Repositorio Dspace

Validation of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in a Mexican Sample

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creator Reyes Perez, Veronica
dc.creator Alcazár-Olán, Raúl
dc.creator Torres, Christian Enrique Cruz
dc.date 2022-09-17
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-20T15:55:17Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-20T15:55:17Z
dc.identifier https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/2270
dc.identifier 10.33881/2027-1786.rip.15201
dc.identifier.uri https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/215612
dc.description The present study validated a scale to measure the cognitive emotional regulation in a Mexican sample. The aim was to assess the validity of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), and to examine its divergent validity, based on instruments previously validated. The sample had 464 Mexican youth (332 women and 132 men); the age ranged between 18 and 33 years. Most of them (98.2%) were single. The design was instrumental, transversal, and non-experimental. Besides the CERQ, other instruments were used to measure anger (ML-STAXI), fear (IESM), depression (BDI), and anxiety (BAI). Responses were collected with the platform SurveyMonkey. As a result, the original CERQ 9-factor model showed poor fit in the confirmatory factor analysis (CFI = .853). The exploratory factor analysis yielded seven valid factors: Refocus positively on the plans (8 items, α = .86), Rumination (5 items, α = .78), Blaming on the others (4 items, α = .77), Self-blame (3 items, α = .76), Catastrophizing (4 items, α = .77), Putting in perspective (4 items, α = .70), and Refocus on the positive (3 items, α = .72). The cognitive nature of the CERQ showed divergence with emotional and behavioral variables of previous instruments. As a conclusion, the factors found with the CERQ represent valid and reliable constructs, with potential for programs that want to attend and strengthen the emotional regulation. en-US
dc.description El presente trabajo es la validación en una muestra mexicana de una escala que mide la regulación emocional cognitiva. El objetivo fue evaluar la validez del Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) y examinar su validez divergente, a partir de instrumentos previamente validados. La muestra se formó de 464 jóvenes mexicanos (332 mujeres y 132 hombres), con edad entre 18 y 33 años. El 98.2% eran solteros. El diseño fue instrumental, transversal y no experimental. Además del CERQ, se usaron instrumentos de medición del enojo (ML-STAXI), miedo (IESM), depresión (IDB) y ansiedad (IAB). Las respuestas se recabaron con la plataforma SurveyMonkey. Como resultado, el modelo original de nueve factores del CERQ mostró pobre ajuste en el análisis factorial confirmatorio (CFI = .853). Por medio de análisis factorial exploratorio, se encontraron siete factores válidos: Reenfocarse en los planes positivamente (8 reactivos, α = .86), Rumiación (5 reactivos, α = .78), Culpar a otros (4 reactivos, α = .77), Auto culpa (3 reactivos, α = .76), Catastrofizar (4 reactivos, α = .77), Poner en perspectiva (4 reactivos, α = .70) y Reenfocarse en lo positivo (3 reactivos, α = .72). El CERQ, cuya naturaleza es cognitiva, mostró divergencia con variables emocionales y conductuales de instrumentos previos. En conclusión, los factores encontrados del CERQ representan constructos válidos y confiables que tienen potencial para programas que busquen atender y fortalecer la regulación emocional. es-ES
dc.description O presente estudo validou uma escala para medir a regulação emocional cognitiva em uma amostra mexicana. Oobjetivo foi avaliar a validade do Questionário de Regulação das Emoções Cognitivas (CERQ) e examinar sua validadedivergente, com base em instrumentos previamente validados. A amostra contou com 464 jovens mexicanos (332mulheres e 132 homens); a idade variou entre 18 e 33 anos. A maioria (98,2%) era solteira. O desenho foi instrumental,transversal e não experimental. Além do CERQ, outros instrumentos foram utilizados para mensurar raiva (ML-STAXI),medo (IESM), depressão (BDI) e ansiedade (BAI). As respostas foram coletadas com a plataforma SurveyMonkey.Como resultado, o modelo original de 9 fatores do CERQ mostrou um ajuste ruim na análise fatorial confirmatória (CFI= 0,853). A análise fatorial exploratória resultou em sete fatores válidos: Reorientar positivamente os planos (6 itens, α= 0,86), Ruminação (3 itens, α = 0,78), Culpar os outros (4 itens, α = 0,77), Auto – culpa (3 itens, α = 0,76), Catastrofização(4 itens, α = 0,77), Colocar em perspectiva (4 itens, α = 0,70) e Refocar no positivo (3 itens, α = 0,72) . A natureza cognitivado CERQ apresentou divergência com as variáveis emocionais e comportamentais dos instrumentos anteriores.Como conclusão, os fatores encontrados com o CERQ representam construtos válidos e confiáveis, com potencialpara programas que queiram atender e fortalecer a regulação emocional pt-BR
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language spa
dc.publisher ĬbērAM es-ES
dc.relation https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/2270/1799
dc.relation /*ref*/Abdi, S., Taban, S., & Ghaemian, A. (2012). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: validity and reliability of persian translation of CERQ-36 item. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 32, 2–7. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.001
dc.relation /*ref*/Akyunus, M., Gencöz, T., & Karakose, S. (2020). The mediator role of negative cognitive emotion regulation strategies between interpersonal problems and borderline personality beliefs. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-020-00373-0
dc.relation /*ref*/Alcázar, R. J., Deffenbacher, J. L. & Byrne, Z. S. (2011). Assessing the factor structure of the anger expression inventory (ML-STAXI) in a Mexican sample. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 307-318. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=12&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=67065657&db=asn
dc.relation /*ref*/Aldao, A. (2013). The future of emotion regulation research: capturing context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459518.
dc.relation /*ref*/Aldao, A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2010). Specificity of cognitive emotion regulation strategies: A transdiagnostic examination. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 974–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2010.06.002
dc.relation /*ref*/Aldao, A., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2012). The influence of context on the implementation of adaptive emotion regulation strategies. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 50, 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2012.04.004
dc.relation /*ref*/Aldao, A., Sheppes, G., & Gross, J.J., (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 39, 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4
dc.relation /*ref*/Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
dc.relation /*ref*/Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
dc.relation /*ref*/Bonanno, G.A., Burton, C.L., (2013). Regulatory flexibility: an individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 591–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613504116
dc.relation /*ref*/Bridgett, D. J., Burt, N. M., Edwards, E. S., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2015). Intergenerational transmission of self-regulation: A multidisciplinary review and integrative conceptual framework. Psychological Bulletin, 141, 602–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038662
dc.relation /*ref*/Butler, A. C., Chapman, J. E., Forman, E. M., & Beck, A. T. (2006). The empirical status of cognitive-behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2005.07.003
dc.relation /*ref*/Çakmak, A. F., & Çevik, E. I. (2010). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: development of turkish version of 18-item short form. African Journal of Business Management, 4(10), 2097–2102 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228631257_Cognitive_emotion_regulation_questionnaire_Development__Turkish_version_of_18-item_short_form#fullTextFileContent
dc.relation /*ref*/Compas, B. E., Connor-Smith, J., Saltzman, H., Thomsen, A. H., & Wadsworth, M. E. (2001). Coping with stress during childhood and adolescence: Problems, progress, and potential in theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 87–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.87.
dc.relation /*ref*/Compas, B. E., Jaser, S. S., Bettis, A. H., Watson, K. H., Gruhn, M. A., Dunbar, J. P., & Thigpen, J. C. (2017). Coping, emotion regulation, and psychopathology in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 939–991. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000110
dc.relation /*ref*/Dobson, D., & Dobson, K. S. (2017). Evidence-based practice of cognitive-behavioral therapy. New York: The Guilford press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Domínguez, S., & Medrano, L. (2016). Psychometric properties of the questionnaire of cognitive regulation of emotions (CERQ) in university students in Lima. Psychology, 10, 53–67. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1900-23862016000100006
dc.relation /*ref*/Domínguez-Lara, S. (2019). Diferencias de sexo en las estrategias cognitivas de regulación emocional: un reporte exploratorio en estudiantes universitarios. Cultura, 33(1), 319-327. http://www.revistacultura.com.pe/revistas/RCU_33_diferencias-de-sexo.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Fiol-Veny, A., Balle, M., De la Torre-Luque, A., & Bornas, X. (2019). Negative cognitive emotion regulation as a predictor of adolescent heart variability and entropy under social stress. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 32(6) 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2019.1641199
dc.relation /*ref*/Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2006). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire-development of a short 18-item version (CERQ-short). Personality and Individual Differences, 41(1), 1045-1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.04.010
dc.relation /*ref*/Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotions regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(1). 1311-1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6
dc.relation /*ref*/Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2002). CERQ: manual for the use of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. The Netherlands: Leiderdorp.
dc.relation /*ref*/Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
dc.relation /*ref*/Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2. 3.271.
dc.relation /*ref*/Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781
dc.relation /*ref*/Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Fang, A., & Asnaani, A. (2012). Emotion dysregulation model of mood and anxiety disorders. Depression & Anxiety, 29, 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.21888
dc.relation /*ref*/Hu, L. & Bentler, P. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
dc.relation /*ref*/Jentsch, V. L., Merz, C. J., & Wolf, O. T. (2019). Restoring emotional stability: Cortisol effects on the neural network of cognitive emotion regulation, Behavioural Brain Research, 374(18), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2019.03.049
dc.relation /*ref*/Jermann, F., Van der Linden, M., d’Acremont, M., & Zermatten, A. (2006). Cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (CERQ). confirmatory factor analysis and psychometric properties of the French translation. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.126
dc.relation /*ref*/Jurado, S., Villegas, M., Méndez, L., Rodríguez, F., Loperena, V. & Varela, R. (1998). La estandarización del Inventario de Depresión de Beck para los residentes de la Ciudad de México. Salud Mental, 21(3): 26-31. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=38&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=3748275&db=lth
dc.relation /*ref*/Kraaij, V., & Garnefski, N. (2019). The behavioural Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: development psychometric properties and relationships with emotional problems and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Personality and Individual Difference, 137(15), 56-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.036
dc.relation /*ref*/Kurlat, S. G. (2015). Leer la cultura popular: desplazamientos desde los márgenes. Latin American Cultural Studies Journal, 4(1), 1-26. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=6&sid=4e6808c1-31e4-4eab-9cb5-90f7b5e754bf%40sdc-v-sessmgr02&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=103197580&db=asn
dc.relation /*ref*/Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39(2), 124-129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.39.2.124
dc.relation /*ref*/Li, L., Li, S., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., & Zhu X. (2019). Factor structure and measurement invariance for Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) among women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01132
dc.relation /*ref*/Martins, D., Darcie, M., Gobbi, M. C. (2019). Día de los muertos no México: uma análise folkcomunicacional. Revista Internacional de Folkcomunicação, 38(17), 200-216. https://doi.org/10.5212/RIF.v.17.i38.0012
dc.relation /*ref*/McKinnon, A., Kuyken, W., Hayes, R., Werner-Seidler, A., Watson, P., Dalgleish, T., & Schweizer, S. (2020). The psychometric properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in a clinical sample of adult’s whit recurrent depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 276(1), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.061
dc.relation /*ref*/Moscoso, M. S. (2000). Estructura factorial del inventario multicultural latinoamericano de la expresión de la cólera y la hostilidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 32, 321-343. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/805/80532204.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2004). Thinking makes it so: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to emotion regulation. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory and Application (pp. 229–255). New York: Guilford Press.
dc.relation /*ref*/Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J. (2005). The cognitive control of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 242–249. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06751.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Pedhazur, E. J., & Pedhazur, L. (1991). Measurement, design, and analysis: an integrated approach. New York: Taylor & Francis Group
dc.relation /*ref*/Reyes, V., y Reidl, L. M. (2013). Miedo y Afrontamiento en Adolescentes Mexicanos. Psicogente, 16(30), 280-295. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=56&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=116363863&db=asn
dc.relation /*ref*/Robles, R., Varela, R., Jurado, S. & Paez, F. (2001). Versión mexicana del inventario de ansiedad de Beck: propiedades psicométricas. Revista mexicana de psicología, 18(2), 211-218. https://psicologiaysalud.uv.mx/index.php/psicysalud/article/view/2563
dc.relation /*ref*/Rusu, P. P., Bodenmann, G., & Kayser, K. (2019). Cognitive emotion regulation and positive dyadic outcomes in married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(1), 359-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517751664
dc.relation /*ref*/Satorra, A. & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507-514. https://doi.org/10.1007/
dc.relation /*ref*/Shaughnessy, J. J., Zechmeister, E. B., & Zechmeister, J. S. (2007). Métodos de investigación en psicología. México: McGrawHill
dc.relation /*ref*/Thompson, R. A. (1991). Emotional regulation and emotional development. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 269-307. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.pbidi.unam.mx:8080/ehost/detail/detail?vid=50&sid=06db9189-63c0-4234-b02b-3a6121f485ac%40sdc-v-sessmgr03&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#AN=14792029&db=eoah
dc.relation /*ref*/Thompson, R. A. (1994). Emotion regulation: a theme in search of definition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2–3), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166137 Visted, E., Vollestad, J., Nielsen, M. B., Schanche, E. (2018). Emotion regulation in current and remitted depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psycholology. 9, 756. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00756
dc.rights Derechos de autor 2022 Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología es-ES
dc.rights https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 es-ES
dc.source Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología; Vol. 15 Núm. 2 (2022): Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología; 1-12 es-ES
dc.source 2500-6517
dc.source 2027-1786
dc.subject emotional regulation, cognition, anger, anxiety, depression, fear en-US
dc.subject regulación emocional, cognición, enojo, ansiedad, depresión, miedo es-ES
dc.title Validation of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) in a Mexican Sample en-US
dc.title Validación del Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) en una muestra mexicana es-ES
dc.title Validação do Questionário de Regulação das Emoções Cognitivas (CERQ) em uma amostra mexicana pt-BR
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta