HUMAN DIGNITY AND PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS / A DIGNIDADE HUMANA E A ANÁLISE DA PROPORCIONALIDADE

Alexy, Robert

DSpace Principal
→
Colección de los Centros Asociados
→
Brasil
→
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito - PPGD/UNOESC - Cosecha
→
Ver ítem

dc.creator	Alexy, Robert
dc.date	2016-02-19
dc.date.accessioned	2023-03-30T19:33:18Z
dc.date.available	2023-03-30T19:33:18Z
dc.identifier	https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/9763
dc.identifier	10.18593/ejjl.v16i3.9763
dc.identifier.uri	https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/246494
dc.description	The relation between proportionality analysis and human dignity is one of the most contested questions in the debate about the normative structure of human dignity. Two conceptions stand in opposition: an absolute and a relative conception. According to the absolute conception, the guarantee of human dignity counts as a norm that takes precedence over all other norms in all cases. Taking precedence over all other norms in all cases implies that balancing is precluded. This, in turn, means that each and every interference with human dignity is a violation of human dignity. Thus, justified interference with human dignity becomes impossible. By contrast, proportionality analysis is intrinsically connected to the distinction between justified and unjustified interferences. A proportional interference is justified and is, therefore, constitutional. The opposite applies in the case of disproportional interference. The absolute conception is incompatible with this conceptual framework. For this reason, it is incompatible with proportionality analysis. According to the relative conception, precisely the opposite is true. The relative conception says that the question of whether human dignity is violated is a question of proportionality. With this, the relative conception is not only compatible with proportionality analysis, it presupposes it.	en-US
dc.format	application/pdf
dc.language	eng
dc.publisher	Universidade do Oeste de Santa Catarina, UNOESC	pt-BR
dc.relation	https://periodicos.unoesc.edu.br/espacojuridico/article/view/9763/pdf
dc.rights	Copyright (c) 2016 Espaço Jurídico: Journal of Law [EJJL] - Qualis A2	pt-BR
dc.source	Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Bd. 16 (2015): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] \| Edição Especial - Graves Violações DDHH; 83-96	de-DE
dc.source	Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 16 (2015): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] \| Edição Especial - Graves Violações DDHH; 83-96	en-US
dc.source	Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 16 (2015): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] \| Edição Especial - Graves Violações DDHH; 83-96	es-ES
dc.source	Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; Vol. 16 (2015): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] \| Edição Especial - Graves Violações DDHH; 83-96	fr-CA
dc.source	Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL]; v. 16 (2015): Espaço Jurídico Journal of Law [EJJL] \| Edição Especial - Graves Violações DDHH; 83-96	pt-BR
dc.source	2179-7943
dc.source	1519-5899
dc.title	HUMAN DIGNITY AND PROPORTIONALITY ANALYSIS / A DIGNIDADE HUMANA E A ANÁLISE DA PROPORCIONALIDADE	en-US
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion