Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
| dc.creator | García Coni, Ana | |
| dc.creator | Comesaña, Ana | |
| dc.creator | Piccolo, Brenda | |
| dc.creator | Vivas, Jorge Ricardo | |
| dc.date | 2020-02-15 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-03-20T15:55:01Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-03-20T15:55:01Z | |
| dc.identifier | https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.13106 | |
| dc.identifier | 10.33881/2027-1786.rip.13106 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://biblioteca-repositorio.clacso.edu.ar/handle/CLACSO/215493 | |
| dc.description | The general aim of this paper was to study what types of conceptual relations are used by school-age children, young adults and old adults, since it is presumed that throughout development the preference for the types of conceptual relations varies, but studies on the subject are scarce, and their results are divergent. For this, 226 children aged 6 to 12 years, 300 adults aged 20 to 40, and 300 adults over 60, performed a feature production task of concepts from the living and the non-living domains. In this task, participants provided attributes from concepts such as "ant" and "pyramid”. The attributes were coded according to whether they were taxonomic ("it is an animal"), perceptual ("it is long") or thematic ("it is found in Egypt"). The results from the analysis of variance indicate that the production of taxonomic attributes was significantly higher for young adults than for older adults and children, whose taxonomic production was even. In terms of thematic production, it was high and homogeneous in all three age groups. Finally, for the non-living things domain, the attributes were mostly thematic and perceptive, and for the living beings, mostly perceptive. It is argued that the use or preference for conceptual relations varies throughout development, with taxonomic relations being more inaccessible to children and older adults, and less prevalent for living and non-living things. | en-US |
| dc.description | El estudio de la organización del conocimiento en la memoria semántica suscita gran interés en Psicología Cognitiva y Neuropsicología. El conocimiento semántico está representado por conceptos que comparten características y forman una jerarquía inclusiva -organización taxonómica-, o que se vinculan en tiempo y espacio -organización temática o situacional-. Se considera que a lo largo del desarrollo cambia la preferencia por estos tipos de organización, pero son pocos los estudios que comparan las organizaciones conceptuales de niños en edad escolar, adultos jóvenes y mayores, y sus resultados son divergentes. Asimismo, la organización conceptual también varía en función del dominio al que pertenece el concepto (vivo vs no vivo). Por lo tanto, el objetivo general de este estudio fue estudiar qué tipos de organización conceptual empleaban esos grupos en una tarea de producción de atributos para conceptos de seres vivos y no vivos. Los resultados indican que la producción de atributos taxonómicos fue significativamente mayor para los adultos jóvenes que para los adultos mayores y los niños, en tanto la producción taxonómica de estos dos últimos grupos fue pareja. En cuanto a la producción temática, fue alta y homogénea en los tres grupos de edad. Por último, para el dominio de los seres no vivos los atributos resultaron en su mayoría temáticos y perceptivos, y para el dominio de los seres vivos, mayormente perceptivos. | es-ES |
| dc.format | application/pdf | |
| dc.language | spa | |
| dc.publisher | ĬbērAM | es-ES |
| dc.relation | https://reviberopsicologia.ibero.edu.co/article/view/rip.13106/1567 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/American Psychological Association (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct, Washington D.C.: American Pychological Association. Recuperado de: http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/ethics-code-2017.pdf | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Beste, C., Willemssen, R., Saft, C., & Falkenstein, M. (2010). Response inhibition subprocesses and dopaminergic pathways: Basal ganglia disease effects. Neuropsychologia, 48, 366-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.023 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Blaye, A. & Jacques, S. (2009). Categorical flexibility in preschoolers: contributions of conceptual knowledge and | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/executive control. Developmental Science, 12(6), 863-873. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00832.x | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Borghi, A. M. & Caramelli, N. (2003). Situation bounded conceptual organization in children: from action to spatial relations. Cognitive Development, 18, 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-2014(02)00161-2 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cicirelli, V. (1976). Categorization behavior in aging subjects. Journal of Gerontology, 31(6), 676-680. Clarke, A., Taylor, K., Devereux, B., Randall, B., & Tyler L. (2013). From perception to conception: How meaningful objects are processed over time. Cerebral Cortex, 23(1), 187-197. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs002 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Coane, J. H., Monahan, K., & Termonen, M. (2015). Hunts, Heinz, and Fries priming ketchup: The effects of lexicality on brand name-product associations and brand memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29, 455-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3124 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Constantinescu, A., O’Reilly, J., Behrens, T. (2016). Organizing conceptual knowledge in humans with a grid-like code. Science, 352, 1464-1468. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf0941 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Cycowicz, Y., Friedman, D., Rothstein, M., & Snodgrass, J. (1997). Picture naming by young children: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 65, 171-237. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.2356 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Di Giorgio, E., Lunghi, M., Simon, F., & Vallortigara, G. (2017). Visual cues of motion that trigger animacy perception at birth: The case of self-propulsion. Developmental Science, 20, e12394. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12394 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Estes, Z., Golonka, S., & Jones, L. (2011). Thematic thinking: The apprehension and consequences of thematic relations. (pp. 249-294). En B. Ross (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 54. Burlington: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-385527-5.00008-5 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Favarotto, V., García Coni, A., Magani, F. & Vivas, J. (2014). Semantic memory organization in children and young adults. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 140, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.391 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Fisher, A., Godwin, K., & Matlen, B. (2015). Development of inductive generalization with familiar categories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1149-1173. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0816-5 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/García Coni, A., Ison, M., & Vivas, J. (2019). Conceptual flexibility in school children: Switching between taxonomic and thematic relations. Cognitive Development, 52, 100827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2019.100827 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/García Coni, A. & Vivas, J. (2018). Diferencias en la categorización de seres vivos y objetos. Estudio en niños de edad escolar. Suma Psicológica, 25, 62-69. https://doi.org/10.14349/sumapsi.2018.v25.n1.7 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of lexical semantics. UK: Oxford University Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Gelman, S. & Meyer, M. (2011). Child categorization. WIREs Cognitive Science, 2(1), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.96 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Golonka, S. & Estes, Z. (2009). Thematic relations affect similarity via commonalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1454-1464. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017397 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Grasso, L. & Peraita, H. (2011). Adaptación de la batería de evaluación de la memoria semántica en la demencia tipo Alzheimer (EMSDA) a la población de la ciudad de Buenos Aires. Interdisciplinaria, 28 (1), 37-56. https://doi.org/10.1037/t07253-000 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hashimoto, N., McGregor, K., & Graham, A. (2007). Conceptual organization at 6 and 8 years of age: Evidence from the semantic priming of object decisions. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50, 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/014) | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Callado, C., & Baptista Lucio, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (6a | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/edición). México: MacGraw-Hill. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Horner, A.J., Bisby, J.A., Bush, D., Lin, W.-J., Burgess, N. (2015). Evidence for holistic episodic recollection via hippocampal pattern completion. Nature Communication, 6, 7462. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8462 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Jouravlev, O. & McRae, K. (2016). Thematic relatedness production norms for 100 object concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 48, 1349-1357. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0679-8 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Kalénine, S., Peyrin, C., Pichat, C., Segebarth, C., Bonthoux, F., & Baciu, M. (2009). The sensory motor specificity of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: A behavioral and fMRI study. Neuroimage, 44, 1152-1162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.043 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Landrigan, J. & Mirman, D. (2017). The cost of switching between taxonomic and thematic semantics. Memory & Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0757-5. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lawson, R., Chang, F., & Wills, A. J. (2017). Free classification of large sets of everyday objects is more thematic than taxonomic. Acta Psychologica, 172, 26-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.001. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lewis, G., Poeppel, D., & Murphy, G. (2015). The neural bases of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations: An MEG study. Neuropsychologia, 68, 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.011 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Ley N° 25.326. Protección de datos personales. Dirección Nacional de Protección de datos personales, Ministerio | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/de Justicia, Seguridad y Derechos humanos, 29 de noviembre de 2001. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Lin, E. & Murphy, G. (2001). Thematic relations in adults’ concepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/General, 130, 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.130.1.3 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Maguire, M., White, J. & Brier, M. (2011). How semantic categorization influences inhibitory processing in middle-childhood: An Event Related Potentials study. Brain & Cognition, 76(1), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2011.02.015 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Maguire, M., Brier, M., & Ferree, T. (2010). EEG theta and alpha responses reveal qualitative differences in processing taxonomic versus thematic semantic relationships. Brain & Language, 114, 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2010.03.005 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Maintenant, C., Blaye, A., & Paour, J. (2011). Semantic categorical flexibility and aging: Effect of semantic relations on maintenance and switching. Psychology and Aging, 26(2), 461-466. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021686 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Merck, C., Noël, A., Jamet, E., Robert, M., Hou, C., Salmon, A., ... Kalénine, S. (2019). Identification of taxonomic and thematic relationships: do the two semantic systems have the same status in semantic dementia? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(9), 946-964. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2019.1641186. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mirman, D., Landrigan, J.-F., & Britt, A. E. (2017). Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 499-520. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000092 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mudar, R. A. & Chiang, H. S. (2017). Categorization and aging. En H. Cohen & C. Lefebvre (Eds.), Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive Science (2nd Edition) (pp. 673-686). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-101107-2.00011-7 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Mudar, R. A., Chiang, H. S., Maguire, M. J., Spence, J. S., Eroh, J., Kraut, M. A., Hart, J. Jr. (2015). Effects of age on cognitive control during semantic categorization. Behavioral Brain Research, 287, 285-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2015.03.042 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Murphy, G. (2002). The big book of concepts. Massachussets: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1602.001.0001 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Muthivhi, A. E. (2010). Piaget, Vygotsky, and the cultural development of the notions of possibility and necessity: An experimental study among rural South African learners. South African Journal of Psychology, 40(2), 139-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124631004000203 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Nelson, K. (1985). Event knowledge. Structure and function in development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/O’Connor, C., Cree, G., McRae, K. (2009). Conceptual hierarchies in a flat attractor network: Dynamics of learning and computations. Cognitive Science, 33(4), 665-708. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Paxton, J. L., Barch, D. M., Racine, C. A., & Braver, T. S. (2008). Cognitive control, goal maintenance, and prefrontal function in healthy aging. Cerebral Cortex, 18(5), 1010-1028. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhm135 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pennequin, V., Fontaine, R., Bonthoux, F., Scheuner, N., & Blaye, A. (2006). Categorization deficit in old age: Reality or artefact? Journal of Adult Development, 13, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-006-9000-5 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Pluciennicka, E., Coello, Y., & Kalenine, S. (2016). Development of thematic and functional similarity relation processing during manipulable artifact object identification: Evidence from eye-tracking in the Visual World Paradigm. Cognitive Development, 38, 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.02.001 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Popp, E. Y. & Serra, M. J. (2018). The animacy advantage for free-recall performance is not attributable to greater mental arousal. Memory, 26, 89-95. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rogers, T. & Patterson, K. (2007). Object Categorization: Reversals and Explanations of the Basic-Level Advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 451-469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.451 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Roversi, C., Borghi, A., & Tummolini, L. (2013). A marriage is an artefact and not a walk that we take together: An experimental study on the categorization of artefacts. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 4(3), 527-542. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-013-0150-7 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sachs, O., Weis, S., Krings, T., Huber, W., & Kircher, T. (2008). Categorical and thematic knowledge representation in the brain: Neural correlates of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations. Neuropsychologia, 46, 409-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.015 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sadeghi, Z., McClelland, J., & Hoffman, P. (2015). You shall know an object by the company it keeps: An investigation of semantic representations derived from object co-occurrence in visual scenes. Neuropsychologia, 76, 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.031 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Salthouse, T. (2017). Shared and unique influences on age-related cognitive change. Neuropsychology, 31. https://doi.org/11-19. 10.1037/neu0000330 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Schwartz, M., Kimberg, D. Walker, G., Brecher, A., Faseyitan, O., Dell, G.... Coslett, H. (2011). Neuroanatomical dissociation for taxonomic and thematic knowledge in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 8520–8524. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1014935108 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Simon, J., Gilsoul, J., & Collette, F. (2015). The executive functioning in normal aging: Impact of the cognitive reserve. Recuperado de http://hdl.handle.net/2268/185655 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sloutsky, V. (2010). From perceptual categories to concepts: What develops? Cognitive Science, 34, 1244-1286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01129.x | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Smiley, S. & Brown, A. (1979). Conceptual preference for thematic or taxonomic relations: A nonmonotonic age trend from preschool to old age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 249-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(79)90087-0 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Sormaz, S., Jefferies, E. Bernhardt, B., Karapanagiotidis, T., Mollo, G., ... Smallwooda, J. (2017). Knowing what from where: Hippocampal connectivity with temporoparietal cortex at rest is linked to individual differences in semantic and topographic memory. Neuroimage, 152, 400-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.071 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Taylor, K., Moss, H., & Tyler, L. (2007). The conceptual structure account: A cognitive model of semantic memory and its neural instantiation. En J. Hart Jr. & M. Kraut (eds.), Neural basis of Semantic Memory (pp. 265-301). Cambridge University Press. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Unger, L. & Fisher, A. (2019). Rapid, experience-related changes in the organization of children’s semantic knowledge. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 179, 1-22. | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Unger, L., Fisher, A., Nugent, R., Ventura, S., & MacLellan, C. (2016). Developmental changes in semantic knowledge organization. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 146, 202-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2016.01.005 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Vivas, L. & García Coni, A. (2013). Relaciones conceptuales: definición del constructo, bases neuroanatómicas y formas de evaluación. Actualidades en Psicología, 27(114), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.15517/ap.v27i114.2852 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Vivas, J., Vivas, L., Comesaña, A., García Coni, A., & Vorano, A. (2017). Spanish semantic feature production norms for 400 concrete concepts. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 1095-1106. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0777-2 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/White, A., Storms, G. Malt, B., & Verheyen, S. (2018). Mind the generation gap: Differences between young and old in everyday lexical categories. Journal of Memory and Language, 98, 12-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.09.001 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wright, K., Poulin-Dubois, D., & Kelley, E. (2015). The animate-inanimate distinction in preschool children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 73-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12068 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Wu, L. & Barsalou, L. (2009). Perceptual simulation in conceptual combination: evidence from property generation. Acta Psychologica, 132, 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.002 | |
| dc.relation | /*ref*/Zortea, M., Menegola, B., Villavicencio, A. & Salles, J. F. (2014). Graph analysis of semantic word association among children, adults, and the elderly. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 27(1), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-79722014000100011 | |
| dc.rights | Derechos de autor 2020 Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana | es-ES |
| dc.source | Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología; Vol. 13 Núm. 1 (2020): Psicología del Desarrollo: Investigaciones en torno al estudio del ciclo vital humano; 49-59 | es-ES |
| dc.source | 2500-6517 | |
| dc.source | 2027-1786 | |
| dc.subject | conceptual development | en-US |
| dc.subject | taxonomic features | en-US |
| dc.subject | thematic features | en-US |
| dc.subject | living things | en-US |
| dc.subject | non-living things | en-US |
| dc.subject | desarrollo conceptual | es-ES |
| dc.subject | organización taxonómica | es-ES |
| dc.subject | organización temática | es-ES |
| dc.subject | seres vivos | es-ES |
| dc.subject | seres no vivos | es-ES |
| dc.subject | SEMANTICA -- 08.05.01 | es-ES |
| dc.subject | desenvolvimento conceitual | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | características taxonômicas | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | características temáticas | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | seres vivos | pt-BR |
| dc.subject | não-vivo coisas | pt-BR |
| dc.title | Conceptual relationships: comparison between Children, Young Adults and Older Adults | en-US |
| dc.title | Relaciones conceptuales: comparación entre Niños, Adultos Jóvenes y Adultos Mayores | es-ES |
| dc.title | Relações conceituais: comparação entre crianças, jovens adultos e idosos | pt-BR |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | |
| dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | |
| dc.type | Mixto | es-ES |
| Ficheros | Tamaño | Formato | Ver |
|---|---|---|---|
|
No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem. |
|||