Repositorio Dspace

Social networks, academic self-efficacy, and perception of wellbeing in Mayan adolescents in Mexico.

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.creator Sánchez Escobedo, Pedro Antonio
dc.creator Gómez-Rivero, Mariel Alejandra
dc.date 2020-12-21
dc.date.accessioned 2023-03-20T15:55:09Z
dc.date.available 2023-03-20T15:55:09Z
dc.identifier https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.13305
dc.identifier 10.33881/2027-1786.rip.13305
dc.identifier.uri https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/215548
dc.description Este trabajo explora la relación La relación entre la utilización de las redes sociales, la autoeficacia académica y la percepción de bienestar de adolescentes en la zona maya de Yucatán. Tres instrumentos que miden cada una de estas variables fueron administrados a 1013 estudiantes de 7 y 9 grados. Los resultados demuestran acceso a internet y redes sociales muy parecido a estudiatnes de zonas urbanas y no se encontraron relaciones significativas entre las variables a excepción de la correlación esperada entre autoeficacia académica y calificaciones. Las mujeres puntuaron más alto que los hombres en todas las medidas y mostraron mas altas exceptivas de ingresar a la universidad.  Los adolescentes de noveno grados puntuaron menos que los de séptimo en las percepciones de bienestar probablemente por factores del desarrollo.Los hallazgos en favor de las mujeres han sido consistentes con otros estudios y cuestiona la aparente desventaja de estas en este contexto particular. en-US
dc.description The relationship between the use of social networks and the students´ academic self-efficacy and perception of wellbeing is explorer in adolescents from the Mayan zone of the Yucatán, Mexico. Three instruments exploring these variables were administered to 1013 students form 7th and 9th grades.   Access to social network in these adolescents seem to be like those in the cities, suggesting some equity in these two contexts. Results evidences no significant relationships between the variables, expect from the logical significant relationship between high self-efficacy and better school grades.  Women scored higher in every dimension of wellbeing and reported higher expectations for college entrance than men. Nine graders scored lower both in self efficacy and perceptions of wellbeing, maybe because to developmental issues associated to adolescence. This higher perception of wellbeing in rural women deserves further considerations in view of commonly held beliefs that women in rural context are in vulnerability and disadvantage in comparison to men. es-ES
dc.format application/pdf
dc.language spa
dc.publisher ĬbērAM es-ES
dc.relation https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.13305/1663
dc.relation /*ref*/Alvídrez, S. & Rojas-Solís, J. L. (2018). Los amantes en la época del smartphone: aspectos comunicativos y psicológicos relativos al inicio y mantenimiento de la relación romántica Global Media Journal, 14 (27), 1-18. Recuperado de: https://www.aacademica.org/dr.jose.luis.rojas.solis/33.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Altman, I. & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston. Recuperado de: https://www.scirp.org/(S(czeh2tfqyw2orz553k1w0r45))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1817496
dc.relation /*ref*/Beam, C., Marcus, K. Turkheimer, E. & Emery, R. (2018). Gender Differences in the Structure of Marital Quality. Behavior Genetics, 48(3), 209-223. doi: 10.1007/s10519-018-9892-4. Recuperado de: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29569187/
dc.relation /*ref*/Blanca, M. J. & Bendayan, R. (2018). Spanish version of the Phubbing Scale: Internet addiction, Facebook intrusion, and fear of missing out as correlates. Psicothema, 30(4), 449-454. Recuperado de: http://www.psicothema.com/pdf/4507.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Burke, M. (2011). Reading, writing, relationships: The impact of social network sites on relations and well-being. Recuperado de:
dc.relation /*ref*/http://reportsarchive.adm.cs.cmu.edu.anon.hcii.CMU-HCII-11-107.pdf.
dc.relation /*ref*/Campbell, C. & Murray, E. (2015). Measuring the Impact of Technology on Couple Relationships: The Development of the Technology and Intimate Relationship
dc.relation /*ref*/Assessment. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 14, 254-256. Recuperado de: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15332691.2014.953657
dc.relation /*ref*/Capilla, E. & Cubo Delgado, S. (2017). Phubbing: conenctados a la red y desconectados de la realidad. Un analisis en relaciona al bienestar psicológico. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 50, 173-185. Recuperado
dc.relation /*ref*/de: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/368/36849882012.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Chotpitayasunondh, V. & Douglas, K. (2018a). The effects of "phubbing" on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48 (6), 304-316. Recuperado
dc.relation /*ref*/de: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/jasp.12506
dc.relation /*ref*/Chotpitayasunondh, V. & Douglas, K. (2018b). Measuring Phone Snubbing Behavior: Development and Validation of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the
dc.relation /*ref*/Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior,
dc.relation /*ref*/, 5-17. Recuperado de:
dc.relation /*ref*/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563218302978
dc.relation /*ref*/Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9-18. Recuperado de: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563216303454
dc.relation /*ref*/Cizmeci, E. (2017). Disconnected, though satisfied: Phubbing behavior and relationship satisfaction. Turkish Online Journal of Design Art and Communication, 7, 364-375. Recuperado de:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315783674_DISCONNECTED_THOUGH_SATISFIED_PPHUBBING_BEHAVIOR_AND_RELATIONSHIP_SATISFACTION
dc.relation /*ref*/Clark, M.S., Aragón, O.R., & Hirsch, J.L. (2015). Social relationships in adulthood. En J. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 563- 569). London: Elsevier Publishers. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/265216486_Social_Relationships_in_Adulthood
dc.relation /*ref*/Coyne, S.M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B. & Grant, D.M. (2011). "I Luv U :)!": A
dc.relation /*ref*/Descriptive Study of the Media Use of Individuals in Romantic Relationships. Family Relations, 60(2), 150-162. Recuperado de: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2010.00639.x
dc.relation /*ref*/Cutrona, C., Bodemann, G., Randall, A., Clavel, F. & Johnson, M. (2018). Stress, Dyadic Coping and Social Support. En A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships. (pp. 341-352). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867.027
dc.relation /*ref*/David, M. E., & Roberts, J. A. (2017). Phubbed and alone: Phone snubbing, social exclusion, and attachment to social media. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 155-163. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315342898_Phubbed_and_Alone_Phone_Snubbing_Social_Exclusion_and_Attachment_to_Social_Media
dc.relation /*ref*/Duck, S. & McMahan, D. T. (2017). Communication in everyday life: A survey of communication. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks. Recuperado de: https://www.worldcat.org/title/communication-in-everyday-life-a-survey-of-communication/oclc/957134470
dc.relation /*ref*/Dwyer, R., Kushlev, K., & Dunn, E. (2018). Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to- face social interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 78, 233–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.007
dc.relation /*ref*/González-Rivera, J., Segura-Abreu, L., & Urbistondo-Rodríguez, V. (2018). Phubbing en las Relaciones Románticas: Uso del celular, satisfacción en la pareja, Bienestar Psicológico y Salud Mental. Interacciones, 4(2), 81-91. https://revistainteracciones.com/index.php/rin/article/view/58
dc.relation /*ref*/Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. (2014). The Couple and Family Technology Framework: Intimate relationships in a digital age. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge. 234 pp. Recuperado de: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01926187.2013.873647
dc.relation /*ref*/Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10705519909540118
dc.relation /*ref*/Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., ... & Babadağ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4, 60-74. Recuperado de: https://akjournals.com/view/journals/2006/4/2/article-p60.xml
dc.relation /*ref*/Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş. B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B. M., ... & Babadağ, B. (2016). The virtual world’s current addiction: Phubbing. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addiction, 3, 250-269. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311689720_The_Virtual_World's_Current_Addiction_Phubbing
dc.relation /*ref*/Kerlinger, F. & Lee, H. (2002). Investigación del comportamiento. Métodos de investigación en Ciencias Sociales. Ciudad de México: Mc Graw-Hill. Recuperado de: https://padron.entretemas.com.ve/INICC2018-2/lecturas/u2/kerlinger-investigacion.pdf
dc.relation /*ref*/Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I., & Baumann, A. (2016). Why Phubbing is Toxic for your Relationship: Understanding the Role of Smartphone Jealousy among “Generation Y" Users. Research Papers. 109. http://aise1.aisnet.org/ecis2016_rp/109.
dc.relation /*ref*/Lenhart, A. & Duggan, M. (2014) Couples, the Internet and Social Media. Pew Research Center (Report). Pew Research Center, Washington, D. C. Recuperado de: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2014/02/11/couples-the-internet-and-social-media/
dc.relation /*ref*/McDaniel, B. T. (2015). “Technoference”: Everyday intrusions and interruptions of technology in couple and family relationships. En C. J. Bruess (Ed.), Family communication in the age of digital and social media. (pp. 228-243). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
dc.relation /*ref*/McDaniel, B. T., & Coyne, S. M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women’s personal and relational well- being. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85-98. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/ppm0000065
dc.relation /*ref*/Morling, B. (2017). Research Methods in Psychology. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Recuperado de: https://wwnorton.com/books/9780393617542
dc.relation /*ref*/Nazir, T. & Pikin, M. (2016). Phubbing: A Technological Invasion Which Connected the World but Disconnected Humans. The International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4), 175-182. Recuperado de: https://ijip.in/articles/phubbing-a-technological-invasion-which-connected-the-world-but-disconnected-humans/
dc.relation /*ref*/Nina, R. & Agosto, O. (Julio, 2019). Pphubbing: problemas actuales de la pareja.
dc.relation /*ref*/Trabajo presentado en el XXXVII Congreso Interamericano de Psicología (SIP). Habana, Cuba.
dc.relation /*ref*/Nina, R. & Rodríguez, R. (2016). El uso de la tecnología en la comunicación marital: Análisis psicométricos del Comari-T. En Diaz-Loving, R., Reyes Lagunes, I.
dc.relation /*ref*/Rivera, S., Hernández. J. & García, R. (Editores). Psicología Social en México
dc.relation /*ref*/(Vol. XVI). México: UNAM/AMEPSO. (pp. 41-46). ISBN:978-607-96539-5-8.
dc.relation /*ref*/Nina, R., Torres, L. & Vargas, Y. (Julio, 2019). El mundo de la pareja: Análisis psicosocial de la calidad marital. Trabajo presentado en el XXXVII Congreso Interamericano de Psicología (SIP). Habana, Cuba.
dc.relation /*ref*/Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1995). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill. Recuperado de: https://www.worldcat.org/title/psychometric-theory/oclc/28221417
dc.relation /*ref*/Petronio, S. (2002). Boundaries of privacy: Dialectics of disclosure. New York: Suny Press. Recuperado de: https://www.sunypress.edu/p-3659-boundaries-of-privacy.aspx
dc.relation /*ref*/Przybylski, A. & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237-246. Recuperado de: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0265407512453827
dc.relation /*ref*/Raykov, T., & Shrout, P. E. (2002). Reliability of scales with general structure: Point and interval estimation using a structural equation modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_3
dc.relation /*ref*/Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 134-141. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282763744_My_life_has_become_a_major_distraction_from_my_cell_phone_Partner_phubbing_and_relationship_satisfaction_among_romantic_partners
dc.relation /*ref*/Roberts, J. A., & David, M. E. (2017). Put down your phone and listen to me: How boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 206-217. Recuperado de: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563217303333
dc.relation /*ref*/Sánchez Aragón, R. (2017). Autodivulgación: Medición en la pareja mexicana. Revista
dc.relation /*ref*/Iberoamericana de Psicología 10 (2), 113-124. Obtenido de:
dc.relation /*ref*/https://revistas.iberoamericana.edu.co/index.php/ripsicologia/article/view/1271
dc.relation /*ref*/Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66(4), 507-514. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/BF02296192
dc.relation /*ref*/Sillars, A. & Vangelisti, A. (2018). Communication: basic properties and Their relevance to relationship research. En A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships. (pp. 243-255). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-personal-relationships/communication-basic-properties-and-their-relevance-to-relationship-research/1A0F22236776F2A8BD3AE384D335A200
dc.relation /*ref*/Spencer, T. A., Lambertsen, A., Hubler, D. S., & Burr, B. K. (2017). Assessing the mediating effect of relationship dynamics between perceptions of problematic media use and relationship satisfaction. Contemporary Family Therapy, 39, 80–86. Recuperado de: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10591-017-9407-0
dc.relation /*ref*/T’ng, S.T, Ho, K.H., & Low, S.K. (2018). Are you “phubbing” me? The Determinants of Phubbing Behavior and Assessment of Measurement Invariance across Sex Differences. International and Multidisciplinary. Journal of Social Sciences,7(2), 159-190. Recuperado de: https://hipatiapress.com/hpjournals/index.php/rimcis/article/view/3318/0
dc.relation /*ref*/Turkle, S. (2016). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York, NY: Basic Books. Recuperado de: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2011/jan/30/alone-together-sherry-turkle-review
dc.relation /*ref*/Turkle, S. (2017). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age.
dc.relation /*ref*/New York: Penguin Press. Recuperado de: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15205436.2016.1234165
dc.relation /*ref*/Vanden, M., Antheunis, M.L. & Schouten, A. P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562-569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.005
dc.relation /*ref*/Vangelisti, A. L., & Perlman, D. (2018). The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships. The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2277/0521826179
dc.relation /*ref*/Vaterlaus, J.M. & Tulane, S. (2019). The Perceived Influence of Interactive Technology on Marital Relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy, 41, 247-257.
dc.relation /*ref*/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-019-09494-w
dc.relation /*ref*/Vitak, J. & Ellison, E. (2018). Personal Relationships and Technology in the Digital Age. En A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships. (pp. 481-493). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Recuperado de: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-handbook-of-personal-relationships/personal-relationships-and-technology-in-the-digital-age/A97F5BE29B383E82FA9D84413CA08A11/core-reader
dc.relation /*ref*/Wang, S., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P. & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110,12-17. Recuperado de: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312382860_Partner_phubbing_and_depression_among_married_Chinese_adults_The_roles_of_relationship_satisfaction_and_relationship_length
dc.relation /*ref*/Wong, Y. (2010). Limitaciones y alcances del enfoque de domesticación de la tecnología en el estudio del teléfono celular. Comunicación y Sociedad, 13, 173-200. Recuperado de: http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/comso/n13/n13a8.pdf
dc.rights Derechos de autor 2020 Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana es-ES
dc.source Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología; Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2020): Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología; 73-81 es-ES
dc.source 2500-6517
dc.source 2027-1786
dc.subject Social networks, Academic self-efficacy, wellbeing, adolescents, Mayan zone, Mexico. en-US
dc.subject Redes sociales, autoeficacia académica, bienestar, adolescentes, zona Maya, Mexico. es-ES
dc.title Social networks, academic self-efficacy, and perception of wellbeing in Mayan adolescents in Mexico. en-US
dc.title Redes sociales, autoeficacia academica y bienestar en adolescentes de la zona Maya de Yucatan es-ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Ficheros en el ítem

Ficheros Tamaño Formato Ver

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Buscar en DSpace


Búsqueda avanzada

Listar

Mi cuenta