Chinese autocracy promotion towards Myanmar and Thailand

Tonetto, Priscilla

DSpace Principal
→
Colección de los Centros Asociados
→
Argentina
→
Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado - SIP/UNR - Cosecha
→
Ver ítem

dc.creator	Tonetto, Priscilla
dc.date	2022-08-18
dc.date.accessioned	2025-03-20T19:45:57Z
dc.date.available	2025-03-20T19:45:57Z
dc.identifier	https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/78
dc.identifier	10.35305/rr.vi5.78
dc.identifier.uri	https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/252605
dc.description	In its autocracy promotion towards Myanmar’s and Thailand’s military regimes, China especially applied incentives but also blackmailing practices. However, China also supported hybrid regimes. Then, China always selected soft and not hard power; military pressure has been indirect. There were strong emulative processes of both Myanmar and Thailand. Chinese pragmatism promoted both options since, if China opposed hybrid regimes, this could cause the defeat of the military and the possible victory of pro-Western and anti-Chinese political actors. In order to avoid this result, Beijing governments adopted a more flexible autocracy promotion, reflecting a real-politik approach to foreign policy, which allowed to preserve Chinese diplomatic interests.	en-US
dc.description	Nella sua autocracy promotion verso i regimi militari di Myanmar e Thailand, la Cina ha applicato soprattutto incentivi ma anche ricatti. La Cina ha comunque sostenuto anche i regimi ibridi. Poi, la Cina ha sempre preferito il soft all’hard power; la pressione militare è stata indiretta. Si sono sviluppati così forti processi imitativi sia da parte del Myanmar che della Tailandia. Il pragmatismo cinese ha promosso entrambe le opzioni, perché se le Cina avesse ostacolato i regimi ibridi, ciò avrebbe causato la sconfitta delle forze armate e la possibile vittoria degli attori politici filo-occidentali e anti cinesi. Per evitare tale esito, i governi di Pechino hanno adottato una autocracy promotion flessibile, attraverso l’applicazione della real-politik alla politica estera, per tutelare gli interessi diplomatici cinesi.	it-IT
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	Universidad Nacional de Rosario	es-ES
dc.relation	https://relasp.unr.edu.ar/index.php/revista/article/view/78/137
dc.rights	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/	es-ES
dc.source	Revista Euro latinoamericana de Análisis Social y Político (RELASP); Núm. 5 (2022); 94-117	es-ES
dc.source	2683-7420
dc.subject	Cina	it-IT
dc.subject	Myanmar	it-IT
dc.subject	Thailand	it-IT
dc.subject	Regimi autoritari	it-IT
dc.subject	Regimi ibridi	it-IT
dc.subject	China	en-US
dc.subject	Myanmar	en-US
dc.subject	Thailand	en-US
dc.subject	Autocracy promotion	en-US
dc.subject	Hybrid regimes	en-US
dc.title	Chinese autocracy promotion towards Myanmar and Thailand	en-US
dc.title	L'autocracy promotion della Cina verso Myanmar and Thailand	it-IT
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion