Implications of the Debate on Irregular Migration in the European and Spanish Asylum Regime

dc.creator	Víctor Merino Sancho
dc.date	2013
dc.date.accessioned	2022-03-22T17:46:02Z
dc.date.available	2022-03-22T17:46:02Z
dc.identifier	http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=15128261004
dc.identifier.uri	http://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/87439
dc.description	Flows of refugees and the reasons why people flee from their countries of origin, seeking protection in third countries, are different from the flows that occurred when the Convention on Refugee Status was approved. However, asylum law has not been changed, at least regarding the internationally legal and conceptual framework established in the 1951 Convention. Meanwhile, the current nature of migration has elicited government policies based on the logic of the control of migration flows. The inability to clearly distinguish between forced and voluntary migration, despite the willingness of states to do so, has caused this logic to affect the right of asylum to the detriment of the protection it implies.
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.language	en
dc.publisher	El Colegio de la Frontera Norte, A.C.
dc.relation	http://www.redalyc.org/revista.oa?id=151
dc.rights	Migraciones Internacionales
dc.source	Migraciones Internacionales (México) Num.2 Vol.7
dc.subject	Demografía
dc.subject	1 Migrations
dc.subject	2 refugees
dc.subject	3 irregularity
dc.subject	4 human rights
dc.subject	5 mixed flows
dc.title	Implications of the Debate on Irregular Migration in the European and Spanish Asylum Regime
dc.type	artículo científico