corrupción | es-ES |
| dc.subject | cambio institucional | es-ES |
| dc.subject | ecología procesal | es-ES |
| dc.subject | proceso de rendición de cuentas. | es-ES |
| dc.title | Institutional development and public control: Analyzing the Brazilian accountability system. | en-US |
| dc.title | Desarrollo institucional y control público: Análisis del Sistema brasileño de rendición de cuentas | es-ES |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | - |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | - |
| Aparece en las colecciones: | Facultad de Ciencias Políticas y Sociología - UCM - Cosecha | |
Ficheros en este ítem:
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.
Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.