Repositorio Dspace

Analysis of Progressive Measurement Invariance of Dorfman and Howell’s Cultural Scales

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creator Didier Pino, Nicolás Osvaldo
dc.creator Luna, Juan Francisco
dc.date 2021-01-10
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-20T15:55:13Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-20T15:55:13Z
dc.identifier https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.13309
dc.identifier 10.33881/2027-1786.rip.13309
dc.identifier.uri https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/215579
dc.description One of the most influential theoretical models in cross-cultural research was developed by Geert Hofstede, which initially considered four dimensions with which different national cultures could be compared. That model was based on attributions and perceptions of individuals related to the culture where they live without focusing on its measurement model in specific situations such as belonging to a particular organization or individual beliefs. Dorfman and Howell (1988) developed a version for Hofstede scales to include organizational domain responses to approach for the work culture. These scales have been disseminated and widely used within the research community transcultural without presenting a detailed analysis of such scales' quality of measurement. This article attempts to present the analysis results of the measurement invariance of scales, considering the four original dimensions of Hofstede, through the progressive factor analysis considering three steps of restrictions on the results. en-US
dc.description Uno de los modelos teóricos más influyentes en la investigación transcultural es el desarrollado por Geert Hofstede, que originalmente consideraba cuatro dimensiones con las cuales se podía comparar diferentes culturas nacionales. Este modelo se basaba en las atribuciones y percepciones de los sujetos en relación a la cultura donde se desenvolvían, sin ser focalizado su modelo de medida en situaciones específicas como la pertenencia a una determinada organización o las creencias individuales. Dorfman y Howell (1988) elaboran una versión para las escalas de Hofstede para incluir el dominio organizacional en las respuestas, como forma de dar cuenta de la cultura laboral. Estas escalas han sido difundidas y utilizadas ampliamente dentro de la comunidad de investigación transcultural, sin presentarse un análisis en profundidad de la calidad de medida de tales escalas. Este artículo se aboca en presentar los resultados del análisis de la invarianza factorial de las escalas, considerando las cuatro dimensiones originales de Hofstede, a través del análisis factorial progresivo considerando los tres pasos de restricciones respecto de los resultados. es-ES
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language spa
dc.publisher ĬbērAM es-ES
dc.relation https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.13309/1667
dc.relation /*ref*/Abrahamson, E., & Fairchild, G. (1999). Management fashion: Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 708–740. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667053
dc.relation /*ref*/Berg, R. C., Rechkemmer, A., Espinel, Z., & Shultz, J. M. (2020). COVID-19 as a tipping point for Latin America’s sustainable development goals: the case of Venezuelan migrants in Colombia. Migration and Development, 00(00), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2020.1830564
dc.relation /*ref*/Bird, A., & Mendenhall, M. E. (2016). From cross-cultural management to global leadership: Evolution and adaptation. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.10.005
dc.relation /*ref*/Bird, A., & Metcalf, L. (2004). Integrating Twelve Dimensions of Negotiating Behavior and Hofstede ’ s Work-Related Values : A Six-Country Comparison Basic Concept of Negotiation : Distributive vs . Integrative. In H. Vinken, J. Soeters, & P. Ester (Eds.), Comparing Cultures: Dimensions of Culture in a Comparative Perspective (pp. 251–269). Leiden. Recovered from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/19160528.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Connell, J., & Burgess, J. (2009). Migrant workers, migrant work, public policy and human resource management. International Journal of Manpower, 30(5), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720910977625
dc.relation /*ref*/Didier Pino, N. (2014). Selección de Personal en Chile. Revista Iberoamericana De Psicología, 7(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.33881/2027-1786.rip.7109
dc.relation /*ref*/Didier, Nicolás. (2017). Los hijos de la democracia: rasgos, valores individuales, laborales y sociales en Chile. Revista de Psicología, 26(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5354/0719-0581.2017.47949
dc.relation /*ref*/Didier, Nicolás. (2019). Discriminación laboral desde Recursos Humanos: Un debate técnico pendiente. NOVUM, 1(9), 9–31. Recuperado a partir de https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/novum/article/view/72995
dc.relation /*ref*/Didier, Nicolás. (2020). Are we ready? Labor market transit to the digital economy. Journal of Adult & Continuing Education. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1477971420983347
dc.relation /*ref*/Didier, Nicolás. (2021). Does credentialism affect the gender wage gap? Evidence from Chile. Latin American Policy.
dc.relation /*ref*/Didier, Nicolás, & Luna, J. F. (2017). ¿dónde Estamos? La Cultura Laboral Chilena desde Hofstede. Revista Colombiana de Psicologia, 26(2), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n2.60557
dc.relation /*ref*/Didier, NicoláS, & Luna, J. F. (2017). ¿dónde Estamos? La Cultura Laboral Chilena desde Hofstede. Revista Colombiana de Psicologia, 26(2), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.15446/rcp.v26n2.60557
dc.relation /*ref*/Dorfman, W. ., & Howell, P. . (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revised. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3(October), 127–150. https://doi.org/papers3://publication/uuid/ED882AF0-E0C3-47BF-B412-A521D211BF79
dc.relation /*ref*/Fanelli, D. (2018). Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115(11), 2628–2631. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114
dc.relation /*ref*/Fang, T. (2003). A critique of Hofstede’s fifth national culture dimension. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 3(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595803003003006
dc.relation /*ref*/Fang, T., Novicevic, M. M., & Zikic, J. (2009). Career success of immigrant professionals: Stock and flow of their career capital. International Journal of Manpower, 30(5), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720910977661
dc.relation /*ref*/Fernandez, D. R., Carlson, D. S., Stepina, L. P., & Nicholson, J. D. (1997). Hofstede’s country classification 25 years later. In Journal of Social Psychology (Vol. 137, Issue 1, pp. 43–54). https://doi.org/10.1080/00224549709595412
dc.relation /*ref*/Forde, C., & Mackenzie, R. (2009). Employers’ use of low-skilled migrant workers: Assessing the implications for human resource management. International Journal of Manpower, 30(5), 437–452. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720910977643
dc.relation /*ref*/Furrer, O., Liu, B. S. C., & Sudharshan, D. (2000). The Relationships between Culture and Service Quality Perceptions: Basis for Cross-Cultural Market Segmentation and Resource Allocation. Journal of Service Research, 2(4), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024004
dc.relation /*ref*/Gillespie, K., McBride, J. B., & Riddle, L. (2010). Globalization, biculturalism and cosmopolitanism: The acculturation status of Mexicans in upper management. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 10(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595809359581
dc.relation /*ref*/Hardwicke, T. E., Wallach, J. D., Kidwell, M. C., Bendixen, T., Crüwell, S., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2020). An empirical assessment of transparency and reproducibility-related research practices in the social sciences (2014-2017). Royal Society Open Science, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190806
dc.relation /*ref*/Hearns, N., Devine, F., & Baum, T. (2007). The implications of contemporary cultural diversity for the hospitality curriculum. Education + Training, 49(5), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910710762922
dc.relation /*ref*/Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences international differences in work-related values. SAGE Publications.
dc.relation /*ref*/Hofstede, G. (1983). The Cultural Relativity of Organizational Practices and Theories. Journal of International Business Studies, 14(2), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490867
dc.relation /*ref*/Hofstede, G. (1991). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values (Abridged E). SAGE Publications, Ltd.
dc.relation /*ref*/Hofstede, G. (1993). Cultural constraints in management theories. Academy of Management Perspectives, 7(1), 81–94. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1993.9409142061
dc.relation /*ref*/Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (Second Ed). SAGE Publications, Ltd.
dc.relation /*ref*/Hofstede, G. (2002). Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney. Human Relations, 55(11), 1355–1361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702055011921
dc.relation /*ref*/Hofstede, G., & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius Connection : From Cultural Roots. Organizational Dynamics, 16(4), 4–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(88)90009-5
dc.relation /*ref*/Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Revised and Expanded. SAGE Publications.
dc.relation /*ref*/Hofstede, G., & Minkov, M. (2010). Long- versus short-term orientation: New perspectives. Asia Pacific Business Review, 16(4), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381003637609
dc.relation /*ref*/Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy, J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting Practices in Confirmatory Factor Analysis: An Overview and Some Recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694
dc.relation /*ref*/Julnes, G. (1999). Principal Component Analysis, Factor Analysis, and Cluster Analysis. In G. J. Miller & M. L. Whicker (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration (Second Edi, pp. 549–598). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203908303
dc.relation /*ref*/Kersh, J. (2020). ‘Gender, Neoliberalism, and the Venezuelan Migrant Crisis’: Female Migrants’ Informal Labour and Access to Services in Urban Colombia. Bulletin of Latin American Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.13207
dc.relation /*ref*/Kirkman, B. L., Lowe, K. B., & Gibson, C. B. (2006). A Quarter Century of “Culture’s Consequences”: A Review of Empirical Research Incorporating Hofstede’s Cultural Values Framework. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(3), 285–320. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400202
dc.relation /*ref*/Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and Covariance Structures (MACS) Analyses of Cross-Cultural Data: Practical and Theoretical Issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3201_3
dc.relation /*ref*/Ma, Z., Erkus, A., & Tabak, A. (2010). Explore the impact of collectivism on conflict management styles: A Turkish study. International Journal of Conflict Management, 21(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1108/10444061011037396
dc.relation /*ref*/McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith - A failure of analysis. Human Relations, 55(1), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702551004
dc.relation /*ref*/Minkov, M. (2007). What makes us different and similar : a new interpretation of the World Values Survey and other cross-cultural data. Klasika i Stil Publishing House.
dc.relation /*ref*/Organización Internacional del Trabajo. (2020). El teletrabajo durante la pandemia de COVID-19 y después de ella. Recovered from https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---protrav/---travail/documents/publication/wcms_758007.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.3
dc.relation /*ref*/Peck, C., & Reitzug, U. C. (2012). How Existing Business Management Concepts Become School Leadership Fashions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(2), 347–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11432924
dc.relation /*ref*/Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online University Teaching During and After the Covid-19 Crisis: Refocusing Teacher Presence and Learning Activity. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(3), 923–945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00155-y
dc.relation /*ref*/Segalla, M., Jacobs-Belschak, G., & Müller, C. (2001). Cultural influences on employee termination decisions: Firing the good, average, or the old? European Management Journal, 19(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00071-2
dc.relation /*ref*/Srite, M., & Karahanna, E. (2006). The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 30(3), 679–704. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148745
dc.relation /*ref*/Taras, V. (2020). Catalogue of Instruments for Measuring Culture. www.vtaras.com: http://vtaras.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Culture_Survey_Catalogue.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Taras, V., Kirkman, B. L., & Steel, P. (2010). Examining the Impact of Culture’s Consequences: A Three-Decade, Multilevel, Meta-Analytic Review of Hofstede’s Cultural Value Dimensions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 405–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018938
dc.relation /*ref*/Tharenou, P., & Caulfield, N. (2010). Will i stay or will i go? Explaining repatriation by self-initiated expatriates. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1009–1028. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533183
dc.relation /*ref*/The Chinese Culture Connection. (1987). Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002187018002002
dc.relation /*ref*/Tuite, A. R., Thomas-Bachli, A., Acosta, H., Bhatia, D., Huber, C., Petrasek, K., Watts, A., Yong, J. H. E., Bogoch, I. I., & Khan, K. (2018). Infectious disease implications of large-scale migration of Venezuelan nationals. Journal of Travel Medicine, 25(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/tay077
dc.relation /*ref*/Turcan, R. V. (2016). Exploring Late Globalization: A Viewpoint. Markets, Globalization & Development Review: The Official Journal of the International Society of Markets and Development, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.23860/mgdr-2016-01-02-04
dc.relation /*ref*/Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–69. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
dc.relation /*ref*/Viteli, S. J., Paolillo, J. G. P., & Thomas, J. L. (2003). The Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility: A Study of Marketing Professionals. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(1), 63–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3857859
dc.relation /*ref*/Voich, D. (1995). Comparative empirical analysis of cultural values and perceptions of political economy issues. Praeger Publishers.
dc.relation /*ref*/Wasti, S. A., Tan, H. H., Brower, H. H., & Önder, Ç. (2007). Cross-cultural measurement of supervisor trustworthiness: An assessment of measurement invariance across three cultures. Leadership Quarterly, 18(5), 477–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.07.004
dc.relation /*ref*/Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2002). The Effects of Marketing Education and Individual Cultural Values on Marketing Ethics of Students. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(2), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475302242002
dc.relation /*ref*/Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2005). The effect of personal cultural. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 18(1/2), 7–44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v18n01
dc.relation /*ref*/Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Measuring hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(3–4), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2011.578059
dc.rights Derechos de autor 2021 Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana es-ES
dc.source Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2020): Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología; 146-155 es-ES
dc.source 2500-6517
dc.source 2027-1786
dc.subject Invarianza Factorial; Escala de Valores Laborales; Cultura Laboral; dimensiones culturales; psicometría; validación de instrumentos es-ES
dc.subject Psicometria es-ES
dc.title Analysis of Progressive Measurement Invariance of Dorfman and Howell’s Cultural Scales en-US
dc.title Escalas de Cultura de Dorfman y Howell. Análisis de Invarianza Factorial Progresiva es-ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta