THE PROBATORY ACTIVITY AND THE IMPARTIAL THIRD PARTY IN THE CONTRADICTORY ACCOUNT MODEL OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL CODE (DEC. LEG. N.° 957)

Castro Medina, Rodolfo

DSpace Principal
→
Otras Autoras y Autores Latinoamericanos
→
Revistas - Cosecha
→
Ver ítem

dc.creator	Castro Medina, Rodolfo	es
dc.date	2017-12-07
dc.date.accessioned	2024-02-25T20:56:09Z
dc.date.available	2024-02-25T20:56:09Z
dc.identifier	https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/1077
dc.identifier.uri	https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/249822
dc.description	This article is concerned with pointing out and believing that the Criminal Procedure Code of 2004, considering the judgment stage as a main phase of the criminal proceedings under the principles of orality, publicity, immediacy, contradiction and procedural equality, among others, would demonstrate a clearly established delimitation of functions, both for the procedural parties, as well as for the impartial third party, forming a triadic scenario in the judgment. Therefore, beyond the observation, control and direction of the oral judgment, it would be counterproductive to accept some judicial intervention in the probative activity as also prescribed in the said adjective code. The objectives of the study are to identify which procedural and structural principles that govern the oral trial are violated with the powers of intervention of the judge of judgment within the framework of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 2004; analyze the concept and attributions of being the impa	en
dc.description	Esteartículoseocupaenseñalaryacreditar queelCódigo Procesal Penal del 2004, al considerar la etapa de juzgamiento comounafaseprincipaldelprocesopenal normadobajolosprincipiosdeoralidad, publicidad,inmediación,contradiccióne igualdadprocesal,entreotros,demostraría una delimitación de funciones claramente establecida,tantopa	es
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.language	spa
dc.publisher	Fondo Editorial de la Universidad de San Martín de Porres	es
dc.relation	https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/VJ/article/view/1077/859
dc.rights	Derechos de autor 2017 Rodolfo Castro Medina	es
dc.source	Vox Juris; Vol. 34 No. 2 (2017); 113-124	en
dc.source	Vox Juris; Vol. 34 Núm. 2 (2017); 113-124	es
dc.source	2521-5280
dc.source	1812-6804
dc.subject	Trial activity	en
dc.subject	impartial third trial	en
dc.subject	accusatory model	en
dc.subject	delimitation of functions	en
dc.subject	techniques of oral litigation	en
dc.subject	theory of the case	en
dc.subject	equality of arms	en
dc.subject	Actividad probatoria	es
dc.subject	tercero imparcial	es
dc.subject	juzgamiento	es
dc.subject	modelo acusatorio	es
dc.subject	delimitación de funciones	es
dc.subject	técnicas de litigación oral	es
dc.subject	teoría del caso igualdad de armas	es
dc.title	THE PROBATORY ACTIVITY AND THE IMPARTIAL THIRD PARTY IN THE CONTRADICTORY ACCOUNT MODEL OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL CODE (DEC. LEG. N.° 957)	en
dc.title	LA ACTIVIDAD PROBATORIA Y EL TERCERO IMPARCIAL EN EL MODELO ACUSATORIO CONTRADICTORIO DEL CÓDIGO PROCESAL PENAL (DEC. LEG. N.° 957)	es
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion