Repositorio Dspace

Protected areas versus areas occupied by productive activities and infrastructure in Brazil – is there room for everybody?

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Drummond, José Augusto
dc.date.accessioned 2021-11-01T23:06:19Z
dc.date.available 2021-11-01T23:06:19Z
dc.date.issued 2014
dc.identifier.uri https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/8639
dc.description.abstract The text argues that there has existed and will continue to exist for much time enough geographical space and related natural resources in the Brazilian national territory to accommodate the expansion of five sets of uses and activities: (i) rural productive activities, (ii) infra-structure installations, (iii) protected areas, and (iv) indigenous homelands and (v) maroon homelands. This point has become highly relevant because recently a pro-agriculture social coalition / lobby and an associated congressional caucus have argued that the expansion of Brazilian agricultural activities has been confined by protected areas and indigenous homelands. These actors call explicitly for the unfettered expansion of agricultural activities and consider it to be strategic for the future of Brazil as a major producer of food and agricultural commodities. This coalition gives little attention to the fact that rural activities compete for territory with other activities and land uses that are common components of modern societies and economies. The present text criticizes an influential research report that defends the unlimited expansion of agricultural activities. It also pulls together data that show the contrary – agricultural areas have expanded strongly over the last decades, the same having happened with areas dedicated to environmental protection, indigenous homelands and infrastructure installations. The major inference is that although agriculture may call for freedom to expand to “new frontiers”, it can also expand by improving the productivity in currently occupied lands and by using lands officially classified as underused, unused or abandoned by farmers. Additionally, it is argued that this pro-agriculture stance should not be rejected outright, but incorporated into a wider debate about a socially legitimate distribution of different land uses in the large, tropical, humid, biologically rich territory of Brazil.
dc.format application/pdf
dc.format.extent 36 p.
dc.language eng
dc.publisher ENGOV
dc.relation ENGOV Working paper no. 13
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
dc.subject Agriculture
dc.subject Indigenous communities
dc.subject Infrastructure
dc.subject Land use
dc.subject Natural resources
dc.subject Protected areas
dc.title Protected areas versus areas occupied by productive activities and infrastructure in Brazil – is there room for everybody?
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/workingPaper
dc.type info:ar-repo/semantics/documento de trabajo
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta